Forged vs CNC milled chainrings. Which last longer?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times
in
315 Posts
Forged vs CNC milled chainrings. Which last longer?
My buddy wore out a beautiful Absolute Black CNC milled black anodized big chainring in just a little over a year. He might have ridden 4,000 miles in that time frame. I would have thought it would have lasted longer.
I read about the Praxis forged and anodized rings and their advertising copy claims they last much longer. I’m wanting to test this out on some NOS Ultegra 6650 crank arms I bought. I was going to buy a 52/36 mid compact set and try them out.
Just curious what durability report folks are getting from their Absolute Black or Praxis replacement chainrings.
‘’Also, if anyone knows where I could obtain some (in stock) 9200 Dura Ace chain rings could you share your vendor?”
I read about the Praxis forged and anodized rings and their advertising copy claims they last much longer. I’m wanting to test this out on some NOS Ultegra 6650 crank arms I bought. I was going to buy a 52/36 mid compact set and try them out.
Just curious what durability report folks are getting from their Absolute Black or Praxis replacement chainrings.
‘’Also, if anyone knows where I could obtain some (in stock) 9200 Dura Ace chain rings could you share your vendor?”
#2
Senior Member
I recently replaced a pair of praxis rings at barely 10.000 mi. The little one was optically worn but worked OK. The big one may have have had some more miles in it, but a pair of fresh 5 arm Shimano rings, that is also forged, was cheap enough to warrant early replacement. I believe forging is far superior to milling and turning. Cheaper in large volume and last longer. Sadly steel rings are not common.
Likes For Racing Dan:
#3
Banned
Forging will make for stronger parts but also more expensive to buy. CNC is a very inexpensive process and one seldom knows what materials is used. Often there is a statement as to the use of "aircraft grade" aluminum but there are many types and hardness grades and this is seldom mentioned. Marketing terms like "hard anodized" are used but it really means nothing.
#4
should be more popular
I would pick forged as it should be longer lasting if done well.
Forging takes quite an initial investment and large scale production to be viable, whereas anyone can CNC on a small scale.
Forging takes quite an initial investment and large scale production to be viable, whereas anyone can CNC on a small scale.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
Doesn't matter how it's made, what makes the difference is what's it made out of. I would imagine forging would help any type of material last a little longer but the difference in material hardness found in different alloys is probably greater. Anodizing probably helps too.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
I've got a set of Praxis 50/34 rings with about 17.500 km on them and they still look and work fine. Have also a set of 52/36 with a bit under 4000km in pretty great condition.
Likes For Branko D:
#7
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Do you know that your buddy replaced the rings because they were actually worn or is it that he just thought they were worn?
Likes For Iride01:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,079
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1397 Post(s)
Liked 1,876 Times
in
1,079 Posts
often these statements might be referring to 7000 series aluminum (compared to a lesser grade) - but even these grades of better aluminum alloys won't find their way onto commercial or military aircraft
my guess is most are not aware of many true grades of 'aircraft aluminum' - and even less have come in contact with the materials ... raise your hand if you are familiar with Waspaloy ... etc
Likes For kyle13:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,678
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 581 Times
in
409 Posts
Agree, forging greatly increases the strength to weight ratio, anodizing does not but it does allow color dyeing and helps with corrosion.
Likes For easyupbug:
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times
in
315 Posts
I wondered if anyone would follow up and ask that. He took the advice of the LBS mechanic on it. Honestly, I was a bit suspicious and thought they were probably OK. But my friend is not the kind of guy who replaces his chain more than every 2 2 years or so. He may have run the chainrings down by having a chain way past its prime?
#12
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,985
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,808 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Chains can wear out pretty quick if ... IMO... the person using them is a high power low cadence cyclist and/or rides in the extreme cross-chained positions for quite a lot of time. And excessively worn out chains will wear the cogs and rings faster.
I use to ride use the large/large combo on my previous bike with 11 speed 105. On it, I wore my first chain out quite fast with only 4000 miles on it. I didn't think I was in the large/large but just less than a minute on various climbs along my route. But none the less the chain was over .75% worn in what for me was a short time for chains. Didn't require a cog or ring change, but that might come later on the next changing of chains.
With my new bike and having Di2 using synchronized shifting, I'm never in the two biggest tooth count cogs on the rear so I'm never in the Large/Large or even the Small/Small as Di2 won't let that happen the way I have it set up. And I have noticed that I don't have any measurable wear on my chain after 5000 miles. So maybe the people screaming don't cross chain your bike or it'll blow up had the right idea, but they just didn't know the correct result or how to say it without being so offensive.
But still the above is just one experience and very anecdotal at best. Maybe more time will tell something better.
I use to ride use the large/large combo on my previous bike with 11 speed 105. On it, I wore my first chain out quite fast with only 4000 miles on it. I didn't think I was in the large/large but just less than a minute on various climbs along my route. But none the less the chain was over .75% worn in what for me was a short time for chains. Didn't require a cog or ring change, but that might come later on the next changing of chains.
With my new bike and having Di2 using synchronized shifting, I'm never in the two biggest tooth count cogs on the rear so I'm never in the Large/Large or even the Small/Small as Di2 won't let that happen the way I have it set up. And I have noticed that I don't have any measurable wear on my chain after 5000 miles. So maybe the people screaming don't cross chain your bike or it'll blow up had the right idea, but they just didn't know the correct result or how to say it without being so offensive.
But still the above is just one experience and very anecdotal at best. Maybe more time will tell something better.