Opinions please, Centurion or Pro Miyata
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 79
Bikes: 2021 Rock Lobster Steel "All-Road" // 1989 Eddy Merckx Century TSX "Team Motorola" // 1995 Eddy Merckx Arcobaleno
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My opinion is purely aesthetic. I think the Miyata looks much nicer. What tubes are used on each frame?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 13,471
Mentioned: 33 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4063 Post(s)
Liked 2,805 Times
in
1,700 Posts
I am a big fan of the Miyata also. Wasn't there a Koga Miyata that wore that livery at one point as well? On the other hand, I'm lazy, the Ironman is already built up and has a pump peg. Still, I think I'd go with the Miyata.
__________________
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),1990 Concorde Aquila(hit by car while riding), others in build queue "when I get the time"
Bikes: 1996 Eddy Merckx Titanium EX, 1989/90 Colnago Super(issimo?) Piu(?),
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 678
Bikes: 1966 Carlton, 197X MKM, 1983 Trek 620, 1988 Schwinn High Sierra, 1995 DBR Axis Ti, 1999 Waterford, 2016 DBR Release, 2017 Surly Travelers Check
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 65 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
7 Posts
Keep the Centurion with the 600. Hang the Pro Miyata on the wall until you find a clean DuraAce group or go retro-roadie with it?
How is this even a question?
How is this even a question?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,470
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5863 Post(s)
Liked 3,393 Times
in
2,038 Posts
Easy peasy, keep the miyata. This was their top end racing bike and it is a heck of a production racing bike. I own one and raced it many years. It is one of the best riding bikes I have ever owned.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 104
Bikes: Koga Miyata 1976 Pro Racer, Koga Miyata 1978 Road Racer, Koga Miyata 1979 Gents Luxe-S, Koga Miyata 1980 Road Winner, Koga Miyata 1980 Voyager, Raleigh super course mk 11, Bianchi X4 1987
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Miyata Pro, they are a great ride. I have a 1976 Pro Racer with 1st generation DurAce and love it.
#10
Senior Member
Below the Team Miyata but still good. Maybe like Ironman Expert vs Master.
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I'm unfamiliar with both. Not up on non Italian frames. I was curious about the hype with the Ironmans, but the Pro Miyata looks like a high quality frame. Really looking to keeping just one using the available 600 group.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,665
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2208 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,404 Posts
I'm a Miyata fan so my vote is goes to the pro.
Miyata's drew their own tubing, often triple butted and are very well made, if not terribly fancy.
Miyata's drew their own tubing, often triple butted and are very well made, if not terribly fancy.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,470
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5863 Post(s)
Liked 3,393 Times
in
2,038 Posts
#15
Full Member
That frame appears to be an 81 Pro from the paint scheme, no triple butting in those early years however should be double butted.
Any K in the serial number?
Serial numbers for Miyata Bicycles Made in Japan Since 1972, according with the first letter on the serial number.
"A 1972 B 1973 C1974 D1975 E1076 F 1977 G 1978 H 1979 I 1980 J 1981 K 1982 L 1983 M 1984 N 1985 O 1986 P 1987 Q 1998 R 1989 S 1990 T 1991 U 1992 V 1993 W 1994 X 1995 Y 1996 Z 1997"
Any K in the serial number?
Serial numbers for Miyata Bicycles Made in Japan Since 1972, according with the first letter on the serial number.
"A 1972 B 1973 C1974 D1975 E1076 F 1977 G 1978 H 1979 I 1980 J 1981 K 1982 L 1983 M 1984 N 1985 O 1986 P 1987 Q 1998 R 1989 S 1990 T 1991 U 1992 V 1993 W 1994 X 1995 Y 1996 Z 1997"
#16
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,228
Bikes: Two wheeled ones
Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 343 Times
in
173 Posts
Keep whichever fits better. All things being equal, I'd keep the Miyata because I'm more familiar with them. The Miyata was one under the Team...I'm not sure where the Centurion is in their order, and I don't think Centurion made a model intended to be pro race ready like the team was.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Prior Lake
Posts: 637
Bikes: 1989 Tommasini Super Prestige, 1985 Chris Kvale, 1977 Colnago Super, 1992 Serotta Colorado, 1984 Schwinn Cimarron
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 189 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 40 Times
in
20 Posts
Cool find on both.
As far as my opinion, I'd rather see what the ride qualities of that Miyata are all about if I had my choice. I think that Centurion has the potential of a more striking build however.
As far as my opinion, I'd rather see what the ride qualities of that Miyata are all about if I had my choice. I think that Centurion has the potential of a more striking build however.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,470
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5863 Post(s)
Liked 3,393 Times
in
2,038 Posts
1990, Miyata Bicycle Catalogs: Miyata Catalog 1990 (100 Year Special Edition)
I bought it as a frame and built it up with a mix of parts. I see you own 2 of them from your sig line. They're great bikes.
I bought it as a frame and built it up with a mix of parts. I see you own 2 of them from your sig line. They're great bikes.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,451
Mentioned: 67 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3012 Post(s)
Liked 2,307 Times
in
1,387 Posts
It depends on what type of riding you are doing. I have a Team Miyata, an Ironman and a Miyata 912. I do not know about the Pro Miyata. The Team was pure racing frame with shorter chainstays and steeper angles. The Ironman and Miyata 9 series are all day racers with frames suited for all day racing. I would keep both.
Here is the catalog link: Miyata Bicycle Catalogs: Miyata Catalog 1981
Here is the catalog link: Miyata Bicycle Catalogs: Miyata Catalog 1981
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Looking for something to hammer on. Short fast rides.
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi
#21
Senior Member
We have an identical Ironman with a mix of 105 sti and 600. It's a fine bike, but I'd still go with the Miyata, although I've ridden only a 710. Seems much more likely you'll have another shot at a Centurion than one of those.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
Posts: 1,643
Bikes: 1997 Rivendell Road Standard 650b conversion (tourer), 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10 (gravel/tour), 2013 Foundry Auger disc (CX/gravel), 2016 Cannondale Fat CAAD 2 (MTB/winter), 2011 Cannondale Flash 29er Lefty (trail MTB)
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 167 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
Then definitely the Pro Miyata. It has steeper geometry.
Strip the Centurion, build up the Miyata, and hammer away.
Sell the Centurion frame and use that $$$ to fund the eventual Dura Ace group for the Miyata. (just make sure the kid you sell it to promises not to chop off the derailer hanger in his fixie conversion)
If it is a 1981, though, be warned that that era of Dura Ace is a bit weird (especially the AX stuff).
Check the shifter bosses to ensure that they're compatible with the later 600 shifters from the Centurion.
Strip the Centurion, build up the Miyata, and hammer away.
Sell the Centurion frame and use that $$$ to fund the eventual Dura Ace group for the Miyata. (just make sure the kid you sell it to promises not to chop off the derailer hanger in his fixie conversion)
If it is a 1981, though, be warned that that era of Dura Ace is a bit weird (especially the AX stuff).
Check the shifter bosses to ensure that they're compatible with the later 600 shifters from the Centurion.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 7,390
Bikes: '72 Cilo Pacer, '72 Gitane Gran Tourisme, '72 Peugeot PX10, '73 Speedwell Ti, '74 Peugeot UE-8, '75 Peugeot PR-10L, '80 Colnago Super, '85 De Rosa Pro, '86 Look Equipe 753, '86 Look KG86, '89 Parkpre Team, '90 Parkpre Team MTB, '90 Merlin
Mentioned: 87 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 806 Post(s)
Liked 1,877 Times
in
511 Posts
I like them both, but the Miyato Pro gets my vote. Centurions were decked in really good quality paint, and your bike is a good example. However, the Miyata should clean up well, and has those nice scalloped seat stays, drilled fork tangs, and lug cutouts.
Lose the the dork disc when you switch over the parts, and consider a round big ring, too. I'm mildly opposed to bio-pace rings, but I especially don't like them on the big ring.
Lose the the dork disc when you switch over the parts, and consider a round big ring, too. I'm mildly opposed to bio-pace rings, but I especially don't like them on the big ring.
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Shifters are not compatible, I'll ride the Centurion and slowly build the Pro Miyata later. Done!
__________________
Semper fi
Semper fi