Handlebar Upgrade. Carbon vs Alum
#1
beeballman
Thread Starter
Handlebar Upgrade. Carbon vs Alum
So I am looking at upgrading my current Oval Alum handle bars to something more aero. Almost everything on my Fuji has been upgraded. I am looking at the Easton SL70 Aero Carbon or The Zipp SR70 Aero Carbon, but I also found The Bontrager Aero VR-CF Road Bar, the later looks promising just a little heavier than the first two choices but also 1/3 the price because they are not carbon. Leaning to the Bontrager because it has room to mount my Quad Lock mount. Thoughts? Are Carbon bars worth the money?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,381
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4388 Post(s)
Liked 4,828 Times
in
2,984 Posts
Well carbon bars do have some inherent, but ultimately minor advantages. Lower weight, better vibration damping and they don't corrode with sweat. Are they worth the money? That's your call entirely. But if I was "upgrading" my bars I would choose carbon.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Denver area (Ken Caryl Valley)
Posts: 1,802
Bikes: 2022 Moots RCS, 2014 BMC SLR01 DA Mech, 2020 Santa Cruz Stigmata, Ibis Ripmo, Trek Top Fuel, Specialized Levo SL, Norco Bigfoot VLT
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 464 Post(s)
Liked 182 Times
in
118 Posts
I use carbon bars (and aero ones) for comfort...weight and aero are not considerations but they will be slight advantages. Go for either one. Over hours, they are more comfortable than any alloy bar I have tried...road and gravel and even MTB. I really like the Zipp with its short reach and they are very comfy.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
So I am looking at upgrading my current Oval Alum handle bars to something more aero. Almost everything on my Fuji has been upgraded. I am looking at the Easton SL70 Aero Carbon or The Zipp SR70 Aero Carbon, but I also found The Bontrager Aero VR-CF Road Bar, the later looks promising just a little heavier than the first two choices but also 1/3 the price because they are not carbon. Leaning to the Bontrager because it has room to mount my Quad Lock mount. Thoughts? Are Carbon bars worth the money?
Likes For Litespud:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,516
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20808 Post(s)
Liked 9,450 Times
in
4,668 Posts
If you've upgraded everything else, buying aluminum bars at this point will probably mean that you'll just end up buying a set of carbon bars sooner rather than later, anyway. Just get them now.
Personally, I like the feel of carbon bars, and I've had them on each of my last three primary bikes. I've got the Easton EC70 Aero on my Cervelo. Nice bars, I really like them - feel nice, look sharp. On my old Domane, I used to have some carbon Bontragers - the VR-CF shape is nice, too (the Easton's are similar and also have a subtle flare).
Personally, I like the feel of carbon bars, and I've had them on each of my last three primary bikes. I've got the Easton EC70 Aero on my Cervelo. Nice bars, I really like them - feel nice, look sharp. On my old Domane, I used to have some carbon Bontragers - the VR-CF shape is nice, too (the Easton's are similar and also have a subtle flare).
Likes For WhyFi:
#6
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,641
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1939 Post(s)
Liked 1,463 Times
in
1,012 Posts
Carbon bars are a nice upgrade; weight reduction (< 200 g) and vibration attenuation. Geometry (width, reach, drop) and comfort (same factors plus bar cross-section) are key considerations. "Aero" handlebars (to the extent that they lower CdA or otherwise improve aerodynamics) may not be as comfortable as ovalized tops.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
The vibration thing has been real in my experience with carbon bars. Noticable, not huge. Appreciated after a couple hours. 🙂
Likes For RGMN:
#9
Senior Member
Before choosing between alloy vs carbon, you should consider shape carefully. Me, I much prefer an all round bar made from a slim tube, and thick tape. I too have a fuji and very much dislike the bar it came with, - too thick on the top and the drop bend back is much too short. Wouldn't help me one bit replacing it with carbon if that was the only difference.
On a side note id suggest that the possible flex in a carbon bar is much greater than what is achievable in alloy. Alloy is susceptible to fatigue induced by repeated bending. Thus they are make very stiff to prevent it. Same with alloy frames. Carbon can be made to be flexible with out the risk of them breaking from fatigue. For that reason I think carbon have some advantages that may be realised in a proper design. Then again, at the usual price point of carbon bar other options in suspension stems emerges too.
On a side note id suggest that the possible flex in a carbon bar is much greater than what is achievable in alloy. Alloy is susceptible to fatigue induced by repeated bending. Thus they are make very stiff to prevent it. Same with alloy frames. Carbon can be made to be flexible with out the risk of them breaking from fatigue. For that reason I think carbon have some advantages that may be realised in a proper design. Then again, at the usual price point of carbon bar other options in suspension stems emerges too.
#11
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
I vote carbon if only for that reason. Not a free ride to abuse or neglect bar tape changes and cleaning, but less risk there.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,862
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3224 Post(s)
Liked 2,056 Times
in
1,174 Posts
Bloody expensive handlebars, carbon is. Is it worth $300, vs. $50 for aluminum ?, not in my world.
Likes For Steve B.:
#13
-------
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Tejas
Posts: 12,795
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9652 Post(s)
Liked 6,364 Times
in
3,504 Posts
The aluminum stem may be subject to galvanic corrosion, but that should be easily observed. Of course, you can isolate the two which would reduce the likelihood.
I have not seen any problem in the year since switching to carbon bars.
Now, the real issue is how do I explain to my wife that these are essential despite the cost: https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...xoC4-IQAvD_BwE
Likes For Mojo31:
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
More aero would be an out front mount with dedicated bike computer instead of a big smartphone sitting on top of a quad lock...
#15
beeballman
Thread Starter
Less wind resistance than a Karoo 2 or Wahoo device out front they are double the the thickness of my phone hitting the wind. Plus Chris Frome uses one when training, not during races.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,355
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,946 Times
in
1,906 Posts
Everything you might want to know: https://www.corrosionpedia.com/galva...olymers/2/1556
The aluminum stem may be subject to galvanic corrosion, but that should be easily observed. Of course, you can isolate the two which would reduce the likelihood.
I have not seen any problem in the year since switching to carbon bars.
Now, the real issue is how do I explain to my wife that these are essential despite the cost: https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...xoC4-IQAvD_BwE
The aluminum stem may be subject to galvanic corrosion, but that should be easily observed. Of course, you can isolate the two which would reduce the likelihood.
I have not seen any problem in the year since switching to carbon bars.
Now, the real issue is how do I explain to my wife that these are essential despite the cost: https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/e...xoC4-IQAvD_BwE
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#17
-------
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Tejas
Posts: 12,795
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9652 Post(s)
Liked 6,364 Times
in
3,504 Posts
Likes For Mojo31:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 7,355
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,946 Times
in
1,906 Posts
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Australia
Posts: 823
Bikes: 2002 Trek 5200 (US POSTAL), 2020 Canyon Aeroad SL
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 313 Post(s)
Liked 679 Times
in
327 Posts
I like carbon bars. Is there a "real world" difference in vibration reduction / increased comfort? I can't say for sure, but I think so (small difference). They're a contact point, so it does pay to get it right. Then if you go for full-on aero shaped bars or an integrated bar/stem combo then carbon gives you plenty of options. Personally I think there's an advantage to quality carbon handlebars.
But of course, is that difference worth:
Arguably not the most cost effective upgrade!
That's a decision you'll need to figure out for yourself.
But of course, is that difference worth:
That's a decision you'll need to figure out for yourself.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,569
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1851 Post(s)
Liked 678 Times
in
429 Posts
I've had plenty of carbon and aluminum bars. Whether it is worth it to spend extra on carbon really depends on the bar. There are good and bad carbon and aluminum bars.
What is more important is that the drop, reach and bar shape fits your needs. Also, note that a lot of aerobars flare at the drops. So a bar that is 42cm wide at the hoods can be 44cm wide at the drops.
And if aero is your goal:
What is more important is that the drop, reach and bar shape fits your needs. Also, note that a lot of aerobars flare at the drops. So a bar that is 42cm wide at the hoods can be 44cm wide at the drops.
And if aero is your goal:
- Narrower bars will likely have a greater impact than aero shaped tops.
- Carbon bars likely have better shaping than aluminum.
Likes For topflightpro:
#21
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,641
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1939 Post(s)
Liked 1,463 Times
in
1,012 Posts
Exactly. And better off putting what one would have spent on a carbon stem toward a better carbon bar.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,750
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4369 Post(s)
Liked 3,001 Times
in
1,854 Posts
One can argue about performance, but the hand positioning and grip of aero carbon bars sure has a different feel to them compared to round alloy bars. I like my Easton EC90s for sure, but maybe not everybody would.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: South shore, L.I., NY
Posts: 6,862
Bikes: Flyxii FR322, Cannondale Topstone, Miyata City Liner, Specialized Chisel, Specialized Epic Evo
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3224 Post(s)
Liked 2,056 Times
in
1,174 Posts
What silly ****.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,952
Bikes: Specialized Roubaix, Canyon Inflite AL SLX, Ibis Ripley AF, Priority Continuum Onyx, Santana Vision, Kent Dual-Drive Tandem
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 871 Post(s)
Liked 726 Times
in
436 Posts
Oh yeah, aerodynamics is all about thin frontal area. That's why all the latest aero frame shapes are thin tubes.