Jan Heine "Busts" Another Tire/Wheel Myth...
#126
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
A few year ago Greenspeed did research on tire roll down. Contrary to all expectations a 20" wheel had the best roll down.
The thing is on a glass smooth road which there never is, a narrow very high pressure tire would have the best roll down. But on a road that has the usual bumps and other imperfections, a wider lower pressure tire has better roll down.
The reason is an ultra high pressure tire does not "give" and therefore causes the whole bike and rider to lift. That lift results in lost forward motion, because speed is sacrificed to lift the bike and rider, and thus a slower speed and roll down.
The thing is on a glass smooth road which there never is, a narrow very high pressure tire would have the best roll down. But on a road that has the usual bumps and other imperfections, a wider lower pressure tire has better roll down.
The reason is an ultra high pressure tire does not "give" and therefore causes the whole bike and rider to lift. That lift results in lost forward motion, because speed is sacrificed to lift the bike and rider, and thus a slower speed and roll down.
#127
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
my belief/experience is that the faster you go on smooth asphalt, the more advantage/less disadvantage you get from narrow HP tires. When I went from 700 x 30 to 700 x 35, I was the same speed or faster most places, except for on downhills. Maybe a tiny bit slower on climbs because of the tiny bit of added weight.
I don't know if I can actually tell this for certain, but it seems like the aerodynamic resistance of the fatter tires is noticeable at higher speeds.
I don't know if I can actually tell this for certain, but it seems like the aerodynamic resistance of the fatter tires is noticeable at higher speeds.
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
That's a lot of discussion so it's probably already been said but there isn't really a myth about it. Larger diameter wheels have certain benefits for speed in some conditions, with drawbacks in weight and handling in some conditions. I think we've always known this.
#129
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,262
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4247 Post(s)
Liked 1,352 Times
in
938 Posts
Years ago, people routinely bought road tires that were 20 mm (even narrower). Now, it seems like 25 mm is the norm.
So, something has changed.
It seems that people thought that narrow tires with high pressure were significantly faster. What it seems that was learned is that that isn't true in an practical sense (how people typically use the tires).
Moulton in the UK appears to be the only concern advocating small wheels for "regular" riding.
https://www.moultonbicycles.co.uk/
In mountain biking, there was a big interest in going larger (to 29') from 26' but no one appears to be interested in going smaller.
Last edited by njkayaker; 08-02-20 at 09:49 AM.
#130
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,945
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3948 Post(s)
Liked 7,292 Times
in
2,945 Posts
Yes, but a lot of people seem to live in a world defined by "xx is always better" or "everyone should use what I use."
Likes For tomato coupe:
#131
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Most of the discussion here was about tires.
Years ago, people routinely bought road tires that were 20 mm (even narrower). Now, it seems like 25 mm is the norm.
So, something has changed.
It seems that people thought that narrow tires with high pressure were significantly faster. What it seems that was learned is that that isn't true in an practical sense (how people typically use the tires).
Moulton in the UK appears to be the only concern advocating small wheels for "regular" riding.
MOULTON Bicycle Company
In mountain biking, there was a big interest in going larger (to 29') from 26' but no one appears to be interested in going smaller.
Years ago, people routinely bought road tires that were 20 mm (even narrower). Now, it seems like 25 mm is the norm.
So, something has changed.
It seems that people thought that narrow tires with high pressure were significantly faster. What it seems that was learned is that that isn't true in an practical sense (how people typically use the tires).
Moulton in the UK appears to be the only concern advocating small wheels for "regular" riding.
MOULTON Bicycle Company
In mountain biking, there was a big interest in going larger (to 29') from 26' but no one appears to be interested in going smaller.
People being hard core about the small high-pressure tires was before my cycling time I guess, because I don't ever recall any general agreement about that.
#132
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,262
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4247 Post(s)
Liked 1,352 Times
in
938 Posts
What changed for me was higher quality larger tires got cheaper, or at least the more affordable ones got easier to find. I had gradually dropped from 32 to 20 looking for that extra speed, realized that the tire's construction made more difference than its width, and now back to 28's.
Many road bikes didn't even have room for wider tires. Now, it seems most of the current ones can take 28 mm.
#133
Senior Member
So, something has changed.
It seems that people thought that narrow tires with high pressure were significantly faster. What it seems that was learned is that that isn't true in an practical sense (how people typically use the tires).
It seems that people thought that narrow tires with high pressure were significantly faster. What it seems that was learned is that that isn't true in an practical sense (how people typically use the tires).
#134
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
640 Posts
Cheers
#135
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,410
Bikes: 2017 Specialized Allez Sprint Comp
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 850 Post(s)
Liked 344 Times
in
247 Posts
I don’t think Jan Heine predicts that WT pros are gonna be rockin 38s... ever. But it’s probably fair to say that most people who ride bikes do not compete. Thus, safety, comfort and versatility are all higher priorities than outright speed. Even today’s race bikes can take 32mm tires. New endurance road bikes can clear 35s. It’s probably not a stretch to assume that in 10 years, non-racers will choose to run 38s.
#136
Senior Member
Tire size, like frame shape, has perhaps more to do with fashion than practicality. Very often, form comes at the cost of function. A great example of this was the 70's Chevrolet Corvette sports cars. They features curvy, aerodynamic bodies, yet in a wind tunnel, the lowly Chevette was more aerodynamic and stable. Cannondale avoided the sloping frame design for years because no matter how they engineered a sloping frame, they could not make it lighter or stronger than conventional frame, but in the end they produced them because the market prioritized fashion over function.
The same is true in the case of tires. You only need as much tire contact as is necessary for safe cornering and efficient braking, any more than that you add rolling resistance. As for myths about wheel and tire sizes, as the economist Milton Friedman said "You have to be careful with figures, anyone came make them say anything they want." Friedman worked in statistics during WW2 studying the efficiency of different bullet and shell designs, and few people knew more about the vagaries of statistics than he did. In time things tend to evolve to their most efficient form, more or less, though fashion trends from time to time have an effect on efficiency, such as the baggy clothes popular in the 90's in mountain biking and winter sports. These certainly slowed riders and athletes down, but once again, "fashion" reared its ugly head, and being fashionable was more important than being fast.
I like larger tires because they are more comfortable. However, that comfort always comes at the expense of increased weight and rolling resistance. Road bike tires used to be quite large, and over time, as bikes got faster, tires became narrower. A 60kg rider on a 10kg bike does not need a lot of rubber on the road, and on a weight-per-rubber basis, a narrow bicycle tire has a larger contact patch than a motorcycle or most cars. Bigger is cooler, but is not faster. On the other hand, smaller is also not better. A 20" bike might have broken speed records, but that is because the entire bike was less than 36" tall, and aerodynamic drag is a greater problem than the rolling resistance the wheels, and becomes ever greater as speeds increase.
The same is true in the case of tires. You only need as much tire contact as is necessary for safe cornering and efficient braking, any more than that you add rolling resistance. As for myths about wheel and tire sizes, as the economist Milton Friedman said "You have to be careful with figures, anyone came make them say anything they want." Friedman worked in statistics during WW2 studying the efficiency of different bullet and shell designs, and few people knew more about the vagaries of statistics than he did. In time things tend to evolve to their most efficient form, more or less, though fashion trends from time to time have an effect on efficiency, such as the baggy clothes popular in the 90's in mountain biking and winter sports. These certainly slowed riders and athletes down, but once again, "fashion" reared its ugly head, and being fashionable was more important than being fast.
I like larger tires because they are more comfortable. However, that comfort always comes at the expense of increased weight and rolling resistance. Road bike tires used to be quite large, and over time, as bikes got faster, tires became narrower. A 60kg rider on a 10kg bike does not need a lot of rubber on the road, and on a weight-per-rubber basis, a narrow bicycle tire has a larger contact patch than a motorcycle or most cars. Bigger is cooler, but is not faster. On the other hand, smaller is also not better. A 20" bike might have broken speed records, but that is because the entire bike was less than 36" tall, and aerodynamic drag is a greater problem than the rolling resistance the wheels, and becomes ever greater as speeds increase.
Last edited by 50PlusCycling; 08-02-20 at 11:09 PM.
#137
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,900
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,926 Times
in
1,209 Posts
I don’t think Jan Heine predicts that WT pros are gonna be rockin 38s... ever. But it’s probably fair to say that most people who ride bikes do not compete. Thus, safety, comfort and versatility are all higher priorities than outright speed. Even today’s race bikes can take 32mm tires. New endurance road bikes can clear 35s. It’s probably not a stretch to assume that in 10 years, non-racers will choose to run 38s.
#138
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
And you can take it even further and suggest technological advances have failed since low technology dominates the industry. The sheer magnitude of low end bikes dwarf the rest.
Even the pandemic suggests that manufacturers have squandered an opportunity by not focussing entirely on less expensive offerings.
It is so easy to point to something to support a position, regardless of its validity.
John
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
One thing I’ll add which is OT. This bike boom has shown it has absolutely nothing to do with the professional aspect of the sport.
It does make one wonder why manufacturers, or even sponsors, are even involved in professional cycling. It has an obvious appeal, but most likely to a very small segment of the industry.
John
It does make one wonder why manufacturers, or even sponsors, are even involved in professional cycling. It has an obvious appeal, but most likely to a very small segment of the industry.
John
#140
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,945
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3948 Post(s)
Liked 7,292 Times
in
2,945 Posts
Yeah, why are auto companies involved in auto racing? Or ski companies involved with ski racing? Most importantly, why are Nike, Adidas, Wilson, and Reebok involved with any professional sports that use athletic shoes or athletic clothing? It's a mystery ...
#141
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Down Under
Posts: 1,936
Bikes: A steel framed 26" off road tourer from a manufacturer who thinks they are cool. Giant Anthem. Trek 720 Multiroad pub bike. 10 kids bikes all under 20". Assorted waifs and unfinished projects.
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1188 Post(s)
Liked 1,154 Times
in
640 Posts
All I know is that my fastest ever downhill run was on a kids bike with 12 1/2" x 2.00 tires on it, pumped up to an indeterminate pressure. I passed a couple of roadies who were in the tuck...much to their surprise. I think if I paid more attention to tire pressure and drank more beer I could go faster. Mind you, being pretzelled up on that little bike meant I walked around like a 120 year old the next day, eventually my back straightened out.
#142
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
#143
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,371
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2482 Post(s)
Liked 2,952 Times
in
1,677 Posts
"This is Doctor Smith."
"Yes, Doctor?"
"How late are you open?"
I would answer the question politely and hang up, having resisted the temptation to say, "Ordinarily, we close at 6 p.m., but for you, Doctor . . . ."
#144
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,945
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3948 Post(s)
Liked 7,292 Times
in
2,945 Posts
#145
Generally bewildered
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037
Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
251 Posts
Trakhak, you may enjoy this true story. The story's a bit self indulgent and a trip down memory lane - please humor me. When I was growing up, my Mom and Dad's best friends were Dorothea and Eldon S. Great people. Wisconsin farm kids. Eldon owned an office equipment supply company, but had been in the Army Air Corps in WWII and was a bomber pilot. Thirty five missions over the Ploesti oil fields. That gives you a certain disdain for pretense, I guess. I remember Dad (a baritone with perfect pitch) and Eldon and Dorothea (both beautiful voices) singing around the player piano. Good memories.
Anyway, the four are down in Chicago to see a show. Beforehand, they end up at a really popular restaurant. The Maitre'd was like "Table for four? An hour an a half", and the offer of twenty didn't move things. So they put their name in and go to the saloon. Both Dad and Eldon, uh, knew their way around a bar stool. But Dad gets an idea. This is like the late 60s, eh? Dad goes out of the restaurant, to a drug store next door, one with a quiet phone booth. Calls the restaurant.
"Hello, Pump Room"*.
"Hey der. Mayor Daley's office calling. May I speak to the manager?"
"Uh, yes sir"
"Hello, this is John Ratzinger, how may I help you?"
"John! This is Joe Dembowski from the mayor's office! I was calling because we understand that some friends of the mayor are coming by your restaurant, and the mayor wanted me to ask you to extend a real Chicago welcome to them. Their names are Eldon S. and Bob B."
"Well, thank you for calling, Joe - we'll take care of it!"
"That's just great John! I'll tell the mayor - he'll be thrilled about this!".
My dad walked out of the phone booth, crossed the street, walked in the saloon door, and saw the Maitre D' walk in from the foyer.
"Table for four? Please come with me!"
Anyway, sometimes titles and associations work.
Anyway, the four are down in Chicago to see a show. Beforehand, they end up at a really popular restaurant. The Maitre'd was like "Table for four? An hour an a half", and the offer of twenty didn't move things. So they put their name in and go to the saloon. Both Dad and Eldon, uh, knew their way around a bar stool. But Dad gets an idea. This is like the late 60s, eh? Dad goes out of the restaurant, to a drug store next door, one with a quiet phone booth. Calls the restaurant.
"Hello, Pump Room"*.
"Hey der. Mayor Daley's office calling. May I speak to the manager?"
"Uh, yes sir"
"Hello, this is John Ratzinger, how may I help you?"
"John! This is Joe Dembowski from the mayor's office! I was calling because we understand that some friends of the mayor are coming by your restaurant, and the mayor wanted me to ask you to extend a real Chicago welcome to them. Their names are Eldon S. and Bob B."
"Well, thank you for calling, Joe - we'll take care of it!"
"That's just great John! I'll tell the mayor - he'll be thrilled about this!".
My dad walked out of the phone booth, crossed the street, walked in the saloon door, and saw the Maitre D' walk in from the foyer.
"Table for four? Please come with me!"
Anyway, sometimes titles and associations work.
Likes For WizardOfBoz:
#146
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
Probably 95% or more of the US population can only name 1 professional cyclist, and we all know who that is.
But you are correct comparing it to skiing, well, cycling will never fall down to the level of skiing.
John
Edit Added: And I shouldn’t just bring up Nike and Jordan, maybe just move on to Tiger.
Last edited by 70sSanO; 08-03-20 at 09:41 PM.
#147
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,945
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3948 Post(s)
Liked 7,292 Times
in
2,945 Posts
It's not all about the U.S. As a reminder, the U.S. accounts for only 4% of the world population.
#148
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,805
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,164 Times
in
1,323 Posts
#149
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
The difference between the bicycle industry’s myopic obsession with pro road bike racing and athletic footwear companies’ affiliation with professional basketball is that the latter did not result in the industry pushing sneakers that were uncomfortable and ill-fitting for the 99% of the population that were not professional basketball players.
I honestly think that the professional road racing did more harm than good for cycling in the US. Thankfully this has begun to change in the last ten years, and we are finally seeing a lot of high quality bikes designed for the 99% of the population that are not pro racers.
The best thing to happen to mountain biking was the declining influence of XC racing in the late 90s and early 00s. Once designers started focusing on something other than what will win an XC or DH race, MTBs got much, much better.
What is happening in the road world is kind of similar, but to a lesser degree. Racing still has an outsized (and IMO unhelpful) influence.
I honestly think that the professional road racing did more harm than good for cycling in the US. Thankfully this has begun to change in the last ten years, and we are finally seeing a lot of high quality bikes designed for the 99% of the population that are not pro racers.
The best thing to happen to mountain biking was the declining influence of XC racing in the late 90s and early 00s. Once designers started focusing on something other than what will win an XC or DH race, MTBs got much, much better.
What is happening in the road world is kind of similar, but to a lesser degree. Racing still has an outsized (and IMO unhelpful) influence.
Likes For Kapusta:
#150
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Rolling resistance is not increased due to the size of the tire contact. Neither is friction. There are some factors increasing (or decreasing) rolling resistance which also alter the size of the contact patch. I think that's mainly where this comes from, but it's really not hard or complicated. The size of the contact depends on weight on the pneumatic tire and the air pressure inside it. Not on the size of the tire, and only a tiny bit on the construction of the tire.
More weight can cause more rolling resistance, and also makes a larger contact area. Lower pressure can cause more rolling resistance (on a very smooth surface) and also makes a larger contact area. In both cases, it's not the contact area causing rolling resistance - it's the weight, or the bend in the tire around it (more bend with lower pressure).
That's pretty simple, and concerning friction - grip - it isn't more complicated. Generally speaking friction does not depend on the size of the contact. I say "generally speaking" not as a weasel, but only because this is not a physical law derived from basic principles. It's what we've found to be true for almost all materials in normal conditions. A bigger contact area can result in more grip, but because the tire doesn't bounce as much at lower pressure and not because of the contact area. Again, it's something else that affects both things.