State Bicycles & Sizing.
#1
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
State Bicycles & Sizing.
Hi all, I'm about to grab a new State Bicycles "Core-Line" single speed, but I'm really hung up on a usually simple thing...Sizing
I usually ride a 56 or close to it, my Salsa Journeyman is a 55.5, my last road bike (years ago was a 56). My mountain bike is a size L (19.5" per Trek)
So here's the issue, State bicycles only offers the Core-line in 46, 50, 54 & 58.
According to there sizing chart people 5' 7" to 5' 11' are M (54cm)...and those 5' 11' to 6' 2" are L (58cm).....well I'm basically 6' (5' 11 15/16" according to the Doc.).
So...Technically the 54cm medium is too small, and the 58cm is too big....
Can anyone speak to the fitment of these bikes? Did you size up? Size down?
According to State if you are "between sizes, you should size down", well I'm not between sizes, I'm actually sized for the L, but the 58 just seems too big....Thoughts?
My gut is saying go 54cm and adjust to fit if needed.
I usually ride a 56 or close to it, my Salsa Journeyman is a 55.5, my last road bike (years ago was a 56). My mountain bike is a size L (19.5" per Trek)
So here's the issue, State bicycles only offers the Core-line in 46, 50, 54 & 58.
According to there sizing chart people 5' 7" to 5' 11' are M (54cm)...and those 5' 11' to 6' 2" are L (58cm).....well I'm basically 6' (5' 11 15/16" according to the Doc.).
So...Technically the 54cm medium is too small, and the 58cm is too big....
Can anyone speak to the fitment of these bikes? Did you size up? Size down?
According to State if you are "between sizes, you should size down", well I'm not between sizes, I'm actually sized for the L, but the 58 just seems too big....Thoughts?
My gut is saying go 54cm and adjust to fit if needed.
#2
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I'd compare the State's top tube lengths to your Salsa and get the one closest to it.
Likes For Rolla:
#3
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
But for grins I went and checked.
Effective top tube for the Salsa is 555mm
Effective top tube for the State (size M) 538mm
Effective top tube for the State (size L) 555mm
So technically the L State has the identical ETT as the Salsa.....However the standover for the State (size M) is basically the same as my Salsa, whereas the State (size L) is 1.3" taller...this may be a problem because the TT of my Salsa is a good fit (I can stand over it with just a tiny bit of "package clearance" ...I'm afraid the TT of the L State will be WAY "up in my business".
Odd thing though the Size M State actually has a .3" LONGER reach verses the Salsa, and the L was .5" longer...I get the L being a bit longer, but I was surprised that the M had a longer reach than my Salsa, especially since it has a shorter Effective top tube length.....Uggg numbers make my head hurt.
Last edited by BassistBiker; 04-11-21 at 09:22 AM.
#4
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Salsa 55.5
Top Tube Effective 555mm (21.9")
Reach 373mm (14.7")
Standover 778mm (30.6")
Stack 595mm (23.4")
State Bikes 54 (Medium)
Top Tube Effective 538mm (21.2") - .7"
Reach 380mm (15") + .3"
Standover 775mm (30.5") - .1"
Stack 536mm (21.1") - 2.3"
State Bikes 58 (Large)
Top Tube Effective 555mm (21.9") 0
Reach 386mm (15.2") + .5"
Standover 811mm (31.9") + 1.3"
Stack 570mm (22.4") - 1"
My inseam is 31.5" or 800mm (no shoes) so therein lies my issue...everything about the L looks OK to me, except the standover.
Top Tube Effective 555mm (21.9")
Reach 373mm (14.7")
Standover 778mm (30.6")
Stack 595mm (23.4")
State Bikes 54 (Medium)
Top Tube Effective 538mm (21.2") - .7"
Reach 380mm (15") + .3"
Standover 775mm (30.5") - .1"
Stack 536mm (21.1") - 2.3"
State Bikes 58 (Large)
Top Tube Effective 555mm (21.9") 0
Reach 386mm (15.2") + .5"
Standover 811mm (31.9") + 1.3"
Stack 570mm (22.4") - 1"
My inseam is 31.5" or 800mm (no shoes) so therein lies my issue...everything about the L looks OK to me, except the standover.
Last edited by BassistBiker; 04-11-21 at 09:40 AM.
#5
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
What's your true floor-to-pelvic bone standover with shoes on?
#6
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
If I'm understanding you correctly it would appear with shoes, my inseam increases to just a hair over 32"...Looks to be 32 1/8" or about 815mm...
Based on that number I know it would appear that I'd fit a Large, but just barely on the standover...and really don't wanna be crowded there.
Looking at the numbers between the M & L there really isn't a ton of difference, the largest difference is in Standover & Stack, and based on that, I think I'm going to opt for the Medium, I just wish the stack was a little higher on it...And compared to my Salsa Journeyman this size medium is going to to have 2.3" lower stack & about .7" longer reach, which I "think" means I'll feel more stretched out on this bike, something I could probably fix with shorter stem with an increased rise, and/or a bit higher rise on the bars, or possibly a a riser bar with a bit of a backsweep.
https://www.statebicycle.com/blogs/s...e-sizing-guide
Based on that number I know it would appear that I'd fit a Large, but just barely on the standover...and really don't wanna be crowded there.
Looking at the numbers between the M & L there really isn't a ton of difference, the largest difference is in Standover & Stack, and based on that, I think I'm going to opt for the Medium, I just wish the stack was a little higher on it...And compared to my Salsa Journeyman this size medium is going to to have 2.3" lower stack & about .7" longer reach, which I "think" means I'll feel more stretched out on this bike, something I could probably fix with shorter stem with an increased rise, and/or a bit higher rise on the bars, or possibly a a riser bar with a bit of a backsweep.
https://www.statebicycle.com/blogs/s...e-sizing-guide
Last edited by BassistBiker; 04-11-21 at 08:46 PM.
#7
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
I think I'm going to opt for the Medium, I just wish the stack was a little higher on it...And compared to my Salsa Journeyman this size medium is going to to have 2.3" lower stack & about .7" longer reach, which I "think" means I'll feel more stretched out on this bike, something I could probably fix with shorter stem with an increased rise, and/or a bit higher rise on the bars, or possibly a a riser bar with a bit of a backsweep.
#8
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
I Typically don't go for the cheapest option, but this is my first Single Speed, and I'm not sure it's something I'm going to ride a ton but I wanted to give it a try, combine that with the fact these cheap State Bike Co. steel bikes are currently getting pretty good reviews. I've got a friend that has one and she LOVES it, unfortunately she's on the smallest size, otherwise I would have taken hers for a spin to gauge size.
#9
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,757
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1331 Post(s)
Liked 764 Times
in
431 Posts
Standover height is the WRONG way to fit a bike, and toptube length is the CORRECT way to fit a bike. I can’t stand over many of my bikes, especially track bikes with high bottom brackets, yet I’ve never smashed my junk on the toptube. The trick is to tilt the bike to the side, and put only one foot down when you stop.
Likes For TejanoTrackie:
#10
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
I guess for some reason I figured TT was important, but that it may vary bike to bike, like My Journeyman for example is a Gravel/Adventure bike, and then the Core-Line is a SS/Fixie....so I figured different riding positions would make the TT less of an issue? Don't get me wrong, I'm not arguing what your saying, I'm just trying to wrap my head around it.
Thanks for the info!
Likes For seau grateau:
#13
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Well, after chatting with the guys over at State Bicycle Co. I went ahead and ordered a large, based on all the measurements I can compare, the Large just fits a little more across the board...Perfect? Nope, but pretty close, probably close enough that I can dial it in good.
I just don't understand why they even show standover heights, if no one used that number to determine bike fit?
I just don't understand why they even show standover heights, if no one used that number to determine bike fit?
#14
Space Ghost
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,762
Bikes: Bridgestone, Fuji, Iro, Jamis, Gary Fisher, GT, Scott, Specialized and more
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 292 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
318 Posts
Standover height is just one consideration when sizing a bike. No biggie but, yeah, I get what you mean about buying a bike without test riding it first.
That said, I think you’re going to be very happy with your new purchase.
That said, I think you’re going to be very happy with your new purchase.
Likes For Rage:
#15
Guest
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 2,888
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1346 Post(s)
Liked 3,270 Times
in
1,439 Posts
BTW, the Bike Insights frame comparison site can be very useful. I loaded this one with the State Core-line 58 and the Journeyman 55.5 so you can see how they "stack" up.
Last edited by Rolla; 04-12-21 at 01:04 PM.
Likes For Rolla:
#16
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
BTW, the Bike Insights frame comparison site can be very useful. I loaded this one with the State Core-line 58 and the Journeyman 55.5 so you can see how they "stack" up.
Likes For BassistBiker:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 398 Times
in
194 Posts
I think it's pretty common for a casual or new-to-the-game rider to gauge size based on standover. Not everyone is bike nerd enough to need or want a detailed bike fit, and geometry charts look like hieroglyphs to an outsider, so I can see why they do it.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
Hi all, I'm about to grab a new State Bicycles "Core-Line" single speed, but I'm really hung up on a usually simple thing...Sizing
I usually ride a 56 or close to it, my Salsa Journeyman is a 55.5, my last road bike (years ago was a 56). My mountain bike is a size L (19.5" per Trek)
So here's the issue, State bicycles only offers the Core-line in 46, 50, 54 & 58.
According to there sizing chart people 5' 7" to 5' 11' are M (54cm)...and those 5' 11' to 6' 2" are L (58cm).....well I'm basically 6' (5' 11 15/16" according to the Doc.).
So...Technically the 54cm medium is too small, and the 58cm is too big....
Can anyone speak to the fitment of these bikes? Did you size up? Size down?
According to State if you are "between sizes, you should size down", well I'm not between sizes, I'm actually sized for the L, but the 58 just seems too big....Thoughts?
My gut is saying go 54cm and adjust to fit if needed.
I usually ride a 56 or close to it, my Salsa Journeyman is a 55.5, my last road bike (years ago was a 56). My mountain bike is a size L (19.5" per Trek)
So here's the issue, State bicycles only offers the Core-line in 46, 50, 54 & 58.
According to there sizing chart people 5' 7" to 5' 11' are M (54cm)...and those 5' 11' to 6' 2" are L (58cm).....well I'm basically 6' (5' 11 15/16" according to the Doc.).
So...Technically the 54cm medium is too small, and the 58cm is too big....
Can anyone speak to the fitment of these bikes? Did you size up? Size down?
According to State if you are "between sizes, you should size down", well I'm not between sizes, I'm actually sized for the L, but the 58 just seems too big....Thoughts?
My gut is saying go 54cm and adjust to fit if needed.
All my road bikes are 56.
i was surprised that 54 felt right.
i ride bullhorns.
Likes For thehammerdog:
#19
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Yep, I nerded out HARD when I bought my Full Suspension MTB...headtube angle, reach, chainstay length, sag, high speed compression, low speed compression, rebound etc... the list went on and on, so when I decided to shop for a Single Speed, I thought "how hard can it be, it's just a bike with 1 speed" LOL!
Likes For BassistBiker:
#20
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Well, my initial thought was for the 54 too, but after talking with the folks at State Bicycle Co. and looking at all the numbers, the 58 was just closer for most of the important specs, with the exception of standover, and a little longer on the reach too, but the reach is easily remedied with a shorter stem, so we'll give it a go on the 58, I'm crossing my fingers that it's a good fit....Should be here in a week or so, I'll report back.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NWNJ
Posts: 3,704
Bikes: Road bike is a Carbon Bianchi C2C & Grandis (1980's), Gary Fisher Mt Bike, Trek Tandem & Mongoose SS MTB circa 1992.
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 722 Post(s)
Liked 353 Times
in
226 Posts
Well, my initial thought was for the 54 too, but after talking with the folks at State Bicycle Co. and looking at all the numbers, the 58 was just closer for most of the important specs, with the exception of standover, and a little longer on the reach too, but the reach is easily remedied with a shorter stem, so we'll give it a go on the 58, I'm crossing my fingers that it's a good fit....Should be here in a week or so, I'll report back.
let me know.
stand over was an issue i am with short leggs 30 inseam
an issue with fixie.
Likes For thehammerdog:
#22
Wide Load
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 52
Bikes: Salsa Journeyman, Trek Fuel EX 8, State Bicycles Delfin Core-Line
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times
in
10 Posts
Alright so a quick follow up. (if anyone was actually watching this thread).
Got the bike today, and built it up.
I'm REALLY happy I went with the 58cm, the stand over ended up not being an issue at all, it's "up there" but not bad at all.
It rides great, tough to believe this is a $300 bike?
As expected, the reach is a bit more than I'd like, but I think if a stick on a 70mm stem with a slight rise, I'm going to get it pretty close, I have a little dialing to do with the seat (front to rear).
All in all, pretty stoked.
Got the bike today, and built it up.
I'm REALLY happy I went with the 58cm, the stand over ended up not being an issue at all, it's "up there" but not bad at all.
It rides great, tough to believe this is a $300 bike?
As expected, the reach is a bit more than I'd like, but I think if a stick on a 70mm stem with a slight rise, I'm going to get it pretty close, I have a little dialing to do with the seat (front to rear).
All in all, pretty stoked.
#23
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I also love the State Bicycle 4130 all-road reviews, but...
Hi,
It's nice to see others are also considering this bike.
I'm mostly a paved road rider up and down hilly streets, but sometimes would like to take it on gravel fire-roads or single tracks. I'm mostly a casual rider but still enjoy high-end features that a good fitness hybrid/gravel bike has to offer.
I too like the idea of getting this bike for it's versatility:
1. Get the frame that will allow me to switch out the wheel sets from 700c to 650B.
2. Get 11-46 cassette in the back for lower gearing and whatever chain ring in the front makes sense for me.
3. Change out brakes for a hydromechanical setup (Winn R1s or the TRP HYRDs).
4. Put on a rear rack for a child seat for my 2-year-old.
But, it looks like the largest frame size ("Large") is 55 cm size. I'm thinking that will be a problem since I'm 6'3" (torso=23" and inseam without shoes with seat firm against crotch=34.6"), arm-length= 29" and neck long. Might this 55 cm frame still work? If not, are there some other bikes with a good versatile base like this one that have larger frames that can accommodate my height, inseam, longer torso proportionately to my legs and reach like 59cm, 60 cm or 61 cm)?
My budget for this is between $3k and $4k
Thank you in advance for your thoughts on this.
Lee
It's nice to see others are also considering this bike.
I'm mostly a paved road rider up and down hilly streets, but sometimes would like to take it on gravel fire-roads or single tracks. I'm mostly a casual rider but still enjoy high-end features that a good fitness hybrid/gravel bike has to offer.
I too like the idea of getting this bike for it's versatility:
1. Get the frame that will allow me to switch out the wheel sets from 700c to 650B.
2. Get 11-46 cassette in the back for lower gearing and whatever chain ring in the front makes sense for me.
3. Change out brakes for a hydromechanical setup (Winn R1s or the TRP HYRDs).
4. Put on a rear rack for a child seat for my 2-year-old.
But, it looks like the largest frame size ("Large") is 55 cm size. I'm thinking that will be a problem since I'm 6'3" (torso=23" and inseam without shoes with seat firm against crotch=34.6"), arm-length= 29" and neck long. Might this 55 cm frame still work? If not, are there some other bikes with a good versatile base like this one that have larger frames that can accommodate my height, inseam, longer torso proportionately to my legs and reach like 59cm, 60 cm or 61 cm)?
My budget for this is between $3k and $4k
Thank you in advance for your thoughts on this.
Lee
Last edited by Lyles; 12-12-21 at 01:20 PM. Reason: for clarity
Likes For Lyles: