Why We Should STOP Our Obsession With Bike Weight
#126
Senior Member
My bike is about 15kg and I've never once thought that I need a lighter bike. Prioritizing weight over durability just doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
#127
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,631
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4729 Post(s)
Liked 1,531 Times
in
1,002 Posts
For example I'm doing a 100 mile ride this weekend with around 4k elevation change. Predicted finishing time at my average endurance power is 7 hrs 35 mins. If I drop my bike weight by 2 kg the model predicts a saving of 4 mins. That's with 4k of vertical climbing! Running the same calculation on a much flatter 100 mile course, I would gain just over 30 seconds with the 2kg lighter bike. Basically nothing worth spending any money on.
#128
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulf Breeze, FL
Posts: 4,128
Bikes: Rossetti Vertigo
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 229 Post(s)
Liked 119 Times
in
70 Posts
What if the lighter bike is just as durable? Just because it's light, doesn't mean it's fragile. Just because it's heavy doesn't mean it's tougher.
#129
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,373
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4384 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
2,981 Posts
Best Bike Splits. It's very accurate once you calibrate your aero drag against a few real life rides. Can also input precise weather data as a forecast before the event and in retrospect later. It typically predicts my finish times over 100 mile courses to within a minute or two when I go back and input my actual power figures and weather data. But I use it mainly for pacing as it shows live power targets on my Garmin during a ride.
Likes For PeteHski:
#130
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,373
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4384 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
2,981 Posts
You need to adjust your mental model. Rolling resistance depends linearly on weight so even on flat ground, a lighter bike will be faster due to the decrease in rolling resistance. (Yes, the difference may be small, but conceptually, weight matters even on flat terrain.)
Likes For PeteHski:
#131
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,373
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4384 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
2,981 Posts
Likes For PeteHski:
#132
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
When are all other things equal, though? It doesn't really have anything to do with reality where weight choices will likely affect the prices and perhaps functionality of the bike and parts.
Likes For livedarklions:
#133
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
You need to adjust your mental model. Rolling resistance depends linearly on weight so even on flat ground, a lighter bike will be faster due to the decrease in rolling resistance. (Yes, the difference may be small, but conceptually, weight matters even on flat terrain.)
I'm riding a bike, not a concept. How does that refute "the difference is too small for me to care about"?
#134
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,907
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10397 Post(s)
Liked 11,849 Times
in
6,066 Posts
Depends on the bikes and the ride, though I suppose that's covered in "all other things being equal". I certainly wouldn't intentionally make my bike HEAVIER for no other reason than simply making it heavier.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#135
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
My bike has effectively gotten lighter relative to the current crop with disc brakes, electronic shifting, big tires, etc..
The bicycle obesity epidemic...
The bicycle obesity epidemic...
#138
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,373
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4384 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
2,981 Posts
If you are a bike designer you will always be trading off weight vs durability within the constraints of your budget, however high or low that may be. So in that sense a heavier bike (of the same design and materials) will be more durable than a lighter bike. Obviously you can't say that any random heavier bike will be more durable than any random lightweight bike as there are so many other parameters affecting durability. But the light, durable, cheap trade-off is real.
Likes For PeteHski:
#139
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times
in
252 Posts
A kilo less is about 1-ish % faster uphill, as a rule of thumb. It's both marginal and nice to have at the same time. If you can afford a nice lightweight race bike, why not?
The idea that it isn't comfortable seems very far fetched. Good saddle, good fit and some time in the saddle and I can sit on a race oriented bike all day.
The idea that it isn't comfortable seems very far fetched. Good saddle, good fit and some time in the saddle and I can sit on a race oriented bike all day.
#140
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
All other things being equal, there's probably some truth in that. But again, other things are never equal.
There's good reasons why a new bike that's light, cheap and durable is not a real-world thing.
You seem to be resistant to the idea that different people place different values on the qualities they're seeking in a bike.
#141
Senior Member
I'm not using a mental model. I'm using an accurate detailed physics model which takes into account rolling resistance with weight. This predicts that bike weight is only really significant when there is a lot of climbing involved and even then it's not a huge difference.
On flat ground, the lighter bike will have lower rolling resistance and so will be faster. Is the difference significant? That depends on each person's definition of significant. However one defines it though, the difference is there.
#142
Senior Member
#143
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,907
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10397 Post(s)
Liked 11,849 Times
in
6,066 Posts
My lightest bike has disc brakes and big tires. All my bikes with caliper brakes and skinnier tires are several pounds heavier.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#144
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
A kilo less is about 1-ish % faster uphill, as a rule of thumb. It's both marginal and nice to have at the same time. If you can afford a nice lightweight race bike, why not?
The idea that it isn't comfortable seems very far fetched. Good saddle, good fit and some time in the saddle and I can sit on a race oriented bike all day.
The idea that it isn't comfortable seems very far fetched. Good saddle, good fit and some time in the saddle and I can sit on a race oriented bike all day.
I'm on your end of the can sit on a race bike all day scale, but one thing I will never do is assume that's "normal". It's totally not far fetched at all that many if not most people would find it uncomfortable.
I don't buy lots of things I can afford because I think it would be a waste of money. Raising the price of the bikes I buy by a couple grand doesn't strike me as something I care to afford. I also don't mind that 1% of added effort on the hills I take. YMMV.
#145
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
You might have noticed I was paraphrasing the comment that you said required the poster to "adjust" his "mental model". I happen to agree with the statement that you were quoting, so it's not a big stretch to assume you were saying I needed to adjust my mental model as well.
And if you're going to be this nitpicky, nowhere did I say or imply that you were responding to me. I just know a really bad "refutation" when I see it.
Literally no one is saying there's "no difference" on flat ground. A bunch of us are saying it's not a difference big enough for us to care about--on a flat ride, the time difference is going to be negligible. You may care about a couple minutes over a 100 mile ride, I don't. You're just making an argument against a strawman "there's NO difference".
To me this has always come down to a bang for the buck thing. I find spending exorbitant amounts of money to shave a couple grams off a bottle cage pretty funny, but if you want to do that, knock yourself out.
#146
Senior Member
Not exactly. The Martin model is good enough to be very useful, but it's known to be incomplete. What is approximated as "crr" appears to be somewhat speed-variant, for instance, and it's not really clear how well suspension-related effects smush into the model. CdA for an airfoil also varies by Reynolds number, and that's an issue that largely gets ignored.
That's probably to a large degree counteracted by proper suspension tuning for the increased load (i.e. increase tire pressure).
That's probably to a large degree counteracted by proper suspension tuning for the increased load (i.e. increase tire pressure).
#147
Senior Member
#148
Senior Member
Not exactly. The Martin model is good enough to be very useful, but it's known to be incomplete. What is approximated as "crr" appears to be somewhat speed-variant, for instance, and it's not really clear how well suspension-related effects smush into the model. CdA for an airfoil also varies by Reynolds number, and that's an issue that largely gets ignored.
#149
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 440
Bikes: 1978 Raleigh Competition-1974 Raleigh Folder-1983 Austro Daimler-198? Fuji Monterey-Surly LHT-Surly Karate Monkey-Surly Cross Check
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times
in
54 Posts
I've always been more concerned about the weight of my arse
Likes For fettsvenska:
#150
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
And? You pulled the sentence out of context--in the same post, he actually showed his math and figured out he would gain 30 seconds over 100 miles of flat. You get no points for selectively quoting to make your straw man look real.
Here's what your quote left out, BTW:
"Running the same calculation on a much flatter 100 mile course, I would gain just over 30 seconds with the 2kg lighter bike. Basically nothing worth spending any money on."
Here's what your quote left out, BTW:
"Running the same calculation on a much flatter 100 mile course, I would gain just over 30 seconds with the 2kg lighter bike. Basically nothing worth spending any money on."
Likes For livedarklions: