Which Part of your Foot do you Pedal with?
#1
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
162 Posts
Which Part of your Foot do you Pedal with?
Couple things:
- I've learned that pedalling more with the balls of your feet (such as when using toe cages, clips, or pedal straps) requires you to set the seat somewhat higher than baseline to achieve a normal leg extension.
- I find that i can sort of "compensate," or adjust the "effective" reach of a bike with a longer reach figure, such as a mountain bike, by pedalling closer towards my heel over the pedal.
- It seems to have taken some stress of my knees, while allowing for me to ensure ideal leg extension with a lower saddle height.
- I've read somewhere that the back of your knee should roughly lineup with your heel as you pedal. Is this true? If so, would this be a good indicator of your ideal reach measurement paired with where you should be placing your foot on the pedal?
- has anyone given this a thought, or do we all subconsciously pedal with our feet placed wherever we feel is right? Who has experimented with different foot positions and what were your observations?
- I've learned that pedalling more with the balls of your feet (such as when using toe cages, clips, or pedal straps) requires you to set the seat somewhat higher than baseline to achieve a normal leg extension.
- I find that i can sort of "compensate," or adjust the "effective" reach of a bike with a longer reach figure, such as a mountain bike, by pedalling closer towards my heel over the pedal.
- It seems to have taken some stress of my knees, while allowing for me to ensure ideal leg extension with a lower saddle height.
- I've read somewhere that the back of your knee should roughly lineup with your heel as you pedal. Is this true? If so, would this be a good indicator of your ideal reach measurement paired with where you should be placing your foot on the pedal?
- has anyone given this a thought, or do we all subconsciously pedal with our feet placed wherever we feel is right? Who has experimented with different foot positions and what were your observations?
Likes For Moisture:
#2
Senior Member
You'll find that the vast majority of road cyclists use a clipless pedal and cleat system to ensure that their feet are always positioned in the same position over the pedal axle and hopefully, although not always, in the optimum position. Now although the 'optimum' position is a contentious subject (with a couple of exceptions) there isn't that much variance.
This page will explain in perfect detail:-
https://www.stevehoggbikefitting.com...leat-position/
Any fitter of any worth will always start with the feet; then saddle then front end. If the feet are wrong, it can throw out everything else. This is why, other than for casual riding; most people don't use flat pedals.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eastern Iowa
Posts: 631
Bikes: 2014 Trek Allant drop bar conversion, modified Schwinn MTN commuter, 2015 Trek 520, Soma ES, Salsa Journeyman, 1980 Trek 414
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 178 Post(s)
Liked 355 Times
in
166 Posts
The bottom
Likes For SalsaShark:
#4
Occam's Rotor
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 7,248
Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2366 Post(s)
Liked 2,331 Times
in
1,164 Posts
Why do I click on his threads?
#5
Senior Member
To address your other points:-
How are you determining baseline?
If you're using the conventional position of (and when I say conventional I mean 'generally conventional') ball of foot 'roughly in line with' or 'to some degree in front of' pedal spindle then your seat will need to be set higher than it would be of you were pedalling with the middle of your foot as the front of your foot is further away from you saddle than the middle....
I have no idea what this means
I don't know what you're referring to here but as a rule of thumb, if your saddle is too high you will experience pain behind the knee; if it's too low you will experience pain in front. In terms of injury or performance, if in doubt too low is better than too high.
This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever; I can't even imagine how that could be physically possible. You do not use pedal position or saddle position to determine reach, ever.
If you're using the conventional position of (and when I say conventional I mean 'generally conventional') ball of foot 'roughly in line with' or 'to some degree in front of' pedal spindle then your seat will need to be set higher than it would be of you were pedalling with the middle of your foot as the front of your foot is further away from you saddle than the middle....
This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever; I can't even imagine how that could be physically possible. You do not use pedal position or saddle position to determine reach, ever.
#6
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
162 Posts
Surprisingly YES! many have indeed 'given this a thought'; pretty much since the start of the 20th century billions of cyclists have been paying attention to their foot / pedal relationship.
You'll find that the vast majority of road cyclists use a clipless pedal and cleat system to ensure that their feet are always positioned in the same position over the pedal axle and hopefully, although not always, in the optimum position. Now although the 'optimum' position is a contentious subject (with a couple of exceptions) there isn't that much variance.
This page will explain in perfect detail:-
https://www.stevehoggbikefitting.com...leat-position/
Any fitter of any worth will always start with the feet; then saddle then front end. If the feet are wrong, it can throw out everything else. This is why, other than for casual riding; most people don't use flat pedals.
You'll find that the vast majority of road cyclists use a clipless pedal and cleat system to ensure that their feet are always positioned in the same position over the pedal axle and hopefully, although not always, in the optimum position. Now although the 'optimum' position is a contentious subject (with a couple of exceptions) there isn't that much variance.
This page will explain in perfect detail:-
https://www.stevehoggbikefitting.com...leat-position/
Any fitter of any worth will always start with the feet; then saddle then front end. If the feet are wrong, it can throw out everything else. This is why, other than for casual riding; most people don't use flat pedals.
So why Do people use the heel to pedal method as a general baseline for seat height if you are supposed to be pedalling with the ball of your foot(according to link you posted, will make sure to study more in depth on that later)
- I think i will need to raise my seat a bit more then, because I'm still getting a bit of pain in the front of my right knee when pushing up windy hills. I realized that, within one minute of moving my feet slightly backwards on the pedal so that the balls of my feet were inline with the pedal axle, the knee pain completely disappeared.
- so I imagine that the reach and top tube are the main factors which determine where you will place your feet over the pedals, and after that it's up to the rider to select an ideal fore/aft saddle position to maximize power transfer?
For reference, the reach on my nishiki ( and norco) is 390mm. On my GT mtb, its about 480mm. The short reach on the road bike allows me to comfortably apply power with the ball of my foot which in turns allows for my calves to become more involved with pedal rotation. On the contrary, with the GT's longer reach, I feel most comfortable pedalling towards the back part of my foot, closer towards the heel. This implies to me that the reach on the GT is a bit too long?
Likes For Rage:
#8
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
162 Posts
I'm noticing a very specific trend with the style/genre of commenters who dislike my posts which otherwise lead to an advancement of education.
#9
Senior Member
As I said earlier, your heel is nearer your saddle than your toes; so, to establish an approximate starting point, set your saddle height so that with your heel on the pedal your knee is almost fully locked out at full extension. You will then find that when you move your foot back into the 'correct' position, at full leg extension you should be somewhere in the ballpark mentioned above. Again, this is just a starting point, depending on your flexibility you may benefit from going slightly higher / lower (There are many reasons why you may benefit from adjustment outside of this range but we're just looking at the basics here)
I think i will need to raise my seat a bit more then, because I'm still getting a bit of pain in the front of my right knee when pushing up windy hills. I realized that, within one minute of moving my feet slightly backwards on the pedal so that the balls of my feet were inline with the pedal axle, the knee pain completely disappeared.
Too far back causes less problems but if you disengage the quads too much your pedal stroke will be less powerful.
When adjusting fore and aft, remember that it you move the seat back you are effectively making it higher and similarly if you move it forward it becomes slightly lower so re-check the height after fore and aft adjustments.
Once you have established a pedal position and then a saddle position; only then should you adjust your reach using stem length / stem height / hood position / handlebar drop and reach based on your preference and to a large extent your flexibility.
This is all 'baseline' stuff and much will depend on your individual proportions / strengths / weaknesses / preference etc. So it's all up for debate to some degree but if you really have no idea where you should be on the bike or why you can adjust certain things in different directions then it should get you in the right ballpark.
#10
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
162 Posts
If you have absolutely no idea where your saddle height should be, this is generally accepted good starting point. You should not be able to actually pedal with your heels on the pedals; or at least not without difficulty. When you pedal, assuming your foot position is correct, you should have an angle of approximately 145 to 155 degrees between your femur and fibula at full extension.
As I said earlier, your heel is nearer your saddle than your toes; so, to establish an approximate starting point, set your saddle height so that with your heel on the pedal your knee is almost fully locked out at full extension. You will then find that when you move your foot back into the 'correct' position, at full leg extension you should be somewhere in the ballpark mentioned above. Again, this is just a starting point, depending on your flexibility you may benefit from going slightly higher / lower (There are many reasons why you may benefit from adjustment outside of this range but we're just looking at the basics here)
Your comment merely suggests that pedalling with the middle of your foot you were over extending your leg and 'reaching' during the pedal stroke. By pulling your feet back you are reducing the distance between the seat and your foot and no longer over-stressing the hamstrings / knee flexors etc. This is a good example of why your saddle height and foot position should be relatively 'fixed' unless just riding casually. If you want to pedal with the middle of your foot, move your saddle down.
NO! Reach and top tube length have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with where you should be placing your feet on the pedals.
Fore and aft is set to achieve balance over the bottom bracket (and to encourage pelvic rotation but that's another tangent) nothing more, nothing less. Too far forward and you will likely have too much weight on your hands and shoulders, your pelvis will not rotate forward (meaning your back will with either be too upright or rigid or bent in the wrong place or all three!) and your pedal stroke can become too quad dominant.
Too far back causes less problems but if you disengage the quads too much your pedal stroke will be less powerful.
When adjusting fore and aft, remember that it you move the seat back you are effectively making it higher and similarly if you move it forward it becomes slightly lower so re-check the height after fore and aft adjustments.
Once you have established a pedal position and then a saddle position; only then should you adjust your reach using stem length / stem height / hood position / handlebar drop and reach based on your preference and to a large extent your flexibility.
This is all 'baseline' stuff and much will depend on your individual proportions / strengths / weaknesses / preference etc. So it's all up for debate to some degree but if you really have no idea where you should be on the bike or why you can adjust certain things in different directions then it should get you in the right ballpark.
As I said earlier, your heel is nearer your saddle than your toes; so, to establish an approximate starting point, set your saddle height so that with your heel on the pedal your knee is almost fully locked out at full extension. You will then find that when you move your foot back into the 'correct' position, at full leg extension you should be somewhere in the ballpark mentioned above. Again, this is just a starting point, depending on your flexibility you may benefit from going slightly higher / lower (There are many reasons why you may benefit from adjustment outside of this range but we're just looking at the basics here)
Your comment merely suggests that pedalling with the middle of your foot you were over extending your leg and 'reaching' during the pedal stroke. By pulling your feet back you are reducing the distance between the seat and your foot and no longer over-stressing the hamstrings / knee flexors etc. This is a good example of why your saddle height and foot position should be relatively 'fixed' unless just riding casually. If you want to pedal with the middle of your foot, move your saddle down.
NO! Reach and top tube length have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with where you should be placing your feet on the pedals.
Fore and aft is set to achieve balance over the bottom bracket (and to encourage pelvic rotation but that's another tangent) nothing more, nothing less. Too far forward and you will likely have too much weight on your hands and shoulders, your pelvis will not rotate forward (meaning your back will with either be too upright or rigid or bent in the wrong place or all three!) and your pedal stroke can become too quad dominant.
Too far back causes less problems but if you disengage the quads too much your pedal stroke will be less powerful.
When adjusting fore and aft, remember that it you move the seat back you are effectively making it higher and similarly if you move it forward it becomes slightly lower so re-check the height after fore and aft adjustments.
Once you have established a pedal position and then a saddle position; only then should you adjust your reach using stem length / stem height / hood position / handlebar drop and reach based on your preference and to a large extent your flexibility.
This is all 'baseline' stuff and much will depend on your individual proportions / strengths / weaknesses / preference etc. So it's all up for debate to some degree but if you really have no idea where you should be on the bike or why you can adjust certain things in different directions then it should get you in the right ballpark.
I noticed that when I am placing my feet over the pedals as normal (balls over pedal axle, by keeping my calves flexed (using ankle flexion to keep your foot pointed downwards) I have noticeably more of a bend in my knee then if I was to pedal with my foot more or less perpendicular to my shin.
I like to pedal with my calves engaged to help with a smoother/faster cadence, but I should be raising my seat much higher than the current seating. So I am assuming that it comes down to making the right compromises to ensure that you achieve an ideal level of knee extension without having the seat simply set too high? (Such as when using toe cages and an exaggerated toe flexion), seat way to high, still not quite enough knee extension..
#11
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,431
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3629 Post(s)
Liked 5,297 Times
in
2,690 Posts
It's good to know you feel like you actually are learning something. It seems to be a difficult process for you so kudos for perseverance.
Likes For shelbyfv:
#12
Senior Member
I noticed that when I am placing my feet over the pedals as normal (balls over pedal axle, by keeping my calves flexed (using ankle flexion to keep your foot pointed downwards) I have noticeably more of a bend in my knee then if I was to pedal with my foot more or less perpendicular to my shin.
A smooth and efficient cadence comes from experience; there's no short cut. If after several months and several thousand miles your body doesn't make at least some adaptations, try using smaller gears and / or shorter cranks*
* I say this based on the fact that we know you currently have a low natural cadence and the cranks you are using are more than likely already too long.
Likes For aniki:
#13
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
162 Posts
Stop worrying about flexing your calves and don't point your toes up or down. Just let your feet rest wherever they naturally want to be!
A smooth and efficient cadence comes from experience; there's no short cut. If after several months and several thousand miles your body doesn't make at least some adaptations, try using smaller gears and / or shorter cranks*
* I say this based on the fact that we know you currently have a low natural cadence and the cranks you are using are more than likely already too long.
A smooth and efficient cadence comes from experience; there's no short cut. If after several months and several thousand miles your body doesn't make at least some adaptations, try using smaller gears and / or shorter cranks*
* I say this based on the fact that we know you currently have a low natural cadence and the cranks you are using are more than likely already too long.
Once your average cadence starts to become affected, this should be a simple indication that the arms are now simply too long for you. Im able to maintain a higher cadence smoother and for longer now. Maybe if I get a video of me pedalling you'd be able to judge better.
Anyways, so once you begin to have trouble reaching the pedals with your heels, this is roughly the indication that you're at, or close to an ideal saddle height? What if you need to go higher based on the way you naturally place your foot over the pedal? Is that a no no?
#14
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
162 Posts
aniki
I'm just trying to understand. I know that no matter how much you adjust your saddle fore and aft, if your top tube isn't the correct length, there's no compensating for that. Regardless of what your effective top tube length is, the bottom bracket is going to be the some proportional distance in front of the tube, which is why is bears no meaning on foo placement, correct?
For example, my gt has a top tube length of 590mm and the Nishiki is 580mm. How exactly can you increase the reach figure of a frame by 90mm of the top tube is only 10mm longer? And how would the the bottom bracket being 90mm closer toward the rider (on an otherwise similarly long top tube) bear no meeting on the way your feet naturally come into contact with the pedals? Please explain
I'm just trying to understand. I know that no matter how much you adjust your saddle fore and aft, if your top tube isn't the correct length, there's no compensating for that. Regardless of what your effective top tube length is, the bottom bracket is going to be the some proportional distance in front of the tube, which is why is bears no meaning on foo placement, correct?
For example, my gt has a top tube length of 590mm and the Nishiki is 580mm. How exactly can you increase the reach figure of a frame by 90mm of the top tube is only 10mm longer? And how would the the bottom bracket being 90mm closer toward the rider (on an otherwise similarly long top tube) bear no meeting on the way your feet naturally come into contact with the pedals? Please explain
#15
Senior Member
Make adjustments in no more than 2 or 3mm increments until you find the position you're happy with. If you get it wrong, your body will let you know somehow.
Likes For aniki:
#16
Senior Member
Better to concentrate on seat tube angle which, assuming a consistent reach measurement, will directly influence the length of the 'effective' top tube and to a large extent, the available adjustable range of the saddle. Anyway, NONE of this has anything at all to do with where you put your feet on the pedals.
.... which is why is bears no meaning on foo placement, correct?
For example, my gt has a top tube length of 590mm and the Nishiki is 580mm. How exactly can you increase the reach figure of a frame by 90mm of the top tube is only 10mm longer? And how would the the bottom bracket being 90mm closer toward the rider (on an otherwise similarly long top tube) bear no meeting on the way your feet naturally come into contact with the pedals? Please explain
For example, my gt has a top tube length of 590mm and the Nishiki is 580mm. How exactly can you increase the reach figure of a frame by 90mm of the top tube is only 10mm longer? And how would the the bottom bracket being 90mm closer toward the rider (on an otherwise similarly long top tube) bear no meeting on the way your feet naturally come into contact with the pedals? Please explain
As for the rest, the answer is simply because the starting point of your fit is the feet on the pedals. This position should be optimal and more importantly 'consistent'.
Regardless of top tub length, bottom bracket height or anything else, your foot position comes first and then that sets the basis for your saddle position; which again should be a constant across multiple bikes (assuming the same discipline)
If for ANY reason, the set-up of a bike is CAUSING you to place your feet in a different position on the pedals then something is seriously wrong with that bike.
Likes For aniki:
#17
Senior Member
Moisture
I thought I'd give you the benefit of the doubt and actually try to help you rather than just mocking your bad decisions; it seemed like for a moment you were actually possibly taking some of this in.
However, despite your temporary ban and the fact that you are obviously very green, you are still insistent on hijacking everyone else's threads to provide your entirely baseless and irrelevant, misunderstood pearls of wisdom!
First you were telling everyone that their 'leaning forward' position was wrong and told everyone to use shorter stems.
Then you got obsessed with crank length and hijacked a million threads telling them their cranks were wrong.
Now you've just done exactly the same telling everyone about their saddle position.
-
You're on your own from here son!
I thought I'd give you the benefit of the doubt and actually try to help you rather than just mocking your bad decisions; it seemed like for a moment you were actually possibly taking some of this in.
However, despite your temporary ban and the fact that you are obviously very green, you are still insistent on hijacking everyone else's threads to provide your entirely baseless and irrelevant, misunderstood pearls of wisdom!
First you were telling everyone that their 'leaning forward' position was wrong and told everyone to use shorter stems.
Then you got obsessed with crank length and hijacked a million threads telling them their cranks were wrong.
Now you've just done exactly the same telling everyone about their saddle position.
-
You're on your own from here son!
#19
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,486
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3866 Post(s)
Liked 1,911 Times
in
1,362 Posts
I use clipless and pedal with the ball of my big toe directly over the pedal axle, as I've done for almost 70 years. Just do that. If you have trouble with that, it's because you lack fitness. Go and do 3 sets of 50 full squats, all the way down, hamstrings on calves. Then do a set of 30 pushups. Do that every other day for a few months, then worry about bike fit.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#20
Senior Member
I've drafted several responses and backed out, Let's try this....
Your legs are not supposed to be fully extended with heels on the pedals. It's 'heels-on-pedals-pedalling-backward-without-rocking-your-hips.' Full leg extension is not the ideal, and I believe research has shown it's not the way to get the most power out of your legs (though I hesitate to write that, since I can't cite the research).
Here's what I read in your posts: you ride, feel discomfort, attribute the discomfort to an adjustment on your bike, and adjust based on something you've read or, possibly, misread. Then you ride more, feel more discomfort, adjust your bike, rinse, and repeat. And you've ended up with a strange looking bike and strange ideas - for example, that foot placement on the pedals is related directly to TT+stem+handlebar measurement. You jump to conclusions that are unexpected, to say the least. You get dogmatic about those conclusions. And you continue to ride without satisfaction. What you're doing isn't working for you, so do something difference.
I think you need to go through some sort of reset in your head and your body.
Why not start with seat height? Assume that you're probably average, so some small variation on the 3 major rules of thumb for setting seat height will work for you - 109% of cycling inseam from seat to pedal, or LeMond's rule of thumb (.883 * inseam from seat to center of BB), or heels on pedals, or the average of all of them. Ride ... this is new to you, still, so expect some discomfort. If your knee(s) hurt, see if you can avoid the pain by changing your foot position. If you can't, make one small change. One small change. Test. Adjust.
Stop assuming that discomfort is due to something wrong with your bike. Riding takes conditioning. If you're not conditioned correctly, cycling will hurt. You may be great climbing hills, but hills are different from headwinds. You may be great going downhill, but that's different from riding on a road. Your core strength may be great, and you may be great aerobically, but your butt still has to get broken in for the saddle to be comfortable.
Reset your head. Stop jumping to conclusions.
BTW, for me, LeMond's .883 x inseam, 109% x inseam, and heels on pedals yield results that are within 1 (one) CM. I can ride comfortably anyplace within that 1 CM range.
Your legs are not supposed to be fully extended with heels on the pedals. It's 'heels-on-pedals-pedalling-backward-without-rocking-your-hips.' Full leg extension is not the ideal, and I believe research has shown it's not the way to get the most power out of your legs (though I hesitate to write that, since I can't cite the research).
Here's what I read in your posts: you ride, feel discomfort, attribute the discomfort to an adjustment on your bike, and adjust based on something you've read or, possibly, misread. Then you ride more, feel more discomfort, adjust your bike, rinse, and repeat. And you've ended up with a strange looking bike and strange ideas - for example, that foot placement on the pedals is related directly to TT+stem+handlebar measurement. You jump to conclusions that are unexpected, to say the least. You get dogmatic about those conclusions. And you continue to ride without satisfaction. What you're doing isn't working for you, so do something difference.
I think you need to go through some sort of reset in your head and your body.
Why not start with seat height? Assume that you're probably average, so some small variation on the 3 major rules of thumb for setting seat height will work for you - 109% of cycling inseam from seat to pedal, or LeMond's rule of thumb (.883 * inseam from seat to center of BB), or heels on pedals, or the average of all of them. Ride ... this is new to you, still, so expect some discomfort. If your knee(s) hurt, see if you can avoid the pain by changing your foot position. If you can't, make one small change. One small change. Test. Adjust.
Stop assuming that discomfort is due to something wrong with your bike. Riding takes conditioning. If you're not conditioned correctly, cycling will hurt. You may be great climbing hills, but hills are different from headwinds. You may be great going downhill, but that's different from riding on a road. Your core strength may be great, and you may be great aerobically, but your butt still has to get broken in for the saddle to be comfortable.
Reset your head. Stop jumping to conclusions.
BTW, for me, LeMond's .883 x inseam, 109% x inseam, and heels on pedals yield results that are within 1 (one) CM. I can ride comfortably anyplace within that 1 CM range.
#21
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
162 Posts
I've drafted several responses and backed out, Let's try this....
Your legs are not supposed to be fully extended with heels on the pedals. It's 'heels-on-pedals-pedalling-backward-without-rocking-your-hips.' Full leg extension is not the ideal, and I believe research has shown it's not the way to get the most power out of your legs (though I hesitate to write that, since I can't cite the research).
Here's what I read in your posts: you ride, feel discomfort, attribute the discomfort to an adjustment on your bike, and adjust based on something you've read or, possibly, misread. Then you ride more, feel more discomfort, adjust your bike, rinse, and repeat. And you've ended up with a strange looking bike and strange ideas - for example, that foot placement on the pedals is related directly to TT+stem+handlebar measurement. You jump to conclusions that are unexpected, to say the least. You get dogmatic about those conclusions. And you continue to ride without satisfaction. What you're doing isn't working for you, so do something difference.
I think you need to go through some sort of reset in your head and your body.
Why not start with seat height? Assume that you're probably average, so some small variation on the 3 major rules of thumb for setting seat height will work for you - 109% of cycling inseam from seat to pedal, or LeMond's rule of thumb (.883 * inseam from seat to center of BB), or heels on pedals, or the average of all of them. Ride ... this is new to you, still, so expect some discomfort. If your knee(s) hurt, see if you can avoid the pain by changing your foot position. If you can't, make one small change. One small change. Test. Adjust.
Stop assuming that discomfort is due to something wrong with your bike. Riding takes conditioning. If you're not conditioned correctly, cycling will hurt. You may be great climbing hills, but hills are different from headwinds. You may be great going downhill, but that's different from riding on a road. Your core strength may be great, and you may be great aerobically, but your butt still has to get broken in for the saddle to be comfortable.
Reset your head. Stop jumping to conclusions.
BTW, for me, LeMond's .883 x inseam, 109% x inseam, and heels on pedals yield results that are within 1 (one) CM. I can ride comfortably anyplace within that 1 CM range.
Your legs are not supposed to be fully extended with heels on the pedals. It's 'heels-on-pedals-pedalling-backward-without-rocking-your-hips.' Full leg extension is not the ideal, and I believe research has shown it's not the way to get the most power out of your legs (though I hesitate to write that, since I can't cite the research).
Here's what I read in your posts: you ride, feel discomfort, attribute the discomfort to an adjustment on your bike, and adjust based on something you've read or, possibly, misread. Then you ride more, feel more discomfort, adjust your bike, rinse, and repeat. And you've ended up with a strange looking bike and strange ideas - for example, that foot placement on the pedals is related directly to TT+stem+handlebar measurement. You jump to conclusions that are unexpected, to say the least. You get dogmatic about those conclusions. And you continue to ride without satisfaction. What you're doing isn't working for you, so do something difference.
I think you need to go through some sort of reset in your head and your body.
Why not start with seat height? Assume that you're probably average, so some small variation on the 3 major rules of thumb for setting seat height will work for you - 109% of cycling inseam from seat to pedal, or LeMond's rule of thumb (.883 * inseam from seat to center of BB), or heels on pedals, or the average of all of them. Ride ... this is new to you, still, so expect some discomfort. If your knee(s) hurt, see if you can avoid the pain by changing your foot position. If you can't, make one small change. One small change. Test. Adjust.
Stop assuming that discomfort is due to something wrong with your bike. Riding takes conditioning. If you're not conditioned correctly, cycling will hurt. You may be great climbing hills, but hills are different from headwinds. You may be great going downhill, but that's different from riding on a road. Your core strength may be great, and you may be great aerobically, but your butt still has to get broken in for the saddle to be comfortable.
Reset your head. Stop jumping to conclusions.
BTW, for me, LeMond's .883 x inseam, 109% x inseam, and heels on pedals yield results that are within 1 (one) CM. I can ride comfortably anyplace within that 1 CM range.
However, my saddle is very puffy and cushioned, so with my body weight pressed into it, im sure that the variance is likely just over 1cm. So I was right about feeling the need to raise my seat slightly.
I wasn't right about having my saddle almost all the way back. I will adjust both of these factors in small increments every couple rides or so (along with lowering my stem slightly) and see how that feels.
#22
Senior Member
That's an excellent word and I think is really at the crux of a lot of the problems with keyboard bike fitting.
As I've tried to point out in my responses to Moisture; regardless of precisely what your preferred method is of achieving a basic starting point, it is still only and exactly that; a starting point.
With saddle height; you can get in the right ballpark using fairly crude methods but then pelvic rotation, hip / knee / ankle flexion, foot position, leg length, body symmetry, injury etc. plus several other factors can ALL influence your final optimal position and realistically that can take some time to achieve.
Once in the right ballpark you really only have two options; go out and ride and adapt and make changes where necessary but understand WHY and HOW certain changes to the bike will affect you. OR go to a bike fitter.
And I'm not talking about a bike fitter who also happens to sell bikes and works behind the counter in the local bike superstore or the guy with a loft, a laptop and a goniometer I mean; well basically someone who understands bikes AND understands bio-mechanics. Or just see Steve Hogg or anyone who uses his methods!
As I've tried to point out in my responses to Moisture; regardless of precisely what your preferred method is of achieving a basic starting point, it is still only and exactly that; a starting point.
With saddle height; you can get in the right ballpark using fairly crude methods but then pelvic rotation, hip / knee / ankle flexion, foot position, leg length, body symmetry, injury etc. plus several other factors can ALL influence your final optimal position and realistically that can take some time to achieve.
Once in the right ballpark you really only have two options; go out and ride and adapt and make changes where necessary but understand WHY and HOW certain changes to the bike will affect you. OR go to a bike fitter.
And I'm not talking about a bike fitter who also happens to sell bikes and works behind the counter in the local bike superstore or the guy with a loft, a laptop and a goniometer I mean; well basically someone who understands bikes AND understands bio-mechanics. Or just see Steve Hogg or anyone who uses his methods!
Likes For aniki:
#23
Drip, Drip.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
162 Posts
That's an excellent word and I think is really at the crux of a lot of the problems with keyboard bike fitting.
As I've tried to point out in my responses to Moisture; regardless of precisely what your preferred method is of achieving a basic starting point, it is still only and exactly that; a starting point.
With saddle height; you can get in the right ballpark using fairly crude methods but then pelvic rotation, hip / knee / ankle flexion, foot position, leg length, body symmetry, injury etc. plus several other factors can ALL influence your final optimal position and realistically that can take some time to achieve.
Once in the right ballpark you really only have two options; go out and ride and adapt and make changes where necessary but understand WHY and HOW certain changes to the bike will affect you. OR go to a bike fitter.
And I'm not talking about a bike fitter who also happens to sell bikes and works behind the counter in the local bike superstore or the guy with a loft, a laptop and a goniometer I mean; well basically someone who understands bikes AND understands bio-mechanics. Or just see Steve Hogg or anyone who uses his methods!
As I've tried to point out in my responses to Moisture; regardless of precisely what your preferred method is of achieving a basic starting point, it is still only and exactly that; a starting point.
With saddle height; you can get in the right ballpark using fairly crude methods but then pelvic rotation, hip / knee / ankle flexion, foot position, leg length, body symmetry, injury etc. plus several other factors can ALL influence your final optimal position and realistically that can take some time to achieve.
Once in the right ballpark you really only have two options; go out and ride and adapt and make changes where necessary but understand WHY and HOW certain changes to the bike will affect you. OR go to a bike fitter.
And I'm not talking about a bike fitter who also happens to sell bikes and works behind the counter in the local bike superstore or the guy with a loft, a laptop and a goniometer I mean; well basically someone who understands bikes AND understands bio-mechanics. Or just see Steve Hogg or anyone who uses his methods!
So other than the fore aft position of the saddle, anything else that directly impacts how your feet come into contact with the pedals? How would one type of frame achieve a different foot placement over another?
#24
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,701
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4769 Post(s)
Liked 7,738 Times
in
3,658 Posts
Thanks Aniki. You've helped to share some invaluable information within the community.
So other than the fore aft position of the saddle, anything else that directly impacts how your feet come into contact with the pedals? How would one type of frame achieve a different foot placement over another?
So other than the fore aft position of the saddle, anything else that directly impacts how your feet come into contact with the pedals? How would one type of frame achieve a different foot placement over another?
Saddle fore-aft position doesn't affect where I place my foot on the pedal. It affects my knee position over the pedal, and my balance over the bike.
Right now, it feels like you are worrying about the color of your door handles before you've built the foundation of your house.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#25
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 7,701
Bikes: 2023 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2018 Trek Procaliber 9.9 RSL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4769 Post(s)
Liked 7,738 Times
in
3,658 Posts
I don't think I've seen this question asked of you...What kind of riding are you trying to do? It seems like you are interested in improving your performance (your ability to go faster and farther), but there are also some strong indicators that short and leisurely rides are more of your thing.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions