Lightest steel freewheel?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Lightest steel freewheel?
With alloy being fairly useless as a freewheel material and Titanium being waaaay overpriced if someone was going for a lightweight steel freewheel what is the lowest weight option? Currently my Regina 6 speed 13-21 is 340grams and my 5 speed Suntour winner pro 13-21 is 334grams. Anyone?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,200
Bikes: Pinarello Montello, Merckx MX Leader, Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Prologo, Tredici Magia Nera, Tredici Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Good question! I think my findings have been similar to yours. Anyone?
#3
Freewheel Medic
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: An Island on the Coast of GA!
Posts: 12,762
Bikes: Snazzy* Schwinns, Classy Cannondales & a Super Pro Aero Lotus (* Ed.)
Mentioned: 134 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1378 Post(s)
Liked 1,934 Times
in
862 Posts
Good question. I've never weighed any of the hundreds of freewheels I've worked on.
Of course there are two variables in every freewheel's weight; the body and the cogs & spacers. Bodies can vary significantly. For instance, without seeing a picture of your two freewheels, I'd guess the 4 gram difference is primarily in the bodies. Regina bodies tend to use less steel than say a Suntour, Shimano, or Sachs.
For instance, look at this Regina Corsa. Originally this design was for a 4 speed freewheel. Regina then determined how to thread the two smallest cogs together, adding the fifth cog. Eventually this same model could thread the three smallest cogs together without enlarging the body, making it a 6 speed.

But now look at the progression in Suntour Perfect bodies. These three pictured bodies are all Perfects. L to R: 6 speed standard, 6 speed Ultra spaced, 5 speed. The difference in body size is apparent.

The second variable would be how much the cogs and spacers weigh. The oldest models tended to use steel spacers. Newer models almost exclusively use plastic spacers. In regard to the cogs, older cogs tended to be solid with no cutouts, newer cogs usually have more drillium on the cogs.
Of course there are two variables in every freewheel's weight; the body and the cogs & spacers. Bodies can vary significantly. For instance, without seeing a picture of your two freewheels, I'd guess the 4 gram difference is primarily in the bodies. Regina bodies tend to use less steel than say a Suntour, Shimano, or Sachs.
For instance, look at this Regina Corsa. Originally this design was for a 4 speed freewheel. Regina then determined how to thread the two smallest cogs together, adding the fifth cog. Eventually this same model could thread the three smallest cogs together without enlarging the body, making it a 6 speed.

But now look at the progression in Suntour Perfect bodies. These three pictured bodies are all Perfects. L to R: 6 speed standard, 6 speed Ultra spaced, 5 speed. The difference in body size is apparent.

The second variable would be how much the cogs and spacers weigh. The oldest models tended to use steel spacers. Newer models almost exclusively use plastic spacers. In regard to the cogs, older cogs tended to be solid with no cutouts, newer cogs usually have more drillium on the cogs.

__________________
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!
Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com
Bob
Enjoying the GA coast all year long!
Thanks for visiting my website: www.freewheelspa.com
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida
Posts: 1,731
Bikes: 87 Bridgestone 550 (Shocking Electric Metallic Pink)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Over at the Weight Weenies site, they have weights on a lot of cassettes, but not on freewheels....guess they are not into C&V!!! :-)
#5
Get off my lawn!
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Garden State
Posts: 6,253
Bikes: 1917 Loomis, 1923 Rudge, 1930 Hercules Renown, 1947 Mclean, 1948 JA Holland, 1955 Hetchins, 1957 Carlton Flyer, 1962 Raleigh Sport, 1978&81 Raleigh Gomp GS', 2010 Raliegh Clubman
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 93 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 97 Times
in
47 Posts
The answer will include drillium
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida
Posts: 1,731
Bikes: 87 Bridgestone 550 (Shocking Electric Metallic Pink)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I threw some of the spare Freewheels I have laying around on my scale, SORRY, it is in OZ...it is what it is...big difference is, the more gears you have, the more they weigh....BIG SURPRISE!
Shimano MF Zo12 5 speed 14-28 13.5 oz
Regina Corsa 5 speed, 13-26 13 3/4 oz
Shimano Sante' 7 Speed, 12-23 14 1/4 oz
Shimano MF Zo12 6 speed 14-28 15 1/4 oz
Shimano UL 7 speed 14-28 17 oz
Sachs Maillard 8 speed 13-30 20 1/4 oz
Shimano MF Zo12 5 speed 14-28 13.5 oz
Regina Corsa 5 speed, 13-26 13 3/4 oz
Shimano Sante' 7 Speed, 12-23 14 1/4 oz
Shimano MF Zo12 6 speed 14-28 15 1/4 oz
Shimano UL 7 speed 14-28 17 oz
Sachs Maillard 8 speed 13-30 20 1/4 oz
Last edited by RubberLegs; 09-03-13 at 08:49 AM.
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How much drillium do you think the steel cogs can handle safely? I've seen people go crazy on alloy chainrings. Without going into the teeth or too near the threads would lots of carefully placed drillium reduce weight noticeably without scraficing too much strength?
#10
Senior Member

That's interesting. I have two Suntour freewheels, a Winner Pro and New Winner, both 6-spd, with similar sized cogs. The Winner Pro is much lighter than the New Winner, but I haven't dismantled them to see where the weight difference is coming from.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,085
Bikes: Frejus/Bertin/Cannondale
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This might be a contender, maybe.
How about Suntour's Pro Compe, in 5-speed or 6-speed? I'd never heard of these until yesterday, when I scored an old Nishiki with a Sunshine Gyro Master rear hub, and the 5-speed version Pro Compe freewheel, which is gold colored (the 6-speed one is silver). I've already been to Velo Base, and there was very little info there. EDIT: After a bit of cleaning, I see this particular freewheel must have had VERY little use, and/or the bit of grease really protected it pretty well.
It's a nice sensible 14-28, in excellent condition, but I also see now, that it wasn't "really" all that special, just very decent for the day.



Last edited by spacemanz; 09-03-13 at 11:15 AM.
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Has anyone drilled cogs before? I'm going to use my NOS winne pro 5 speed and only the largest cog has cutouts. Even the Campagnolo alloy freewheel in 13-21 has the three largest cogs drilled. I imagine that same drilling wouldn't affect steel like it would on the factory drilled aluminum.
#13
Senior Member
With alloy being fairly useless as a freewheel material and Titanium being waaaay overpriced if someone was going for a lightweight steel freewheel what is the lowest weight option? Currently my Regina 6 speed 13-21 is 340grams and my 5 speed Suntour winner pro 13-21 is 334grams. Anyone?
The best freewheel right now for the combination of light weight and shifting quality is Shimano's TZ20 and TZ21 (6 and 7 speed respectively) Tourney freewheels. Why:
- They cost less than $15 each.
- They feature Shimano's superior Hyperglide cog profiles, which provide worlds better shifting than any of the old freewheels. Uniglide and Suntour freewheels were somewhat better than the old Italian cogs, which were hopeless.
- They have a unique design in which the 2 largest (heaviest) cogs are heavily cut away and supported (pinned to) the smaller cogs. This accounts for their low weight.
- They have a sensible 14-28 gear range. This elimates the useless 11 and 12 tooth cogs found in current cassettes, and includes lower gears for use with standard crankets. We're not getting younger.
Likes For Dave Mayer:
#15
Senior Member
I have a 50 pound pail of 6 and 7 speed Dura-Ace freewheels and spare cogs. I also have an equivalent stash of Winner and Winner Pro hardware. So here is my unbiased advice.
The best freewheel right now for the combination of light weight and shifting quality is Shimano's TZ20 and TZ21 (6 and 7 speed respectively) Tourney freewheels. Why:
The best freewheel right now for the combination of light weight and shifting quality is Shimano's TZ20 and TZ21 (6 and 7 speed respectively) Tourney freewheels. Why:
- They cost less than $15 each.
- They feature Shimano's superior Hyperglide cog profiles, which provide worlds better shifting than any of the old freewheels. Uniglide and Suntour freewheels were somewhat better than the old Italian cogs, which were hopeless.
- They have a unique design in which the 2 largest (heaviest) cogs are heavily cut away and supported (pinned to) the smaller cogs. This accounts for their low weight.
- They have a sensible 14-28 gear range. This elimates the useless 11 and 12 tooth cogs found in current cassettes, and includes lower gears for use with standard crankets. We're not getting younger.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,138
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
27 Posts
Per my experience, most steel FWs with the same number of speeds, weigh very similarly. I don't think the little difference between them is ever going to be noticeable on the road, so picking your steel freewheel on the basis of weight is a bit pointless. I still think that hybrid Al (cogs)/Fe (body) FWs is not a bad way to go if you want to lose some weight. At least you won't have to worry too much about stripping pin wrench holes or notches on them, if you have to remove the thing from your rear wheels. The Zeus 2000 FW is a good one, and the Al cogs for them are still available from sellers at eBay.
Likes For Chombi:
#17
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,577
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3856 Post(s)
Liked 2,526 Times
in
1,555 Posts
I wonder if that's because the hub+cluster is already lighter for cassette systems, or if other benefits to cassette wheels make freewheels not worth considering for that group...
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 14,106
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 103 Times
in
76 Posts
They can handle a lot but most of them are already 'drilled' or have big windows.
Last edited by miamijim; 09-03-13 at 12:42 PM.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 8,016
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1626 Post(s)
Liked 625 Times
in
355 Posts

__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I would never put a $15 shimano on my full vintage super record bike! Gross. 13 is as big as I'd like my smallest gear.must not descend much where you are from. Which also makes the 28 useless. All in good humor of course. I think I'll just disassemble my sun tour and drill the cogs and be happy.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 14,106
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 413 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 103 Times
in
76 Posts
Going through my 30+ freewheels this is what I've found:
Steel freewheels weigh between 350 and 400 grams depending on gearing. There're a few outliers, a Suntour 13-23 7s I have weighs 335, a Sachs 14-24 6s weighs 411.
A few samples:
Suntour Microlite 194g
Dura Ace 13-21 360
Dura Ace 13-21 398 I don't know why this weighs more, I double checked the weights
Helicomatic 6s 400g
Steel freewheels weigh between 350 and 400 grams depending on gearing. There're a few outliers, a Suntour 13-23 7s I have weighs 335, a Sachs 14-24 6s weighs 411.
A few samples:
Suntour Microlite 194g
Dura Ace 13-21 360
Dura Ace 13-21 398 I don't know why this weighs more, I double checked the weights
Helicomatic 6s 400g
#23
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,419
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 503 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7138 Post(s)
Liked 2,086 Times
in
1,240 Posts
I have a modern Shimano freewheel on my McLean. It's a wear item, like tires and brake cables. As Dave points out, they're a heck of a lot better than older freewheels. And I do trust it, even though it's chintzier.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Likes For noglider:
#24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use only NOS parts on my drivetrain. I replace the freewheel and chain an usually rings all at once. I can get years out of the system as a whole. They wear but not that fast.
#25
curmudgineer
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,429
Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 263 Post(s)
Liked 110 Times
in
69 Posts
The wear items are the cogs. The body will last longer than any other moving part on the bike, with a modicum of care. That goes for the ball bearings as well, which are at any rate cheap to replace, in the unlikely instance of needing replacement.
Of course, the internal lubrication cannot be expected to last forever, this comes under the "modicum of care" proviso.
For some C&V enthusiasts, it is practical to dismantle and overhaul freewheels, and for others, it is more practical to discard and replace them.
Of course, the internal lubrication cannot be expected to last forever, this comes under the "modicum of care" proviso.
For some C&V enthusiasts, it is practical to dismantle and overhaul freewheels, and for others, it is more practical to discard and replace them.
