Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Good frame gone bad

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Good frame gone bad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-22, 09:01 PM
  #26  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,630

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4677 Post(s)
Liked 5,790 Times in 2,279 Posts
Not quite sure what the fuss is about, this is clearly an attempt at recreating a Ritchey Breakaway.
@RustyJames, there is a non-zero probability that the Atelier would take on such work, but I'd love to see it! @Andy_K will bring the buffing compound.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 11-23-22, 09:07 PM
  #27  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,984
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 2,566 Times in 1,072 Posts
Originally Posted by RustyJames
**caveat to my statement about the fork. I only gauged it with my eyeball and the fact that the front wheel removed easily. Maybe it was damaged and straightened professionally and the bill caused the owner to fix the remainder at home. How hard could it be!!??
753 forks are ridiculously strong. To a fault!
The blades are just as thick wall and heavy as 531, but with the extra strength from heat treating. Bad engineering, if you ask me. They should have made them lighter, but they chickened out. So they made forks so strong that they ruin frames that they conceivably could have saved if they'd bent. In that rather particular scenario where a little bending in the blades can save the frame. Yes I know this is a fairly narrowly defined circumstance (crash "only so hard" and no harder), but it can never happen if the fork is a lot stronger than the frame.

Being so overly strong also makes it extremely difficult to add rake, so don't plan on trying low trail on one of these.

Yes a full 753 fork does have a weaker steerer — it's unbutted, so thinner at the bottom than a 531 steerer. So maybe the steerer could bend... but it usually doesn't

To me, the best blades to use with a 753 frame would be Col. SL, or similar gauge non-heat-treated tubes from any other maker. A little lighter than 753, and a lot weaker, so it might save the frame in a crash. Might even reduce the likelihood of a fatigue crack in the frame (say in the bottom of the DT near the HT lug), if the flex in the fork attenuates the shock forces from hitting bumps and pot-holes. SL is only a little thinner than 753 though, so there's only a tiny bit more flex.

If you like flexy blades, seek out some Excell, from around 1990 I think, one of the few makers that made blades substantially thinner than Reynolds or Columbus. I used them on a fork for my wife that came out weighing 450 g. (under a pound) which is quite rare for a steel 700c fork. She said she didn't notice the extra flex, until she got on a moden CF bike with a 1-1/2" steerer, stiff as a board... and hated it. A big heavy guy might find those scary-light Excell blades too flexy.

Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 11-23-22, 09:56 PM
  #28  
himespau 
Senior Member
 
himespau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,443
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4224 Post(s)
Liked 2,944 Times in 1,803 Posts
If it's a 60 cm frame, am I the only one wondering if what's left of the tubes could be used to make a 50 cm frame?
himespau is offline  
Old 11-23-22, 10:34 PM
  #29  
RustyJames 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,432

Bikes: You had me at rusty and Italian!!

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 565 Post(s)
Liked 1,043 Times in 541 Posts
gugie careful what you wish for. I’ll be at my brother’s house tomorrow and he lives down the street from you.

bulgie very insightful info. The intact fork and hammered frame may be related.

I did some measuring and the dimensions are a rough average not totally accounting for decals, paint, missing paint, dents, etc.

TT: 25.4mm OD, 23” L CTC (~58mm?)
DT: 28.5mm OD, 24” L CTC (~60mm?)
ST: 29mm OD, 23” CTC (see above)
Included seatpost is 27.2mm and fits perfectly.

Serial no. on BB;
DS: SB810C
NDS: 60

I wouldn’t attempt to date this thing (or it’s sister) based on components since it’s a hodgepodge of 7400 D-A, late model 105 RD, WTB seat, Weinmann LP18 rear wheel with a Quanta hub and 6 speed Sunrace freewheel, Shimano cartridge BB, Ritchey bars/stem and so on.
RustyJames is offline  
Old 11-23-22, 10:38 PM
  #30  
RustyJames 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,432

Bikes: You had me at rusty and Italian!!

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 565 Post(s)
Liked 1,043 Times in 541 Posts
Originally Posted by himespau
If it's a 60 cm frame, am I the only one wondering if what's left of the tubes could be used to make a 50 cm frame?
Highly doubtful. Also, if any of my sleuthing is correct, 753 is much trickier to work with than 531.
RustyJames is offline  
Old 11-23-22, 11:15 PM
  #31  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,742

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,865 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by gugie
Not quite sure what the fuss is about, this is clearly an attempt at recreating a Ritchey Breakaway.
@RustyJames, there is a non-zero probability that the Atelier would take on such work, but I'd love to see it! @Andy_K will bring the buffing compound.
Do you remember that 753 Eddy Merckx with the bodged chainstay repair I tried to talk you into fixing about five years ago? This looks so much worse than that one was.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Likes For Andy_K:
Old 11-24-22, 09:45 AM
  #32  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,630

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4677 Post(s)
Liked 5,790 Times in 2,279 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
Do you remember that 753 Eddy Merckx with the bodged chainstay repair I tried to talk you into fixing about five years ago? This looks so much worse than that one was.
Oh, I don’t want to repair it. It would be interesting to see.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 11-24-22, 10:04 AM
  #33  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,630

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4677 Post(s)
Liked 5,790 Times in 2,279 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_K
Do you remember that 753 Eddy Merckx with the bodged chainstay repair I tried to talk you into fixing about five years ago? This looks so much worse than that one was.
Oh, I don’t want to repair it. It would be interesting to see an SBDU frame mangled so badly
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Old 11-24-22, 11:04 AM
  #34  
Schreck83 
Full Member
 
Schreck83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: WNY
Posts: 441
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Liked 305 Times in 160 Posts
Originally Posted by RustyJames

I did some measuring and the dimensions are a rough average not totally accounting for decals, paint, missing paint, dents, etc.

TT: 25.4mm OD, 23” L CTC (~58mm?)
DT: 28.5mm OD, 24” L CTC (~60mm?)
ST: 29mm OD, 23” CTC (see above)
Included seatpost is 27.2mm and fits perfectly.

Serial no. on BB;
DS: SB810C
NDS: 60

I wouldn’t attempt to date this thing (or it’s sister) based on components since it’s a hodgepodge of 7400 D-A, late model 105 RD, WTB seat, Weinmann LP18 rear wheel with a Quanta hub and 6 speed Sunrace freewheel, Shimano cartridge BB, Ritchey bars/stem and so on.
Here is a discussion of SBDU serial number and frame characteristics. Given that neither 753 tubing nor the Raleigh Cycle Corporation of America existed in 1976, perhaps the serial number ends in a number rather than a C. If so, that points to 1986. According to the discussion about Cinelli bottom brackets, the orientation of the chainstay tangs indicates imperial rather than metric sizing.

It's also possible that a different serial number sequence was used for frames built for the RCCA.

raleigh-sb4059.com/2016/03/02/ re serial numbers
__________________
72+76 Super Course, 74 P-10+ 79 Tandem Paramounts, 84 Raleigh Alyeska, 84 Voyageur SP, 85 Miyata Sport 10 mixte and a queue




Schreck83 is offline  
Old 11-24-22, 01:21 PM
  #35  
RustyJames 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,432

Bikes: You had me at rusty and Italian!!

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 565 Post(s)
Liked 1,043 Times in 541 Posts
Originally Posted by Schreck83
Here is a discussion of SBDU serial number and frame characteristics. Given that neither 753 tubing nor the Raleigh Cycle Corporation of America existed in 1976, perhaps the serial number ends in a number rather than a C. If so, that points to 1986. According to the discussion about Cinelli bottom brackets, the orientation of the chainstay tangs indicates imperial rather than metric sizing.

It's also possible that a different serial number sequence was used for frames built for the RCCA.

raleigh-sb4059.com/2016/03/02/ re serial numbers
I ran across that website digging around the interwebz out of curiosity. In better light my SN is SB8106. One mystery solved. Thank you for the assistance.
RustyJames is offline  
Old 11-24-22, 01:57 PM
  #36  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,509

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times in 2,090 Posts
Originally Posted by RustyJames
I ran across that website digging around the interwebz out of curiosity. In better light my SN is SB8106. One mystery solved. Thank you for the assistance.
Paint is also consistent with an '86, so that correlates as well

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 11-24-22, 03:38 PM
  #37  
Drillium Dude 
Banned.
 
Drillium Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,823 Times in 1,709 Posts
But will it plane anymore with all that misplaced extra weight up front?



I'm assuming that hex head bolt passes through to the other side, and is held by a nut similar to those on the left?

DD
Drillium Dude is offline  
Old 11-24-22, 06:01 PM
  #38  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,509

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times in 2,090 Posts
Originally Posted by Drillium Dude
But will it plane anymore with all that misplaced extra weight up front?
Vertically stiff, yet laterally stiffer?

Sorry, couldn't resist.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Likes For cudak888:
Old 11-24-22, 06:45 PM
  #39  
garryg
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Campbell River BC
Posts: 461
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 147 Post(s)
Liked 331 Times in 141 Posts
What a waste of time when a few wraps of duct tape would get er done.
garryg is offline  
Likes For garryg:
Old 11-24-22, 07:15 PM
  #40  
Drillium Dude 
Banned.
 
Drillium Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,823 Times in 1,709 Posts
Originally Posted by garryg
What a waste of time when a few wraps of duct tape would get er done.
A bead of JB Weld.

DD
Drillium Dude is offline  
Old 11-24-22, 07:52 PM
  #41  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,509

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2420 Post(s)
Liked 4,381 Times in 2,090 Posts
Originally Posted by Drillium Dude
A bead of JB Weld.
A glob of Milliput.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 11-25-22, 04:36 PM
  #42  
georges1
Steel is real
 
georges1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,940

Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1998KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon,1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 666 Post(s)
Liked 964 Times in 638 Posts
Very sad to see that kind of so called fix. The Reynolds753 tubing is only sold in limited quantities and one must be a silver brazing certified welder to receive the 753 brazing certification. 753 is now very scarce and hard to repair.
georges1 is offline  
Likes For georges1:
Old 11-26-22, 12:42 AM
  #43  
gugie 
Bike Butcher of Portland
 
gugie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,630

Bikes: It's complicated.

Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4677 Post(s)
Liked 5,790 Times in 2,279 Posts
Frame tubing of the same gauge as 753 is available. Rather than repair with 753, one could use a similar tube. For example, the .7/.4/.7mm 753 top tube could substitute a similar dimensioned top tube from Kasai.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
gugie is offline  
Likes For gugie:
Old 01-20-23, 10:25 PM
  #44  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,984
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 2,566 Times in 1,072 Posts
OK I got the frame from RustyJames (thanks man!) and disassembled the frame patches. Incredibly, both places had tight-fitting solid aluminum bars, not hollow or tubular. Lathe-turned to a diameter to fit 'just so' inside the tubes. Put in with screws and some kind of rubbery glue, like barge cement? Totally inappropriate type of glue — luckily, since I wouldn't have been able to get them out if they'd been put in with proper toughened epoxy.

The alu bars, the steel clamps, nuts and bolts all together weighed 516 g, well over a pound.

The frame, now divested of all the repair pieces, weighs 1819 g, but the missing piece of TT means it would have weighed ~1850 g originally.

That seems heavy; what do you-all think. My own '86 Davidson, about the same size, weighs 200 g less and it's not the lightest gauge of Prestige. My DT is 3 "notches" from the lightest in fact, and the TT is 2 notches heavier. The rear stays on mine are Col. SL, which should be a tad heavier than 753. Makes me wonder if SBDU subbed in some heavier tubes. I tried a 27.4 seatpost, won't go in even after I spread the pinchbolt ears a little to counter any amount they might be bent in, from tightening on a too-small post. It's my understanding that a real 753 ST should take 27.4.

Anyway, not sure if I want to repair it, still might, but the chainstays are a little gouged up, both sides. I'd hate to put a new front triangle on and repaint it, only to have the rear break soon after. So this might end up being wind chimes or a shop stool.




Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 01-20-23, 10:41 PM
  #45  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,984
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1172 Post(s)
Liked 2,566 Times in 1,072 Posts
Oh and for the record, yes I am 753-certified.



..tho if I repair it, I probably won't use 753 tubes. I have some, but they're in sets, and more valuable if used to make a new frame. If I use some currently-available tubes (say Reynolds 725) in the same gauge, it will ride identically to original.

-mb
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 01-20-23, 11:27 PM
  #46  
RustyJames 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,432

Bikes: You had me at rusty and Italian!!

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 565 Post(s)
Liked 1,043 Times in 541 Posts
You’re welcome? I hope you can get something from it besides an education.
RustyJames is offline  
Old 01-21-23, 12:05 AM
  #47  
Andy_K 
Senior Member
 
Andy_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,742

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,865 Times in 1,439 Posts
Originally Posted by bulgie
That seems heavy; what do you-all think.
I don't know. I have no experience with 753, but I am a nerd so I have records of some of my frame weights. The lightest frame I recorded a weight for is my Coppi with Columbus Genius tubing. It's pretty much exactly the same weight, 4.08 pounds == 1850.7 grams. My Pinarello Montello (Columbus SLX) weighs in at 4.35 pounds (1973). On the other hand, my Reynolds 853 LeMond, for which I don't have a bare frame weight, was half a pound lighter than the Coppi when both were built with the same components. The LeMond has a carbon fork, but it's carbon fiber from 2001, so I really hope it isn't very light. If I weighed that frame, I'm guessing it would be less than 1850 grams.
__________________
My Bikes
Andy_K is offline  
Old 01-21-23, 12:19 AM
  #48  
sfazio 
Junior Member
 
sfazio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Northern California
Posts: 136

Bikes: 1970 Peugeot PX10, 1977 PX-10, 1978 Peugeot UE8, 1972 Schwinn Paramount P15-9, 1970 Raleigh Competition, 1985 Centurion Ironman, 2012 Trek Madone 4.5

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 44 Posts
The fitting into the lug is a real work of art--this would be a fun Frankenstein rig to bring to the group rides--a definite conversation starter.
sfazio is offline  
Old 01-21-23, 03:51 AM
  #49  
jdawginsc 
Edumacator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,772

Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2434 Post(s)
Liked 3,107 Times in 1,957 Posts
It might be fun to repair with artisan quality (Mark) frankenpatches.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super












jdawginsc is offline  
Old 01-21-23, 04:33 AM
  #50  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,361
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2479 Post(s)
Liked 2,947 Times in 1,673 Posts
Originally Posted by jdawginsc
It might be fun to repair with artisan quality (Mark) frankenpatches.
Or add a second coupling to the top tube to turn it into a travel bike.
Trakhak is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.