Carbolite 103, what is wrong with this type of frame?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 149
Bikes: A couple of motley Peugeots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Carbolite 103, what is wrong with this type of frame?
Ok, I have an old 80's Pug with the above type of frame, I got it cheap (ish) and spent more putting new tyres and a saddle on it than it originally cost me to buy, I actually have my eye on another which is in slightly better condition but will suit my size better. The thing is that in almost every forum I have visited when searching for parts the general theme is how bad these frames are, now I am no expert and I defer to those in the know but I can't understand the level of antipathy towards these bikes, surely they cannot be that awful? is a Pug Carbolite from the 80's selling for £50 in good condition really so bad when compared to a similar bike of the era on a Reynolds frame?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,874
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3261 Post(s)
Liked 2,545 Times
in
1,817 Posts
Visually the construction process was just too close to a cheap cheap utility frame. Different process but it did not appear that way. Frame tubing was not very special, in comparison to Peugeot's history the bikes just did not visually measure up.
Likes For repechage:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: northern michigan
Posts: 13,304
Bikes: '77 Colnago Super, '76 Fuji The Finest, '88 Cannondale Criterium, '86 Trek 760, '87 Miyata 712
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 657 Post(s)
Liked 584 Times
in
309 Posts
The Mixte. Sometimes a compromise in the attempt to please the greater amount winds up pleasing the lesser. Mixte or otherwise, Carbolite was not what Peugeot enthusiasts were accustomed to seeing.
Last edited by OldsCOOL; 06-20-14 at 08:31 AM.
#4
Still learning
As long as you enjoy it, that's all that really matters. Every time I get on a Peugeot road bike, whether a U-08, U18, Carbolite or HLE derivative, I am amazed at the ride quality and effortless acceleration. But through reconditioning and selling a bunch of them, I can now afford a PX-10 and also love my PGN10!

#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 149
Bikes: A couple of motley Peugeots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
As long as you enjoy it, that's all that really matters. Every time I get on a Peugeot road bike, whether a U-08, U18, Carbolite or HLE derivative, I am amazed at the ride quality and effortless acceleration. But through reconditioning and selling a bunch of them, I can now afford a PX-10 and also love my PGN10! 

#6
Still learning
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11,138
Bikes: 1986 Alan Record Carbonio, 1985 Vitus Plus Carbone 7, 1984 Peugeot PSV, 1972 Line Seeker, 1986(est.) Medici Aerodynamic (Project), 1985(est.) Peugeot PY10FC
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 150 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
27 Posts
There are bad low priced C&V bikes and there are low priced C&V cheap bikes, Peugeot bikes with Carbolite 103 frames and internally brazed construction happen to be good bikes. and people who tend to put them down just on the basis of them being made out of high carbon, high tensile steel tubing, just don't know what they are talking about and most likely never even rode a Carbolite 103 framed Peugeot in their lives..... I've owned two Carbolite framed Peugeots back in the 80's and despite them not being as light as my higher model Peugeots, they still are some of the best riding bikes I've ever ridden, despite their very humble place in the Peugeot model line. Most attribute it mostly to the frame geometries that Peugeot used, but Carbolite 103 seems to provide a ride that does not end up dead and heavy like a lot of other High Tensile, High Carbon steel tubing does.
Best thing to do is to try them out yourselves and hopefully your doubts can be erased.
Best thing to do is to try them out yourselves and hopefully your doubts can be erased.
Likes For Chombi:
#8
Shifting is fun!
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 10,821
Bikes: Yes, please.
Mentioned: 269 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2123 Post(s)
Liked 4,083 Times
in
1,613 Posts
Nothing wrong with Carbolite 103. In terms of value for money (or ride for your buck, if you will) it is actually very, very good.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 149
Bikes: A couple of motley Peugeots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 149
Bikes: A couple of motley Peugeots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It's nice to read something positive! I don't have much to compare it with but I enjoy riding my Carbolite and I reckon it's a good bike to learn some simple skills with. Ok I'm really displaying my ignorance but how do Peugeots in general place alongside such names as Cannondale or Bianchi?
#11
Senior Member
Please pardon my ignorance but what exactly is carbolite? Is it chromoly or a fancy name for hi-tensile steel? I just picked up an 88 Montreal Express low end mtb and this thread is making me wonder what kind of steel ot is made of. This is my first Peugeot and I know very little about them.
#12
Still learning
.
Just cleaned, polished, overhauled, with cheap CST tires and new bar tape. It has new hoods now too. paint is immaculate.
Catalogs available at retropeugoet.com. Carbolite introduced in 1980 +/-.
Just cleaned, polished, overhauled, with cheap CST tires and new bar tape. It has new hoods now too. paint is immaculate.
Please pardon my ignorance but what exactly is carbolite? Is it chromoly or a fancy name for hi-tensile steel? I just picked up an 88 Montreal Express low end mtb and this thread is making me wonder what kind of steel ot is made of. This is my first Peugeot and I know very little about them.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Middle Earth (aka IA)
Posts: 20,471
Bikes: A bunch of old bikes and a few new ones
Mentioned: 178 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5863 Post(s)
Liked 3,395 Times
in
2,039 Posts
There are bad low priced C&V bikes and there are low priced C&V cheap bikes, Peugeot bikes with Carbolite 103 frames and internally brazed construction happen to be good bikes. and people who tend to put them down just on the basis of them being made out of high carbon, high tensile steel tubing, just don't know what they are talking about and most likely never even rode a Carbolite 103 framed Peugeot in their lives..... I've owned two Carbolite framed Peugeots back in the 80's and despite them not being as light as my higher model Peugeots, they still are some of the best riding bikes I've ever ridden, despite their very humble place in the Peugeot model line. Most attribute it mostly to the frame geometries that Peugeot used, but Carbolite 103 seems to provide a ride that does not end up dead and heavy like a lot of other High Tensile, High Carbon steel tubing does.
Best thing to do is to try them out yourselves and hopefully your doubts can be erased.
Best thing to do is to try them out yourselves and hopefully your doubts can be erased.
#14
What??? Only 2 wheels?
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston-ish, MA
Posts: 13,451
Bikes: 72 Peugeot UO-8, 82 Peugeot TH8, 87 Bianchi Brava, 76? Masi Grand Criterium, 74 Motobecane Champion Team, 86 & 77 Gazelle champion mondial, 81? Grandis, 82? Tommasini, 83 Peugeot PF10
Mentioned: 189 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1222 Post(s)
Liked 641 Times
in
232 Posts
He! I can't help thinking "I just bought a Peugeot Carbolite", sort of like "I just bought a Peugeot Record du Monde." The Carbolite model was priced between the Atrophy and the Alsoran, or something. 
AH, OJ2's link should probably be retropeugeot, not retropeugoet. There are a dozen or more ways to spell Peugeot but I'm pretty certain only one is correct! And I can't tpye eihter.
I've never ridden one of the later Peugeots but I do like my UO8.

AH, OJ2's link should probably be retropeugeot, not retropeugoet. There are a dozen or more ways to spell Peugeot but I'm pretty certain only one is correct! And I can't tpye eihter.
I've never ridden one of the later Peugeots but I do like my UO8.
__________________
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
Real cyclists use toe clips.
With great bikes comes great responsibility.
jimmuller
#15
Decrepit Member
A 1982 Peugeot catalog had a vague description of Carbolite 103, calling it "a special, thin-walled tubing made from a composition in carbon steel unique to Peugeot. This tubing combines strength and resilience and produces the unusual durability of our bicycles."
I've never seen detailed specifications for Carbolite 103, but have seen speculation (without any specific references) that it is similar to AISI 1030 carbon steel.
AISI 1030 (UNS G10300) Carbon Steel chemical composition, physical properties, and mechanical properties
I've never seen detailed specifications for Carbolite 103, but have seen speculation (without any specific references) that it is similar to AISI 1030 carbon steel.
AISI 1030 (UNS G10300) Carbon Steel chemical composition, physical properties, and mechanical properties
#17
Senior Member
Likes For rando_couche:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Fairplay Co
Posts: 9,414
Bikes: Current 79 Nishiki Custum Sport, Jeunet 620, notable previous bikes P.K. Ripper loop tail, Kawahara Laser Lite, Paramount Track full chrome, Raliegh Internatioanl, Motobecan Super Mirage. 59 Crown royak 3 speed
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 749 Post(s)
Liked 1,581 Times
in
579 Posts
1+ I would agree with this simple assesment. As for high carbon steel tubing Carbolite 103 was very similar to medium strait gage Reynolds 501 and 531 tubing.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Sunny South
Posts: 1,913
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
I think there are still enough bargains in really good complete bikes, that settling for a heavy, entry level C&V is just not necessary. If you already have a less desirable frame (bike that is) and like the ride; then spend what you want on it and ride the hell out of it.
Last edited by Thumpic; 06-20-14 at 07:38 PM.
#21
Decrepit Member
A significant difference between 1030 carbon steel, 4130 chromium-molybdenum (like Reynolds 501 and 525), and Reynolds 531 manganese-molybdenum is the strength - both the ultimate tensile strength and the yield strength.
AISI 1030 - UTS=525 MPa, YS=440 MPa
AISI 4130 - UTS=700 MPa, YS=600 MPa
Reynolds 531 - UTS=803 MPa, YS=695 MPa
Reynolds 953 ultra high strength stainless steel has a UTS of 1,750 MPa and a YS of 1,450 MPa
The stronger the alloy, the thinner (and lighter) the tubes can be drawn. The downside of thin walled tubes, though, is that since the modulus of elasticity of all steel alloys is virtually the same (~200 GPa), the thinner walled tubes will be flexier. In order to make thin-walled tubing stiffer, oversized (OS) tubing with slightly larger outside diameters was developed in the late 1980s. To get really stiff lightweight frames, "double OS" tubing with even larger diameters came to market.
EDIT - There is absolutely nothing "wrong" with Peugeot Carbolite 103 frames. They're typically a little heavier than frames made with stronger alloys, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.
AISI 1030 - UTS=525 MPa, YS=440 MPa
AISI 4130 - UTS=700 MPa, YS=600 MPa
Reynolds 531 - UTS=803 MPa, YS=695 MPa
Reynolds 953 ultra high strength stainless steel has a UTS of 1,750 MPa and a YS of 1,450 MPa
The stronger the alloy, the thinner (and lighter) the tubes can be drawn. The downside of thin walled tubes, though, is that since the modulus of elasticity of all steel alloys is virtually the same (~200 GPa), the thinner walled tubes will be flexier. In order to make thin-walled tubing stiffer, oversized (OS) tubing with slightly larger outside diameters was developed in the late 1980s. To get really stiff lightweight frames, "double OS" tubing with even larger diameters came to market.
EDIT - There is absolutely nothing "wrong" with Peugeot Carbolite 103 frames. They're typically a little heavier than frames made with stronger alloys, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.
Last edited by Scooper; 06-20-14 at 09:58 PM.
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 149
Bikes: A couple of motley Peugeots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A significant difference between 1030 carbon steel, 4130 chromium-molybdenum (like Reynolds 501 and 525), and Reynolds 531 manganese-molybdenum is the strength - both the ultimate tensile strength and the yield strength.
AISI 1030 - UTS=525 MPa, YS=440 MPa
AISI 4130 - UTS=700 MPa, YS=600 MPa
Reynolds 531 - UTS=803 MPa, YS=695 MPa
Reynolds 953 ultra high strength stainless steel has a UTS of 1,750 MPa and a YS of 1,450 MPa
The stronger the alloy, the thinner (and lighter) the tubes can be drawn. The downside of thin walled tubes, though, is that since the modulus of elasticity of all steel alloys is virtually the same (~200 GPa), the thinner walled tubes will be flexier. In order to make thin-walled tubing stiffer, oversized (OS) tubing with slightly larger outside diameters was developed in the late 1980s. To get really stiff lightweight frames, "double OS" tubing with even larger diameters came to market.
EDIT - There is absolutely nothing "wrong" with Peugeot Carbolite 103 frames. They're typically a little heavier than frames made with stronger alloys, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.
AISI 1030 - UTS=525 MPa, YS=440 MPa
AISI 4130 - UTS=700 MPa, YS=600 MPa
Reynolds 531 - UTS=803 MPa, YS=695 MPa
Reynolds 953 ultra high strength stainless steel has a UTS of 1,750 MPa and a YS of 1,450 MPa
The stronger the alloy, the thinner (and lighter) the tubes can be drawn. The downside of thin walled tubes, though, is that since the modulus of elasticity of all steel alloys is virtually the same (~200 GPa), the thinner walled tubes will be flexier. In order to make thin-walled tubing stiffer, oversized (OS) tubing with slightly larger outside diameters was developed in the late 1980s. To get really stiff lightweight frames, "double OS" tubing with even larger diameters came to market.
EDIT - There is absolutely nothing "wrong" with Peugeot Carbolite 103 frames. They're typically a little heavier than frames made with stronger alloys, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 149
Bikes: A couple of motley Peugeots
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Your comments were very interesting btw Scooper, thanks for posting.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Sunny South
Posts: 1,913
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
But on the other hand, I seem to think that heavier frames ride a little smoother too. It takes more energy to get/keep the bicycle moving. But I think less tranmission of road "noise" is the pay off of a beefier frame. If your an fat, old coaster like me; I don't mind an extra pound or so; if I enjoy the bike more.
Last edited by Thumpic; 06-21-14 at 03:25 AM.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 19,874
Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3261 Post(s)
Liked 2,545 Times
in
1,817 Posts
A significant difference between 1030 carbon steel, 4130 chromium-molybdenum (like Reynolds 501 and 525), and Reynolds 531 manganese-molybdenum is the strength - both the ultimate tensile strength and the yield strength.
AISI 1030 - UTS=525 MPa, YS=440 MPa
AISI 4130 - UTS=700 MPa, YS=600 MPa
Reynolds 531 - UTS=803 MPa, YS=695 MPa
Reynolds 953 ultra high strength stainless steel has a UTS of 1,750 MPa and a YS of 1,450 MPa
The stronger the alloy, the thinner (and lighter) the tubes can be drawn. The downside of thin walled tubes, though, is that since the modulus of elasticity of all steel alloys is virtually the same (~200 GPa), the thinner walled tubes will be flexier. In order to make thin-walled tubing stiffer, oversized (OS) tubing with slightly larger outside diameters was developed in the late 1980s. To get really stiff lightweight frames, "double OS" tubing with even larger diameters came to market.
EDIT - There is absolutely nothing "wrong" with Peugeot Carbolite 103 frames. They're typically a little heavier than frames made with stronger alloys, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.
AISI 1030 - UTS=525 MPa, YS=440 MPa
AISI 4130 - UTS=700 MPa, YS=600 MPa
Reynolds 531 - UTS=803 MPa, YS=695 MPa
Reynolds 953 ultra high strength stainless steel has a UTS of 1,750 MPa and a YS of 1,450 MPa
The stronger the alloy, the thinner (and lighter) the tubes can be drawn. The downside of thin walled tubes, though, is that since the modulus of elasticity of all steel alloys is virtually the same (~200 GPa), the thinner walled tubes will be flexier. In order to make thin-walled tubing stiffer, oversized (OS) tubing with slightly larger outside diameters was developed in the late 1980s. To get really stiff lightweight frames, "double OS" tubing with even larger diameters came to market.
EDIT - There is absolutely nothing "wrong" with Peugeot Carbolite 103 frames. They're typically a little heavier than frames made with stronger alloys, but that's not necessarily a bad thing.