MIPS vs Fit
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,847
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6939 Post(s)
Liked 10,944 Times
in
4,677 Posts
Funny, I used to use a Giro Synthe MIPS before I switched to a Kask Mojito X for a better fit. It was the Kask Mojito that saved my skull when I went over the handlebars and crashed at 25mph. Helmet cracked in 5 places and I road home with a minor concussion and some road rash. I doubt the Giro could've done better. Replaced my Kask with a new one as soon a I got home.
A poorly fitting helmet is certainly worse than a proper fitting one. As far as the safety of a non-MIPS helmet, I'll vouch for the Kask on this one.
A poorly fitting helmet is certainly worse than a proper fitting one. As far as the safety of a non-MIPS helmet, I'll vouch for the Kask on this one.
#27
Member
Again, you're telling me that just because a helmet has fancy technology, if it doesn't fit well, it's going to protect my head than a helmet that fits properly? I would think the poor fitment negates the fancy technology.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,847
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6939 Post(s)
Liked 10,944 Times
in
4,677 Posts
You're still engaging in pure speculation, since (1) a properly-fitting MIPS helmet might've given even better protection, and/or (2) even the poorly-fitting Giro might've given even better protection. There's a possibility that either (1) or (2) might have prevented your minor concussion. The only way to know for sure is for you to wear the GIRO and perform the crash all over again.
Last edited by Koyote; 12-24-21 at 08:22 AM.
#29
Member
This is your first mention of of the Giro fitting poorly. But you're still engaging in pure speculation, since (1) a properly-fitting MIPS helmet might've given better protection, and/or (2) even the poorly-fitting Giro might've given better protection. The only way to know for sure is for you to wear the GIRO and perform the crash all over again.
My original point was to say that it's more important to wear the helmet that fits and is comfortable. The OP asked about a specific helmet and I provided my experience of that helmet. If Kask (or any brand) made a helmet with MIPS that fit comfortably, I'd wear it. As it is, I'm quite happy with my Mojito.
Last edited by sdimattia; 12-24-21 at 08:33 AM.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,847
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6939 Post(s)
Liked 10,944 Times
in
4,677 Posts
If helmets are considered to be safety equipment, then in my personal experience and anecdotally, poorly fitting equipment is more hazardous than it is beneficial. It doesn't matter if it's got the best technology and safety features if they can't be employed properly because of poor fitment.
My original point was to say that it's more important to wear the helmet that fits and is comfortable. The OP asked about a specific helmet and I provided my experience of that helmet. If Kask (or any brand) made a helmet with MIPS that fit comfortably, I'd wear it. As it is, I'm quite happy with my Mojito.
My original point was to say that it's more important to wear the helmet that fits and is comfortable. The OP asked about a specific helmet and I provided my experience of that helmet. If Kask (or any brand) made a helmet with MIPS that fit comfortably, I'd wear it. As it is, I'm quite happy with my Mojito.
#31
Member
Unless you have something useful to contribute to the OP's thread, then I'm not interested in arguing with you over opinions.
OP, wear the helmet that fits you best, MIPS or non MIPS. I've had good experiences with Kask and it's my personal opinion that fitment is more important than fancy technologies. That being said, I'd love to see Kask develop a MIPS version but for now, I'll stick with my Mojito X.
#32
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
OT, but I'm curious how a brand signs up for MIPS? Does the MIPS company make the special liners to spec and sell them at a basic unit cost, or just provide a blueprint of sorts and charges a licensing fee? I can imagine why Bontrager wanted to create their own alternative and keep the fees as their own.
#33
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,698 Times
in
1,026 Posts
OT, but I'm curious how a brand signs up for MIPS? Does the MIPS company make the special liners to spec and sell them at a basic unit cost, or just provide a blueprint of sorts and charges a licensing fee? I can imagine why Bontrager wanted to create their own alternative and keep the fees as their own.
Also, Singletracks.com quoted MIPS’ Max Strandwitz on the question of licensing:
“Yes we do charge a license fee to brands for the right to use our brand, technology, patents, and marketing material. Reasons for brands developing their own systems is difficult for us to answer. Indeed if they do that they do not need to pay a licensee fee but instead they need to pay for an organization that can replicate what we are doing in terms of development of the technique, implementing in helmets for mass production, marketing, research etc. Bear in mind that we have now done more than 23,000 tests and it took us 20 years to become profitable, so it is not that easy.”
https://www.singletracks.com/mtb-gea...han-different/
#34
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,605
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10947 Post(s)
Liked 7,473 Times
in
4,181 Posts
10% improvement in a single type of test is different from 10% safer overall.
Just worth clarifying.
Just worth clarifying.
#35
well hello there
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Point Loma, CA
Posts: 15,430
Bikes: Bill Holland (Road-Ti), Fuji Roubaix Pro (back-up), Bike Friday (folder), Co-Motion (tandem) & Trek 750 (hybrid)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 503 Post(s)
Liked 336 Times
in
206 Posts
Lots of MIPS out there. Just find one that fits.
__________________
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
.
.
Two wheels good. Four wheels bad.
Likes For Nachoman:
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
They all have to pass a safety standard but by how much and for which part of the standard is not known, so everything is just speculation.
MIPs doesn't necessarily mean it is a safer helmet. For example I am sure a motorcycle helmet without MIPs is far safer than a cycling helmet with it.
MIPs doesn't necessarily mean it is a safer helmet. For example I am sure a motorcycle helmet without MIPs is far safer than a cycling helmet with it.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,847
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6939 Post(s)
Liked 10,944 Times
in
4,677 Posts
#38
Super Modest
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 23,461
Bikes: Trek Emonda, Giant Propel, Colnago V3, Co-Motion Supremo, ICE VTX WC
Mentioned: 107 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10961 Post(s)
Liked 4,616 Times
in
2,120 Posts
Likes For Trsnrtr:
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
Some will exceed that standard by more than others wether they have MIPS or not, but that data is not given to the consumer.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,847
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6939 Post(s)
Liked 10,944 Times
in
4,677 Posts
They all have to pass a safety standard but by how much and for which part of the standard is not known, so everything is just speculation.
MIPs doesn't necessarily mean it is a safer helmet. For example I am sure a motorcycle helmet without MIPs is far safer than a cycling helmet with it.
MIPs doesn't necessarily mean it is a safer helmet. For example I am sure a motorcycle helmet without MIPs is far safer than a cycling helmet with it.
#41
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,428
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,698 Times
in
1,026 Posts
To further illustrate with an example, let’s say Helmet A may record a peak acceleration value of 180g on the flat anvil drop test which is performed at 20ft/sec velocity. That’s well under the maximum PA allowed, but it is not again tested at higher velocities to see if it continues to perform within range.
Testing is pass or fail, not testing to failure. You can learn about testing requirements on the CPSC government website: https://www.cpsc.gov/Business--Manuf...icycle-Helmets
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,675
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 567 Post(s)
Liked 563 Times
in
405 Posts
I assume the term "fit" above means the helmet feels snug with no space between the pads and the cyclists head and the helmet can not slide on the head with the chin strap centered under the chin, fitting snugly so that opening the mouth wide the helmet pulls down on the head.
MIPS will help in a crash with a good fitting helmet and a lesser fit will interfere to some degree with the MIPS advantage as it would with a helmet with simple padding protection.
My three daughters, granddaughter and me with a 7 3/4 hat size and rectangular head can get a MIPS to fit.
MIPS will help in a crash with a good fitting helmet and a lesser fit will interfere to some degree with the MIPS advantage as it would with a helmet with simple padding protection.
My three daughters, granddaughter and me with a 7 3/4 hat size and rectangular head can get a MIPS to fit.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
Santa brought me a new Lazer G1 mips to replace the one that saved my head in a crash recently. The trauma doctors could not believe that I did not have a concussion given the extent of other damages to my body. The helmet was cracked and dented at the occipital bone area, so, one might surmise MIPS might have decreased the rate of deceleration. N = 1. Sold here. Besides, the ventilation and comfort on that helmet is fantastic.
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,750
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4366 Post(s)
Liked 3,001 Times
in
1,854 Posts
As other have said, there are too many MIPS models out there for one to plausibly claim that none of them are good fits.
I went down pretty hard on a Giro Synthe MIPS helmet last year, dented the helmet pretty good, and walked away without any adverse head injuries. (A bunch of road rash, yeah). Would a non-MIPS helmet have protected me as well? I haven't done that test, but something like 90% of the helmets top-rated for safety by Va Tech are MIPS or Wavecell. At all price points. I'd have to have a damned good reason to wear a non-MIPS helmet, and I can't think of one.
So now I have two MIPS helmets. With Giro's generous crash-replacement deal, I replaced the Synthe with a Vanquish MIPS and also I have $50 helmet very highly rated by Va Tech - the Specialized Align.
I went down pretty hard on a Giro Synthe MIPS helmet last year, dented the helmet pretty good, and walked away without any adverse head injuries. (A bunch of road rash, yeah). Would a non-MIPS helmet have protected me as well? I haven't done that test, but something like 90% of the helmets top-rated for safety by Va Tech are MIPS or Wavecell. At all price points. I'd have to have a damned good reason to wear a non-MIPS helmet, and I can't think of one.
So now I have two MIPS helmets. With Giro's generous crash-replacement deal, I replaced the Synthe with a Vanquish MIPS and also I have $50 helmet very highly rated by Va Tech - the Specialized Align.
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,847
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6939 Post(s)
Liked 10,944 Times
in
4,677 Posts
As other have said, there are too many MIPS models out there for one to plausibly claim that none of them are good fits.
I went down pretty hard on a Giro Synthe MIPS helmet last year, dented the helmet pretty good, and walked away without any adverse head injuries. (A bunch of road rash, yeah). Would a non-MIPS helmet have protected me as well? I haven't done that test, but something like 90% of the helmets top-rated for safety by Va Tech are MIPS or Wavecell. At all price points. I'd have to have a damned good reason to wear a non-MIPS helmet, and I can't think of one.
So now I have two MIPS helmets. With Giro's generous crash-replacement deal, I replaced the Synthe with a Vanquish MIPS and also I have $50 helmet very highly rated by Va Tech - the Specialized Align.
I went down pretty hard on a Giro Synthe MIPS helmet last year, dented the helmet pretty good, and walked away without any adverse head injuries. (A bunch of road rash, yeah). Would a non-MIPS helmet have protected me as well? I haven't done that test, but something like 90% of the helmets top-rated for safety by Va Tech are MIPS or Wavecell. At all price points. I'd have to have a damned good reason to wear a non-MIPS helmet, and I can't think of one.
So now I have two MIPS helmets. With Giro's generous crash-replacement deal, I replaced the Synthe with a Vanquish MIPS and also I have $50 helmet very highly rated by Va Tech - the Specialized Align.
#46
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
Maybe we need a separate thread to ask if anyone has crashed, hit their head while wearing a non-Mips helmet, and walked away without injuries.
#47
Senior Member
With all that time sitting in hospitals and being an engineer, I started looking into the whole thing. This is just before MIPS was scheduled to come up and I wound up talking to some engineers I know involved in helmet design as well as corresponding with POC and through them, with MIPS engineering. Bottom line is that as acceleration on the brain increases, you eventually reach the knee in the curve where damage to the brain takes off and dramatically increases with acceleration experience by the brain. Any bit you can back down this curve pays large dividends in reducing damage. If you can get it below the knee in the curve, you can almost eliminate damage thanks to the anatomy of the head.
With MIPS technology, and with most of the others, there is going to be little to no downside in having it with respect to injury. Testing helmets in actual practice is sort of like testing firecrackers, and you're not likely to get a lot of volunteers willing to crash for the sack of science. As my son's neurosurgeon put it when I asked him about damage - "It's difficult to fully ascertain the extent of the damage without an autopsy which are generally not in the best interest of the patient."
Anyhow, having been through this, I'd strongly suggest doing anything one can to minimize the accelerations the brain experiences. It's just not worth betting against a simple technology like MIPS that has little chance to do additional harm and potential to be really beneficial especially when it just isn't a price point issue any longer.
OT, but I'm curious how a brand signs up for MIPS? Does the MIPS company make the special liners to spec and sell them at a basic unit cost, or just provide a blueprint of sorts and charges a licensing fee? I can imagine why Bontrager wanted to create their own alternative and keep the fees as their own.
J.
Likes For JohnJ80:
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,847
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6939 Post(s)
Liked 10,944 Times
in
4,677 Posts
#49
Full Member
First gen (I think) of Giro helmets with MIPS were less comfortable than the non-MIPS models (I had a Synthe and Foray), but I have two Aegiles helmets now that are far more comfortable, and that's at the low-mid range price point. Earlier in the year I had a crash on a solo ride wearing a MIPS helmet that resulted in a minor concussion I wasn't totally aware of until I got home. I would not ride without one now because the brain is mostly non-repairable.
#50
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts