How are you guys eyeballing frame sizes?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 92
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times
in
22 Posts
How are you guys eyeballing frame sizes?
I see a lot of posts here where someone will post a picture of a bike or a frame without saying what size it is, and other people will say something like "Oh, I'd buy that if it were a little bigger/smaller," or they'll just somehow just know the size outright. How are you doing that - is it just experience?
If I'm browsing through pictures on Craigslist or eBay, I look at how much space there is between where the top and down tubes join the head tube, but other than that I have no clue how to estimate the size. Are there other tips/tricks?
If I'm browsing through pictures on Craigslist or eBay, I look at how much space there is between where the top and down tubes join the head tube, but other than that I have no clue how to estimate the size. Are there other tips/tricks?
Likes For Lemond1985:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,156
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3810 Post(s)
Liked 6,690 Times
in
2,610 Posts
Yeah, for traditional diamond frames, head tube length is an excellent indicator but there are always exceptions.
Likes For nlerner:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,265
Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,205 Times
in
701 Posts
Me too, head tube is the first place I look. With the classic geometry from the mid- to late-20th century, that's a good rule of thumb since it was fairly consistent from one bike type to another.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 2,249
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 1,844 Times
in
609 Posts
I focus on frames that are roughly my size while I'm browsing eBay and have had enough of my own, so that I can rather quickly tell the proportions between the main tubes to figure things out approximately. What throws me for a loop are larger or smaller frames with awkward proportions that sometimes make them seem to mirror what I usually see in my size range, which is between 60-62cm. It most frequently happens with slightly smaller frames that have high bottom brackets and longer-than-usual head tubes to compensate for the rise.
It's just a matter of looking at bicycles way too much, really... That's all!
-Gregory
It's just a matter of looking at bicycles way too much, really... That's all!
-Gregory
Likes For Kilroy1988:
#6
Shifting is fun!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,005
Bikes: Yes, please.
Mentioned: 280 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2198 Post(s)
Liked 4,600 Times
in
1,764 Posts
In general older bikes have shorter head tubes, as a result of bigger clearances. Early nineties Giants have also fooled me, because of their slightly forward-sloping top tube.
#7
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
Yeah, if the head tube looks like my bike, i know we're in the 58-60 range, and i kinda extrapolate from there.
Obviously we base these guesses on a bunch of assumptions that we may not recognize. So when I bought a 1940 Schwinn New World on ebay some years ago, i failed to consider that it had 26 wheels. Sadly it proved to be a much smaller frame than I'd expected. Doh!
Obviously we base these guesses on a bunch of assumptions that we may not recognize. So when I bought a 1940 Schwinn New World on ebay some years ago, i failed to consider that it had 26 wheels. Sadly it proved to be a much smaller frame than I'd expected. Doh!
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
#8
Friendship is Magic
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,984
Bikes: old ones
Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26412 Post(s)
Liked 10,378 Times
in
7,206 Posts
I see a lot of posts here where someone will post a picture of a bike or a frame without saying what size it is, and other people will say something like "Oh, I'd buy that if it were a little bigger/smaller," or they'll just somehow just know the size outright. How are you doing that - is it just experience?
If I'm browsing through pictures on Craigslist or eBay, I look at how much space there is between where the top and down tubes join the head tube, but other than that I have no clue how to estimate the size. Are there other tips/tricks?
If I'm browsing through pictures on Craigslist or eBay, I look at how much space there is between where the top and down tubes join the head tube, but other than that I have no clue how to estimate the size. Are there other tips/tricks?
The tip is to bring along a tape measure.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
If the head tube has a pump peg, it's placement will give you some indication. 56cm frames generally look square or close to it. 58cm and up the TT looks shorter than the rest of the triangle. 54 and down, the TT generally looks longer than the rest of the triangle. Buy yourself one of the small 6ft. tape measures and put it somewhere in the vehicle you go to look at bikes in.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,044
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 838 Post(s)
Liked 1,080 Times
in
521 Posts
Like everyone has said: head tube length (on traditional frames). But you gotta combine that with a lot of time spent looking at pictures of bikes. After getting into the hobby I realized that after a month or so I was starting to eyeball frame sizes, not long after that I was a natural.
So it sounds like youre on the right track, you just maybe havent looked through countless thousands of photos of bicycles like the rest of us
So it sounds like youre on the right track, you just maybe havent looked through countless thousands of photos of bicycles like the rest of us
Last edited by polymorphself; 11-13-20 at 11:21 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
It's also important to note that you are only looking for 2 sizes.
Size 1: "Thats my size. I can ride that."
Size 2: "I better list that one in the Looking
For/Ebay thread so someone else can see it."
Size 1: "Thats my size. I can ride that."
Size 2: "I better list that one in the Looking
For/Ebay thread so someone else can see it."
Likes For seypat:
#12
Senior Member
As others already mentioned, the length of the head tube gives a good clue on the frame size.
I also pay attention to the location of a pump peg (if present of course) and the distance from the peg to the top and the down tubes.
If the distance between the peg and down tube is roughly double of the distance between the peg and the top tube then that's a good indication of a 56cm frame:
If the distances from the peg to the top tube and the bottom tube are about the same - its 54 cm. Important note here: the distance should be roughly equal to the top tube to peg distance on 56cm frame (about 1"). On 52 cm frames the distances from the peg to top/down tubes are about the same too but they are much smaller (about 1/2").
Example of 54 cm frame:
if the peg to down tube distance is about 2.5-3 times greater than the peg to top tube distance then it could be 57-58 cm frame. But it's much harder to eyeball the frames that are larger than 56cm (in my experience). Here's an example of a 57 cm frame:
As far as I remember, the 50cm frames and smaller will not have the pump peg.
Hope this helps.
And yes, I am showing off my bikes ... cause i love them and they are pretty
I also pay attention to the location of a pump peg (if present of course) and the distance from the peg to the top and the down tubes.
If the distance between the peg and down tube is roughly double of the distance between the peg and the top tube then that's a good indication of a 56cm frame:
If the distances from the peg to the top tube and the bottom tube are about the same - its 54 cm. Important note here: the distance should be roughly equal to the top tube to peg distance on 56cm frame (about 1"). On 52 cm frames the distances from the peg to top/down tubes are about the same too but they are much smaller (about 1/2").
Example of 54 cm frame:
if the peg to down tube distance is about 2.5-3 times greater than the peg to top tube distance then it could be 57-58 cm frame. But it's much harder to eyeball the frames that are larger than 56cm (in my experience). Here's an example of a 57 cm frame:
As far as I remember, the 50cm frames and smaller will not have the pump peg.
Hope this helps.
And yes, I am showing off my bikes ... cause i love them and they are pretty
Likes For t1k:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
...I once drove all the way to Merced and back to look at a 58cm Paramount that turned out to be a 21" frame, even after I asked the guy to measure it. So I always ask the current owner, and then I don't count on getting correct information. I want to measure the top tube length and the stem to saddle distance as currently configured anyway, so while I can sort of get a feeling from a photo, I don't count on my feeling being correct either.
The tip is to bring along a tape measure.
The tip is to bring along a tape measure.
Likes For Road Fan:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times
in
938 Posts
Head tube size. I know roughly what a 56 cm (my ideal frame size) head tube looks like, so that's my visual target.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
#16
Senior Member
Post pictures of your Miyata. I'd love to see it.
Another thing that helps identifying the frame size is looking into manufacturers catalog and finding out what sizes were available for the given model. For example, Miyata's touring models (600, 615, 618 and 1000) were available in 54 and 57cm, but the rest of their road bikes had 56 cm option.
Here's a link to the Miyata catalogs: https://www.ragandbone.ca/Miyata/miyata_selector.html
Likes For t1k:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Headtube length is reasonable with these modifiers-
frame era- 60s bikes will most often have more generous clearances, and often a longer top tube- making for a shorter headtube verses
an 80s bike with tight clearances for only smaller tires and a short reach brake in front.
One gets a visual Ref. After a while.
I have been fooled, but not often.
worst was a reportedly 57 center to top frame that looked right. It arrived and was a 54!
even marked as such on the bottom bracket.
the image was distorted- very strange.
referencing the images later it still looked like a 57 in the sellers sale image set.
seller went awol after.
Vanished.
fortunately it was a good size for my son later.
frame era- 60s bikes will most often have more generous clearances, and often a longer top tube- making for a shorter headtube verses
an 80s bike with tight clearances for only smaller tires and a short reach brake in front.
One gets a visual Ref. After a while.
I have been fooled, but not often.
worst was a reportedly 57 center to top frame that looked right. It arrived and was a 54!
even marked as such on the bottom bracket.
the image was distorted- very strange.
referencing the images later it still looked like a 57 in the sellers sale image set.
seller went awol after.
Vanished.
fortunately it was a good size for my son later.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times
in
938 Posts
I bought this Marinoni off of Kijiji. The bike was listed as a 52cm, a perfect size for my one of my grand daughters. I did not even question the bike's size until a bit later...
When I got the bike home, something did not jive. The lady who owned the bike was the same approximate height as I am. With that in mind, I straddled the bike? Got off and snapped up the measuring tape. Not a 52, but a 56cm machine. No good for my grand daughter but perfect for you know who. Yup, me and the Marinoni is now my daily rider, when I can actually ride (been off the bike for a couple of months now with worn out hands that cannot pull a brake lever).
I got fooled by the over sized tubing which make the head tube appear to be short and proper for a 52cm size. I was wrong but still tend to look at head tube to approximate a vintage road bicycle's size.
When I got the bike home, something did not jive. The lady who owned the bike was the same approximate height as I am. With that in mind, I straddled the bike? Got off and snapped up the measuring tape. Not a 52, but a 56cm machine. No good for my grand daughter but perfect for you know who. Yup, me and the Marinoni is now my daily rider, when I can actually ride (been off the bike for a couple of months now with worn out hands that cannot pull a brake lever).
I got fooled by the over sized tubing which make the head tube appear to be short and proper for a 52cm size. I was wrong but still tend to look at head tube to approximate a vintage road bicycle's size.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
#20
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,531
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times
in
631 Posts
It's really top tube length that's most important, but fortunately, it doesn't vary as much as seat tube length, and can usually be corrected with the right length stem.
I had a 59.5 cm frame that was perfect in the "reach" department, but I just couldn't clear the top tube standing over it. Why a taller person needs to have the top tube right under their crotch when the reach is already fine ... I will never know. I prefer the smaller frame sizes anyway, most 58 cm and larger steel frames flex like crazy for me, why anyone taller than me would want that, if they could use a smaller stiffer frame size ... also a mystery.
I had a 59.5 cm frame that was perfect in the "reach" department, but I just couldn't clear the top tube standing over it. Why a taller person needs to have the top tube right under their crotch when the reach is already fine ... I will never know. I prefer the smaller frame sizes anyway, most 58 cm and larger steel frames flex like crazy for me, why anyone taller than me would want that, if they could use a smaller stiffer frame size ... also a mystery.
#21
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,397
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 784 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
686 Posts
Why a taller person needs to have the top tube right under their crotch when the reach is already fine ... I will never know. I prefer the smaller frame sizes anyway, most 58 cm and larger steel frames flex like crazy for me, why anyone taller than me would want that, if they could use a smaller stiffer frame size ... also a mystery.
But most taller frames often use stiffer tubing (less butting or oversized) to compensate for the flex.
As for OP, practice and looking at head tubes.
57cm Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
66cm Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
#22
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,531
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times
in
631 Posts
I have a couple of un-butted "plain gauge" frames, and really like them for their stiffness. I do think butting causes unnecessary flex in many frames, maybe that's why Miyaya and others went to "triple butting" their frame tubes, to try to minimize this.
Beautiful bikes, BTW.
Beautiful bikes, BTW.
Likes For Lemond1985:
#23
2k miles from the midwest
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,964
Bikes: ~'75 Colin Laing, '80s Schwinn SuperSport 650b, ex-Backroads ti project...
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 525 Post(s)
Liked 931 Times
in
446 Posts
Mostly because seat post lengths tend to top out at 250-300mm. I'm already at the maximum safe length for my 64cm frame's seat post. And I can ride taller bikes than that.
But most taller frames often use stiffer tubing (less butting or oversized) to compensate for the flex.
As for OP, practice and looking at head tubes.
57cm Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
66cm Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
But most taller frames often use stiffer tubing (less butting or oversized) to compensate for the flex.
As for OP, practice and looking at head tubes.
57cm Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
66cm Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Actually I've got a sscx frame that I've put a chain tensioner with a rd hanger to make into a 1x. That would be the best way to add a multispeed crank.
#24
Passista
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,597
Bikes: 1998 Pinarello Asolo, 1992 KHS Montaņa pro, 1980 Raleigh DL-1, IGH Hybrid, IGH Utility
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 866 Post(s)
Liked 721 Times
in
396 Posts
On horizontal top tube frames, you can also look at the distance between the rear tire and the top of the seat cluster.
#25
Overdoing projects
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Rotterdam, former republic of the Netherlands
Posts: 2,397
Bikes: Batavus Randonneur GL, Gazelle Orange Excellent, Gazelle Super Licht, Gazelle Grand Tourist, Gazelle Lausanne, Gazelle Tandem, Koga-Miyata SilverAce, Koga-Miyata WorldTraveller
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 784 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
686 Posts
Is that just a normal dt braze-on mounted on the back of the seattube for fd duty? I may have to find someone to do that to one or more of my frames. All the contortioning of a suicide shifter, but lighter and easier setup.
Actually I've got a sscx frame that I've put a chain tensioner with a rd hanger to make into a 1x. That would be the best way to add a multispeed crank.
Actually I've got a sscx frame that I've put a chain tensioner with a rd hanger to make into a 1x. That would be the best way to add a multispeed crank.
But if I weren't going for bar ends that would be a pretty sweet option.