Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Disagreements

Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Disagreements

Old 11-05-17, 02:06 PM
  #1  
Diamond
Rain Rider
Thread Starter
 
Diamond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 108

Bikes: Breezer Beltway (commuter), Co-Motion Deschutes, Specialized Tarmac, Salsa La Cruz (rain bike), Co-Motion Tandem

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Disagreements

As I read the debates on double versus triple chain rings in my last post it makes me think of how divergent our opinions are. Mostly this is fine, if we don't think our answer is right and everyone should be doing what we do, and, if we are polite, then I generally enjoy the different perspectives. I've been cycling for years but I'm still open to learning. For fun though I thought I'd put together a list of things we disagree on:

  • Wheels Size - 700C, 26", 650B this debate comes up again and again
  • Disc Brakes - What everyone should tour with or unnecessary and hard to get spare parts in remote areas?
  • STI/Brake Shifter - The only way to shift or completely unreliable and totally inappropriate for tour
  • Triple versus Double Crank - Are triple crank DoDo birds on the way out or the only crank choice for touring?
  • Wide Tires - Is the move to wider tires at lower pressure the right answer for touring or just the latest trend?
  • Panniers - Ortlieb or Arkel? Which is best?

Without debating the above, any other hot topics I'm missing?


EDIT/UPDATE - Wow great input everyone! It is really interesting to see the range of things we disagree on. I think it would make an interesting adventure cycling article.

Last edited by Diamond; 11-05-17 at 04:58 PM.
Diamond is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 02:16 PM
  #2  
raybo
Bike touring webrarian
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,068

Bikes: I tour on a Waterford Adventurecycle. It is a fabulous touring bike.

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 119 Post(s)
Liked 91 Times in 50 Posts
Clipless pedals vs toe clips vs flats.

I use clipless pedals and really like them.
raybo is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 02:21 PM
  #3  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,505

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10872 Post(s)
Liked 7,354 Times in 4,125 Posts
Traditional rack setup vs rackless bikepacking.


As with most everything else, there is really no right or wrong way.
mstateglfr is online now  
Old 11-05-17, 02:21 PM
  #4  
willibrord
Senior Member
 
willibrord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Way Out West
Posts: 489

Bikes: carbon bamboo composite is the best

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 540 Post(s)
Liked 50 Times in 36 Posts
Tubes vs tubeless
drop bars vs flat
clipless pedals vs platform
solar panels vs hub dynamo
panniers vs frame bags
steel vs modern materials
schrader vs presta
willibrord is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 02:32 PM
  #5  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,504

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 139 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5680 Post(s)
Liked 2,386 Times in 1,320 Posts
You missed a bit on the panniers question. It's not so much about brand (anymore than anything else is) but about whether they're necessary, how large, and using front panniers.

IMO- besides the usual personal bias issues, we have plenty of debate about touring because it encompasses such a wide spectrum.

We have experienced light tourists, traveling in style and using lodging, folks packing more and camping at least some of the time, folks like myself that mix lodging and camping, but don't cook on the road, other than some coffee or other simple stuff.

Then there's touring in the "civilized" world where spare parts can be managed easily, either bought locally or using the excellent logistics available, vs. touring in more remote areas where one has to be nearly 100% self reliant, and cannot count on getting service parts easily.

So, I expect disagreement, and feel it's part of the forum, and take the attitude that I'm free to ignore any post I don't like.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 03:04 PM
  #6  
Tourist in MSN
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 11,093

Bikes: 1961 Ideor, 1966 Perfekt 3 Speed AB Hub, 1994 Bridgestone MB-6, 2006 Airnimal Joey, 2009 Thorn Sherpa, 2013 Thorn Nomad MkII, 2015 VO Pass Hunter, 2017 Lynskey Backroad, 2017 Raleigh Gran Prix, 1980s Bianchi Mixte on a trainer. Others are now gone.

Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3416 Post(s)
Liked 1,434 Times in 1,119 Posts
The big disagreement is how much weight to carry. Some of the ultra light packers are downright evangelical about it. I have seen several groups of riders seriously dehydrated by the time they get to a campground because they did not want to carry very much weight in water. Once I gave a rider half of one of my water bottles because I was not sure he would make the next half mile to where there was a water supply. On the other extreme, at one time on one of my trips I had two weeks of food on my bike along with the gear I would need for sub-freezing weather, that was a very heavy bike.

Derailleur vs IGH (Rohloff, Shimano, etc.) vs a gearing system built into the frame (pinion). And of course the single speed folks. (Since I have a Rohloff touring bike and two derailleur touring bikes, I chuckle at these arguments as they usually are arguing about meaningless points.)

For the non-derailleur bikes, chain or belt?

There is a small group of front-only pannier proponents.

Some believe that GPS is totally unnecessary if you can read a map, others won't leave home without one.

How many spokes do you really need?

Fenders or not?

Leather seat or not?

How many sprockets do you really need on a cassette (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, are they up to 12 yet?).
Tourist in MSN is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 03:34 PM
  #7  
robow
Senior Member
 
robow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,857
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 595 Post(s)
Liked 277 Times in 188 Posts
As long disagreements don't become personal, it can all be very entertaining as well as educational. I really feel this forum above all others remains quite civil most of the time. As you glean through the debate, there is a wealth of knowledge to be gained here, which far exceeds what is available at most any bike shop. That being said, I have a friend whom I call the Touring Queen because she has crossed the U.S. a dozen or more times in every conceivable direction as well as traveled abroad and the one time she offered sound advice on this forum, she was emphatically told that she was doing it all wrong : )
robow is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 04:14 PM
  #8  
mev
bicycle tourist
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Posts: 2,267

Bikes: Trek 520, Lightfoot Ranger, Trek 4500

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 457 Post(s)
Liked 242 Times in 167 Posts
Probably something in the shelter category, e.g. tents, hammocks, tarps, etc.

Also the topic of stealth camping and related opinions about it...

As far as the disagreements go, I see a bunch of them as differences in both perspective and style. In my opinion, there isn't necessarily just one way to tour, nor one ideal set of equipment. There are some choices that may not best suited for some riders but that often sorts itself out fairly quickly. I often learn something when people describe rationale *behind* their choices and so appreciate the discussion.
mev is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 04:16 PM
  #9  
J.Higgins 
2-Wheeled Fool
 
J.Higgins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,486

Bikes: Surly Ogre, Brompton

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1385 Post(s)
Liked 677 Times in 457 Posts
Originally Posted by robow
I really feel this forum above all others remains quite civil most of the time.
Until Squeezebox pops in with a sock, and its like chickens fighting over a grasshopper.
J.Higgins is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 05:03 PM
  #10  
ClydesterD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 179

Bikes: '97 W'ford X-11, '00 W'ford RS-22; '06 VO Rando; '07 Surly Cross-Check; '08 VO Pass Hunter; Riv Homer Hilsen; '09 Riv Sam Hillborne; '09 VO Polyvalent; '11 Rich Adams; '13 VO Campeur; '17 Riv Cheviot

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Threaded versus threadless. Threadless is the only way to go, unless of course it's not.
ClydesterD is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 05:27 PM
  #11  
jamawani 
Hooked on Touring
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 2,854
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 91 Posts
Eastbound vs westbound.
jamawani is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 06:43 PM
  #12  
HTupolev
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,261
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1971 Post(s)
Liked 1,297 Times in 629 Posts
Originally Posted by Diamond
It is really interesting to see the range of things we disagree on.
No it isn't.
HTupolev is online now  
Old 11-05-17, 07:55 PM
  #13  
Doug64
Senior Member
 
Doug64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,481
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1181 Post(s)
Liked 822 Times in 430 Posts
Originally Posted by HTupolev
No it isn't.
What is interesting and what is not
Doug64 is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 09:27 PM
  #14  
Brian25
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 720

Bikes: Road, mountain and track bikes and tandems.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 18 Times in 15 Posts
I thin that you are going to start word war three of bike touring.
Brian25 is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 09:34 PM
  #15  
bwgride
Slow Rider
 
bwgride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,043
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Helmet vs no helmet
bwgride is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 10:17 PM
  #16  
linus
Crawler
 
linus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: OH~ CANADA
Posts: 1,410
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 211 Post(s)
Liked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Cable vs Electronic shifting

or

Etap vs. DI2
linus is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 10:24 PM
  #17  
thumpism 
Bikes are okay, I guess.
 
thumpism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 9,128

Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT

Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,445 Times in 1,557 Posts
Solo versus otherwise.
Riding at night versus not.
Accordion music or not.
Shirts versus skins.
Fuzzy dice versus hula girls.
thumpism is offline  
Old 11-05-17, 11:14 PM
  #18  
saddlesores
Senior Member
 
saddlesores's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Thailand..........Nakhon Nowhere
Posts: 3,646

Bikes: inferior steel....and....noodly aluminium

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1050 Post(s)
Liked 337 Times in 227 Posts
godzilla vs. megalon!



.....awright kiddies, raise yer hand if ya played hookie an' seen this'n at the pitcher house...
saddlesores is offline  
Old 11-06-17, 12:02 AM
  #19  
gauvins
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: QC Canada
Posts: 1,942

Bikes: Custom built LHT & Troll

Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 824 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 99 Posts
There is a difference between different preferences and disagreements over "facts". I am under the impression that in this forum, most disagreements reflect differences in preferences. As such they can provide the stimulus for a thoughtful conversation that can change the way we think about an issue.

I can think, as of now, about one disagreement based on facts -- should we or should we not clean chains in order to get more mileage out of them. Assuming the we all prefer more miles/kms, the debate should focus on "is it worth the effort". But cost/benefit ratio notwithstanding, we are confronted with diametrically different advices, coming from credible sources, some saying that cleaning chains (with solvent) should be avoided (Shimano's position), others saying that we should (Wipperman, Sheldon Brown).

The "there is no right or wrong answer" applies to differences in preferences, so these "disagreements" will go on forever. The situation is different when disagreements are rooted in objective facts.

Last edited by gauvins; 11-06-17 at 06:42 AM.
gauvins is offline  
Old 11-06-17, 06:18 AM
  #20  
indyfabz
Senior Member
 
indyfabz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 38,963
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18269 Post(s)
Liked 15,185 Times in 7,172 Posts
Are red bikes really faster?
indyfabz is online now  
Old 11-06-17, 07:06 AM
  #21  
herbincj
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SWMo
Posts: 17
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by indyfabz
Are red bikes really faster?
Of course! Just look at them.
herbincj is offline  
Old 11-06-17, 07:09 AM
  #22  
checoles
Senior Member
 
checoles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Hull, England
Posts: 253

Bikes: Tern Link A7 Folding Bike, Marin Gestalt 2019

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 73 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Interesting thread. If, you go back to the original post and clean it up, stick in links to previous threads relating to the said subjects/debates, it could be made into a sticky for future first-comers to navigate through.
checoles is offline  
Old 11-06-17, 09:08 AM
  #23  
Leebo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 5,721

Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Liked 111 Times in 66 Posts
I disagree with your disagreements list.
Leebo is offline  
Old 11-06-17, 09:33 AM
  #24  
alan s 
Senior Member
 
alan s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 6,977
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1496 Post(s)
Liked 189 Times in 128 Posts
Lycra or not. Real cyclists wear Lycra.
alan s is offline  
Old 11-06-17, 11:35 AM
  #25  
pdlamb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,826

Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2568 Post(s)
Liked 1,889 Times in 1,185 Posts
Originally Posted by thumpism
Riding at night versus not.

I don't remember a thread like this. Touring, I go to bed with the sun, but some other times when I'm not as tired, night riding can be fun.
pdlamb is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.