9 speed or more, relative chain wear?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,903
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,212 Posts
9 speed or more, relative chain wear?
I remember going from 7 -> 8 -> 9 speeds, and there was concern that the chain and cassettes would wear out more quickly as the cogs and chains were thinned. I'd expect similar degradation in chain and cog life from 10, 11, and 12 speeds.
Has anyone kept track of chain or cassette wear, for similar use, going from 9 speed up? Part 2 and 3, what sort of conditions were you riding in, and what chain life did you observe on the different speeds?
Has anyone kept track of chain or cassette wear, for similar use, going from 9 speed up? Part 2 and 3, what sort of conditions were you riding in, and what chain life did you observe on the different speeds?
#2
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,538
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3672 Post(s)
Liked 5,427 Times
in
2,757 Posts
#3
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times
in
130 Posts
As far as I could measure, chain durability depends mostly on the quality, and maintenance (clean and lubricated lasts a lot longer, while even with a similar maintenance regime, some higher-quality chains last longer).
In other words, to my amazement, 10 and 11-speed chains don't always last shorter than 7, or 8-speed ones.
Can't really say anything about the cassettes. A lot depends on how much time one spends on one, or just a few sprockets. Couldn't find a way to reliably measure and compare cassette wear.
In other words, to my amazement, 10 and 11-speed chains don't always last shorter than 7, or 8-speed ones.
Can't really say anything about the cassettes. A lot depends on how much time one spends on one, or just a few sprockets. Couldn't find a way to reliably measure and compare cassette wear.
Likes For Bike Gremlin:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Golden, CO and Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,837
Bikes: 2016 Fuji Tread, 1983 Trek 520
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 676 Post(s)
Liked 741 Times
in
430 Posts
My nine speed goes through chains just a tad faster than the old seven speed. Not enough to worry about for me, maybe two a year max, instead of three in two years. I haven't replaced the cassette, maybe because I keep a close eye on the chain. A friend got surprised with her first nine-speed wearing out a chain and cassette, now she checks it more often.
#5
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,986
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,809 Times
in
3,317 Posts
I went from 7 speed rears to 11 speed rears just over twelve years ago. While I think that my 7 speed chains lasted longer I can't prove it. I did wear out an 11 speed chain in a little less than 5000 miles. But the rings and cogs so far are not showing any signs of issues caused from wear.
It's not a big deal though. At least not to me. The advantages of more gears far out weighs any chain or cassette I might have to throw away. Plus, you get to be in the 21st Century, instead of smug with the delusions of vintage stuff as I was until I dared to try the new stuff.
It's not a big deal though. At least not to me. The advantages of more gears far out weighs any chain or cassette I might have to throw away. Plus, you get to be in the 21st Century, instead of smug with the delusions of vintage stuff as I was until I dared to try the new stuff.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18375 Post(s)
Liked 4,510 Times
in
3,352 Posts
I thought my old 5/6 speed freewheels used to last absolutely forever. I had troubles finding ones with 12T, and think I had one 12T sprocket wear out many years ago. I wasn't the best at keeping the chain in tip top shape, but chains and freewheels all lasted quite well.
When I went car-free a couple of years ago... and upgraded to 9s & 11s, whew!!! I started chewing up chains and cassettes right and left.
Of course, my miles went way up, and I was putting on as many miles in 1 years as I had been doing in several years earlier. Probably in about 4 years I put on as many miles as I had done the rest of my life.
I'm not quite sure what caused me to have so many problems with the transition to cassettes.
One thing. If one is pretty good at not cross-chaining a 5 speed freewheel, then the chainline is relatively straight.
Go to 11 speed, and a more flexible chain, and one is always pulling a bit to one side or another.
When I went car-free a couple of years ago... and upgraded to 9s & 11s, whew!!! I started chewing up chains and cassettes right and left.
Of course, my miles went way up, and I was putting on as many miles in 1 years as I had been doing in several years earlier. Probably in about 4 years I put on as many miles as I had done the rest of my life.
I'm not quite sure what caused me to have so many problems with the transition to cassettes.
One thing. If one is pretty good at not cross-chaining a 5 speed freewheel, then the chainline is relatively straight.
Go to 11 speed, and a more flexible chain, and one is always pulling a bit to one side or another.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,075
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,859 Times
in
2,307 Posts
I, also, have no recorded data to show but I think the modern stuff wears faster than the older and wider cogs and chains. Back ith the day before 7 speeds were the boss chains had real bearing bushings. The cog plates were thicker and I know some who say were of a harder steel (softer steels cost less to stamp and form all those shifting aids in).
All this is personal observation, stories told by various industry members and some basic design principles. Andy
All this is personal observation, stories told by various industry members and some basic design principles. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,903
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,212 Posts
Likes For pdlamb:
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,903
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,212 Posts
I, also, have no recorded data to show but I think the modern stuff wears faster than the older and wider cogs and chains. Back ith the day before 7 speeds were the boss chains had real bearing bushings. The cog plates were thicker and I know some who say were of a harder steel (softer steels cost less to stamp and form all those shifting aids in).
#10
Full Member
The newer chains 10/11/12 speed may be narrower but they are actually designed for a wider deflection angle because of the width of the cassette.
I read a technical article a while ago and a SRAM tech stated that, while it's not ideal to cross chain, it is miles better in terms of longevity than the 7/8/9 Speed.
I read a technical article a while ago and a SRAM tech stated that, while it's not ideal to cross chain, it is miles better in terms of longevity than the 7/8/9 Speed.