Tubeless rim requirements?
#1
Old bikes, Older guy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Fiscal Conservative on the Lefty Coast - Oregon
Posts: 841
Bikes: A few modern, Several vintage, All ridden when weather allows.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 250 Post(s)
Liked 165 Times
in
114 Posts
Tubeless rim requirements?
Hi folks,
Just curious, are special rims required for a tubeless setup or will thenproper tape work with tubeless tires, bolt-in stem and sealant? I have several vintage bikes that I would like to switch to tubeless, but really don’t want to redo the wheels.
Thanks & regards,
Van
Just curious, are special rims required for a tubeless setup or will thenproper tape work with tubeless tires, bolt-in stem and sealant? I have several vintage bikes that I would like to switch to tubeless, but really don’t want to redo the wheels.
Thanks & regards,
Van
__________________
Remember: Real bikes have pedals.
...and never put a yellow tail on a Red, White and Blue kite!
Remember: Real bikes have pedals.
...and never put a yellow tail on a Red, White and Blue kite!
#2
LR÷P=HR
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,161
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 862 Post(s)
Liked 1,195 Times
in
687 Posts
True tubeless rims are "hooked" in order to retain the tire.
Clinchers don't require that same hook.
Ghetto tubeless setups, well......... it's up to you.
Barry
Clinchers don't require that same hook.
Ghetto tubeless setups, well......... it's up to you.
Barry
#3
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,385
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,686 Times
in
2,509 Posts
I wouldn't do it. There are significant differences between older rims and tubeless rims. The most important one from a safety perspective is probably the bead retention lip.
People have done it, that's how Stan's got their start since there weren't any tubeless rims.
People have done it, that's how Stan's got their start since there weren't any tubeless rims.
Likes For unterhausen:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,681
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 441 Times
in
314 Posts
True tubeless rims are "hooked" in order to retain the tire.
Clinchers don't require that same hook.
Ghetto tubeless setups, well......... it's up to you.
Barry
Clinchers don't require that same hook.
Ghetto tubeless setups, well......... it's up to you.
Barry
#5
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,385
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,686 Times
in
2,509 Posts
I think I have some DT road rims in both tubeless and not tubeless versions. The hook that's important is at the edge of the shelf near the center channel. My newer rims have it, the older one I have doesn't
I think the older rim would work fine tubeless for the most part, but losing air could be a lot more rapid. I have it taped for tubeless, and it's a rear wheel, so maybe I will run it tubeless.
Seems like companies are making "hookless" rims again. I don't really pay attention to that sort of thing. In this diagram, the part that stops rapid air loss is the "hump"
I think the older rim would work fine tubeless for the most part, but losing air could be a lot more rapid. I have it taped for tubeless, and it's a rear wheel, so maybe I will run it tubeless.
Seems like companies are making "hookless" rims again. I don't really pay attention to that sort of thing. In this diagram, the part that stops rapid air loss is the "hump"
Last edited by unterhausen; 08-28-21 at 12:56 PM.
#6
Old bikes, Older guy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Fiscal Conservative on the Lefty Coast - Oregon
Posts: 841
Bikes: A few modern, Several vintage, All ridden when weather allows.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 250 Post(s)
Liked 165 Times
in
114 Posts
Thanks for the feedback.
I forgot to mention that all these wheels have hook bead rim, just not “tubeless ready”.
Cheers,
Van
I forgot to mention that all these wheels have hook bead rim, just not “tubeless ready”.
Cheers,
Van
__________________
Remember: Real bikes have pedals.
...and never put a yellow tail on a Red, White and Blue kite!
Remember: Real bikes have pedals.
...and never put a yellow tail on a Red, White and Blue kite!
#7
LR÷P=HR
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,161
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 862 Post(s)
Liked 1,195 Times
in
687 Posts
This not to be confused with the more square cornered hook on a tubeless ready rim.
Barry
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
True tubeless rims are "hooked" in order to retain the tire.
Clinchers don't require that same hook.
Ghetto tubeless setups, well......... it's up to you.
Barry
Clinchers don't require that same hook.
Ghetto tubeless setups, well......... it's up to you.
Barry
Likes For cxwrench:
#9
LR÷P=HR
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,161
Bikes: 1981 Holdsworth Special, 1993 C-dale MT3000 & 1996 F700CAD3, 2018 Cervelo R3 & 2022 R5, JustGo Runt, Ridley Oval, Kickr Bike 8-)
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 862 Post(s)
Liked 1,195 Times
in
687 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
What, are you such a sensitive guy you can't deal w/ being corrected? How was my post not tactful? Because I use the word 'wrong'?
Likes For cxwrench:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,681
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 441 Times
in
314 Posts
I think I have some DT road rims in both tubeless and not tubeless versions. The hook that's important is at the edge of the shelf near the center channel. My newer rims have it, the older one I have doesn't
I think the older rim would work fine tubeless for the most part, but losing air could be a lot more rapid. I have it taped for tubeless, and it's a rear wheel, so maybe I will run it tubeless.
Seems like companies are making "hookless" rims again. I don't really pay attention to that sort of thing. In this diagram, the part that stops rapid air loss is the "hump"
I think the older rim would work fine tubeless for the most part, but losing air could be a lot more rapid. I have it taped for tubeless, and it's a rear wheel, so maybe I will run it tubeless.
Seems like companies are making "hookless" rims again. I don't really pay attention to that sort of thing. In this diagram, the part that stops rapid air loss is the "hump"
I purchased a couple extra DT Swiss R460's since they were super cheap during pre-covid times. I may have a close up look when I get home using my magnifier.
#12
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
What rims do you have? There are enough stories of trouble here with wheels that are tubeless-compatible that I no interest in trying it with regular rims. Most new rims are tubeless-compatible, so that problem is working itself out anyway...
#13
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,385
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,686 Times
in
2,509 Posts
I think it's just a generic diagram. Apparently some tubeless rims have wider humps, but the ones on the DT rims I have are this size or smaller. They do keep the bead from dropping into the center channel fairly effectively though.
Likes For unterhausen:
#14
Old bikes, Older guy
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Fiscal Conservative on the Lefty Coast - Oregon
Posts: 841
Bikes: A few modern, Several vintage, All ridden when weather allows.
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 250 Post(s)
Liked 165 Times
in
114 Posts
Cheers,
Van
__________________
Remember: Real bikes have pedals.
...and never put a yellow tail on a Red, White and Blue kite!
Remember: Real bikes have pedals.
...and never put a yellow tail on a Red, White and Blue kite!
#15
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
What I'm getting at is that some rim models may be more able to do tubeless than others. Without any useful information, it's hard to advise either way.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,676
Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 425 Post(s)
Liked 452 Times
in
311 Posts
If you're going ghetto tubeless, one factor is intended use. Will this be for road or mountain? Ghetto tubeless works better on mountain (or just low psi applications). For road or high psi use, better to get rims and tires that are marked tubeless ready.
#17
mosquito rancher
I'll add my voice to those advising against doing this, at least for road riding. I've read a horror story about a guy who was using tubeless tires on tubeless rims, but the tires were slightly wider than the rim maker specified for that rim, and had a catastrophic loss of pressure (and ambulance ride). Basically road tubeless is finicky enough that I would not mess around with an experimental or out-of-spec setup.
Tubeless tires interface with the rim differently than regular clinchers. Clinchers are retained by the hooks at the tops of the sidewalls. Tubeless tires are supposed to be snug against the rim bed, and those "humps" (as shown in underhausen's diagram) hold the beads in place so they can't squirm inward and burp out air. But there's even some debate within the industry about this: There are some tubeless rims that are hookless (operating on the assumption that if the tire is properly snug against the bed, the hook is redundant—this simplifies carbon rim fabrication and supposedly gives the tire a more aero profile on the rim)—I believe Zipp's current tubeless rims are hookless. But there are some tubeless tires (eg Continental) that say they require hooks (which may simply be a CYA belts-and-suspenders policy).
Tubeless tires interface with the rim differently than regular clinchers. Clinchers are retained by the hooks at the tops of the sidewalls. Tubeless tires are supposed to be snug against the rim bed, and those "humps" (as shown in underhausen's diagram) hold the beads in place so they can't squirm inward and burp out air. But there's even some debate within the industry about this: There are some tubeless rims that are hookless (operating on the assumption that if the tire is properly snug against the bed, the hook is redundant—this simplifies carbon rim fabrication and supposedly gives the tire a more aero profile on the rim)—I believe Zipp's current tubeless rims are hookless. But there are some tubeless tires (eg Continental) that say they require hooks (which may simply be a CYA belts-and-suspenders policy).
__________________
Adam Rice
Adam Rice
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 4,390
Bikes: '80 Masi Gran Criterium, '12 Trek Madone, early '60s Frejus track
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 513 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times
in
335 Posts
It's got something to do with the shape of the hook. Since they don't have spoke holes, I tried setting the bead on my Mavic Ksyrium SLs tubless. Big fail. Glad I found out before using sealant.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
If it's the shape of the hook can you explain how hookless tubeless rims manage to work? I'll wait.
#21
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,946
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4925 Post(s)
Liked 8,039 Times
in
3,800 Posts
I recently converted the 26" Mavic X517 rims on my 20 year old MTB to tubeless, using the recipe recommended in a YouTube video. Old rim tape was removed, the inside of the rim was thoroughly cleaned, and wiped down with alcohol. Rim was sealed with 1 layer of electrical tape, plus 2 layers of Stan's tape. Tires mounted fairly easily, and inflated just fine with a standard floor pump.
I have had 1 flat where the tire burped on fairly hard impact after a stair-step drop-off. I was unable to get the tire to reseal on the trail (probably needed more sealant), and finished my ride with a tube. Being that I'm on an old bike with rim brakes, I suspect the rim may have gotten warm to the point of softening the sealant at the tire bead on a long and steep descent section, and the impact was just too much for it.
Other than that one issue, they've worked just fine for me, and are getting used about twice a week.
I'm not sure I would try this with old road rims.
I have had 1 flat where the tire burped on fairly hard impact after a stair-step drop-off. I was unable to get the tire to reseal on the trail (probably needed more sealant), and finished my ride with a tube. Being that I'm on an old bike with rim brakes, I suspect the rim may have gotten warm to the point of softening the sealant at the tire bead on a long and steep descent section, and the impact was just too much for it.
Other than that one issue, they've worked just fine for me, and are getting used about twice a week.
I'm not sure I would try this with old road rims.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
Likes For Eric F:
#22
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
Mavic X517 looks like it was a good candidate. Mavics are often a tight fit, and that rim has a nice flat shelf for the beads with a well in the middle.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
Any more what? Things I know about and you don't? Given enough time I could probably come up with a couple hundred. You learn about a lot of things after almost 30 years of doing it for a living.