front mech is driving me crazy
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
front mech is driving me crazy
Allignment , rotation , limit screw, cable tension seems all fine.... but this sucker won't shift down to the smallest cog.
video ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vxiXrayqg0
note to myself: next mtb must have a microshift or another brand for the drivetrain. I hate everything branded shimano on this bike
video ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vxiXrayqg0
note to myself: next mtb must have a microshift or another brand for the drivetrain. I hate everything branded shimano on this bike
Last edited by CrowSeph; 11-12-20 at 06:45 PM.
Likes For CrowSeph:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 761 Times
in
569 Posts
Is that the front mech that came with the bike? I can't see a lot in the video, but it looks like very tight chainline (almost like a road bike) and you have a Deore front mech -- it may simply be designed to not travel that far inward (mountain bikes usually have a higher chainline measurement). I see you can force the chain down to the small ring by hand, but the mech is obviously supposed to get it there itself...if it's the right mech for the application. It appears you're using a mountain mech where you might should be using a road mech (Sora, etc.). Just a guess based on the limited info.
Likes For hokiefyd:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 761 Times
in
569 Posts
As a follow-up -- to confirm that, loosen the cable adjustment entirely (so the cable does not operate the mech) and back out the lower limit screw so that the mech is bottoming out "on itself". In other words, no external inputs like cable or limit screw. Work it by hand and "shift" to a larger ring and then let the mech snap back home while pedaling. Does the chain move to the smallest ring then? If so, then you probably DID have a cable adjustment or limit screw problem. If it still doesn't, then I think my earlier advise may apply -- it may just be the wrong mech for the application.
Likes For hokiefyd:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
A lot of those top swing derailleurs will bottom on themselves before they can mover far enough to shift the chain to the small ring, especially on bikes w/ aluminum frames/larger diameter seat tubes. I've seen them spec'd on new bikes that absolutely will not shift to the small ring. Nothing you can do except replace it with one that works...I'd always go bottom swing...I HATE top swing derailleurs.
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
Is that the front mech that came with the bike? I can't see a lot in the video, but it looks like very tight chainline (almost like a road bike) and you have a Deore front mech -- it may simply be designed to not travel that far inward (mountain bikes usually have a higher chainline measurement). I see you can force the chain down to the small ring by hand, but the mech is obviously supposed to get it there itself...if it's the right mech for the application. It appears you're using a mountain mech where you might should be using a road mech (Sora, etc.). Just a guess based on the limited info.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 761 Times
in
569 Posts
Thanks for that -- I didn't think of a replacement crank. It's possible that the Alivio crank requires a longer BB spindle and installing it on a shorter-than-optimal spindle puts the small ring too far inboard. This is usually noted with the specs of the crankset (the correct BB spindle length). If it's a square taper BB, you do have some options if you cannot find the spindle length specs for the crankset -- estimate how far more inboard you need the mech to move. It's probably not much -- maybe a few millimeters. That's how far you need the crankset to move outboard (because the mech is already bottomed out). Multiply that (2mm for example) by 2 and that's the additional spindle length you need (because the spindle is generally centered in the BB (although offset ones do exist). So if your current BB is a 113mm and you need an additional 2mm, then look for a 117mm (or similar) BB. It would be better to err too long rather than too short -- too short keeps you in the same scenario you have now.
Likes For hokiefyd:
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
Thanks for that. An alternative is to move from 3x9 to 2x9.
Actually i'am using a custom 40-11 cassette with 22-32-38 chainrings at the front.
Do you think i can keep the 32-38 or i should use a more appropriate gear with a bit lower teets?
Actually i'am using a custom 40-11 cassette with 22-32-38 chainrings at the front.
Do you think i can keep the 32-38 or i should use a more appropriate gear with a bit lower teets?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Your current 22x40 low gear is lower than even loaded tourists typically use and the 32x40 gear is about what they use. If you don't really require the extremely low gear that 22T chainring provides then using your crank as a 32x38 double should be fine.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
My current bb is 68*113
How much longer bb should i use?
How much longer bb should i use?
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682
Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times
in
315 Posts
Allignment , rotation , limit screw, cable tension seems all fine.... but this sucker won't shift down to the smallest cog.
video ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vxiXrayqg0
note to myself: next mtb must have a microshift or another brand for the drivetrain. I hate everything branded shimano on this bike
video ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vxiXrayqg0
note to myself: next mtb must have a microshift or another brand for the drivetrain. I hate everything branded shimano on this bike
There is nothing inherently wrong with Shimano. Setting up that triple front derailleur to work with your (different) crank might be a simple matter of doing the set up procedure for the front derailleur (for a mountain bike triple) from the beginning. That orange set-up block that comes with a new front derailleur is helpful or you can use a 5 mm allen key to space the cage pivots out ever so slightly when you first snug up the cable with the shifter in the granny ring. So long as your low limit screw is set correctly, your shifter should shift into the small chainring OK.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
.
There is nothing inherently wrong with Shimano. Setting up that triple front derailleur to work with your (different) crank might be a simple matter of doing the set up procedure for the front derailleur (for a mountain bike triple) from the beginning. That orange set-up block that comes with a new front derailleur is helpful or you can use a 5 mm allen key to space the cage pivots out ever so slightly when you first snug up the cable with the shifter in the granny ring. So long as your low limit screw is set correctly, your shifter should shift into the small chainring OK.
There is nothing inherently wrong with Shimano. Setting up that triple front derailleur to work with your (different) crank might be a simple matter of doing the set up procedure for the front derailleur (for a mountain bike triple) from the beginning. That orange set-up block that comes with a new front derailleur is helpful or you can use a 5 mm allen key to space the cage pivots out ever so slightly when you first snug up the cable with the shifter in the granny ring. So long as your low limit screw is set correctly, your shifter should shift into the small chainring OK.
#14
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,984
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6191 Post(s)
Liked 4,806 Times
in
3,315 Posts
Can you put the old drive crank and chain rings back on? Then you can measure how far from the center of the seat tube to the center of the middle chain ring. Then if you do the same measure with the new crank on the old BB, you'll have a decent idea.
But...... Square tapers are ticky things. Different standards and even among the same standard, it doesn't take much difference in the tolerances to make the crank arm and spider sit further out or in. Probably one of the many reasons why they moved away from square tapers, though some things are still made with them.
If these aren't square tapers, then something else is up. The newer standards of ISIS and Octalink by design put the chainrings more in a standard position so all that was necessary was to know the bb shell width.
But...... Square tapers are ticky things. Different standards and even among the same standard, it doesn't take much difference in the tolerances to make the crank arm and spider sit further out or in. Probably one of the many reasons why they moved away from square tapers, though some things are still made with them.
If these aren't square tapers, then something else is up. The newer standards of ISIS and Octalink by design put the chainrings more in a standard position so all that was necessary was to know the bb shell width.
Last edited by Iride01; 11-13-20 at 01:34 PM.
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
Seems i spotted the problem. i compared the two cranks and seems the old is more external that the new. Basically by rusted math i should solve the problem by fitting a bottom bracket with the total lenght of 120-121 instead of the 113.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 761 Times
in
569 Posts
That sounds reasonable. That's a total difference of about 8mm and, assuming your current BB and a replacement BB have centered (vs. offset) spindles, that should position your chainrings outboard about 4mm. That sounds like a plan.
Likes For hokiefyd:
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: South Italy
Posts: 1,015
Bikes: BMC SLR01; Cannondale Trail; Lot's of project and vintage bikes..
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 333 Post(s)
Liked 168 Times
in
101 Posts
Last question....... "68" means english threads?
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,140
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1444 Post(s)
Liked 761 Times
in
569 Posts
68 very likely refers to a 68mm bottom bracket shell...the shell itself is 68mm wide. This does not tell you the type of threads. Most modern bikes use English/British threads but there are other standards out there. Sheldon Brown's page on this has some good information.
If your bike currently has a cartridge type bottom bracket (like a Shimano BB-UN26 or similar), then it probably has English/British threads, but it would be best to check to be sure first.
If your bike currently has a cartridge type bottom bracket (like a Shimano BB-UN26 or similar), then it probably has English/British threads, but it would be best to check to be sure first.