Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Touring
Reload this Page >

Alternatives to Surly Ogre?

Search
Notices
Touring Have a dream to ride a bike across your state, across the country, or around the world? Self-contained or fully supported? Trade ideas, adventures, and more in our bicycle touring forum.

Alternatives to Surly Ogre?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-15, 12:23 AM
  #1  
stevage
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,505

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Sport 2009

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Alternatives to Surly Ogre?

I'm considering jumping on the offroad touring bandwagon with a new bike that takes fatter tyres. Then I can convert my current Specialized Tricross to lighter duties like commuting, paved midweight cycle tours and day rides.

The Ogre seems pretty appealing: fattish tyres, lots of mounting options on the fork (especially bottle cages/Anything bags). But I'm not a steel fetishist, so I wonder if there's something equivalent in aluminum somewhere? The must-haves are 700c, able to run 35mm to 2.5", rigid fork with rack and cage mounts. Still undecided about disks vs cantis etc.

Also, and maybe unanswerable, but I just noticed that the Surly Ogre has a maximum tyre width of 2.5" (64mm), while the Troll takes up to 2.7" (69mm). Is there a reason for this difference?
stevage is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 09:30 AM
  #2  
Jim Kukula
Senior Member
 
Jim Kukula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589

Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
The Santos Travelmaster 2.9 has an aluminum frame but steel forks, by the look of it. Definitely an up-market alternative but from the reports I have seen they make really solid bikes.

Santos - Custombuilt bicycles - Travelmaster 2.9
Jim Kukula is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 10:14 AM
  #3  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
Trek 920? its their 29er touring rig. 920 - Trek Bicycle
fietsbob is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 10:31 AM
  #4  
ShortLegCyclist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 791

Bikes: Many bikes in three states and two countries, mainly riding Moots Vamoots, Lynskey R265 disc and a Spot Denver Zephyr nowadays

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stevage
I'm considering jumping on the offroad touring bandwagon with a new bike that takes fatter tyres. Then I can convert my current Specialized Tricross to lighter duties like commuting, paved midweight cycle tours and day rides.

The Ogre seems pretty appealing: fattish tyres, lots of mounting options on the fork (especially bottle cages/Anything bags). But I'm not a steel fetishist, so I wonder if there's something equivalent in aluminum somewhere? The must-haves are 700c, able to run 35mm to 2.5", rigid fork with rack and cage mounts. Still undecided about disks vs cantis etc.

Also, and maybe unanswerable, but I just noticed that the Surly Ogre has a maximum tyre width of 2.5" (64mm), while the Troll takes up to 2.7" (69mm). Is there a reason for this difference?
High end: Koga Miyata Traveler ($3000+)
Less high end: Cannondale Synapse, Giant OCR, REI Novara Strada, not sure if any can take wide tires
ShortLegCyclist is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 10:54 AM
  #5  
stevage
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,505

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Sport 2009

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
Trek 920? its their 29er touring rig. 920 - Trek Bicycle
Oh wow, that just looks so...mean. I love it. Any idea what the maximum tyre clearance is?
stevage is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 11:54 AM
  #6  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
by reading the website you would have learned the standard tire is 2 inches wide, as supplied new on the bike.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 12:31 PM
  #7  
mijome07
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,570
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Salsa Fargo:

mijome07 is offline  
Likes For mijome07:
Old 06-28-15, 02:00 PM
  #8  
ze_zaskar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
If that matters to you, the Ogre will even run tires a little bigger than 2.5, like some guys who installed 29+ rubber.
Will also run 27.5+ tires easily
ze_zaskar is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 02:01 PM
  #9  
seeker333
-
 
seeker333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,865

Bikes: yes!

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 282 Post(s)
Liked 38 Times in 36 Posts
Originally Posted by stevage
I just noticed that the Surly Ogre has a maximum tyre width of 2.5" (64mm), while the Troll takes up to 2.7" (69mm). Is there a reason for this difference?
Tire diameter + drive line + drivetrain (FD) limitation + how much you can bend chainstays and they don't end up weak and ugly. It's simply harder to fit big tires into a bicycle that is essentially the same size.

For the same reasons, a LHT in 26 will accommodate 2.1" (53mm) tires with fenders, whereas LHT in 700c limited to 42mm with fenders.
seeker333 is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 02:04 PM
  #10  
rjl33
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 63
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Salsa Fargo, which I own and love, is a steel frame. To me, that is a benefit, but the op is looking for an aluminum framed alternative.
rjl33 is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 02:36 PM
  #11  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,212
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2736 Post(s)
Liked 970 Times in 793 Posts
Steve, check out the threads from a few weeks ago about the trek 920, seems like a nest bike, although the cost appears to be high in my opinion, and bar ends might be a deal breaker for some people.
djb is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 08:02 PM
  #12  
stevage
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,505

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Sport 2009

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by djb
Steve, check out the threads from a few weeks ago about the trek 920, seems like a nest bike, although the cost appears to be high in my opinion, and bar ends might be a deal breaker for some people.
Yeah, thanks. I'm not super sensitive to price, but some of the options further up the thread were a bit ridiculous, like the Santos Travelmaster at like 4000 euros. I'm definitely not a fan of bar ends - I've been really happy with STI, and I'd be fine with MTB shifters, but having to move hand positions to change gears is a turn-off.
stevage is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 08:16 PM
  #13  
DanBell
Senior Member
 
DanBell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: On the road...
Posts: 566
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by stevage
having to move hand positions to change gears is a turn-off.
You might be surprised to find out how quickly this becomes second nature. Maybe it depends on how stable you feel on a bike though, i.e. riding with one hand or no hands. After seeing a relatively long thread over in the road biking subforum with someone seeking advice about how to move their hands from the hoods to the drops, I realized that not everyone is comfortable shifting their hands around.
DanBell is offline  
Old 06-28-15, 09:08 PM
  #14  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,212
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2736 Post(s)
Liked 970 Times in 793 Posts
Originally Posted by stevage
Yeah, thanks. I'm not super sensitive to price, but some of the options further up the thread were a bit ridiculous, like the Santos Travelmaster at like 4000 euros. I'm definitely not a fan of bar ends - I've been really happy with STI, and I'd be fine with MTB shifters, but having to move hand positions to change gears is a turn-off.
Re barends, ya I know what you mean. I've never owned one, but have ridden a friends 520 trek a bit and having had ridden downtube bikes for years, I adapted really quickly. That said, I really like sti and my other bike is a MTB with trigger shifters, which I really like also. Not having to move your hands to shift in rough stuff, and with lots of riding i do in city traffic, makes me leery of barends. I guess ultimately I'd have to live with a bar end bike for a while to see if I'd be OK with it.

Hey, ps, did you ever replace the shifter on the tricross of did flushing the heck out of it help, I don't remember the outcome
djb is offline  
Old 06-29-15, 02:03 AM
  #15  
stevage
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,505

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Sport 2009

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DanBell
You might be surprised to find out how quickly this becomes second nature.
Yeah, maybe. I actually ride no-hands a lot, but I still think it would be frustrating being stuck in a gear on rough terrain.
stevage is offline  
Old 06-29-15, 02:05 AM
  #16  
stevage
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,505

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Sport 2009

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by djb
Hey, ps, did you ever replace the shifter on the tricross of did flushing the heck out of it help, I don't remember the outcome
Oh, hey Eventually bit the bullet and had them replaced with Sora. New handlebars at the same time. I was about to do the Mawson Trail (partial write up here) and didn't want a big disaster.

On that trip I had a 48mm front tyre which got me thinking about fatter tyres. Sadly I can only fit about a 38mm rear.
stevage is offline  
Old 06-29-15, 03:34 AM
  #17  
jargo432
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Texas
Posts: 277

Bikes: Surly Disc Trucker, Ogre, Steamroller

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd like to address the no hands subject for just a second. (since you brought it up) I ride a DT and noticed that when empty I can "no hands it" easily. However when I try it loaded, you can forget it. I not complaining or anything, just thought it was interesting how much differently the bike handles when it's loaded. (and that's with a tubus low rider front rack)
jargo432 is offline  
Old 06-29-15, 05:38 AM
  #18  
DanBell
Senior Member
 
DanBell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: On the road...
Posts: 566
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 141 Post(s)
Liked 16 Times in 14 Posts
Originally Posted by jargo432
I'd like to address the no hands subject for just a second. (since you brought it up) I ride a DT and noticed that when empty I can "no hands it" easily. However when I try it loaded, you can forget it. I not complaining or anything, just thought it was interesting how much differently the bike handles when it's loaded. (and that's with a tubus low rider front rack)
That's interesting. I have a Disc Trucker too, and I find it to be incredibly easy to ride with no hands loaded or unloaded. Tubus something in the back and Duo on the front. It's definitely easier to no-hands at lower speed unloaded, but there's so much momentum to it loaded that I love riding no hands coasting down a road. Great way to stretch the back out on a long tour. I wonder if it's a size difference? I'm on a 56cm DT with 700c wheels. This is certainly dragging the OP off track though. Apologies.
DanBell is offline  
Old 06-29-15, 05:53 AM
  #19  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,392
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,690 Times in 2,513 Posts
check out the Kona Big Rove
unterhausen is offline  
Old 06-29-15, 09:17 PM
  #20  
Jim Kukula
Senior Member
 
Jim Kukula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Utah
Posts: 589

Bikes: Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I ride a steel bike, a Thorn Nomad. On handling, I find that with my handlebar bag mounted I can easily ride no-hands. Without the bag, the bike is a lot more skittish.

Jim Kukula is offline  
Old 06-29-15, 10:07 PM
  #21  
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Montreal Canada
Posts: 13,212
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2736 Post(s)
Liked 970 Times in 793 Posts
Jim, I've always thought that those drivetrain cover thingees are the smartest thing. Imagine how much longer life everything lasts not having gunk on it. Would absolutely be on my list if I were ever to go that route.
djb is offline  
Old 06-30-15, 01:10 AM
  #22  
Darth Lefty 
Disco Infiltrator
 
Darth Lefty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,446

Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3126 Post(s)
Liked 2,103 Times in 1,367 Posts
Originally Posted by stevage
Also, and maybe unanswerable, but I just noticed that the Surly Ogre has a maximum tyre width of 2.5" (64mm), while the Troll takes up to 2.7" (69mm). Is there a reason for this difference?
Like @seeker333 said, 29er tires are really large. If you look at the area behind the seat tube, you can see the difference.


__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Darth Lefty is offline  
Old 06-30-15, 09:32 AM
  #23  
Leebo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Boston
Posts: 5,721

Bikes: Kona Dawg, Surly 1x1, Karate Monkey, Rockhopper, Crosscheck , Burley Runabout,

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Liked 111 Times in 66 Posts
The troll uses 26" tires. I have a Karate Monkey, but he ogre has more mounts. Can you even run cantis on an ogre?
Leebo is offline  
Old 06-30-15, 05:21 PM
  #24  
stevage
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,505

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Sport 2009

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Darth Lefty
Like @seeker333 said, 29er tires are really large. If you look at the area behind the seat tube, you can see the difference.
Ah...that makes sense. I was thinking of sideways clearance only.
stevage is offline  
Old 06-30-15, 05:22 PM
  #25  
stevage
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,505

Bikes: Specialized Tricross Sport 2009

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Leebo
The troll uses 26" tires. I have a Karate Monkey, but he ogre has more mounts. Can you even run cantis on an ogre?
Yep:

>Ogre comes with our suspension-corrected (80mm) fork with threaded mounts for fenders and a rack. It will run cantilever or disc brakes so you can choose a system that best suits your stopping needs. Both fork and frame allow the use of a fender, disc brake, and rack at the same time.
stevage is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.