Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Bridgestone RB-1 number

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Bridgestone RB-1 number

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-21, 12:59 PM
  #1  
Oldairhead 
RUSA #3100
Thread Starter
 
Oldairhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon City
Posts: 836

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 505 Times in 181 Posts
Bridgestone RB-1 number

I've got this "known to be" 1992 RB-1 road bike on my stand right now. I've got the catalog for that year and it all checks out except for one thing. The frame number does not match the resources I have seen for Bridgestone bikes. Maybe I didn't get the right resource to consult. Any thoughts?




__________________
https://utahrandonneur.wordpress.com
Oldairhead is offline  
Old 11-25-21, 02:21 PM
  #2  
IAmSam
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,610
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 399 Post(s)
Liked 274 Times in 136 Posts
Yeah that's a '92 paintjob and yeah starting with an X like your number does throws all the B'stone SN decoders stating A-L tells you the month it was made out of whack. My '93 has 7 digits after the letter to tell the day it was made and such. So yours differs from the norm there too. But I bet you've heard this all before. Have you been to the Bridgestone Owners Bunch on Facebook? There's a couple guys there who know this SN stuff in and out. Good luck...
IAmSam is offline  
Likes For IAmSam:
Old 11-26-21, 06:52 AM
  #3  
T-Mar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times in 1,874 Posts
While Grant Peterson is on record as stating that the alpha characters, represent months, I believe that they are actually fortnights. That would make make the frame manufacture during weeks 47-48 of 1991, which is certainly late enough in the calendar year to be a 1992 model.
T-Mar is offline  
Old 11-26-21, 10:36 AM
  #4  
Oldairhead 
RUSA #3100
Thread Starter
 
Oldairhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon City
Posts: 836

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 505 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Mar
While Grant Peterson is on record as stating that the alpha characters, represent months, I believe that they are actually fortnights. That would make make the frame manufacture during weeks 47-48 of 1991, which is certainly late enough in the calendar year to be a 1992 model.
So far the experts over at the BOB group on Facebook agree that it was a "built in 91" as a 92 model but are confused by the rest of the number. Here is an excerpt.

"The 1 means it was made in 1991. No doubt it’s a 92 model but it was likely made in late 91. The first letter is usually an A-L which signifies the month however there were frames stamped X or M and I’ve never seen an explanation."

If the X means it is a custom order then that likely puts the rest of the number as a non standard method, except for the second digit (1) which indicates 1991.
__________________
https://utahrandonneur.wordpress.com
Oldairhead is offline  
Likes For Oldairhead:
Old 11-26-21, 10:54 AM
  #5  
rjhammett
Senior Member
 
rjhammett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 2,247

Bikes: 85 De Rosa, 92 Merckx MX Leader, 99 Tommasini Sintesi, 08 Look 585, 89 Merckx Corsa Extra, 72 Holdsworth Professional

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 362 Post(s)
Liked 552 Times in 241 Posts
The '92 RB-1 I used to own had a serial number of X124108.
rjhammett is offline  
Old 11-26-21, 11:40 AM
  #6  
Oldairhead 
RUSA #3100
Thread Starter
 
Oldairhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon City
Posts: 836

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 505 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by rjhammett
The '92 RB-1 I used to own had a serial number of X124108.
Was your bike a custom order?
__________________
https://utahrandonneur.wordpress.com
Oldairhead is offline  
Old 11-26-21, 12:43 PM
  #7  
T-Mar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times in 1,874 Posts
Originally Posted by Oldairhead
So far the experts over at the BOB group on Facebook agree that it was a "built in 91" as a 92 model but are confused by the rest of the number. Here is an excerpt.

"The 1 means it was made in 1991. No doubt it’s a 92 model but it was likely made in late 91. The first letter is usually an A-L which signifies the month however there were frames stamped X or M and I’ve never seen an explanation."

If the X means it is a custom order then that likely puts the rest of the number as a non standard method, except for the second digit (1) which indicates 1991.
I've been collecting Bridgestone serial numbers for quite some time. I've seen a lot letters beyond L, besides M and X, probably around 18 different letters in total and about 8 beyond L. The first numeral does appear to be the calendar year indcator. That would make the letter prefix a fortnight indicator. The remaining number string, typically 5 characters, is likely a sequential frame numbering for the fortnight.

It's possible that at one time the letter prefix was a month indcator but they may have converted to a fortnight indicator once the monthly volume started exceeding 99,999 frames.

Last edited by T-Mar; 11-26-21 at 12:59 PM. Reason: changed capacity to volume
T-Mar is offline  
Likes For T-Mar:
Old 11-26-21, 12:48 PM
  #8  
Oldairhead 
RUSA #3100
Thread Starter
 
Oldairhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon City
Posts: 836

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 505 Times in 181 Posts
Thanks @T-Mar, I will consider the mystery solved.
__________________
https://utahrandonneur.wordpress.com
Oldairhead is offline  
Old 11-26-21, 01:07 PM
  #9  
rjhammett
Senior Member
 
rjhammett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 2,247

Bikes: 85 De Rosa, 92 Merckx MX Leader, 99 Tommasini Sintesi, 08 Look 585, 89 Merckx Corsa Extra, 72 Holdsworth Professional

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 362 Post(s)
Liked 552 Times in 241 Posts
Originally Posted by Oldairhead
Was your bike a custom order?
I was not the original owner so I don’t know.
rjhammett is offline  
Old 11-26-21, 08:13 PM
  #10  
bikingshearer 
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
 
bikingshearer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,650

Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1025 Post(s)
Liked 2,524 Times in 1,055 Posts
I am not aware that Bridgestone ever made customs. The 1992 catalog discussion of the RB-1 touts their geometry, but certainly doesn't say anything about doing custom builds. It does say you can take their geometry to a custom builder if you want to. FWIW, that sounds to me like customs were not on the menu, at least not for 1992..

And as usual, my opinion is worth exactly what you are paying for it . . . .
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
bikingshearer is offline  
Old 12-07-21, 04:27 PM
  #11  
Oldairhead 
RUSA #3100
Thread Starter
 
Oldairhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon City
Posts: 836

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 505 Times in 181 Posts
Okay, here is a follow up. I inquired to the folks at Rivendell to see if someone would ask the "big guy" if he could shed light on this frame number. This is the response that I received today.

An "X" means it was part of the Fall production run.

I suspect that production during the fall and into the holidays was a little sporadic and work that was started in one month may have carried over into the next so they just put them into an X batch. This might lend credibility to the letter = month version as explained by GP in an earlier document as opposed to the fortnight theory. @T-Mar

Cheers!
__________________
https://utahrandonneur.wordpress.com

Last edited by Oldairhead; 12-07-21 at 05:33 PM.
Oldairhead is offline  
Likes For Oldairhead:
Old 01-06-22, 10:50 AM
  #12  
Hummer
Senior Member
 
Hummer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Rupert's Land
Posts: 1,243

Bikes: 1981 Raleigh GP, 1985 Norco Bush Pilot, . . .

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 241 Post(s)
Liked 187 Times in 136 Posts
Originally Posted by T-Mar
While Grant Peterson is on record as stating that the alpha characters, represent months, I believe that they are actually fortnights. That would make make the frame manufacture during weeks 47-48 of 1991, which is certainly late enough in the calendar year to be a 1992 model.
Originally Posted by T-Mar
I've been collecting Bridgestone serial numbers for quite some time. I've seen a lot letters beyond L, besides M and X, probably around 18 different letters in total and about 8 beyond L. The first numeral does appear to be the calendar year indcator. That would make the letter prefix a fortnight indicator. The remaining number string, typically 5 characters, is likely a sequential frame numbering for the fortnight.

It's possible that at one time the letter prefix was a month indcator but they may have converted to a fortnight indicator once the monthly volume started exceeding 99,999 frames.
That would make the letter prefix a fortnight indicator.
That is quite an assumption that the letter is a fortnight indicator. Do you have any other support for this assumption?

The fact that more than 12 different letters have been used does not necessarily mean that the time period for the letter is a fortnight

I have catalogued more than 140 Bridgestone serial numbers, with a broader range of letters for the time period indicator, 21 different letters and 10 beyond the letter L. The distribution of the letters in may data show that most frequent letters found are X and letters before the letter M. I would not assume that the letter is a fortnight indicator.

There is a blog which proposes a decoding of Bridgestone serial numbers. The writer of this blog, Demo Tori-san, is a Bridgestone bicycle owner in Japan.

Here are a link to the blog and another to a google translation of part of the blog.

BS frame No.

Bridgestone serial numbers decoded.


Originally Posted by Oldairhead
So far the experts over at the BOB group on Facebook agree that it was a "built in 91" as a 92 model but are confused by the rest of the number. Here is an excerpt.

"The 1 means it was made in 1991. No doubt it’s a 92 model but it was likely made in late 91. The first letter is usually an A-L which signifies the month however there were frames stamped X or M and I’ve never seen an explanation."

If the X means it is a custom order then that likely puts the rest of the number as a non standard method, except for the second digit (1) which indicates 1991.
From the findings in the blog from Japan, the X is for the month of September. X was used for September instead of the letter "I".
The findings are consistent with Grant Peterson.

Demo Tori-san also researched the Bridgestone custom order bicycles and the findings are in this post:

BS frame No. (Granvelo)
Hummer is offline  
Old 01-06-22, 11:34 AM
  #13  
Oldairhead 
RUSA #3100
Thread Starter
 
Oldairhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Oregon City
Posts: 836

Bikes: Yes

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 237 Post(s)
Liked 505 Times in 181 Posts
Originally Posted by Hummer
From the findings in the blog from Japan, the X is for the month of September. X was used for September instead of the letter "I".
The findings are consistent with Grant Peterson.
Wow, amazing research! Educated guesses are great but confirmation is even better. Your rationale seems to be confirmed by Grant Peterson's statement (to me) that X was a fall production date. Along with the fact that letters I and O could easily be confused for digits and so were replaced with other characters. This seems to be a very plausible explanation. Along with the fortnight theory this bike was built in the fall of 1991, end of story. Thanks again to all!
__________________
https://utahrandonneur.wordpress.com

Last edited by Oldairhead; 01-06-22 at 06:22 PM.
Oldairhead is offline  
Old 01-06-22, 05:46 PM
  #14  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,153
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3806 Post(s)
Liked 6,674 Times in 2,607 Posts
Originally Posted by Hummer
I have catalogued more than 140 Bridgestone serial numbers, with a broader range of letters for the time period indicator, 21 different letters and 10 beyond the letter L. The distribution of the letters in may data show that most frequent letters found are X and letters before the letter M.
I have no dog in this fight that you seem to continually picking with T-Mar (other than finding it quite annoying), but I do have to say making any claims from a sample of 140 out of the 10s if not 100s of thousands of frames Bridgestone produced is in the realm of wishful thinking, not statistical evidence. I mean, you could be right, but that would be because you got lucky, not as a result of your analytical method.
nlerner is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.