Grand Bois Tires: Unidirectional?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Bainbridge Island, WA
Posts: 457
Bikes: '72 Peugeot PX-10, '09 A. Homer Hilsen, '78 Masi Gran Crit, '79 Echelon Spectra
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Liked 159 Times
in
98 Posts
Grand Bois Tires: Unidirectional?
Hello All-
I was just cleaning my Masi and noticed that it looks like I installed my Grand Bois Cypres Cerfs backwards. With my previous Grand Bois tires whenever I installed the tires with the tread arrows pointing forward the tire name label was always on the drive side of the bike. I guess when I installed these Cerfs I just assumed this would be the case. On the Cerfs the tread arrows are pointing backwards when the tire name label is on the drive side of the bike.
Is it safe to say that I put my tires on backwards?
I was just cleaning my Masi and noticed that it looks like I installed my Grand Bois Cypres Cerfs backwards. With my previous Grand Bois tires whenever I installed the tires with the tread arrows pointing forward the tire name label was always on the drive side of the bike. I guess when I installed these Cerfs I just assumed this would be the case. On the Cerfs the tread arrows are pointing backwards when the tire name label is on the drive side of the bike.
Is it safe to say that I put my tires on backwards?
#2
Senior Member
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,468
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1078 Post(s)
Liked 1,896 Times
in
930 Posts
I say no. That tread pattern isn't doing anything to dispel water and if you're leaning that far over on your bike you've probably got bigger issues.
Jobst thought tread on bicycle tyres was useless: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/slicks.html
Jan thinks a bit of tread is preferred, but even he says the direction isn't important: https://www.renehersecycles.com/myth...r-on-the-road/
Jobst thought tread on bicycle tyres was useless: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/slicks.html
Jan thinks a bit of tread is preferred, but even he says the direction isn't important: https://www.renehersecycles.com/myth...r-on-the-road/
Likes For P!N20:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,835
Bikes: Trek Domane SL6 Gen 3, Soma Fog Cutter, Focus Mares AL, Detroit Bikes Sparrow FG, Volae Team, Nimbus MUni
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 892 Post(s)
Liked 2,053 Times
in
1,074 Posts
Aesthetics.
Likes For downtube42:
#6
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
I say no. That tread pattern isn't doing anything to dispel water and if you're leaning that far over on your bike you've probably got bigger issues.
Jobst thought tread on bicycle tyres was useless: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/slicks.html
Jan thinks a bit of tread is preferred, but even he says the direction isn't important: https://www.renehersecycles.com/myth...r-on-the-road/
Jobst thought tread on bicycle tyres was useless: https://www.sheldonbrown.com/brandt/slicks.html
Jan thinks a bit of tread is preferred, but even he says the direction isn't important: https://www.renehersecycles.com/myth...r-on-the-road/
"I rode Clement Campionato del Mundo tubulars and some Paris Roubaix until Specialized offered the Touring II so called 700-28c tire, the first reasonably available and durable clincher."
"When Avocet decided to enter the tire market I convinced them to make a smooth tread tire, a slick, because that is essentially what we rode in the days of tubulars, the tread of those tires being about 1/2mm deep when new." (https://yarchive.net/bike/tire_color.html)
His real objection seemed to be larger knobs and grooves in tire tread, if I parse his writings correctly.
Likes For ThermionicScott:
#7
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times
in
1,800 Posts
Every time I think shallow, superficial tread on skinny road bike tires serves no purpose, I ride in rain and decide maybe it does help.
I've ridden in all conditions, including downpours and patches of ice, on Continental Ultra Sport II -- slicks, because the patterns in the sidewalls never contact the ground in normal riding -- and Conti GP Classics, their retro-style skinwalls with diagonal slashes in the raised center tread, and shallow herringbone tread on the shoulders. The GP Classics definitely grip better in the wet, which I got a refresher in Monday evening during a downpour. The Ultra Sport II are excellent values and not bad at all in rain, but I did need to mind my hard braking to avoid skidding, and my cornering. The GP Classics grip better in both conditions.
But... they also use different compounds: Pure Grip on the Ultra Sport, Black Chili on the GP Classics.
And I've ridden Conti's Sport Contact II, with shallow file tread; and SpeedRides, with medium depth diamond tread, the type that's very popular with gravel tires in general and some cyclocross tires for dry conditions. Both grip significantly better in the wet than the Ultra Sport, or any chevron tread tires with more pronounced, deeper tread.
I'm leaning toward the theory/assertion by some tire manufacturers that even superficial tread creates just enough friction and heat to be effective in the wet. That might make some tires slightly less efficient on perfect dry pavement -- that increasingly rare beast once known as asphalt or tarmac. I rarely see that anymore, as the new normal pavement in Texas is coarse chipseal, like railroad ballast glued down with epoxy.
These tires are all marked with direction arrows (which, of course, are difficult to see), but I've mounted them "backward" a few times and didn't notice any difference in performance. But I fixed the orientation as soon as I noticed, so I haven't spent much time riding the tires mounted incorrectly, including in the wet. I doubt it matters at all with the fine file and diamond file tread patterns, which show no indications of being directional despite the arrows on the sidewalls.
I've ridden in all conditions, including downpours and patches of ice, on Continental Ultra Sport II -- slicks, because the patterns in the sidewalls never contact the ground in normal riding -- and Conti GP Classics, their retro-style skinwalls with diagonal slashes in the raised center tread, and shallow herringbone tread on the shoulders. The GP Classics definitely grip better in the wet, which I got a refresher in Monday evening during a downpour. The Ultra Sport II are excellent values and not bad at all in rain, but I did need to mind my hard braking to avoid skidding, and my cornering. The GP Classics grip better in both conditions.
But... they also use different compounds: Pure Grip on the Ultra Sport, Black Chili on the GP Classics.
And I've ridden Conti's Sport Contact II, with shallow file tread; and SpeedRides, with medium depth diamond tread, the type that's very popular with gravel tires in general and some cyclocross tires for dry conditions. Both grip significantly better in the wet than the Ultra Sport, or any chevron tread tires with more pronounced, deeper tread.
I'm leaning toward the theory/assertion by some tire manufacturers that even superficial tread creates just enough friction and heat to be effective in the wet. That might make some tires slightly less efficient on perfect dry pavement -- that increasingly rare beast once known as asphalt or tarmac. I rarely see that anymore, as the new normal pavement in Texas is coarse chipseal, like railroad ballast glued down with epoxy.
These tires are all marked with direction arrows (which, of course, are difficult to see), but I've mounted them "backward" a few times and didn't notice any difference in performance. But I fixed the orientation as soon as I noticed, so I haven't spent much time riding the tires mounted incorrectly, including in the wet. I doubt it matters at all with the fine file and diamond file tread patterns, which show no indications of being directional despite the arrows on the sidewalls.
#9
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,644
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
935 Posts
My guess is it does matter.
People are mentioning rain- and water siping channels are the tire technology that keeps you from hydroplaning. The channels allow water to be diverted out of the way of the rubber- so the rubber can meet the road.
Now- how much of a difference does it make for a bicycle tire, and the location of the sipes- in that location, are they more decorative than functional? Is throwing the water "out and forward" different/better than "out and back." I don't know.
Personally- I'd point the arrows forward- if for any other reason, it would drive me bonkers otherwise.
People are mentioning rain- and water siping channels are the tire technology that keeps you from hydroplaning. The channels allow water to be diverted out of the way of the rubber- so the rubber can meet the road.
Now- how much of a difference does it make for a bicycle tire, and the location of the sipes- in that location, are they more decorative than functional? Is throwing the water "out and forward" different/better than "out and back." I don't know.
Personally- I'd point the arrows forward- if for any other reason, it would drive me bonkers otherwise.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For BertoBerg:
#11
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,644
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
935 Posts
#12
Senior Member
#13
Senior Member
I've ridden Vittoria Rubino Pros for years. They used to have an arrow on them. Now they don't. Same tread pattern. Does it matter? I still put them on in the same direction.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Berkeley CA
Posts: 2,533
Bikes: 1981 Ron Cooper, 1974 Cinelli Speciale Corsa, 2000 Gary Fisher Sugar 1, 1986 Miyata 710, 1982 Raleigh "International"
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 929 Post(s)
Liked 1,289 Times
in
486 Posts
My thought exactly. If the tread has any function at all it is to increase the roughness and therefore frictional resistance to sliding, not to channel water away.
#15
Tortoise Wins by a Hare!
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Looney Tunes, IL
Posts: 7,398
Bikes: Wabi Special FG, Raleigh Roper, Nashbar AL-1, Miyata One Hundred, '70 Schwinn Lemonator and More!!
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1549 Post(s)
Liked 941 Times
in
504 Posts
I have 28mm Grand Bois tires on a fixed gear bike. The rear wheel gets flipped around depending on which gear I want to ride. I've never noticed a difference (and have ridden it in the rain) and don't believe anyone could. Then again, the front tire was always spinning the correct direction so maybe that saved me from certain death.
Likes For AlmostTrick:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,835
Bikes: Trek Domane SL6 Gen 3, Soma Fog Cutter, Focus Mares AL, Detroit Bikes Sparrow FG, Volae Team, Nimbus MUni
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 892 Post(s)
Liked 2,053 Times
in
1,074 Posts
Interesting you cite the specific tire - Sport Contact II - that slid out from under me on a wet corner. Obviously it could have been a spot of oil or whatever, but I do hold a serious if irrational grudge against that tire. I had a shredded elbow, slight concussion, and some bike damage. I finished the ride - a 600k brevet - but I was a confused and a bloody mess.
My normal tires, Primo Comets, were pure slicks and even had a reputation for poor wet performance. I returned to those, and never had a problem since.
I'm on the page of it doesn't matter, but I also don't have any real data to back up that opinion.
My normal tires, Primo Comets, were pure slicks and even had a reputation for poor wet performance. I returned to those, and never had a problem since.
I'm on the page of it doesn't matter, but I also don't have any real data to back up that opinion.