Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Winter Cycling
Reload this Page >

Prank or Vandalism? MassDOT Bike Lane Cones

Notices
Winter Cycling Don't let snow and ice discourage you this winter. The key element to year-round cycling is proper attire! Check out this winter cycling forum to chat with other ice bike fanatics.

Prank or Vandalism? MassDOT Bike Lane Cones

Old 02-21-22, 05:21 AM
  #1  
parkbrav
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 220 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times in 97 Posts
Prank or Vandalism? MassDOT Bike Lane Cones

The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) has released video of pranksters? or vandals? throwing over a bridge (the Harvard Bridge) traffic cones meant to protect a winter bike lane.

https://www.wcvb.com/article/video-c...-2022/39155245

Do you deem this to be a prank? or dangerous vandalism?
parkbrav is offline  
Old 02-21-22, 05:53 AM
  #2  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,337
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2428 Post(s)
Liked 2,873 Times in 1,643 Posts
Originally Posted by parkbrav
The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) has released video of pranksters? or vandals? throwing over a bridge (the Harvard Bridge) traffic cones meant to protect a winter bike lane.

https://www.wcvb.com/article/video-c...-2022/39155245

Do you deem this to be a prank? or dangerous vandalism?
It's neither. It's drivers who want their lane back. Last sentence in the article:

Drivers, on the other hand, say the single lane causes traffic buildup.
Trakhak is offline  
Old 02-21-22, 06:36 AM
  #3  
parkbrav
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 220 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times in 97 Posts
When it goes through the city approval process, random people don't just get to decide themselves. That's called vigilantism

It's one thing just to ignore a law; it's then another to take the law into your own hands like that.
parkbrav is offline  
Old 02-21-22, 08:59 AM
  #4  
_ForceD_
Sr Member on Sr bikes
 
_ForceD_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Rhode Island (sometimes in SE Florida)
Posts: 2,304

Bikes: Several...from old junk to new all-carbon.

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1012 Post(s)
Liked 758 Times in 407 Posts
One man’s prank is another man’s vandalism. In this case, if they’re caught, they will likely be additionally charged with an environmental crime for throwing the cones in the river. They’d probably have been better off just throwing them onto the sidewalk.

Dan
_ForceD_ is offline  
Old 02-21-22, 09:12 AM
  #5  
Digger Goreman
Quidam Bike Super Hero
 
Digger Goreman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Stone Mountain, GA (Metro Atlanta, East)
Posts: 1,150

Bikes: 1995 Trek 800 Sport, aka, "CamelTrek"

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 331 Post(s)
Liked 415 Times in 282 Posts
Car culture "Richards"....
Digger Goreman is offline  
Old 02-21-22, 09:32 AM
  #6  
MNBikeCommuter
Senior Member
 
MNBikeCommuter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 852

Bikes: Cannondale '92 T600 '95 H600 '01 RT1000

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Originally Posted by parkbrav
Do you deem this to be a prank? or dangerous vandalism?
It could be both, especially if college kids and alcohol are involved.
MNBikeCommuter is offline  
Old 02-21-22, 10:13 AM
  #7  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18318 Post(s)
Liked 4,487 Times in 3,337 Posts

How many pedestrians are on that sidewalk? That would seem like the best place to put the cyclists, as long as they can be sane around other bridge users.

Also consider making bicycle (bike/pedestrian) specific bridges.

Eugene may be somewhat unique with I think 5 bicycle bridges across the Willamette river, and 2 over the McKenzie river. Plus several smaller bridges. There may well be more bicycle bridges crossing the river than automobile bridges.



The river is smaller than in Boston, but it is also a lot smaller city.

It just seems a little crazy to apparently cut the vehicle access in half, but not spend the money on bicycle infrastructure.
CliffordK is offline  
Likes For CliffordK:
Old 02-21-22, 10:14 AM
  #8  
Route 66
Full Member
 
Route 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 218

Bikes: Spot ACME with Shimano Alfine 11 & Gates Carbon Drive

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 24 Posts
I would never classify it as a prank when it endangers people's lives.
Route 66 is offline  
Old 02-22-22, 10:56 AM
  #9  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
typical yutes
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 02-27-22, 09:07 PM
  #10  
sweeks
Senior Member
 
sweeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,541

Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 978 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times in 395 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
typical yutes
OK, Vinnie!
sweeks is offline  
Likes For sweeks:
Old 02-27-22, 09:32 PM
  #11  
Route 66
Full Member
 
Route 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 218

Bikes: Spot ACME with Shimano Alfine 11 & Gates Carbon Drive

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 24 Posts
One of my faves. 😆
Route 66 is offline  
Old 02-28-22, 04:48 AM
  #12  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
something about the way she explains positraction, is just so hot
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 02-28-22, 05:03 AM
  #13  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydAAb-uFIy4
How many pedestrians are on that sidewalk? That would seem like the best place to put the cyclists, as long as they can be sane around other bridge users.
Also consider making bicycle (bike/pedestrian) specific bridges.
Eugene may be somewhat unique with I think 5 bicycle bridges across the Willamette river, and 2 over the McKenzie river. Plus several smaller bridges. There may well be more bicycle bridges crossing the river than automobile bridges.
The river is smaller than in Boston, but it is also a lot smaller city.
It just seems a little crazy to apparently cut the vehicle access in half, but not spend the money on bicycle infrastructure.
cool bridge! pedestrians & bikes don't mix. diff. cities need diff solutions. we have more bike lanes opposing up everywhere. seems ti be working fine. we've had some truly horrifying & incredibly tragic deaths of cyclists by trucks & buses https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105001/ I don't think they are eliminating car lanes on all bridges. I've ridden from my home way outside of Boston to Fenway & even the waterfront a cpl of times. it was pretty harrowing even on a nice sunny day. for ppl commuting year round, I suspect they need a better solution. I've been know to nickname the Cambridge side as looking like China due to all the bikes. bike use is growing & this tiny old city has to adapt. I like driving in the city, grew up in NY, but it's good to see more bike lanes. actually makes it easier for car drivers to figure out what to do to avoid killing someone, or rather saves them from trying to decide. bike lanes are probably faster ^ cheaper to implement than new bridges. we can barely rebuild maintain the bridges we already have
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 02-28-22, 05:06 AM
  #14  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
https://www.bikeattorney.com/massach...accidents.html

https://www.boston.com/news/local-ne...bike-friendly/

https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/us/09bike.html

https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/11...-more-to-come/
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 02-28-22, 06:50 AM
  #15  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,497

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1477 Post(s)
Liked 637 Times in 436 Posts
This thread belongs in the A&S section.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 02-28-22, 09:37 AM
  #16  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
related? speaking for Boston area bridges, have you seen this video? the driver survived
https://www.necn.com/news/national-i...river/2687700/

so much for guard rails, eh?
rumrunn6 is offline  
Likes For rumrunn6:
Old 02-28-22, 12:21 PM
  #17  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18318 Post(s)
Liked 4,487 Times in 3,337 Posts
Originally Posted by Daniel4
This thread belongs in the A&S section.
And get it subjected to the endless bickering about whether cycling safety is the responsibility of the cyclist, or falls 100% on the drivers?
CliffordK is offline  
Old 02-28-22, 12:52 PM
  #18  
CliffordK
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18318 Post(s)
Liked 4,487 Times in 3,337 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
cool bridge! pedestrians & bikes don't mix. diff. cities need diff solutions. we have more bike lanes opposing up everywhere. seems ti be working fine. we've had some truly horrifying & incredibly tragic deaths of cyclists by trucks & buses https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5105001/ I don't think they are eliminating car lanes on all bridges. I've ridden from my home way outside of Boston to Fenway & even the waterfront a cpl of times. it was pretty harrowing even on a nice sunny day. for ppl commuting year round, I suspect they need a better solution. I've been know to nickname the Cambridge side as looking like China due to all the bikes. bike use is growing & this tiny old city has to adapt. I like driving in the city, grew up in NY, but it's good to see more bike lanes. actually makes it easier for car drivers to figure out what to do to avoid killing someone, or rather saves them from trying to decide. bike lanes are probably faster ^ cheaper to implement than new bridges. we can barely rebuild maintain the bridges we already have
Boston has a lot of bridges, many of which are wide crossings.

Eugene may have a unique situation. The city took over the public utilities over a century ago due to a typhoid outbreak.

This may well have impacted cyclists during the 1970's and 1980's.

Whenever the city needed a new utility crossing, they did a cost analysis. Under water, above water, or bike bridge.

Finishing it off as a bridge did increase costs somewhat, but it largely was a utility project. Thus, we have a wonderful bike bridge in North Eugene leading directly to the Sewage Treatment Plant. Nonetheless, several of the bike bridges were utility crossings, and even the one near the sewage plant gets quite a bit of use due to neighboring schools, and businesses, as well as poor alternative crossings.

Anyway, it sounds like Boston is doing a lot of work on bike infrastructure, and bridges are the next thing.

Hard to say about pedestrians and bikes. To some extent they mix. But, it depends on both cyclist and pedestrian density. And pedestrians like to loiter on bridges

One thing Eugene has also done is build several miles of sawdust jogging paths. Pedestrians still like the paved paths, but it is possible that a community could start creating parallel infrastructure for cyclists and pedestrians in certain situations.

This was up in Portland.


I think it meant bicycles beware of Sasquatch.

It wasn't in a place that had a lot of pedestrians, but there are some attempts to segregate cyclists and pedestrians. Since that photo was taken, the city has also planted a bunch of plastic posts along the side of the bike lanes. Not a change I'm in favor of, but some like it.
CliffordK is offline  
Likes For CliffordK:
Old 02-28-22, 01:10 PM
  #19  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,520

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
This was up in Portland.
I think it meant bicycles beware of Sasquatch.
It wasn't in a place that had a lot of pedestrians, but there are some attempts to segregate cyclists and pedestrians. Since that photo was taken, the city has also planted a bunch of plastic posts along the side of the bike lanes. Not a change I'm in favor of, but some like it.
lol yeah there is some size diff. there. 1st thing that comes to mind is what happens when 2 bikes going in opposite directions meet in that narrow bike lane. but I know markings like this are more of a suggestion & ppl will just figure it out when it happens. & yeah cones are not the answer, a legit protected bike lane is much better. I like what I saw in DC a few years ago

got that pic here

regarding the underwater option ... Boston & the Charles River, may always have it's knuckleheads
rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 02-28-22, 03:10 PM
  #20  
Daniel4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,497

Bikes: Sekine 1979 ten speed racer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1477 Post(s)
Liked 637 Times in 436 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
And get it subjected to the endless bickering about whether cycling safety is the responsibility of the cyclist, or falls 100% on the drivers?
In that regard, it's no difference where it's posted because you and I are both here making comments.

Unless...there's a certain someone or two, who hang around the A&S section complaining about the threads, I think you might not want to get involved?

Last edited by Daniel4; 02-28-22 at 03:35 PM.
Daniel4 is offline  
Old 03-01-22, 06:56 AM
  #21  
parkbrav
Full Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 462
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 220 Post(s)
Liked 114 Times in 97 Posts
Well it's a winter cycling thread in the sense that the traffic cones were set up to protect winter cyclists especially during the unique winter darkness.

And the vandalism resulted in the "fruits" of the crime being on full display on top of the Charles River ice as opposed to being concealed under water

And as RumRun says, in the winter time the bridges get icier faster than the roads do. This fact lends credence to the city's protection of bicycles. And this fact reinforces the rational basis underpinning the law protecting the bike lanes. Which goes back to the original point that it's vandalism and not "harmless."

Last edited by parkbrav; 03-01-22 at 07:59 AM.
parkbrav is offline  
Likes For parkbrav:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.