What so bad about stem shifters??
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What so bad about stem shifters??
I love old steel bikes (even new steel bikes for that matter). I see alot of bar end shifters and even down tube shifters, which seem really dangerous imho, but it seems that stem shifters are seen as unbearably low end. What is the difference, isn't a friction shifter a friction shifter, and what is so bad about stem shifters?
#2
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,418
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 503 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7138 Post(s)
Liked 2,084 Times
in
1,239 Posts
There's nothing wrong with them at all. Folks who ride high end bikes look down on them and come up with reasons to dislike them, but it's only because they came on low end bikes. They never came on high end bikes. All of the technical explanations are untrue. They're fine.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#3
Steel is real, baby!
Tom hit it on the head. They shift fine. It's just that it's a sign of a low end bike that usually has low end components. IMO, said components usually require more attention to keep them shifting well.
Likes For frpax:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Baltimore MD
Posts: 3,939
Bikes: '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '72 Gitane tandem, '72 Raleigh Super Course, '73 Raleigh Gran Sport, '73 Colnago Super, '76 Fiorelli Coppi, '78 Raleigh SBDU Team Pro, '78 Trek 930, '81 Holdsworth Special 650B, '86 Masi GC, ’94 Bridgestone RB-T
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 771 Post(s)
Liked 485 Times
in
261 Posts
I think there was also some concern, back in the day, about the safety of having pointy metal things at approximately crotch level. I may be mis-remembering things though.
__________________
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
The man who dies with the most toys…is dead. - Rootboy
#5
Senior Member
They are uber dangerous! They will impale you if you stop short. I read it on the internet.
__________________
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
Bikes on Flickr
I prefer email to private messages. You can contact me at justinhughes@me.com
Last edited by ColonelJLloyd; 01-18-12 at 05:04 PM.
Likes For ColonelJLloyd:
#6
Wood
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Beaumont, Tx
Posts: 2,304
Bikes: Raleigh Sports: hers. Vianelli Professional & Bridgestone 300: mine
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 11 Times
in
9 Posts
I feared the same thing, so I changed out my stem with a rubber spongy stem. I feel so safe now.
If you ride upright, stem shifters are the shizzle.
If you ride upright, stem shifters are the shizzle.
Likes For David Newton:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,138
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
27 Posts
You can also blame it on period bicycling magazines/publications whose writers also pooh-poohed such components and added theories like "slower, less precise shifting action due to more cable legnth and housing flex"...........but they still find bar end shifters to be a great thing for some reason.
Only time I could really see a negative situation with stem shifters is when one might want to try riding more on the drops. The position of the shifter will make it more difficult to do shifts as you wil have to bend your arms clumsily to do the shift from the drops. Otherwise, when riding at more upright positions, such as on the hoods or top of the bars, it works pretty well.
Chombi
Only time I could really see a negative situation with stem shifters is when one might want to try riding more on the drops. The position of the shifter will make it more difficult to do shifts as you wil have to bend your arms clumsily to do the shift from the drops. Otherwise, when riding at more upright positions, such as on the hoods or top of the bars, it works pretty well.
Chombi
Likes For Chombi:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Detroit
Posts: 10,327
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
31 Posts
They were popularized right along with turkey wings during the bike boom, because a lot of newbie riders couldn't really make the transition from riding upright to the drops, and thus they needed the controls on top.
__________________
- Auchen
- Auchen
#9
Señor Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Boston Burbs
Posts: 1,701
Bikes: Bedford, IF, Hampsten, DeSalvo, Intense Carbine 27.5, Raleigh Sports, Bianchi C.u.S.S, Soma DC Disc, Bill Boston Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
They are just as bad as the black door handles that aren't painted to match cars....they function just fine but they are a symbol that you're driving (riding) a base model.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 102
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 27 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So the stemmies came on low end bikes originally and need more maintenance to work well? I could see the maintenance aspect as undesirable considering that one the main reasons to use friction shifters is the "set and forget" ability of them.
Also, I never stopped short enough to impale myself on something on the handlebars but have stopped short enough to impale myself on the road...
Also, I never stopped short enough to impale myself on something on the handlebars but have stopped short enough to impale myself on the road...
#11
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,451
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
232 Posts
I have a slightly different take on this. What they say is true, but there are a few issues. Stem shifters require a second section of housing compared to DT shifters. This can add some friction, and the compressibility of the housing decreses shifting precision. This was a worse problem in the old days when housings weren't as good as today's Jagwire housing. Of course too, this is no different from bar-end shifters and some people really like them. In any case, DT shifters are wonderfully direct.
Some people argue that large shift levers on the stem can be dangerous in an accident. Going over the bar is bad enough that you don't want the added harm of being gouged by them. But you could argue that if go over the bars you're screwed anyway.
Finally, I always felt like shifting stem shifters affected steering. With DT shifters you have to take one hand off the bars so you use core muscles to hold your body stable, but you push or pull on something fixed to the frame. If you shift bar-ends your hands are anchored to the bars all through the operation. But to shift stem shifters you remove one hand from the bar and push a lever than can torque the steering to one side or the other without you being able to counter it. That's just my opinion (but I'm sticking to it (at least for the time being)).
Some people argue that large shift levers on the stem can be dangerous in an accident. Going over the bar is bad enough that you don't want the added harm of being gouged by them. But you could argue that if go over the bars you're screwed anyway.
Finally, I always felt like shifting stem shifters affected steering. With DT shifters you have to take one hand off the bars so you use core muscles to hold your body stable, but you push or pull on something fixed to the frame. If you shift bar-ends your hands are anchored to the bars all through the operation. But to shift stem shifters you remove one hand from the bar and push a lever than can torque the steering to one side or the other without you being able to counter it. That's just my opinion (but I'm sticking to it (at least for the time being)).
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#12
Phyllo-buster
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,791
Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2274 Post(s)
Liked 1,979 Times
in
1,222 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 149
Bikes: 1988 Miyata 615, 1985 Team Miyata
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've also heard the crouch-gouging argument against stem shifters and I have to say that at first it was rather compelling, in a visceral sort of way. But the way I figure it, if you're in a situation where your crouch is careening at high speed toward the stem, you're going to get mangled, whether it's by shifters or the corner of the stem itself. I've been sent forward lightly into the corner of my stem a couple of times and wouldn't want to repeat the experience in fast forward.
Likes For jar351:
#14
"Purgatory Central"
Join Date: May 2005
Location: beautiful "Cypress Gardens" florida
Posts: 1,757
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I aint never had a problem with them. My first road bikes, which were 'bike boom' bikes back in the 70's were all stem shifters. I thought they were rather cool. When I got my first DT shifter road bike I thought it was kinda odd. I had to relearn how to shift and how to orientate myself on the bike without losing my line. Of course I was a lot younger back then.
#16
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 21,142
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Hybrid
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2991 Post(s)
Liked 5,911 Times
in
3,457 Posts
Down tube shifters aren't dangerous, ATMO.
__________________
Cold-hearted orb that rules the night / Removes the colors from our sight / Red is grey and yellow, white / But we decide which is right / And which is an illusion.
#17
Steel is real, baby!
If you upgrade to better/nicer derailleurs & some good quality cables & housing (like Jagwire or other quality stuff), then the mainenance issue all but goes away.
#18
Steel is real, baby!
As for affecting steering, I think bar end shifters affect steering more than stem shifters. The affect is minimal at the stem.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,409
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 748 Post(s)
Liked 1,579 Times
in
578 Posts
Nothing is wrong with stem shifters. As for quality and maintence issues there really aren't any on a better set. A lot of the 70's and 80's DT and stem shifters where basically the same they where just mounted in different places. The issue is the are as said assiociated with lower end bikes and often used by C&V guys as quick way to spot lesser bikes in ads or at a distance.
#21
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,418
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 503 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7138 Post(s)
Liked 2,084 Times
in
1,239 Posts
BTW, I just got rid of my last set of DT shifters. My Super Course has upright bars, at least for the time being, and I installed my first set of ratchet thumb shifters. They're very nice, though I'm still reaching towards the down tube from time to time. Funny. But I'm old enough to do without DT shifters now.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
#22
Chrome Freak
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuna, ID
Posts: 3,208
Bikes: 71 Chrome Paramount P13-9, 73 Opaque Blue Paramount P15, 74 Blue Mink Raleigh Pro, 91 Waterford Paramount, Holland Titanium x2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
14 Posts
My Nishiki International came with them in the early 70's and I was fully prepared to hate them. They were SunTour Power Shifters, coupled to a SunTour derailleur. They worked flawlessly and I grew to like them, at least until I discovered bar end shifters.
__________________
1971 Paramount P-13 Chrome
1973 Paramount P-15 Opaque Blue
1974 Raleigh Professional Blue Mink
1991 Waterford Paramount
Holland Titanium Dura Ace Group
Holland Titanium Ultegra Triple Group
1971 Paramount P-13 Chrome
1973 Paramount P-15 Opaque Blue
1974 Raleigh Professional Blue Mink
1991 Waterford Paramount
Holland Titanium Dura Ace Group
Holland Titanium Ultegra Triple Group
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,138
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
27 Posts
BTW, I just got rid of my last set of DT shifters. My Super Course has upright bars, at least for the time being, and I installed my first set of ratchet thumb shifters. They're very nice, though I'm still reaching towards the down tube from time to time. Funny. But I'm old enough to do without DT shifters now.

Chombi
#25
Senior Member
I have a slightly different take on this. What they say is true, but there are a few issues. Stem shifters require a second section of housing compared to DT shifters. This can add some friction, and the compressibility of the housing decreses shifting precision. This was a worse problem in the old days when housings weren't as good as today's Jagwire housing. Of course too, this is no different from bar-end shifters and some people really like them. In any case, DT shifters are wonderfully direct.
Some people argue that large shift levers on the stem can be dangerous in an accident. Going over the bar is bad enough that you don't want the added harm of being gouged by them. But you could argue that if go over the bars you're screwed anyway.
Finally, I always felt like shifting stem shifters affected steering. With DT shifters you have to take one hand off the bars so you use core muscles to hold your body stable, but you push or pull on something fixed to the frame. If you shift bar-ends your hands are anchored to the bars all through the operation. But to shift stem shifters you remove one hand from the bar and push a lever than can torque the steering to one side or the other without you being able to counter it. That's just my opinion (but I'm sticking to it (at least for the time being)).
Some people argue that large shift levers on the stem can be dangerous in an accident. Going over the bar is bad enough that you don't want the added harm of being gouged by them. But you could argue that if go over the bars you're screwed anyway.
Finally, I always felt like shifting stem shifters affected steering. With DT shifters you have to take one hand off the bars so you use core muscles to hold your body stable, but you push or pull on something fixed to the frame. If you shift bar-ends your hands are anchored to the bars all through the operation. But to shift stem shifters you remove one hand from the bar and push a lever than can torque the steering to one side or the other without you being able to counter it. That's just my opinion (but I'm sticking to it (at least for the time being)).