2021 FX4 Carbon sport
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 8
Bikes: Trek FX. 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
2021 FX4 Carbon sport
I don’t see a lot of information on this bike. I have an FX3 (2017) now and want a new bike but not sure the extra $1000 for the carbon sport would be worth the upgrade over a new FX3. I like the blue color, understand the gearing is different, and it’s a lighter bike. They’re backordered in my region until Jan 2022, so can’t see one in person for closer scrutiny. Does anyone have one? Input would be appreciated.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
I don't have an FX4 carbon, but it is pretty easy to see the advantages of the newer bike. 1 x 11 drivetrain for the new FX 4, vs 3 x 9 drivetrain on the FX3. Full carbon vs. aluminum frame/carbon fork on the FX 3. Hydraulic discs vs. mechanical v brakes on the FX3. And, 26 lbs or so vs. 21 lbs, but you could shave some of that weight off by upgrading wheels and tires on the FX 3 for a lot less than $1,000.
Is it worth it? I would say no. At least not if you like your current bike, you still have plenty of room for improving your current bike before upgrading. This is especially so given that you can't even get the bike until next year.
Is it worth it? I would say no. At least not if you like your current bike, you still have plenty of room for improving your current bike before upgrading. This is especially so given that you can't even get the bike until next year.
#3
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Lutz, FL
Posts: 416
Bikes: 2014 Fuji Traverse 1.3, 2020 Electra Cruiser 1, 1995 Giant CFM-4
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times
in
36 Posts
I'm in Tampa too and am looking at the FX4 Carbon as well (and a FX4 Disc). It looks like a great bike to splurge on. If you find one and don't buy it, let me know where in Tampa you found it. I'd probably lean towards a FX4 Disc if I had them both available in front of me as I don't think I could get all the benefit out of the extra for the Carbon with my current riding. For me, by the time I make any changes/upgrades and spend the money on my 2014 Fuji Traverse, I might as well sell it and get a new bike. I've already made my mind up on that, it's just finding a bike in stock.
Good luck!
Good luck!
Last edited by MrWasabi; 04-22-21 at 09:58 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,877
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 1,735 Times
in
1,011 Posts
I found a really nice used FX4 Carbon as a new bike for my wife. They are super nice and she loves the 1x setup. One of out local Trek dealers has...well had one when I was in there last week, so they can be had. The FX4 has a really nice component setup as well compared to the FX3.
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 8
Bikes: Trek FX. 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Yes, I have seen those stat comparisons, gearing, weight, etc. I’ve never had a full carbon bike for a ride comparison to an aluminum frame so don’t know what to expect as far as handling and comfort of the ride. I’ve also seen mention, more than once, in other reviews/critiques of the FX4 that it’s difficult to get up past 20 mph because of that 1x11 drivetrain. That’s probably ok for my normal riding but I do like to get it going on occasion
Probably leaning toward the FX3 now but all kinds of things could happen between now and Jan 2022.
Probably leaning toward the FX3 now but all kinds of things could happen between now and Jan 2022.
#6
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
5 Posts
I got a call yesterday from an LBS that a Sirrus X4 which I expressed interest in has shown up if anyone is looking for an X4.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
Yes, I have seen those stat comparisons, gearing, weight, etc. I’ve never had a full carbon bike for a ride comparison to an aluminum frame so don’t know what to expect as far as handling and comfort of the ride. I’ve also seen mention, more than once, in other reviews/critiques of the FX4 that it’s difficult to get up past 20 mph because of that 1x11 drivetrain. That’s probably ok for my normal riding but I do like to get it going on occasion
Probably leaning toward the FX3 now but all kinds of things could happen between now and Jan 2022.
Probably leaning toward the FX3 now but all kinds of things could happen between now and Jan 2022.
I often wonder who these people are who claim to need 120 gear inches.
Likes For MRT2:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times
in
570 Posts
In my riding, 100 gear inches is about as fast as I need to have. In fact, some of my "slower" bikes top out in the mid 80s and that's fast enough in most situations.
I think 120 inches or more are most useful if you're riding downhill and want to be able to pedal downhill at 40+ miles per hour. That doesn't describe most hybrid riders' environments and is probably not exactly useful for many of us.
I think 120 inches or more are most useful if you're riding downhill and want to be able to pedal downhill at 40+ miles per hour. That doesn't describe most hybrid riders' environments and is probably not exactly useful for many of us.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
In my riding, 100 gear inches is about as fast as I need to have. In fact, some of my "slower" bikes top out in the mid 80s and that's fast enough in most situations.
I think 120 inches or more are most useful if you're riding downhill and want to be able to pedal downhill at 40+ miles per hour. That doesn't describe most hybrid riders' environments and is probably not exactly useful for many of us.
I think 120 inches or more are most useful if you're riding downhill and want to be able to pedal downhill at 40+ miles per hour. That doesn't describe most hybrid riders' environments and is probably not exactly useful for many of us.
Last edited by MRT2; 04-23-21 at 11:42 AM.
Likes For MRT2:
#10
Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 24
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times
in
5 Posts
Interestingly enough I have been thinking a lot about cadence since my on my Peloton 80 seems comfortable, but I struggle to hit that on the bike. I am going to make a concentrated effort to maintain 75-80 and higher resistance to hopefully improve what I can do on the real bike.
#11
Full Member
I don't have an FX4 carbon, but it is pretty easy to see the advantages of the newer bike. 1 x 11 drivetrain for the new FX 4, vs 3 x 9 drivetrain on the FX3. Full carbon vs. aluminum frame/carbon fork on the FX 3. Hydraulic discs vs. mechanical v brakes on the FX3. And, 26 lbs or so vs. 21 lbs, but you could shave some of that weight off by upgrading wheels and tires on the FX 3 for a lot less than $1,000.
Is it worth it? I would say no. At least not if you like your current bike, you still have plenty of room for improving your current bike before upgrading. This is especially so given that you can't even get the bike until next year.
Is it worth it? I would say no. At least not if you like your current bike, you still have plenty of room for improving your current bike before upgrading. This is especially so given that you can't even get the bike until next year.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,877
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 1,735 Times
in
1,011 Posts
Yes, I have seen those stat comparisons, gearing, weight, etc. I’ve never had a full carbon bike for a ride comparison to an aluminum frame so don’t know what to expect as far as handling and comfort of the ride. I’ve also seen mention, more than once, in other reviews/critiques of the FX4 that it’s difficult to get up past 20 mph because of that 1x11 drivetrain. That’s probably ok for my normal riding but I do like to get it going on occasion
Probably leaning toward the FX3 now but all kinds of things could happen between now and Jan 2022.
Probably leaning toward the FX3 now but all kinds of things could happen between now and Jan 2022.
Hmmm, well...I changed the brake pads and after I bedded them, I took it for a spin and I easily got over 25 mph.. I changed the cassette from the 11-34 to a 14-28 and I live in a very flat area, .so, not quite sure about that.
__________________
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Last edited by jaxgtr; 04-23-21 at 09:37 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
Me too, but triples are on their way out, so if you are buying a new bike, or replacing components on an old bike, you will likely face the choice of 1 x or 2 x systems. With an 11 speed or 10 speed system, especially with very wide cassettes with 40, or 42 tooth options for the easiest gear, you should be able to optimize the gearing to your riding style and not need a second chainring. With a 9 or 8 speed, you might need to go to 2 x as an 8 or even 9 speed 11 - 42 cassette will have some huge jumps between gears.
#14
Newbie
I've only been dropped once in 50x11 on my FX 6 with some fast Roadies. We picked up the pace on a 1% downgrade. I was spinning out and thought I was in the Small Ring. Nope I was in the Big with a 100 cadence cruising at 33 mph.
With that said, unless you're averaging 20+ mph, 40x11 is a large enough gear for most people with an average speed <=18 mph. I ride with inner Barends on my FX 6 for those wondering how I can average those speeds on a hybrid.
With that said, unless you're averaging 20+ mph, 40x11 is a large enough gear for most people with an average speed <=18 mph. I ride with inner Barends on my FX 6 for those wondering how I can average those speeds on a hybrid.
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 8
Bikes: Trek FX. 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well, called the Trek dealer yesterday and they had rec’d two Carbon FX4s. Just back from checking them out and I have to say, I was really looking forward to bringing one home, but didn’t.
Beautiful color (aquatic blue), very lightweight, and rides smoother than my aluminum FX3. The single drive 1x11 shifted well and was easy to manipulate. I’d consider myself to be a bit above an average rider and I have to reiterate what I’d read in many of the bike forums I frequent that the top gear just doesn’t seem fast enough, sadly.
I did a pretty decent test run in a large lot behind the store got up to some major speed easily and it felt like I could have used a couple more gears to go through. Maybe because it’s a lighter bike?
Long and short, I didn’t think that the extra $1000 for this bike (over a newer FX#3) just to have a smoother ride, yet wanting more speed would suit me.
I’d brought my own FX3 to ride as a comparison and although there were obvious differences in the ride etc it didn’t justify the money.
I’ll wait patiently for either a 2021 FX3 to show up or maybe for the Covid backlog to subside so they bring out new models. Either way it’s my tried and true FX3 for the time being.
Beautiful color (aquatic blue), very lightweight, and rides smoother than my aluminum FX3. The single drive 1x11 shifted well and was easy to manipulate. I’d consider myself to be a bit above an average rider and I have to reiterate what I’d read in many of the bike forums I frequent that the top gear just doesn’t seem fast enough, sadly.
I did a pretty decent test run in a large lot behind the store got up to some major speed easily and it felt like I could have used a couple more gears to go through. Maybe because it’s a lighter bike?
Long and short, I didn’t think that the extra $1000 for this bike (over a newer FX#3) just to have a smoother ride, yet wanting more speed would suit me.
I’d brought my own FX3 to ride as a comparison and although there were obvious differences in the ride etc it didn’t justify the money.
I’ll wait patiently for either a 2021 FX3 to show up or maybe for the Covid backlog to subside so they bring out new models. Either way it’s my tried and true FX3 for the time being.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
Well, called the Trek dealer yesterday and they had rec’d two Carbon FX4s. Just back from checking them out and I have to say, I was really looking forward to bringing one home, but didn’t.
Beautiful color (aquatic blue), very lightweight, and rides smoother than my aluminum FX3. The single drive 1x11 shifted well and was easy to manipulate. I’d consider myself to be a bit above an average rider and I have to reiterate what I’d read in many of the bike forums I frequent that the top gear just doesn’t seem fast enough, sadly.
I did a pretty decent test run in a large lot behind the store got up to some major speed easily and it felt like I could have used a couple more gears to go through. Maybe because it’s a lighter bike?
Long and short, I didn’t think that the extra $1000 for this bike (over a newer FX#3) just to have a smoother ride, yet wanting more speed would suit me.
I’d brought my own FX3 to ride as a comparison and although there were obvious differences in the ride etc it didn’t justify the money.
I’ll wait patiently for either a 2021 FX3 to show up or maybe for the Covid backlog to subside so they bring out new models. Either way it’s my tried and true FX3 for the time being.
Beautiful color (aquatic blue), very lightweight, and rides smoother than my aluminum FX3. The single drive 1x11 shifted well and was easy to manipulate. I’d consider myself to be a bit above an average rider and I have to reiterate what I’d read in many of the bike forums I frequent that the top gear just doesn’t seem fast enough, sadly.
I did a pretty decent test run in a large lot behind the store got up to some major speed easily and it felt like I could have used a couple more gears to go through. Maybe because it’s a lighter bike?
Long and short, I didn’t think that the extra $1000 for this bike (over a newer FX#3) just to have a smoother ride, yet wanting more speed would suit me.
I’d brought my own FX3 to ride as a comparison and although there were obvious differences in the ride etc it didn’t justify the money.
I’ll wait patiently for either a 2021 FX3 to show up or maybe for the Covid backlog to subside so they bring out new models. Either way it’s my tried and true FX3 for the time being.
#17
Newbie
The FX4 Carbon has identity issues in it's current form. The gearing is for gravel, but the tires are for the road. I think this would be a fun gravel bike with a simple tire change.
I personally think Trek should have experimented with 1X systems on the Verve, before moving over the the FX series. Unless a 'proven' break through in bike tech comes out, I don't see a 1X system practical on the road for some time. You're always going to want a big chainring for Sprinting, Descents and Tailwinds and a small chainring for Climbing and Recovery.
I personally think Trek should have experimented with 1X systems on the Verve, before moving over the the FX series. Unless a 'proven' break through in bike tech comes out, I don't see a 1X system practical on the road for some time. You're always going to want a big chainring for Sprinting, Descents and Tailwinds and a small chainring for Climbing and Recovery.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
The FX4 Carbon has identity issues in it's current form. The gearing is for gravel, but the tires are for the road. I think this would be a fun gravel bike with a simple tire change.
I personally think Trek should have experimented with 1X systems on the Verve, before moving over the the FX series. Unless a 'proven' break through in bike tech comes out, I don't see a 1X system practical on the road for some time. You're always going to want a big chainring for Sprinting, Descents and Tailwinds and a small chainring for Climbing and Recovery.
I personally think Trek should have experimented with 1X systems on the Verve, before moving over the the FX series. Unless a 'proven' break through in bike tech comes out, I don't see a 1X system practical on the road for some time. You're always going to want a big chainring for Sprinting, Descents and Tailwinds and a small chainring for Climbing and Recovery.
#19
Full Member
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Lutz, FL
Posts: 416
Bikes: 2014 Fuji Traverse 1.3, 2020 Electra Cruiser 1, 1995 Giant CFM-4
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 124 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times
in
36 Posts
Well, called the Trek dealer yesterday and they had rec’d two Carbon FX4s. Just back from checking them out and I have to say, I was really looking forward to bringing one home, but didn’t.
Beautiful color (aquatic blue), very lightweight, and rides smoother than my aluminum FX3. The single drive 1x11 shifted well and was easy to manipulate. I’d consider myself to be a bit above an average rider and I have to reiterate what I’d read in many of the bike forums I frequent that the top gear just doesn’t seem fast enough, sadly.
I did a pretty decent test run in a large lot behind the store got up to some major speed easily and it felt like I could have used a couple more gears to go through. Maybe because it’s a lighter bike?
Long and short, I didn’t think that the extra $1000 for this bike (over a newer FX#3) just to have a smoother ride, yet wanting more speed would suit me.
I’d brought my own FX3 to ride as a comparison and although there were obvious differences in the ride etc it didn’t justify the money.
I’ll wait patiently for either a 2021 FX3 to show up or maybe for the Covid backlog to subside so they bring out new models. Either way it’s my tried and true FX3 for the time being.
Beautiful color (aquatic blue), very lightweight, and rides smoother than my aluminum FX3. The single drive 1x11 shifted well and was easy to manipulate. I’d consider myself to be a bit above an average rider and I have to reiterate what I’d read in many of the bike forums I frequent that the top gear just doesn’t seem fast enough, sadly.
I did a pretty decent test run in a large lot behind the store got up to some major speed easily and it felt like I could have used a couple more gears to go through. Maybe because it’s a lighter bike?
Long and short, I didn’t think that the extra $1000 for this bike (over a newer FX#3) just to have a smoother ride, yet wanting more speed would suit me.
I’d brought my own FX3 to ride as a comparison and although there were obvious differences in the ride etc it didn’t justify the money.
I’ll wait patiently for either a 2021 FX3 to show up or maybe for the Covid backlog to subside so they bring out new models. Either way it’s my tried and true FX3 for the time being.
Thanks.
#20
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 8
Bikes: Trek FX. 7.3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
(813) 963-5765
Good luck.
Likes For stkfox:
#21
Newbie
I supposed a 2 x 11 system could really optimize the gearing. Maybe something like a ultra compact system with 46 - 30 chainrings, mated with an 11 - 32 cassette. Or even a 44 - 30. Maybe get the best of both worlds. I am of 2 minds about this. In theory, I can see myself riding a 1 x 11, but what I don't know is whether the big jumps between middle gears would bother me or not.
But if you need the wider range of gears, stick with a 2X. I'm glad I went with the FX 6 over the 4. I would be dropped on faster group rides with the FX 4.
Likes For DarkSkyHUnter:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times
in
570 Posts
The approach I took with spec'ing these was finding a combination of cassette and chain ring that gave me the highest gear inch range that I wanted for high speed travel (these are about 80-85 gear inches) and also provided the low speed torque for off road riding (these are about 20 gear inches). Obviously, adjusting the chain ring to something like a 38 or a 40 would shift that gear inch range up in the scale (to many something like 30-100 gear inches). Something like a 44 would shift it even higher (maybe 35-110 for example). It's all about figuring out what you want your gear inch range to be and then doing the math (which is pretty easy -- I have an Excel spreadsheet) to figure out the tooth counts.
#23
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Upgrades?
Just purchased this model, has anyone upgraded the wheel/tire or handle bar/seatpost? If so models? Looking to trim weight, make it easier on long mostly paved hill rides
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 520
Bikes: 2021 Trek FX Sport 4, ~1996 Mongoose Crossway 4.50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 94 Post(s)
Liked 1,308 Times
in
433 Posts
I've had one since March 2022, but have pretty much left it alone. Switched to a Brooks B17 seat, but that's it. Will be interested in the responses you get.
Mark
Mark
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 6,877
Bikes: Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS, Trek CheckPoint SL7 AXS, Trek Emonda ALR AXS, Trek FX 5 Sport
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 765 Post(s)
Liked 1,735 Times
in
1,011 Posts
Yes... I put some Bontrager Aeolus Pro 37's on my wife's bike and running Pirelli P Zero Race in 28's on it. Rides like a dream. I have not swapped out the bars or seat post at this time. Although I used to own a Trek CrossRip that I converted to a flat bar commuter and I replaced both the bars and seat post with a Bontrager carbon bars and seat post and they were fantastic.
__________________
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Brian | 2023 Trek Domane SLR 7 AXS | 2023 Trek CheckPoint SL 7 AXS | 2016 Trek Emonda ALR | 2022 Trek FX Sport 5
Last edited by jaxgtr; 08-31-22 at 07:07 AM.
Likes For jaxgtr: