Columbus, Cinelli, Campagnolo
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 156
Bikes: Colnago Super (panto) - Gios Professional (1st Generation C-Record) - Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra (Team USA) - Barellia Reynolds 531 - Fully chromed Columbus steel bike (Patelli?) Super Record Titanium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
26 Posts
Columbus, Cinelli, Campagnolo
Hi there,
There is one question that comes to my mind once in a while:
Most good Italian frames from the 1970s / 1980s were made from pretty much the same material: Columbus SL tubing, Cinelli lugs and Campagnolo frame ends and fork ends (Colnago, Gios, Bianchi...). To my knowledge, anyone else who had the money could buy these ingredients, too.
Of course, frame geometry does make a difference. But apart from that, is there really a difference between a frame from a "cult" brand and one from a small, unknown but experienced producer who used the same ingredients?
I don´t expect to find out "the truth" but I would like to read some opinions. Thanks!
Cheers
There is one question that comes to my mind once in a while:
Most good Italian frames from the 1970s / 1980s were made from pretty much the same material: Columbus SL tubing, Cinelli lugs and Campagnolo frame ends and fork ends (Colnago, Gios, Bianchi...). To my knowledge, anyone else who had the money could buy these ingredients, too.
Of course, frame geometry does make a difference. But apart from that, is there really a difference between a frame from a "cult" brand and one from a small, unknown but experienced producer who used the same ingredients?
I don´t expect to find out "the truth" but I would like to read some opinions. Thanks!
Cheers
Last edited by Nuovo Record; 06-19-21 at 04:25 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1079 Post(s)
Liked 1,898 Times
in
931 Posts
There are many smaller, lesser known frame builders that produced a just as good, if not better, product. Both in Italy and other countries.
The difference is they didn’t sponsor the big name riders at the time.
(IMO, YMMV, etc)
The difference is they didn’t sponsor the big name riders at the time.
(IMO, YMMV, etc)
Likes For P!N20:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hervey Bay, Qld, Australia.
Posts: 2,928
Bikes: Colnago (82, 85, 89, 90, 91, 96, 03), 85 Cinelli, 90 Rossin, 83 Alan, 82 Bianchi, 78 Fountain, 2 x Pinarello, Malvern Star (37), Hillman (70's), 80's Beretto Lo-Pro Track, 80's Kenevans Lo-Pro, Columbus Max (95), DeGrandi (80's) Track.
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 179 Post(s)
Liked 198 Times
in
124 Posts
Could it be just an 'alphabet thing'? It seems that the quality Italian bike alphabet starts with "C". Columbus, Cinelli, Capmagnolo, Cipollini, Colnago, Ciocc, Chesini, etc., and it goes down hill from there.
#4
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,651
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1025 Post(s)
Liked 2,525 Times
in
1,055 Posts
Yes, some smaller some builders made frames every bit as good, if not better, than the name brands. There are also smaller builders whose product was not as good. Ya pays y'r money and ya takes y'r chances.
Another complicating factor - personal preference. The De Rosa or Cinelli frame (or the frame from a lesser known builder, or from an American, British or French builder) that sends me into rapture may feel meh to you, and vice-versa.
With the name builders, there is enough literature and other info out there that you can get some idea how it will ride and, thus, an experienced rider can get a fair to middlin' (but still not perfect) idea of whether he or she will like it. The smaller, less well known builder's frame won't have that info base, so it represents a bit more of a risk. That's part of the excitement.
At the end of the day, it really is impossible to say who made the "best" frames because the possible criteria vary so greatly. About the best you can hope for is figuring out who made the best frame for you for a given application. And even that is not easy to figure out without riding a lot of different bikes. But boy, the process sure can be a ton of fun..
Another complicating factor - personal preference. The De Rosa or Cinelli frame (or the frame from a lesser known builder, or from an American, British or French builder) that sends me into rapture may feel meh to you, and vice-versa.
With the name builders, there is enough literature and other info out there that you can get some idea how it will ride and, thus, an experienced rider can get a fair to middlin' (but still not perfect) idea of whether he or she will like it. The smaller, less well known builder's frame won't have that info base, so it represents a bit more of a risk. That's part of the excitement.
At the end of the day, it really is impossible to say who made the "best" frames because the possible criteria vary so greatly. About the best you can hope for is figuring out who made the best frame for you for a given application. And even that is not easy to figure out without riding a lot of different bikes. But boy, the process sure can be a ton of fun..
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
#5
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,651
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1025 Post(s)
Liked 2,525 Times
in
1,055 Posts
Some owners of Bianchis, De Rosas, Masis, and Pogliaghis (to name a few) might beg to differ.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
Likes For bikingshearer:
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 156
Bikes: Colnago Super (panto) - Gios Professional (1st Generation C-Record) - Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra (Team USA) - Barellia Reynolds 531 - Fully chromed Columbus steel bike (Patelli?) Super Record Titanium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
26 Posts
What else would make a difference in framebuilding apart from the ingredients (C,C, and C) and the geometry?
I can only think of the soldering. I know a couple of terms that get mentioned when it comes to that, like silver solder, microfusione etc. Probably the temperature is important.
Can that really create a difference?
I can only think of the soldering. I know a couple of terms that get mentioned when it comes to that, like silver solder, microfusione etc. Probably the temperature is important.
Can that really create a difference?
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,828 Times
in
1,995 Posts
#9
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,651
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1025 Post(s)
Liked 2,525 Times
in
1,055 Posts
What else would make a difference in framebuilding apart from the ingredients (C,C, and C) and the geometry?
I can only think of the soldering. I know a couple of terms that get mentioned when it comes to that, like silver solder, microfusione etc. Probably the temperature is important.
Can that really create a difference?
I can only think of the soldering. I know a couple of terms that get mentioned when it comes to that, like silver solder, microfusione etc. Probably the temperature is important.
Can that really create a difference?
Keep in mind that subtle differences in geometry (half a centimeter here, half a degree there) can make a perceptible difference. Also keep in mind what I said above about personal preference and what the bike is to be used for. You don't buy a Colnago or a Masi for touring, you don't buy a bike designed for loaded touring to use in a criterium, and so on. Vive le difference.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
Likes For bikingshearer:
Likes For satbuilder:
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 156
Bikes: Colnago Super (panto) - Gios Professional (1st Generation C-Record) - Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra (Team USA) - Barellia Reynolds 531 - Fully chromed Columbus steel bike (Patelli?) Super Record Titanium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
26 Posts
Are there Italian frames (or frame builders) that are to be avoided? I know that Mexican-built Benottos had quality issues. Are there others?
The general background of my question is: I have been looking for a C-C-C frame for quite some time now (ideally 50 cm seat tube / 49 cm upper tube, both center-center), and I would, of course, love a Bianchi Specialissima, Masi, De Rosa, or Cinelli frame, but I can´t seem to find one. Plan B is to buy a frame from some lesser known maker who used the same components.
The general background of my question is: I have been looking for a C-C-C frame for quite some time now (ideally 50 cm seat tube / 49 cm upper tube, both center-center), and I would, of course, love a Bianchi Specialissima, Masi, De Rosa, or Cinelli frame, but I can´t seem to find one. Plan B is to buy a frame from some lesser known maker who used the same components.
#12
Full Member
I worked for 20 year with a fellow who learned his frame building skills working for Chas Roberts and Holdsworthy Co.
Mention Italian built frames he'd make a face and mutter something to the effect that they "mitered their tubes with hack saws...". Lol...
Mention Italian built frames he'd make a face and mutter something to the effect that they "mitered their tubes with hack saws...". Lol...
#14
Crawlin' up, flyin' down
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Democratic Peoples' Republic of Berkeley
Posts: 5,651
Bikes: 1967 Paramount; 1982-ish Ron Cooper; 1978 Eisentraut "A"; two mid-1960s Cinelli Speciale Corsas; and others in various stages of non-rideability.
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1025 Post(s)
Liked 2,525 Times
in
1,055 Posts
Are there Italian frames (or frame builders) that are to be avoided? I know that Mexican-built Benottos had quality issues. Are there others?
The general background of my question is: I have been looking for a C-C-C frame for quite some time now (ideally 50 cm seat tube / 49 cm upper tube, both center-center), and I would, of course, love a Bianchi Specialissima, Masi, De Rosa, or Cinelli frame, but I can´t seem to find one. Plan B is to buy a frame from some lesser known maker who used the same components.
The general background of my question is: I have been looking for a C-C-C frame for quite some time now (ideally 50 cm seat tube / 49 cm upper tube, both center-center), and I would, of course, love a Bianchi Specialissima, Masi, De Rosa, or Cinelli frame, but I can´t seem to find one. Plan B is to buy a frame from some lesser known maker who used the same components.
Reputable names include, in no particular order: Daccordi; Bottechia; Basso; Rossin; Faggin; Fiorelli; Viner; Battaglin; Willier-Trestina; and Mondonico. There are more, these are just off the top of my head. Also, Billatto (sp?) Brothers and Biemezetta (BMZ) both did a bunch of contract builds for other builders; they made a good product. And as previously mentioned, De Rosa, Masi, Poghliaghi and top-end Bianchi frames are high on many grail lists.
Others may want to chime in here, but I have to go now.
__________________
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
"I'm in shape -- round is a shape." Andy Rooney
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Wurundjeri Country
Posts: 2,469
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1079 Post(s)
Liked 1,898 Times
in
931 Posts
When you're buying second hand bikes/frames, usually their condition is more of a deciding factor than the marque. I mean, sure, by all means get one that will start conversations at the cafe, but if it's been stored outside near the ocean then it's probably not going to be a sound purchase.
Likes For billytwosheds:
#17
Le savonnier
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,422
Bikes: I can count 'em on one hand
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 729 Post(s)
Liked 602 Times
in
274 Posts
Back in my road racing days (mid-late 80s) I rode a Bianchi Specialissima with Columbus SL tubing. Bucking tradition, I outfitted it with Dura-Ace 7400. I've owned other Italian bikes throughout the years, including Paletti, Giordana (Billato built), and Torelli. Lusted after but never owned Galmozzi, Pegoretti and Mondonico.
These days I own those crazy French bikes, mostly made with Reynolds 531, with names like Peugeot, Gitane, and Liberia. I no longer lust after Italian steel. But then I'll be 55 next month; could be a testosterone thing.
These days I own those crazy French bikes, mostly made with Reynolds 531, with names like Peugeot, Gitane, and Liberia. I no longer lust after Italian steel. But then I'll be 55 next month; could be a testosterone thing.
#18
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 156
Bikes: Colnago Super (panto) - Gios Professional (1st Generation C-Record) - Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra (Team USA) - Barellia Reynolds 531 - Fully chromed Columbus steel bike (Patelli?) Super Record Titanium
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 60 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
26 Posts
Would you say that there was a difference between the Bianchi Specialissima and the other Italian bikes from the same material that you owned?
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 3,332
Bikes: '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '72 Gitane tandem, '72 Raleigh Super Course, '73 Raleigh Gran Sport, '73 Colnago Super, '76 Fiorelli Coppi, '78 Raleigh SBDU Team Pro, '78 Trek 930, '81 Holdsworth Special 650B, '86 Masi GC, ’94 Bridgestone RB-T
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 786 Post(s)
Liked 518 Times
in
281 Posts
Bikes appearing virtually identical can ride and respond to your specific size, shape, and needs very differently. I have been through maybe 40 bikes in my size, buying, fixing up, riding, and selling the majority. The keepers are ones that jibe with me the most. I have some very nice Italian bikes, but my number one C/C/C bike is a '78 Trek 930. It just wants to go.
This is also why I'll never plunk down $$$ for a custom frame. Even if the specs look right, it may not work as well for me as a $150 Craigslist fixer-upper.
__________________
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
Likes For jeirvine:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 14,744
Bikes: Yes
Mentioned: 525 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3230 Post(s)
Liked 3,868 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Honestly, I'm not even certain that a given Bianchi Specialissima wouldn't be different from another one made later the same day. Certainly it would be different than another one that's a different size. The comments above about trying as many different bikes as possible are part whimsy but also part gospel truth. It's fun to read about other people's experiences with various vintage bikes, and it provides useful data to help in your quest. Certain brands, tubing, components, and geometry emerge from the crowd, but there are always more factors to consider.
I think this is part of why we're all such cheapskates here. It's foolish to invest a large amount of money in a vintage bike you haven't ridden unless you're buying it purely for its aesthetic qualities (and that's a perfectly valid reason to buy many vintage bikes, especially Italians). I've had a high-ten Japanese-built entry-level Gitane that I loved. I have a once top-of-the-line Columbus SLX Pinarello that I don't think rides better than an average bike. Vintage bikes are like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're gonna get.
If you don't overspend on a vintage bike, you can ride it for a while and sell it if you don't like it without losing much money. My problem is I tend to like them all well enough to keep.
In all seriousness, there's a traditional story that J.D. Salinger used in "Raise High the Roofbeam Carpenters" that applies perfectly to selecting a vintage bike. The key line is this, "A good horse can be picked out by its general build and appearance. But the superlative horse — one that raises no dust and leaves no tracks — is something evanescent and fleeting, elusive as thin air." The whole story (which is very brief) is worth reading. You can find it here: https://bigthink.com/Think-See-Feel/salinger-buddhist
I think this is part of why we're all such cheapskates here. It's foolish to invest a large amount of money in a vintage bike you haven't ridden unless you're buying it purely for its aesthetic qualities (and that's a perfectly valid reason to buy many vintage bikes, especially Italians). I've had a high-ten Japanese-built entry-level Gitane that I loved. I have a once top-of-the-line Columbus SLX Pinarello that I don't think rides better than an average bike. Vintage bikes are like a box of chocolates. You never know what you're gonna get.
If you don't overspend on a vintage bike, you can ride it for a while and sell it if you don't like it without losing much money. My problem is I tend to like them all well enough to keep.
In all seriousness, there's a traditional story that J.D. Salinger used in "Raise High the Roofbeam Carpenters" that applies perfectly to selecting a vintage bike. The key line is this, "A good horse can be picked out by its general build and appearance. But the superlative horse — one that raises no dust and leaves no tracks — is something evanescent and fleeting, elusive as thin air." The whole story (which is very brief) is worth reading. You can find it here: https://bigthink.com/Think-See-Feel/salinger-buddhist
__________________
My Bikes
My Bikes
#21
Le savonnier
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,422
Bikes: I can count 'em on one hand
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 729 Post(s)
Liked 602 Times
in
274 Posts
One of the favorite bikes I owned was a 1983 Trek 760, made with Reynolds 531. That was a sweet ride, and probably one of the reasons I gravitate towards Reynolds 531 bikes today. The French bikes that I own or have owned made with Reynolds 531 are sublime, both fast AND comfortable.
#22
framebuilder
Bikes appearing virtually identical can ride and respond to your specific size, shape, and needs very differently. I have been through maybe 40 bikes in my size, buying, fixing up, riding, and selling the majority. The keepers are ones that jibe with me the most. I have some very nice Italian bikes, but my number one C/C/C bike is a '78 Trek 930. It just wants to go.
This is also why I'll never plunk down $$$ for a custom frame. Even if the specs look right, it may not work as well for me as a $150 Craigslist fixer-upper.
This is also why I'll never plunk down $$$ for a custom frame. Even if the specs look right, it may not work as well for me as a $150 Craigslist fixer-upper.
A custom frame can be a lot more than just how it rides. I became a builder/painter because aesthetics are very important to me. This is a lot more than just choosing my own colors and graphics. I can design and cut my lugs and finish them to a quality not found in production frames.
Eventually I can explain the details of how a custom builder can improve the quality of its ride.However listing all the possibilities would make this post too long for people to want to read. Of course if someone says my budget is limited and a custom frame is not an option, I can certainly understand that.
Likes For Doug Fattic:
#23
Le savonnier
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,422
Bikes: I can count 'em on one hand
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 729 Post(s)
Liked 602 Times
in
274 Posts
^ What Doug said. For all the money I've spent on vintage used steel bikes, many of them great bikes no doubt, I probably could have at least one or two really great custom bikes. If fact, my next bike will be a custom, possibly a Woodrup, but I'm considering many options.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 11,674
Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma
Mentioned: 210 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,751 Times
in
938 Posts
There certainly is a difference and the difference is workmanship based .
Entry level lug work on an Italian bike (file marks and sloppy brazing)...
Same brand but top of the line lug work (not quality but much better)...
True quality lug work...
I have owned sloppy top of the line English, Italian, French and other bikes. Usually, Japanese top dogs offer top quality workmanship.
Drops offer the same kind of comparisons. File marks, poor or even uneven joints and even different length stays,
So, there is nothing special about brands (I have owned one Cinelli and it did not blow my kilt up). In general, I have never seen a sloppy Trek road bike.
Entry level lug work on an Italian bike (file marks and sloppy brazing)...
Same brand but top of the line lug work (not quality but much better)...
True quality lug work...
I have owned sloppy top of the line English, Italian, French and other bikes. Usually, Japanese top dogs offer top quality workmanship.
Drops offer the same kind of comparisons. File marks, poor or even uneven joints and even different length stays,
So, there is nothing special about brands (I have owned one Cinelli and it did not blow my kilt up). In general, I have never seen a sloppy Trek road bike.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,475
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1829 Post(s)
Liked 3,373 Times
in
1,579 Posts
I tend to agree with the OP's general premise... when everyone was using the same tubes (mostly) and same components (almost entirely), what made one bike better than another?
The folks in the marketing departments weren't afraid to fall back on the usual answers... make it look good!! In the early 80's, that might mean chrome and pantographed components! My Olmo Competition certainly includes these embellishments!
but I like my Raleigh Team bike with Reynolds 753 tubing better.
Steve in Peoria
The folks in the marketing departments weren't afraid to fall back on the usual answers... make it look good!! In the early 80's, that might mean chrome and pantographed components! My Olmo Competition certainly includes these embellishments!
but I like my Raleigh Team bike with Reynolds 753 tubing better.
Steve in Peoria