Any ride difference when using a rear rack?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,845
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,822 Times
in
1,541 Posts
Any ride difference when using a rear rack?
Odd question, has anyone noticed increased stiffness or ride/handing differences when adding a rear rack, especially one where there are eyelets on the drops outs and on the seat stays for attachment? reason i ask is I am in early stages of contemplating a custom and thinking pros/cons of various options
thanks
thanks
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
no
Likes For rumrunn6:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Southeast US
Posts: 921
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 318 Post(s)
Liked 149 Times
in
104 Posts
That's my exact scenario (rear rack, seat stay and dropout eyelet mounting) coming up if UPS delivers on time today. Looking forward to finding out.
Last edited by rseeker; 05-01-20 at 01:10 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,265
Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,205 Times
in
701 Posts
If the geometry is favorable to a rear load and stability, then no difference, even with the added weight. Specific examples are that I had a rear rack on my old Puch Bergmeister, which had a long wheelbase and generous fork curve, and it was very stable with a rear load. The same is true for my Motobecane Grand Record. I also had a rack on a Felt SR91 flat bar road bike with a pretty steep fork rake and tight geometry, and with every bump, it seemed like the front wheel wanted to flop and fold under me.
Without any load, there was no perceptible difference between rack and rackless.
Without any load, there was no perceptible difference between rack and rackless.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,989
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
256 Posts
I’m a big fan of versatile bikes, especially since the stable has to be kept small.
A Tubus Fly SS rack lives on my Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer (43.5cm chainstays, 103cm wheelbase) mostly full-time, usually with this bag. The 6-7.5 liter bag is attached to the seatpost, but it’s weight is supported by the rack. I’ve also ridden it sans rack, or with a smaller bag, but also with a full single pannier when I used it for long work commutes. The only difference in all those configurations is the influence of additional weight going up the many hills around here. Descents and flat roads are unaffected. When I once used two large and full panniers, the handling was less confident, but I’m sure that was just the relatively extreme weight shift off the front, which was notably on less secure (i.e., skinnier) tires.
It’s worth noting that the rack is quite stiff laterally with its triangulated design of strong but light tubes, and the single forward link, a solid rod to rack mount on the seat stay, doesn’t have to do much.
A Tubus Fly SS rack lives on my Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer (43.5cm chainstays, 103cm wheelbase) mostly full-time, usually with this bag. The 6-7.5 liter bag is attached to the seatpost, but it’s weight is supported by the rack. I’ve also ridden it sans rack, or with a smaller bag, but also with a full single pannier when I used it for long work commutes. The only difference in all those configurations is the influence of additional weight going up the many hills around here. Descents and flat roads are unaffected. When I once used two large and full panniers, the handling was less confident, but I’m sure that was just the relatively extreme weight shift off the front, which was notably on less secure (i.e., skinnier) tires.
It’s worth noting that the rack is quite stiff laterally with its triangulated design of strong but light tubes, and the single forward link, a solid rod to rack mount on the seat stay, doesn’t have to do much.
Likes For Dfrost:
#6
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times
in
1,679 Posts
Just a lightweight rack, id say no. However i have removed front and rear racks and fenders and had an eye opening exp. What amounted to possibly 4 lbs turned a nice bike into a wonderful bike. That said, all my bikes have fenders and at least 1 rack.
#7
Senior Member
I have a trunk bag on one of my bikes (Guerciotti TSX). It mounts just on the seat post. I use this bike for my long hauls away from home. So, it's loaded with a bunch of tools and it's heavy. Yes, I do feel a handling difference. I say it feels a little loose. Nothing drastic though.
#8
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,511
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2746 Post(s)
Liked 3,390 Times
in
2,053 Posts
I know if you bungee a couple Weber gas grill cast iron grates on top with one side pannier full of commuter stuff it affects your handling.
In general I don't really notice any affect normally.
In general I don't really notice any affect normally.
Likes For dedhed:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times
in
2,610 Posts
As others have said, the rack alone won’t have any discernible effect, but load it up and you willlikely notice a change in handling characteristics. I do know that gugie has said a front rack with stays to the dropout eyelets will stiffen up a front end, usually beyond what one would want.
#10
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
PletcherRat Trap Racks
Off the topic... the ubiquitous old Swiss made Pletcher "rat trap" rear racks used to shake side to side with any kind of load on them which could severely affect the bike's handling causing a front end shimmy.
The clamps that attached to the seat stays was one source of the problem, the other was the was flimsy design of the struts. But for $5 bucks what did you expect?
We used to use plastic covered wiring harness clamps to attach the rack to the seat stay on all of the ones that we installed. It reduced a lot of the shimmy plus those clamps were less like to come loose like the Pletcher strap clamps always did.
There was a US made Pletcher knock off rack that didn't have the rat trap spring device. They had more robust struts and gussets cast into the rack where they attached. The racks were powder coated red. I had one that I used one for heavy touring and there wasn't much shimmy induced wheel wobble on high speed descents.
By 1975-76 Blackburn and Eclipse racks hit the market. They solved the shimmy problems.
verktyg
The clamps that attached to the seat stays was one source of the problem, the other was the was flimsy design of the struts. But for $5 bucks what did you expect?
We used to use plastic covered wiring harness clamps to attach the rack to the seat stay on all of the ones that we installed. It reduced a lot of the shimmy plus those clamps were less like to come loose like the Pletcher strap clamps always did.
There was a US made Pletcher knock off rack that didn't have the rat trap spring device. They had more robust struts and gussets cast into the rack where they attached. The racks were powder coated red. I had one that I used one for heavy touring and there wasn't much shimmy induced wheel wobble on high speed descents.
By 1975-76 Blackburn and Eclipse racks hit the market. They solved the shimmy problems.
verktyg
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Last edited by verktyg; 05-02-20 at 04:26 AM.
Likes For verktyg:
#11
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,623
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3886 Post(s)
Liked 6,480 Times
in
3,206 Posts
I always have my Blackburn rack on my Moto Grand Record for grocery getting. But in the summer, I remove the rack a few weeks and get the bike out on longer rides. It's a stable bike anyway, with heavier rear stays than my others, but I can definitely tell a difference without the rack. The bike feels livelier and lighter. It feels more like one of my full 531 bikes. I look forward to removing it each summer. It reminds me of its first purchase years ago. It feels new again. Fast.
#12
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,832 Times
in
2,229 Posts
What's this thing? A rear rack...
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,904
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,928 Times
in
2,553 Posts
I never noticed a rear rack making any difference at all but weight on it making a huge difference for this guy who loves to climb and accelerate from lights out of the saddle and throw the bike side to side in "the dance". With weight back there at the end of a lever the length of almost the entire bike and my hands trying ot fight it with a lever only 16" long,it gets old fast. I do that climbing without the dance, holding the bike steady.
My love is LowRider (or equivalent) racks up front with low panniers on them. There I can do the full dance with a lot of weight. Easy on the hands and I can do a full side-to-side rock.
My love is LowRider (or equivalent) racks up front with low panniers on them. There I can do the full dance with a lot of weight. Easy on the hands and I can do a full side-to-side rock.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#14
Senior Member
That's a good question. It never occurred to me that my rear rack would effect the ride. I ride a comfort bike at speeds that handling isn't likely to be effected, so there's no problem there. But I must say when I ride MUP's and sidewalks with small curbs the rear of the bike REALLY slams. I stand for some of the small curbs at driveways.
Mine bolts to the drops outs and on the seat stays and I must say looks pretty darn strong. It wouldn't surprise me if it makes a noticeable difference in ride. I think I'm going to remove it one day to see if it helps. Perhaps I can mount it in such a way that that there is some give or a pivot of some sort without adversely effecting its stability for the light loads I carry.
Mine bolts to the drops outs and on the seat stays and I must say looks pretty darn strong. It wouldn't surprise me if it makes a noticeable difference in ride. I think I'm going to remove it one day to see if it helps. Perhaps I can mount it in such a way that that there is some give or a pivot of some sort without adversely effecting its stability for the light loads I carry.
#15
Senior Member
I've never noticed a difference, but I guess I pretty much never ride bikes with empty racks either. I guess theoretically it might add some stiffness and resistance to lateral deflection. I'd guess it would be pretty small difference. It seems to me the down tube of the main frame is way more important. There's probably FEA of this somewhere. Anyhow, It wouldn't be that hard to jury rig a setup to test deflection with and without a rack, if you were super motivated.
With a loaded rear rack, it's absolutely different. You can't wag the bike back and forth at all, as noted above. Being that out of the saddle climbing is maybe the main beneficiary of a stiffer frame, it kind of renders any improvements moot...
AFA ride quality, IMHO it's the distortion of the main 'triangle' and deflection of the fork that is most responsible for vertical compliance. A rear rack wouldn't change that.
With a loaded rear rack, it's absolutely different. You can't wag the bike back and forth at all, as noted above. Being that out of the saddle climbing is maybe the main beneficiary of a stiffer frame, it kind of renders any improvements moot...
AFA ride quality, IMHO it's the distortion of the main 'triangle' and deflection of the fork that is most responsible for vertical compliance. A rear rack wouldn't change that.
#16
Bike Butcher of Portland
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,635
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4678 Post(s)
Liked 5,796 Times
in
2,282 Posts
As others have said, the rack alone won’t have any discernible effect, but load it up and you willlikely notice a change in handling characteristics. I do know that gugie has said a front rack with stays to the dropout eyelets will stiffen up a front end, usually beyond what one would want.
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
Likes For gugie:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Salt Lake City, UT (Formerly Los Angeles, CA)
Posts: 1,145
Bikes: 2008 Cannondale Synapse -- 2014 Cannondale Quick CX
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 212 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 83 Times
in
54 Posts
I have a Tubus Cargo Evo rack on my Cannondale Quick CX hybrid, and a Tubus Fly Evo on my Cannondale Synapse endurance road bike. I don't believe there's any difference in handling, except a little added weight.
I've ridden both bikes with and without racks. I detect no difference in frame stiffness with the racks. The Cargo Evo adds one and a quarter pounds to the bike. The Fly Evo adds about three quarters of a pound to the bike. They're both very sturdy; the Cargo can handle officially up to 55 pounds, unofficially up to 88. The Fly can handle 44 pounds. Sure, with panniers attached or a trunk there will be a difference in handling. And if racing were my thing I'd remove the racks just so that my psychological state doesn't focus on how much the rack is contributing to me getting beaten.
It would be securing a rod between the seat stay mount points and the drop-outs. That would stiffen the ride a lot. But a rack has a lot of give in its geometry because the seat stay mount points and the drop-out mount points form approximately a right angle; there's a lot of flex available.
Tubus racks don't have a solid platform; they're just tubes. As such, I feel they would probably have less of a footprint when you're out in gusty conditions. When I used to ride with a rack that had a plate/platform, I noticed it more when in a cross-wind.
I think you will discover once you get used to how it looks, you're going to forget it's there.
I've ridden both bikes with and without racks. I detect no difference in frame stiffness with the racks. The Cargo Evo adds one and a quarter pounds to the bike. The Fly Evo adds about three quarters of a pound to the bike. They're both very sturdy; the Cargo can handle officially up to 55 pounds, unofficially up to 88. The Fly can handle 44 pounds. Sure, with panniers attached or a trunk there will be a difference in handling. And if racing were my thing I'd remove the racks just so that my psychological state doesn't focus on how much the rack is contributing to me getting beaten.
It would be securing a rod between the seat stay mount points and the drop-outs. That would stiffen the ride a lot. But a rack has a lot of give in its geometry because the seat stay mount points and the drop-out mount points form approximately a right angle; there's a lot of flex available.
Tubus racks don't have a solid platform; they're just tubes. As such, I feel they would probably have less of a footprint when you're out in gusty conditions. When I used to ride with a rack that had a plate/platform, I noticed it more when in a cross-wind.
I think you will discover once you get used to how it looks, you're going to forget it's there.
Last edited by daoswald; 05-01-20 at 04:31 PM.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,549
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5224 Post(s)
Liked 3,581 Times
in
2,342 Posts
they do add wind drag especially with a trunk. not enough to discourage me. but I remember seeing a wind tunnel analysis video showing various designs I think the best design was one that is just attached to the seat post and angles upward hiding from the slipstream behind the rider’s back
#19
Senior Member
No ride difference unloaded. Ride changes incrementally with load. If it's just a couple towels or a jacket then no big deal. If you put a twelve pack of beer on one side & a watermelon on the other side then oh boy! It can be a pretty dramatic impact.
#20
Master Parts Rearranger
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present
Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times
in
989 Posts
That was a bit, uh, effusive, but the thrust remains. Now you know why it's so hard for me to saddle a bike, even a touring bike, with such things. It's great the way it is!
Fenders, plus a front and rear rack on my former '90 Cannondale ST400 made for a fantastic ride. It just glided along!
#21
2k miles from the midwest
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,964
Bikes: ~'75 Colin Laing, '80s Schwinn SuperSport 650b, ex-Backroads ti project...
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 525 Post(s)
Liked 931 Times
in
446 Posts
On a super flexy frame, yes.
I have a titanium track bike I've had for ~15yrs. When I was closer to 200lbs, standing for hills would cause the rear end to shimmy all over the place. I installed a seatpost collar with integrated rack mounts and p-clamps for the legs to install a rear rack. It made a palatable difference.
I have a titanium track bike I've had for ~15yrs. When I was closer to 200lbs, standing for hills would cause the rear end to shimmy all over the place. I installed a seatpost collar with integrated rack mounts and p-clamps for the legs to install a rear rack. It made a palatable difference.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,624
Bikes: iele Latina, Miele Suprema, Miele Uno LS, Miele Miele Beta, MMTB, Bianchi Model Unknown, Fiori Venezia, Fiori Napoli, VeloSport Adamas AX
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1324 Post(s)
Liked 927 Times
in
640 Posts
I was quite surprised that this item didn't noticeable affet the handling of my bicycle.
Yes, there was a brand new 50 pints dehumidifier in that box.
Cheers
Yes, there was a brand new 50 pints dehumidifier in that box.
Cheers
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
356 Posts
On a super flexy frame, yes.
I have a titanium track bike I've had for ~15yrs. When I was closer to 200lbs, standing for hills would cause the rear end to shimmy all over the place. I installed a seatpost collar with integrated rack mounts and p-clamps for the legs to install a rear rack. It made a palatable difference.
I have a titanium track bike I've had for ~15yrs. When I was closer to 200lbs, standing for hills would cause the rear end to shimmy all over the place. I installed a seatpost collar with integrated rack mounts and p-clamps for the legs to install a rear rack. It made a palatable difference.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
#24
Full Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Weston-super-Mare, Somerset, UK
Posts: 433
Bikes: Gitane Course, Paris Sport, Peugeot AO8, Peugeot Bretagne, Peugeot Premiere 85, Peugeot Premiere 86, Peugeot ANC Halfords Team Replica, Peugeot Festina Team Replica, Motobecane Grand Sport, Motobecane Super 15, Raleigh Pro Race, Raleigh Stratos, BSA
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 117 Post(s)
Liked 427 Times
in
90 Posts
I'm using the car as little as possible at the moment due to being on furlough, so I bought a cheap rack, bag, and panniers for my AO-8.
Unloaded I can't tell the difference to be honest - it's not the lightest bike to start with. Add 40 pounds of shopping and you do notice it, especially going uphill. The steering is fine though, and no problems braking.
Unloaded I can't tell the difference to be honest - it's not the lightest bike to start with. Add 40 pounds of shopping and you do notice it, especially going uphill. The steering is fine though, and no problems braking.
#25
Full Member
You may notice some amount of "tail wagging the dog" effect (even on a triangulated rear rack) if you bungee a 50 lb window air conditioner to your rack and haul it a few miles down the road.
I did some crazy **** before I had car.
I did some crazy **** before I had car.