Gravel bike as all-around bike?
#26
Full Member
I think for you, the question is, #1 - does the bike fit? #2 what size tires do you need. Lord knows, in the last year or two a "gravel" bike has grown to be a bike that maxes out at 32mm to well over 50mm. Some gravel bikes are road race bikes with tire clearance, some are endurance bikes, some are drop bar mountain bikes.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 557
Bikes: 2021 Trek Checkpoint SL (GRX Di2), 2020 Domane SLR 9 (very green), 2016 Trek Emonda SL, 2009 Bianchi 928, 1972 Atala Record Pro
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 85 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 143 Times
in
55 Posts
prj71 It will depend on the wheels I suspect. On my Domane, 40s mounted on a set of wheels with a 25mm inner rim width were about as close to the front derailleur (a Dura-ace di2) as I'd want to be - 2mm or so. Everywhere else there was plenty of room.
#28
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times
in
1,574 Posts
Well, sure you don't NEED them.... but d@mn, they sure are nice.
You make a good point about not having to stick with what comes on the bike. I've had a few friends go back to using road racing bikes more because they felt the gravel bikes were kind of slow, but they were still running the (not-so-great) semi-knobbies that came stock with the bikes. One friend of mine who is a fairly mellow rider who has a killer Salsa Warbird went out and bought a new road bike, and I can't help but think that she spent $2.5K for a faster set of tires.
You make a good point about not having to stick with what comes on the bike. I've had a few friends go back to using road racing bikes more because they felt the gravel bikes were kind of slow, but they were still running the (not-so-great) semi-knobbies that came stock with the bikes. One friend of mine who is a fairly mellow rider who has a killer Salsa Warbird went out and bought a new road bike, and I can't help but think that she spent $2.5K for a faster set of tires.
#29
Sprockets away!
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sidney, BC, Canada
Posts: 83
Bikes: 2021 Prior Prime 105 Disc, 2015 Cannondale Synapse 105 Disc, 1996 Brodie Quantum, 1984 Norco Monterey (SRAM automatix two-speed), 198x Cramerotti Campagnolo Chorus (restored)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times
in
12 Posts
I just built a custom gravel bike this fall.. Chinese Carbon frame, self-painted, Shimano 7000 series groupo. I set the geometry up to match my road bike, and then put my old road wheels on it while I decided what to do about gravel wheels. Riding it on the road wheels, it's about a pound heavier but rides just as nicely. If I swapped the lighter Campagnolo wheels off my road bike it would be even better.
Eventually I figured out what I wanted for gravel wheels, and switched to 700cx40 Continental Terra Speeds. Turns out it is also *excellent* as a gravel bike.
So yes, it is *definitely* possible to have one bike for both. I wouldn't want to just pick one set of tires for both, but the geometry works for both uses for me.
Eventually I figured out what I wanted for gravel wheels, and switched to 700cx40 Continental Terra Speeds. Turns out it is also *excellent* as a gravel bike.
So yes, it is *definitely* possible to have one bike for both. I wouldn't want to just pick one set of tires for both, but the geometry works for both uses for me.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,186
Bikes: 2016 Surly Cross Check, 2019 Kona Rove ST
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 313 Times
in
211 Posts
I bought my first gravel bike because, as far as I understood it, that's exactly what they're intended to be - all arounders!
So, now I have two, but one is a singlespeed 700c and the other geared 650B, so that's how I justify having both
So, now I have two, but one is a singlespeed 700c and the other geared 650B, so that's how I justify having both
Likes For pbass:
#31
Newbie
Just curious as an add to this--what wheels/rims are you running? What's the internal width and spoke count?
Thanks.
Thanks.
#32
Junior Member
I have recently gone to a gravel bike as an all rounder, I'm 62, 98kg, and live in a hilly area, I have a road bike (Giant TCR) and a touring oriented Giant FCR, the FCR is great for the hills and the TCR is fine on the flat and mild hills but I struggle on the steep stuff with it. So after a lot of thought and looking at gear inches I chose (the word chose is a misnomer as there aint much choice out there right now, at least here in Tiawan..) what my LBS told me was the only Merida Silex in stock in Taiwan in M size..
I have found that it suites me almost perfectly, i have a 46/30 chainrings, and 11-34 at the back, and could go to 11-36 if I need. I prefer drops, and with my age I find the lower gearing gives me so much more reserve than the TCR, and lets face it at may age anything above 90 gear inchecs is pretty much wasted, I coast down hills anyway trying to get my breath back from the climb. My bike is Aluminium and wieghs 10.35kg, I consider that light.
I have no intension of using in on real gravel sone light forrest tracks may be.. the 38mm tires make it very comfortable and with the bars and seat about the same hight so is the riding position.
I can see many more people switcheing to gravel bikes as all rounders. As most morph from road bikes I'd say the emphisis is leaning to road, but my Silex geometry comes from mountain bikes so is a different take and makes for a more upright position that suits me.
I have found that it suites me almost perfectly, i have a 46/30 chainrings, and 11-34 at the back, and could go to 11-36 if I need. I prefer drops, and with my age I find the lower gearing gives me so much more reserve than the TCR, and lets face it at may age anything above 90 gear inchecs is pretty much wasted, I coast down hills anyway trying to get my breath back from the climb. My bike is Aluminium and wieghs 10.35kg, I consider that light.
I have no intension of using in on real gravel sone light forrest tracks may be.. the 38mm tires make it very comfortable and with the bars and seat about the same hight so is the riding position.
I can see many more people switcheing to gravel bikes as all rounders. As most morph from road bikes I'd say the emphisis is leaning to road, but my Silex geometry comes from mountain bikes so is a different take and makes for a more upright position that suits me.
Last edited by deaninkl; 11-04-21 at 10:41 AM.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,418
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 929 Post(s)
Liked 1,595 Times
in
1,021 Posts
I think that's it. Years ago my old UNIVEGA was modified to take Light Gravel and Torn Up Asphalt. It could be considered a Gravel Bike in a way. Now days a Gravel Bike has taken on it's own persona. Who would consider a gravel bike without disk brakes, tubeless tires, 11 speed cassettes with of course BRIFTERS!
But with two wheel sets my ChroMo UNIVEGA can hold its own on light gravel, touring, city or even road biking (not that I could)...
Long live the Franken Bike... Ha
But with two wheel sets my ChroMo UNIVEGA can hold its own on light gravel, touring, city or even road biking (not that I could)...
Long live the Franken Bike... Ha
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
#34
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 105
Bikes: 2014 Avanti Circa (Rd Dist), 2020 Giant Toughroad (Rd Tour), 2021 Trek Allant+ 8S (eCommute), 2021 Scott Aspect 940 (Mt HT), 2014 Santa Cruz Superlight 29er (Mt FS), 2022 Scott Spark 960 (Mt FS)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 52 Times
in
26 Posts
One thing I like about the new influx of modern gravel bikes is the gearing, especially with the 2x11 GRX options.
I am in a similar situation, where I'm handing my CX bike to my partner for triathlons, and I'll get a gravel bike for myself.
I am in a similar situation, where I'm handing my CX bike to my partner for triathlons, and I'll get a gravel bike for myself.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,337
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 638 Times
in
395 Posts
I think that's it. Years ago my old UNIVEGA was modified to take Light Gravel and Torn Up Asphalt. It could be considered a Gravel Bike in a way. Now days a Gravel Bike has taken on it's own persona. Who would consider a gravel bike without disk brakes, tubeless tires, 11 speed cassettes with of course BRIFTERS!
But with two wheel sets my ChroMo UNIVEGA can hold its own on light gravel, touring, city or even road biking (not that I could)...
Long live the Franken Bike... Ha
But with two wheel sets my ChroMo UNIVEGA can hold its own on light gravel, touring, city or even road biking (not that I could)...
Long live the Franken Bike... Ha
Likes For Lazyass:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 1,298
Bikes: 2017 Salsa Carbon Mukluk frame built with XT, 2018 Kona Rove NRB build with Sram Apex 1,2008 Salsa El Mariachi, 1986 Centurion Ironman
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 286 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times
in
65 Posts
__________________
Don't complain about the weather and cower in fear. It's all good weather. Just different.
Don't complain about the weather and cower in fear. It's all good weather. Just different.
#37
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,538
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10902 Post(s)
Liked 7,393 Times
in
4,148 Posts
It would reduce tire size since the rim would take up more space in the stays and fork, but it is certainly thought provoking.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,418
Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 929 Post(s)
Liked 1,595 Times
in
1,021 Posts
Here I am using a Kenda K184 27 1-3/8 tire on WheelMaster 27 1-1/4 wheels, Weinman RM19 rims. The bike is a P6 Peugeot Carbolite. There is room to spare. It gives a very relaxed ride on Light Gravel and Torn Up Asphalt. I have been satisfied with WheelMaster Machine built wheel sets and they come pretty much set out of the box. I do however loosen them up and re-tune them before use, but that's just me. The K184 tire in 27" 1-3/8 can be hard to find. Ordering on Ebay took a 3 week delivery from China (Taiwan).
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
Last edited by zandoval; 11-04-21 at 11:29 AM.
#40
Senior Member
I have a new Giant TCX, and have spent the last week covering my usual rides, which includes relatively smooth gravel and lots of tarmac. I've taken it on some soul-crushing climbs and warp-speed descents, including getting caught out in the rain for a couple of hours.
Great bike; if I was booted into the afterlife, and given the choice of only one bike to take (into Hell obviously..) then this bike would be right up there for consideration.
Bottom line: this bike isn't as 'fast' as a full-on road racing bike, the difference most notable on the climbs. First off, at 19 pounds (with pedals), it weights at least 2 pounds more than an equivalently-spec'd road bike. Unfortunately, most of this extra mass is concentrated around the wheels and the fork. On a full-on race bike with rim brakes, you can easily spec 1,500g wheels, and lighter and faster 23mm rubber. And this is for clinchers - tubular wheels are much lighter again. However, my new Giant has discs and (good) 32mm tires, which is the cause of most of the ballast.
Sure, the fat tires are more comfy on gravel, but on the gravel I frequent, 25mm tires ride just fine. I am light, and careful, and if you go fast enough, every surface 'smooths' out.
The discs are the other cause of the weight, as disc-specific wheels and forks simply have to be bulked-up relative to rim-brake equivalents. The extra stresses caused by discs, particularly on the fork and front wheel, requires this. So the fork has to be made stronger, which in addition to extra weight, means it rides with less compliance.
However, if you want an all-rounder, and need discs for descending in the wet, then a current 'cross/gravel type bike would make an excellent choice.
Great bike; if I was booted into the afterlife, and given the choice of only one bike to take (into Hell obviously..) then this bike would be right up there for consideration.
Bottom line: this bike isn't as 'fast' as a full-on road racing bike, the difference most notable on the climbs. First off, at 19 pounds (with pedals), it weights at least 2 pounds more than an equivalently-spec'd road bike. Unfortunately, most of this extra mass is concentrated around the wheels and the fork. On a full-on race bike with rim brakes, you can easily spec 1,500g wheels, and lighter and faster 23mm rubber. And this is for clinchers - tubular wheels are much lighter again. However, my new Giant has discs and (good) 32mm tires, which is the cause of most of the ballast.
Sure, the fat tires are more comfy on gravel, but on the gravel I frequent, 25mm tires ride just fine. I am light, and careful, and if you go fast enough, every surface 'smooths' out.
The discs are the other cause of the weight, as disc-specific wheels and forks simply have to be bulked-up relative to rim-brake equivalents. The extra stresses caused by discs, particularly on the fork and front wheel, requires this. So the fork has to be made stronger, which in addition to extra weight, means it rides with less compliance.
However, if you want an all-rounder, and need discs for descending in the wet, then a current 'cross/gravel type bike would make an excellent choice.
#41
Running on plenty
I have taken to calling my 2016 Fuji Tread 1.3 my 'Swiss Army bike'. They called it their adventure bike. It's been on reasonably quick group rides, commuting, solo fitness riding, and shopping trips on sealed roads, unsealed tracks and off-road bike paths of various forms. Usually with 38 tyres, but sometimes it's had 25 or 28 on if I've needed to go a little faster. If I was forced to cut it down to one, this would possibly be what is left of the collection. Thinking about a replacement thru axle frame in a slightly bigger size, as this one was always a little compromised on fit. It has worked out OK for a few years but is proving to be slightly too low in the head after all this time for longer stuff or loaded riding. These types of bikes seem to make a great all-rounder, even if someone says you can't or shouldn't. "Run what you brung" and all that. The compromises might catch you out once in a blue moon (under-geared, over-geared, too long, too relaxed) but they'll be few and far between unless you have a really specific aim.
Last edited by familyguy; 11-09-21 at 09:20 PM.
Likes For familyguy:
#43
Newbie
Thanks. I will check Spank out.
Trying to do a one wheel to ride them all--bike packing and road touring.
Trying to do a one wheel to ride them all--bike packing and road touring.