What to buy?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What to buy?
New to biking, looking at road bikes for the last few weeks and I’ve narrowed it down to a ‘74 Trek 501@$200, early 90’s KHS@$125. Both are said to be in good shape, I’m expecting to have to wrench on them a bit, am mechanically inclined so that doesn’t bother or scare me. I just don’t know much about either model, any help words of wisdom would be appreciated. Remember, I’m new to riding so please be kind...
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,518 Times
in
7,324 Posts
You are considering a 47 year old bike? As your first bike? Did Trek even make a "501" model or does that number refer to the Reynolds tubing used?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,515
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3241 Post(s)
Liked 2,512 Times
in
1,510 Posts
Have a mod move your thread to C & V. You'll get plenty of responses there.
#4
Senior Member
Welcome to the wonderful world of road bikes!
Personally, I would be hesitant to buy the '74 Trek for two reasons:
First, it's old enough that it's considered a vintage bike, which is fine except it's often difficult to find parts (at a reasonable price).
Second, I'm a kind of wimpy rider, so I find the gear ratio of '70s road bikes daunting. I know I road them at the time, but I must have been stronger (and was comfortable with a much lower cadence) than I am now.
The Trek has down-tube shifters while the KHS has integrated brake/shifters (which is what virtually all road bikes use today). So, if you got the KHS, you wouldn't have to re-learn those motor memories when you upgrade (which I suspect you will if you stick with road biking).
Whichever you do get,, have lots of fun riding it!
Personally, I would be hesitant to buy the '74 Trek for two reasons:
First, it's old enough that it's considered a vintage bike, which is fine except it's often difficult to find parts (at a reasonable price).
Second, I'm a kind of wimpy rider, so I find the gear ratio of '70s road bikes daunting. I know I road them at the time, but I must have been stronger (and was comfortable with a much lower cadence) than I am now.
The Trek has down-tube shifters while the KHS has integrated brake/shifters (which is what virtually all road bikes use today). So, if you got the KHS, you wouldn't have to re-learn those motor memories when you upgrade (which I suspect you will if you stick with road biking).
Whichever you do get,, have lots of fun riding it!
#5
Senior Member
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 604
Bikes: 1995 Specialized Rockhopper,1989 Specialized Rock Combo, 2013 Specialized Tarmac Elite
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
Liked 588 Times
in
278 Posts
There is a section here called Classic and Vintage. Given the age of the bikes you are considering, the posters in that area will be able to give you some good advice. You can contact a forum monitor who will move your post to that section.
#10
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,976
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6186 Post(s)
Liked 4,803 Times
in
3,313 Posts
Old bikes ride nice and look great. However when you start fixing them up you'll have to decide on overpriced used stuff from eBay to keep it all original or put new modern components on it... if they'll fit.
Either way, you'll end up putting more money into the bike than it's worth. Maybe even more than what a new bike with a decent modern group set.
However if you are looking at it just for the educational aspect of learning to DIY your own bike, then maybe well worth the expense. Having done it myself, I wouldn't do it again.
Either way, you'll end up putting more money into the bike than it's worth. Maybe even more than what a new bike with a decent modern group set.
However if you are looking at it just for the educational aspect of learning to DIY your own bike, then maybe well worth the expense. Having done it myself, I wouldn't do it again.
#11
Senior Member
My point is, it's hard to know what to tell you about that bike, because neither yourself nor the person selling the item seem to know what it is.
#13
Full Member
Yes you are dealing with vintage bikes. An the average bike owner today has little knowledge of bike made past a couple of years ago.
Trek models
Trek Bike Models by Year and Color
KHS
https://www.bikepedia.com/Year.aspx?search=KHS
If it was me buying I would buy a used Trek.
If you like working on bikes you can do all kind of fun projects with a vintage frame.
Todays new bikes are priced so high I can see why you are looking at vintage. There may be even a vintage bike shop in your city.
Trek models
Trek Bike Models by Year and Color
KHS
https://www.bikepedia.com/Year.aspx?search=KHS
If it was me buying I would buy a used Trek.
If you like working on bikes you can do all kind of fun projects with a vintage frame.
Todays new bikes are priced so high I can see why you are looking at vintage. There may be even a vintage bike shop in your city.
#14
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 17,936
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10413 Post(s)
Liked 11,874 Times
in
6,081 Posts
I am discovering that old bikes are a lot like old watches - they seem cheap, but there are a lot of hidden costs. With a watch, it's the price of getting it serviced, which means taking it down to its smallest parts, cleaning and reassembling it. Anything broken or worn gets replaced. Bikes are the same. Figure new tires, new cables, new bar tape, probably new cable housing, new brake pads and new chain, minimum. But really, you SHOULD strip down and repack the hubs, BB, and headset. This is how a $100 bike off Craigs List ends up costing you $300.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,518 Times
in
7,324 Posts
#16
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,782
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,398 Times
in
1,932 Posts
Trek didn't begin until 1975, and production started about a year later. Reynolds 501 tubing didn't come on the market until the early 80s. I suspect the OP made a typo or some other mistake.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,229
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18409 Post(s)
Liked 15,518 Times
in
7,324 Posts
#18
Full Member
I am discovering that old bikes are a lot like old watches - they seem cheap, but there are a lot of hidden costs. With a watch, it's the price of getting it serviced, which means taking it down to its smallest parts, cleaning and reassembling it. Anything broken or worn gets replaced. Bikes are the same. Figure new tires, new cables, new bar tape, probably new cable housing, new brake pads and new chain, minimum. But really, you SHOULD strip down and repack the hubs, BB, and headset. This is how a $100 bike off Craigs List ends up costing you $300.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
New to biking, looking at road bikes for the last few weeks and I’ve narrowed it down to a ‘74 Trek 501@$200, early 90’s KHS@$125. Both are said to be in good shape, I’m expecting to have to wrench on them a bit, am mechanically inclined so that doesn’t bother or scare me. I just don’t know much about either model, any help words of wisdom would be appreciated. Remember, I’m new to riding so please be kind...
My personal recommendation is to do the least You can to get it rideable and just ride it. The value in owning a bicycle isn't in the bike itself. The value is in the experience.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
Likes For Retro Grouch:
#20
52psi
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 4,015
Bikes: Schwinn Volare ('78); Raleigh Competition GS ('79)
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 802 Times
in
391 Posts
Don't be intimidated by tales of wildly overpriced vintage stuff you'll have to score from ebay and blah blah whatever. Vintage bicycles are very wallet-friendly unless you are going for a full restoration on a truly special bike. Get the one that fits you better. Expect some outlays for tires, cables, etc., but I've found most old components clean up to solid functionality unless the previous owner has truly beat them to hell.
And as suggested above, spend some time in the Classic & Vintage forum.
And as suggested above, spend some time in the Classic & Vintage forum.
__________________
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
A race bike in any era is a highly personal choice that at its "best" balances the requirements of fit, weight, handling, durability and cost tempered by the willingness to toss it and oneself down the pavement at considerable speed. ~Bandera
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,388
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1557 Post(s)
Liked 1,733 Times
in
973 Posts
I love old bikes too, but a word of caution - the older bikes with single pivot brakes are significantly worse in the braking department than the bikes with dual pivot brakes (roughly 1990 is the switchover point). This is especially true if you ride with your hands on the hoods instead of on the drops. Speaking of which- the older bikes are less comfortable to ride on the hoods with. The bars and brake levers don't have the right contours for that.
All of the above can be remedied if you don't mind swapping in more modern parts. That Trek would be a perfectly fine blank canvas for that exercise.
All of the above can be remedied if you don't mind swapping in more modern parts. That Trek would be a perfectly fine blank canvas for that exercise.
#22
Full Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Eastern Washington
Posts: 440
Bikes: 1978 Raleigh Competition-1974 Raleigh Folder-1983 Austro Daimler-198? Fuji Monterey-Surly LHT-Surly Karate Monkey-Surly Cross Check
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
Liked 97 Times
in
54 Posts
New to biking, looking at road bikes for the last few weeks and I’ve narrowed it down to a ‘74 Trek 501@$200, early 90’s KHS@$125. Both are said to be in good shape, I’m expecting to have to wrench on them a bit, am mechanically inclined so that doesn’t bother or scare me. I just don’t know much about either model, any help words of wisdom would be appreciated. Remember, I’m new to riding so please be kind...
#23
Senior Member
The old Treks are great bikes. Can't go wrong with them. Great bike to learn basic mechanics. Trek selected nice components for their bikes, no need to buy anything but perhaps tires. Clean, lubricate and adjust. Bikes aren't like cars. Parts rarely break or stop functioning. Very simple machines.
#24
Senior Member
Very odd statement. I ride on the hoods the majority of the time on 1970's Weinmann brakes. It was just as common to ride on the hoods in the 70's as it is today. Its not a new concept.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,388
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1557 Post(s)
Liked 1,733 Times
in
973 Posts
Notice you can't put the butt of your palm on the handlebar, because that part of the bar is sloping down. You are more or less resting on the web of your thumb and your carpal tunnel.
Now the same bike, with modern brifters and handlebars:
Notice the top of the handlebar and the hood of the brifter, form a continuous horizontal surface. Much more comfortable to put your whole palm on the bar now.
Likes For icemilkcoffee: