How often do you use the big chainring?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,840
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2337 Post(s)
Liked 2,818 Times
in
1,539 Posts
95% of the time with my 50/34 and 11x32 setup (really need to climb more hills)
50/50 on my 53/39 13x32 setup (need to get in better shape and climb more hills)
50/50 on my 53/39 13x32 setup (need to get in better shape and climb more hills)
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#52
Not lost wanderer.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,325
Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier
Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 989 Times
in
521 Posts
I either ride a 1x or half step and switch off a lot. Kind of a gearing junkie.
__________________
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
#53
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 604
Bikes: 1995 Specialized Rockhopper,1989 Specialized Rock Combo, 2013 Specialized Tarmac Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
Liked 588 Times
in
278 Posts
Headwind uphill, little ring. Tailwind downhill, big ring. About 50-50.
#54
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,782
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,398 Times
in
1,932 Posts
When I found that my aging legs couldn't handle the typical large chainrings on my bikes, I started downsizing the large rings. The 54T ring on the tandem went to 50T; 52T and 53T rings on other bikes went to 44T, 46T, and 48T. That allows me to use the full range of gears available on my bikes. But I have a pile of 52, 53, and 54 tooth rings I'll likely never use again.
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Whittier
Posts: 872
Bikes: 1973 Colnago Super, Litespeed Classic , Automoto , Pinarello Gavia TSX,Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra,Eddy Merckx EMX-5 , 1982 Moser SL, Concorde TSX, Vitus 979 KAS. Diamant SLX,60's Meteor
Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 235 Post(s)
Liked 947 Times
in
327 Posts
The BIG ring every time I ride, except when im up a steep climb.
I rode up Azusa Canyon on my vintage Moser 53-42 with a corncob rear..Big mistake.
I rode up Azusa Canyon on my vintage Moser 53-42 with a corncob rear..Big mistake.
Likes For Manny66:
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: San Clemente
Posts: 664
Bikes: 87 Bianchi X4, 95 Bianchi Ti Mega Tube, 06 Alan Carbon Cross X33, Gold plated Columbus AIR Guerciotti, 74 Galmozzi Super Competizione, 52 Bianchi Paris Roubaix.
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 259 Post(s)
Liked 539 Times
in
166 Posts
at least 95% of the time.
#57
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,482
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1639 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 828 Times
in
537 Posts
BITD, I was almost always on my big ring (52 or 53T) when I rode...... but Southeast Wisconsin is quite flat.....
__________________
72 Line Seeker
83 Davidson Signature
84 Peugeot PSV
84 Peugeot PY10FC
84 Gitane Tour de France.
85 Vitus Plus Carbone 7
86 ALAN Record Carbonio
86 Medici Aerodynamic (Project)
88 Pinarello Montello
89 Bottecchia Professional Chorus SL
95 Trek 5500 OCLV (Project)
72 Line Seeker
83 Davidson Signature
84 Peugeot PSV
84 Peugeot PY10FC
84 Gitane Tour de France.
85 Vitus Plus Carbone 7
86 ALAN Record Carbonio
86 Medici Aerodynamic (Project)
88 Pinarello Montello
89 Bottecchia Professional Chorus SL
95 Trek 5500 OCLV (Project)
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,654
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1607 Post(s)
Liked 2,579 Times
in
1,221 Posts
As soon as I Crest a hill I'm back in the big ring. It's also a lot cheaper to replace when it wears out. That said, we have a lot of hills so I'm probably in it 60 percent of the time.
#59
The Huffmeister
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Le Grande HQ
Posts: 2,734
Bikes: '79 Trek 938, '86 Jim Merz Allez SE, '90 Miyata 1000, '68 PX-10, '80 PXN-10, '73 Super Course, '87 Guerciotti, '83 Trek 600, '80 Huffy Le Grande
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1225 Post(s)
Liked 3,535 Times
in
1,407 Posts
Wow, thanks for all the replies. Been gone a couple days working out of town, long days, etc. and haven't had a chance to check in.
Not silly at all! Part of the reason I ask is because there is a tendency (partially with me, but probably with many others), to keep a nice vintage bike stock, so that means using the gears that came with it. That being the case, a lot of these bikes came with 50T+ large rings - it started an internal debate: change to make it more useful? Keep stock?
Ha! You're kind of right. Fortunately every English speaker in this thread understood what I meant. We all must be really special/smart!
I'm VERY skeptical...because I've got a 53T on the front of my bike and riding it is frickin hard! haha
That is exactly what I have. 53T in the front with a corncob in which the largest rear is 23T. I switched a few times to the larger chainring and it felt like I was peddling through molasses.
I guess I am way less fit than I thought haha. But yes I'm here in CO and everywhere is a hill. I live on a hill. And I'm on the east side, where it is supposed to be flat.
I think I have a prejudice about the big ring because 1) I haven't found it useful when the terrain is so varied, 2) I have my PX-10 setup as a 1x5 and it is a really fun combo that seems to do just about everything well, and finally 3) principle...past owners shifting between the front chainrings and trying to quickly drop back down to the smaller ring is probably the biggest reason our precious (otherwise pristine) steeds are all mucked up on the chainstay. Yep. I think that is probably the biggest reason. Never dropped a chain on a 1x with a proper length chain...which I really wasn't expecting.
You sound skeptical that the big ring is useful.
It's mostly flat where I am, so the 53 big ring (39 small) is definitely used and is useful. Coupled with a 12-23 cluster, and it makes for a pretty good workout.
Of course, my bike is a racing bike--not a sport tourer, hybrid or mountain bike. It would look equally silly with either a 1X or a triple.
It's mostly flat where I am, so the 53 big ring (39 small) is definitely used and is useful. Coupled with a 12-23 cluster, and it makes for a pretty good workout.
Of course, my bike is a racing bike--not a sport tourer, hybrid or mountain bike. It would look equally silly with either a 1X or a triple.
I guess I must be fitter than I thought I'm blessed with a mostly smooth rail trail near my house and when it's quiet there, I'm in 52x19 a lot, 72 gear inches. 17 cog/80 inches when I'm pushing myself, but I can't keep that up for long.
Of course, our OP is in Colorado. I imagine I'd be struggling to get anywhere with a 52/42 setup.
Of course, our OP is in Colorado. I imagine I'd be struggling to get anywhere with a 52/42 setup.
I think I have a prejudice about the big ring because 1) I haven't found it useful when the terrain is so varied, 2) I have my PX-10 setup as a 1x5 and it is a really fun combo that seems to do just about everything well, and finally 3) principle...past owners shifting between the front chainrings and trying to quickly drop back down to the smaller ring is probably the biggest reason our precious (otherwise pristine) steeds are all mucked up on the chainstay. Yep. I think that is probably the biggest reason. Never dropped a chain on a 1x with a proper length chain...which I really wasn't expecting.
#60
The Huffmeister
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Le Grande HQ
Posts: 2,734
Bikes: '79 Trek 938, '86 Jim Merz Allez SE, '90 Miyata 1000, '68 PX-10, '80 PXN-10, '73 Super Course, '87 Guerciotti, '83 Trek 600, '80 Huffy Le Grande
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1225 Post(s)
Liked 3,535 Times
in
1,407 Posts
#61
Senior Member
I ride mine all the time - 42/52 X 14-24. I'm usually in 52X18, sometimes even when I could go to 52X16 (but don't).
There was a 4% grade, 5 mile long hill in Albuquerque where I used my 42, a lot. Remember, though, ABQ ranges from 5,000 to 6,000 feet above sea level. I loved riding there.
There was a 4% grade, 5 mile long hill in Albuquerque where I used my 42, a lot. Remember, though, ABQ ranges from 5,000 to 6,000 feet above sea level. I loved riding there.
Last edited by Bad Lag; 10-05-22 at 11:06 PM.
#62
Cantilever believer
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,553
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 529 Post(s)
Liked 1,822 Times
in
824 Posts
I take a hacksaw, cut the teeth off, and use them as chainguards for saner chainrings such as 46 and below.
__________________
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
Richard C. Moeur, PE - Phoenix AZ, USA
https://www.richardcmoeur.com/bikestuf.html
#63
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,775
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3502 Post(s)
Liked 2,917 Times
in
1,771 Posts
and finally 3) principle...past owners shifting between the front chainrings and trying to quickly drop back down to the smaller ring is probably the biggest reason our precious (otherwise pristine) steeds are all mucked up on the chainstay. Yep. I think that is probably the biggest reason. Never dropped a chain on a 1x with a proper length chain...which I really wasn't expecting.
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,102
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 288 Post(s)
Liked 329 Times
in
160 Posts
I think this is kind of a silly question. Perhaps a better way to phrase it would be “are you a masher or a spinner?” or “what gear inches do you mostly ride in?” And a lot of this has to do with the type of riding you do, terrain, age, fitness, etc.
Just because you push big gears doesn’t make you fast or a monster cyclist. Macho maybe.
If your gearing isn’t working for you you should consider changing it.
Just because you push big gears doesn’t make you fast or a monster cyclist. Macho maybe.
If your gearing isn’t working for you you should consider changing it.
#65
señor miembro
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 6,620
Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3878 Post(s)
Liked 6,467 Times
in
3,199 Posts
#66
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 3,443
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 873 Post(s)
Liked 2,279 Times
in
1,276 Posts
I find, with most of my bikes, that a 14/28 FW can take care of my gearing needs in a 52 or 53 chainring...until I hit a hill! Then I use the precious lil' 41 TA ring , and after that it's the walk of shame
I have to climb to my nest . My house is quite a bit above the houses 2 blocks down the hill. I've only made it on my mountain bike , can't do it on my road bike and I hate riding my mountain bike!
Leaving the nest is GREAT!!! Like the little pig holding the spinner out the window, WEEEE!
I have to climb to my nest . My house is quite a bit above the houses 2 blocks down the hill. I've only made it on my mountain bike , can't do it on my road bike and I hate riding my mountain bike!
Leaving the nest is GREAT!!! Like the little pig holding the spinner out the window, WEEEE!
Last edited by Kabuki12; 10-06-22 at 01:11 PM.
Likes For Kabuki12:
#67
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,650
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1025 Post(s)
Liked 2,524 Times
in
1,055 Posts
I use the big ring (52 on most of my bike, 50 on one) almost every ride. I also use my middle ring (42 on most bikes, 38 or so on one) and my dinky ring (24, 26 or 30, depending on the bike) an almost every ride. 90+% of my rides include significant climbs (dinky ring) and descents (big ring), and all rides include good middle ring territory.
I also cheat and ride Campy 10sp triple most of the time, but on frames ranging from 40 to almost 60 years old, so it kind of averages out.
I also cheat and ride Campy 10sp triple most of the time, but on frames ranging from 40 to almost 60 years old, so it kind of averages out.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
#68
The Huffmeister
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: The Le Grande HQ
Posts: 2,734
Bikes: '79 Trek 938, '86 Jim Merz Allez SE, '90 Miyata 1000, '68 PX-10, '80 PXN-10, '73 Super Course, '87 Guerciotti, '83 Trek 600, '80 Huffy Le Grande
Mentioned: 45 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1225 Post(s)
Liked 3,535 Times
in
1,407 Posts
At this point it would be great fun if I was able to ride with just about anybody, even chain droppers and chainstay grinders