Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

700C vs 27” Crazy Question

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

700C vs 27” Crazy Question

Old 05-14-22, 02:18 PM
  #1  
Basstar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 26 Times in 14 Posts
700C vs 27” Crazy Question

I purchased a vintage bike that when stock would have had 700c x 28 tires.

The bike I purchased is configured with 27”.

The current setup works fine but my OCD mentality is considering replacing the rims, tires, and brakes to 700 C.

Also I’m thinking the smaller diameter may make the bicycle more responsive when pedaling.

Questions:

Am I overthinking the slight diameter difference and secondly will an average rider be able to notice the difference if switched?

Should I simply put it out of my mind, save my money, and keep pedaling?

Thanks
Basstar is offline  
Old 05-14-22, 02:21 PM
  #2  
repechage
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,323
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3449 Post(s)
Liked 2,800 Times in 1,974 Posts
missing parameters there.
if it works fine now, stick with it.
When you need tires, then think about it.
note that the brake pads most likely only need to drop 4mm to catch the 700c rim.
repechage is offline  
Likes For repechage:
Old 05-14-22, 02:22 PM
  #3  
ehcoplex 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,823

Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 756 Post(s)
Liked 1,535 Times in 745 Posts
Originally Posted by Basstar
I purchased a vintage bike that when stock would have had 700c x 28 tires.

The bike I purchased is configured with 27”.

The current setup works fine but my OCD mentality is considering replacing the rims, tires, and brakes to 700 C.

Also I’m thinking the smaller diameter may make the bicycle more responsive when pedaling.

Questions:

Am I overthinking the slight diameter difference and secondly will an average rider be able to notice the difference if switched?

Should I simply put it out of my mind, save my money, and keep pedaling?

Thanks
Over-thinking, maybe. Would you notice the difference? Very probably not. But...... with 700c you'll have a wider choice of tires. And it's really unlikely you'd have to change your brake set if you switch to 700c. And you might gain an extra few millimeters of clearance for wider tires (should you want to go there..).
ehcoplex is offline  
Likes For ehcoplex:
Old 05-14-22, 02:48 PM
  #4  
davester
Senior Member
 
davester's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,531

Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"

Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 926 Post(s)
Liked 1,281 Times in 482 Posts
All else being equal, there's no way you can tell the difference between the two sizes. Put it out of your mind. The only advantage to 700C is more tire choice. However, 27" Paselas are fine tires.
davester is offline  
Likes For davester:
Old 05-14-22, 02:59 PM
  #5  
DonkeyShow
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 333
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 195 Post(s)
Liked 234 Times in 141 Posts
My 27 and 700c look the same. I agree with ^
DonkeyShow is offline  
Likes For DonkeyShow:
Old 05-14-22, 03:05 PM
  #6  
Basstar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 26 Times in 14 Posts
Many Thanks

OK.

Thanks everyone.

I’m cool and will leave the bike as is. It rides great but I tend to be a worry wort from time to time.
Basstar is offline  
Old 05-14-22, 03:19 PM
  #7  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,830

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4745 Post(s)
Liked 3,861 Times in 2,510 Posts
There is a another good reason for going to 700c if you ride in the wet. More fender clearance; hence allowing bigger tires and more tread choices. (I try to buy 27" wheeled bikes as winter/city/rain bikes and set them up with 700c wheels. Now that gravel and other trends have happened, modern bikes with tons of clearance are available but for a long stretch, needing that clearance limited your options so I kept buying early '80s Japanese bikes and the like.)
79pmooney is offline  
Likes For 79pmooney:
Old 05-16-22, 03:58 PM
  #8  
bamboobike4
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 581 Times in 335 Posts
If you can tell the difference between 27" & 700c when riding:

You likely don't need our help.
bamboobike4 is offline  
Likes For bamboobike4:
Old 05-16-22, 04:24 PM
  #9  
SurferRosa
señor miembro
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 8,322

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3846 Post(s)
Liked 6,437 Times in 3,183 Posts
For me, a lot would depend on what the calipers look like. If the pads are at the top of the caliper arms, and they look kind of ugly like that, I would probably convert back to 700c. If the pads are closer to the middle part of the arm, I'd probably leave it alone.
SurferRosa is offline  
Likes For SurferRosa:
Old 05-16-22, 07:31 PM
  #10  
big chainring 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wilmette, IL
Posts: 7,318
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 746 Post(s)
Liked 718 Times in 347 Posts
I go back and forth with 27" and 700c wheels on all my bikes. Fat tires, skinny tires, sew-ups. Use them all and swap them from bike to bike. Been riding a mid 70's Raleigh Super Course with stock 27 x 1 1/4 wheels. Looking forward to see how it rides with sew-up wheels/tires.
big chainring is offline  
Likes For big chainring:
Old 05-17-22, 01:22 PM
  #11  
dddd
Ride, Wrench, Swap, Race
 
dddd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern California
Posts: 9,171

Bikes: Cheltenham-Pedersen racer, Boulder F/S Paris-Roubaix, Varsity racer, '52 Christophe, '62 Continental, '92 Merckx, '75 Limongi, '76 Presto, '72 Gitane SC, '71 Schwinn SS, etc.

Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1554 Post(s)
Liked 1,273 Times in 845 Posts
The 4mm change in pad height effects about a 10% reduction in caliper braking leverage when switching to 700c, one more detail to perhaps ponder.

It's just the opposite though if the bike has canti's, where the leverage improvement can be quite a bit more than even 20%, and where the pad-dive angle (of pad trajectory) reduces pad clearance at the tire's sidewalls while also tending to drive the pad off of the edge of the rim (toward the spokes). So setup becomes more demanding, especially when the pivot post spacing is relatively wide and/or when the rim is relatively narrow (and narrow relative to the tire width), and when the rim's braking tracks are on the short side. I used very wide Module-4 700c rims with ~26mm tires on my Trek 720, and the braking power is pretty fierce now.
dddd is online now  
Likes For dddd:
Old 05-17-22, 01:30 PM
  #12  
TugaDude
Senior Member
 
TugaDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 3,511
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 586 Post(s)
Liked 612 Times in 447 Posts
Originally Posted by Basstar
I purchased a vintage bike that when stock would have had 700c x 28 tires.

The bike I purchased is configured with 27”.

The current setup works fine but my OCD mentality is considering replacing the rims, tires, and brakes to 700 C.

Also I’m thinking the smaller diameter may make the bicycle more responsive when pedaling.

Questions:

Am I overthinking the slight diameter difference and secondly will an average rider be able to notice the difference if switched?

Should I simply put it out of my mind, save my money, and keep pedaling?

Thanks
If nothing is wrong, put it out of your mind. No, the average rider wouldn't be able to tell unless there was a significant change in the tires. It would have zero to do with the rims. On the subject of tires, 1-1/4 is about the widest available for 27" at this time. If you want plush, supple tires, then you have greater options in the 700c.
TugaDude is offline  
Likes For TugaDude:
Old 05-17-22, 01:45 PM
  #13  
bamboobike4
Banned.
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,070
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 359 Post(s)
Liked 581 Times in 335 Posts
Originally Posted by SurferRosa
For me, a lot would depend on what the calipers look like. If the pads are at the top of the caliper arms, and they look kind of ugly like that, I would probably convert back to 700c. If the pads are closer to the middle part of the arm, I'd probably leave it alone.
+1

We succumb to appearance issues in one way or another.

But on that note, there are some calipers that fit 27" just fine, and are very close to touching the tire sidewall on 700c.
This is important, because if the pads do touch the sidewall, under heavy braking you are going to have flats.
Some Suntour calipers had a very limited range and this made some wheel switching difficult.
bamboobike4 is offline  
Likes For bamboobike4:
Old 05-17-22, 05:27 PM
  #14  
Kabuki12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,404
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 863 Post(s)
Liked 2,225 Times in 1,248 Posts
I have a few bikes that run 27” tires and they are fine. I use the Pamela tires that were mentioned and they ride great.
Kabuki12 is offline  
Likes For Kabuki12:
Old 05-17-22, 09:14 PM
  #15  
SurferRosa
señor miembro
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 8,322

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3846 Post(s)
Liked 6,437 Times in 3,183 Posts
Originally Posted by Kabuki12
I use the Pamela tires and they ride great.
That's what Tommy Lee said!
SurferRosa is offline  
Likes For SurferRosa:
Old 05-17-22, 11:42 PM
  #16  
Bad Lag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: So Cal, for now
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: 1974 Bob Jackson - Nuovo Record, Brooks Pro, Clips & Straps

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times in 452 Posts
You'll have a better selection of tires in 700C than you will in 27".
Bad Lag is offline  
Likes For Bad Lag:
Old 05-18-22, 03:33 AM
  #17  
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,672

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1370 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,743 Times in 934 Posts
There is a distinct performance difference between 700c and 27". That said, I have to disagree with some of the comments or opinions of others. The 27". all things being equal, will feel somewhat sluggish when compared to the 700c offering. Why..?

Bicycle wheels, when spinning, become gyroscopes and the further the rim is away from the axle, the greater the gyroscopic effect. It is easy to understand the gyroscopic feel...

Take a bicycle wheel, any wheel. Hold it by the axle and, while keeping the wheel, more or less, vertical, tip if from side to side. Now, using the same wheel, give it a good spin and attempt to tip it from side to side. My guess is that the resistance to tipping will surprise you when the wheel is spinning. Now, double that effect, since a bicycle has two wheels, and you will know what a wheel with larger diameter rims has a more negative impact of ride feel. Also...

As others have suggested, tire selection for 27" wheels are, somewhat, limited and, in general, 27" tires and inner tubes tend to be heavier than their 700c rivals. The more weight one adds to the wheel rim/tire combination, the greater the gyroscopic effect. Hence, once again, the ride quality or feel in negatively impacted.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Likes For randyjawa:
Old 05-18-22, 03:53 AM
  #18  
Oldsteeler
Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 26

Bikes: Nishiki / Merckx / Belgium

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 9 Times in 6 Posts
You should simply put it out of your mind, save your money, and keep pedaling !
Ok, the terms 27' and/or 622 may be confusing.
But in reality it makes no difference whether 27' tubular or 622mm clincher are mounted.

Last edited by Oldsteeler; 05-18-22 at 04:00 AM.
Oldsteeler is offline  
Likes For Oldsteeler:
Old 05-18-22, 04:36 AM
  #19  
Basstar
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 77
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 26 Times in 14 Posts
Technically Yes……But

Originally Posted by randyjawa
There is a distinct performance difference between 700c and 27". That said, I have to disagree with some of the comments or opinions of others. The 27". all things being equal, will feel somewhat sluggish when compared to the 700c offering. Why..?

Bicycle wheels, when spinning, become gyroscopes and the further the rim is away from the axle, the greater the gyroscopic effect. It is easy to understand the gyroscopic feel...

Take a bicycle wheel, any wheel. Hold it by the axle and, while keeping the wheel, more or less, vertical, tip if from side to side. Now, using the same wheel, give it a good spin and attempt to tip it from side to side. My guess is that the resistance to tipping will surprise you when the wheel is spinning. Now, double that effect, since a bicycle has two wheels, and you will know what a wheel with larger diameter rims has a more negative impact of ride feel. Also...

As others have suggested, tire selection for 27" wheels are, somewhat, limited and, in general, 27" tires and inner tubes tend to be heavier than their 700c rivals. The more weight one adds to the wheel rim/tire combination, the greater the gyroscopic effect. Hence, once again, the ride quality or feel in negatively impacted.
Being the OCD over thinker that I am, this is exactly what I was thinking and my concern.

Technically I have no doubt that this is correct and in addition I would think that the larger and heavier wheel set would be a bit more sluggish to spin up from a start or when accelerating…..BUT

I’m not so certain to what extent an average rider can actually feel and tell the difference, hence my original inquiry.
Basstar is offline  
Old 05-18-22, 12:18 PM
  #20  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Lightweight wheels in 27" are certainly doable if you wanted, but you'd be replacing so many parts that buying a set of 700C wheels would still make more sense.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Likes For ThermionicScott:
Old 05-18-22, 12:28 PM
  #21  
zandoval 
Senior Member
 
zandoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,418

Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 929 Post(s)
Liked 1,595 Times in 1,021 Posts
I have four bikes configured with 27" wheels and yes tire replacement is limited but not so much as to make getting new wheels to have a broader choice of tires. I would continue as is till ya can't find new replacement tiers anymore.

It's not like your trying to find a voltage regulator for a 48 Chevy... But that's another story... Ha
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
zandoval is online now  
Likes For zandoval:
Old 05-18-22, 02:36 PM
  #22  
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,672

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1370 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,743 Times in 934 Posts
@ Basstar

Based on post #19, you suggest that the "average" rider would not notice the difference in ride quality. At best, I am an average rider and I most certainly do notice the difference in ride quality. To that add that many other forum members recommend going to alloy rims as opposed to steel hoops. Once again, the issue is the same - steel hoops weigh more than alloy ones and that extra weight does negatively impact ride quality. That said...

It can be argued that the lighter wheel does "spin up" more easily, however; the 27" wheel has a larger diameter than the 700c counter part. That would make pedaling a wee bit easier in the same fashion that a larger cog does.

I say these things out of personal experience and, as my wife of 53 years, will readily attest, I could be wrong. That said, do the wheel stationary and wheel rotating tip test that I suggested, then think about it. The first time I did the test, I was amazed at the gyroscopic effect. And, the faster you spin the wheel, the greater the effect. Try it just for fun.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Likes For randyjawa:
Old 05-18-22, 05:13 PM
  #23  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
Originally Posted by Basstar
Being the OCD over thinker that I am, this is exactly what I was thinking and my concern.

Technically I have no doubt that this is correct and in addition I would think that the larger and heavier wheel set would be a bit more sluggish to spin up from a start or when accelerating…..BUT

I’m not so certain to what extent an average rider can actually feel and tell the difference, hence my original inquiry.
Will they notice? I think people notice changes and initially respond to them, positive or negative. But then they start to deal with the change an go on to ride the bike. After a little time with the new parts, we're all back to normal.

Will they notice? Yes, at first.

Will they care? No, not after some time has gone by.
Road Fan is offline  
Likes For Road Fan:
Old 05-18-22, 05:18 PM
  #24  
Road Fan
Senior Member
 
Road Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,853

Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8

Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 654 Times in 498 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
Lightweight wheels in 27" are certainly doable if you wanted, but you'd be replacing so many parts that buying a set of 700C wheels would still make more sense.

Speaking of lightweight 27" wheels, this topic deserves it's own little place to be explored. This is one of the themes of my Rudge Aero Special rebuild.
Road Fan is offline  
Likes For Road Fan:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.