Rivendell Atlantis or Vintage
#176
aka Tom Reingold
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York, NY, and High Falls, NY, USA
Posts: 40,502
Bikes: 1962 Rudge Sports, 1971 Raleigh Super Course, 1971 Raleigh Pro Track, 1974 Raleigh International, 1975 Viscount Fixie, 1982 McLean, 1996 Lemond (Ti), 2002 Burley Zydeco tandem
Mentioned: 511 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7348 Post(s)
Liked 2,465 Times
in
1,433 Posts
I use the smidsy weave on my bike a lot for many reasons. I use it to show pedestrians in crosswalks that I am actually going to yield to them, which they don't expect in New York City. I think the weave not only makes me more visible, it also makes it easier for people to judge my speed.
__________________
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Tom Reingold, tom@noglider.com
New York City and High Falls, NY
Blogs: The Experienced Cyclist; noglider's ride blog
“When man invented the bicycle he reached the peak of his attainments.” — Elizabeth West, US author
Please email me rather than PM'ing me. Thanks.
Likes For noglider:
#177
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1955 Post(s)
Liked 3,661 Times
in
1,679 Posts
I use the smidsy weave on my bike a lot for many reasons. I use it to show pedestrians in crosswalks that I am actually going to yield to them, which they don't expect in New York City. I think the weave not only makes me more visible, it also makes it easier for people to judge my speed.
#178
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Grass Valley, Ca
Posts: 387
Bikes: Surly Cross Check, Specialized Enduro Pro, Lemond Tourmalet
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 105 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
94 Posts
In 2007, I bought a Surly LHT 54 cm frame/fork and built it into a pretty good, sturdy bike. Found out later the the dimensions on the LHT and the Atlantis are about identical.
I bought a 1986 Stumpjumper Sport frame a couple of years ago and just recently finished building it to my taste. It fits really well. As some of you have mentioned, the Stumpjumper does have a pretty high BB and the geometry is laid back but I am an old guy and not in too much of a hurry most of the time.
I bought a 1986 Stumpjumper Sport frame a couple of years ago and just recently finished building it to my taste. It fits really well. As some of you have mentioned, the Stumpjumper does have a pretty high BB and the geometry is laid back but I am an old guy and not in too much of a hurry most of the time.
Likes For gorillimo:
#181
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Soviet of Oregon or Pensacola FL
Posts: 5,342
Bikes: Still have a few left!
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 467 Post(s)
Liked 532 Times
in
267 Posts
Enjoyed reading through this thread. Grant does write well and I always liked reading his stuff. Saw several Atlantis Rivs around town when we lived in Olympia Washington. I looked into them but the price put me off, plus every one I saw seemed to be in the "Big Bike for a Big Guy" Category. I knew Rivendell made small frames too, still, I doubted such a heavy, durable, build was really necessary for a little guy like me(I weigh around (140-142 pounds).
So I went the Budget Vintage route: Started with a $10, 1969 Raleigh Super Course from Good Will. Stripped it to bare frame, got a $220 paint job from Acme of Portland, OR (prior to their fame). Searching eBay for parts, for $125 plus $75 shipping, I found a NIB, Ross Super Gran Tour, a hi-ten frame built with Shimano Arabesque group that included their high flanged hub wheels. I stripped it to build the Super Course into a beautiful bike, with Nervex Lugs, which checked off many of the Rivendell boxes. I'll post a pic after I get back to Oregon on May 1 as pics aren't in this laptop.
Meanwhile, here are pics of my 1973 Super Course from the 2017 Clunker 100 challenge built with a similar but "Velo-Cheapo" approach:
For $10, a Coffee Brown, 1973 Raleigh Super Course frameset with saddle, taped bars, Carlton white hooded brake levers and good headset but minus the bottom bracket, wheels, derailleurs, brake calipers, shift levers cables and sheaths. For $20, from the co-op, I got a complete Motobecane Super Mirage with a broken headtube. It provided: 2 wheels, 2 derailleurs, a crank set + pedals, a blinky light, 1 brake caliper, used cables and sheaths. Additional from co-op: SunTour down tube mounted, ratcheting power shifters $2, 1 Weinmann 750 center pull caliper $5, 1 new brake cable $4, a free used chain, 2 used tires with tubes $10, derailleur claw $ .50 cents. From my basement shop: bottom bracket $8, 2 plastic bar plugs $ .25 cents. Total cost $59.75
1973 Super Course
1976 S/C + Super Mirage Parts
White Carlton Hoods + fairly new bar tape
Capella Lugs
So I went the Budget Vintage route: Started with a $10, 1969 Raleigh Super Course from Good Will. Stripped it to bare frame, got a $220 paint job from Acme of Portland, OR (prior to their fame). Searching eBay for parts, for $125 plus $75 shipping, I found a NIB, Ross Super Gran Tour, a hi-ten frame built with Shimano Arabesque group that included their high flanged hub wheels. I stripped it to build the Super Course into a beautiful bike, with Nervex Lugs, which checked off many of the Rivendell boxes. I'll post a pic after I get back to Oregon on May 1 as pics aren't in this laptop.
Meanwhile, here are pics of my 1973 Super Course from the 2017 Clunker 100 challenge built with a similar but "Velo-Cheapo" approach:
For $10, a Coffee Brown, 1973 Raleigh Super Course frameset with saddle, taped bars, Carlton white hooded brake levers and good headset but minus the bottom bracket, wheels, derailleurs, brake calipers, shift levers cables and sheaths. For $20, from the co-op, I got a complete Motobecane Super Mirage with a broken headtube. It provided: 2 wheels, 2 derailleurs, a crank set + pedals, a blinky light, 1 brake caliper, used cables and sheaths. Additional from co-op: SunTour down tube mounted, ratcheting power shifters $2, 1 Weinmann 750 center pull caliper $5, 1 new brake cable $4, a free used chain, 2 used tires with tubes $10, derailleur claw $ .50 cents. From my basement shop: bottom bracket $8, 2 plastic bar plugs $ .25 cents. Total cost $59.75
1973 Super Course
1976 S/C + Super Mirage Parts
White Carlton Hoods + fairly new bar tape
Capella Lugs
Last edited by ollo_ollo; 04-22-22 at 08:59 AM. Reason: fix typo
#182
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 121
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 48 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
16 Posts
this is my MB4 that I’ve been having a lot of fun with lately. I’m waiting for an OEM rear derailleur and an upgraded 7s rear cassette to be shipped to me. I’ve installed a Selle Anatomica X1 on it, some vintage almost-bullmoose bars, VO Grand Cru brake levers, OEM biopace shimano crankset, and some other bits and bobs.
I love this bike, it rides like a dream and it makes me truly happy when I’m on it.
I love this bike, it rides like a dream and it makes me truly happy when I’m on it.
Likes For heytchap:
#183
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
I paid $75 for the MB-2. That's a pretty big cost difference adjustment.
One place there may be a significant difference between the MB-2 and Atlantis frame is bottom bracket height. I've never gotten around to comparing that spec between the two, but I've been meaning to for years. The large MB-2 frame is a road bike fit for me and I feel very tall in the saddle.
One place there may be a significant difference between the MB-2 and Atlantis frame is bottom bracket height. I've never gotten around to comparing that spec between the two, but I've been meaning to for years. The large MB-2 frame is a road bike fit for me and I feel very tall in the saddle.
#184
Full Member
I wanted a A Homer Hilsen, then I saw their other frames. I'm really not sure what the differences are between some of them. My wife wanted a Betty Foy but they no longer make them, and their custom built page is gone.
I bought a tandem frame from them, then it got flooded in the hurricane and the fork and other parts were thrown out by clean up workers. At some point the new fork and old frame will be painted the same color and I'll get it built.
I recently found out about a frame builder in England, Richard Hallett's hand-built cycles and wheels , it looks like they build some things I'd like.
I bought a tandem frame from them, then it got flooded in the hurricane and the fork and other parts were thrown out by clean up workers. At some point the new fork and old frame will be painted the same color and I'll get it built.
I recently found out about a frame builder in England, Richard Hallett's hand-built cycles and wheels , it looks like they build some things I'd like.
#185
Port
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 6,653
Bikes: 2022 Soma Fog Cutter, 2021 Calfee Draqonfly 44, 1984 Peter Mooney, 2017 Soma Stanyan, 1990 Fuji Ace, 1990 Bridgestone RB-1, 1995 Independent Fabrications Track, 2003 Calfee Dragonfly Pro
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 984 Post(s)
Liked 1,862 Times
in
1,062 Posts
I appreciate the aesthetic of Grant's vision, and have owned 3 Bridgestones:
1991 RB-T that I rode from LA to Boston. Currently my buddy uses it as his indoor trainer bike and for foul weather.
1990 RB-1 that I raced locally and my wife currently rides.
1990 MB-0 that I explored all sorts of trails in New England. Then used to pull my kids in a trailer when they were younger and we didn't have (or want) a second car.
I *loved* all of those bikes. And miss them all (well, my wife still rides my old RB-1). The Bridgestone catalogs of the era were exceptional, and still fun to read & informative 30 years later.
I think "peak Rivendell" was about 10 years ago, but they have jumped the shark since then, IMO. The new models all have such long chain stays that they are almost cargo bikes. And after reading how much better Grant thinks lugs are compared to tig welded frames, it is sad to see them move away from lugs.
I never bought into the double top tube frames -and I am a larger rider at 6'04" 220lbs. I rode a friend's beautiful Atlantis with double top tubes. It felt sluggish and heavy.
Their latest insistence that "rapid rise" low norm rear derailleurs are so great is just wrong. I had a rapid rise XTR rear der that I never go used to. I had it for almost 10 years and hated every shift.
Finally, it seems off that a typical "Rivendell build" will have super high end seat posts and stems, but the absolute cheapest rear derailleur and hubs. Seatposts and stems don't do anything, but the hubs and derailleurs are arguably the most complex moving parts on your bike.
The only frame they sell that still interests me is the Rodeo, but for $2800, I'd go custom. Or vintage.
I am glad they are still out there doing their thing. But in a lot of ways, Surly, Soma, Crust, etc are doing the same sort of thing: practical steel bikes. And way cheaper.
1991 RB-T that I rode from LA to Boston. Currently my buddy uses it as his indoor trainer bike and for foul weather.
1990 RB-1 that I raced locally and my wife currently rides.
1990 MB-0 that I explored all sorts of trails in New England. Then used to pull my kids in a trailer when they were younger and we didn't have (or want) a second car.
I *loved* all of those bikes. And miss them all (well, my wife still rides my old RB-1). The Bridgestone catalogs of the era were exceptional, and still fun to read & informative 30 years later.
I think "peak Rivendell" was about 10 years ago, but they have jumped the shark since then, IMO. The new models all have such long chain stays that they are almost cargo bikes. And after reading how much better Grant thinks lugs are compared to tig welded frames, it is sad to see them move away from lugs.
I never bought into the double top tube frames -and I am a larger rider at 6'04" 220lbs. I rode a friend's beautiful Atlantis with double top tubes. It felt sluggish and heavy.
Their latest insistence that "rapid rise" low norm rear derailleurs are so great is just wrong. I had a rapid rise XTR rear der that I never go used to. I had it for almost 10 years and hated every shift.
Finally, it seems off that a typical "Rivendell build" will have super high end seat posts and stems, but the absolute cheapest rear derailleur and hubs. Seatposts and stems don't do anything, but the hubs and derailleurs are arguably the most complex moving parts on your bike.
The only frame they sell that still interests me is the Rodeo, but for $2800, I'd go custom. Or vintage.
I am glad they are still out there doing their thing. But in a lot of ways, Surly, Soma, Crust, etc are doing the same sort of thing: practical steel bikes. And way cheaper.
__________________
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
https://rowdml.tripod.com/panmass
Likes For Rocket-Sauce:
#186
Full Member
Rivendell had their lugs made in Taiwan. They have moved Atlantis production to Taiwan, I think all of their frames are made there now. I assumed everything would get lugs. I thought that was one of the things they were known for.
I didn't pay attention when I ordered the tandem frame, I was disappointed it is not lugged. I don't know if was for structural or cost reasons. I am also disappointed it has a modern type threadless steerer, again I don't know if there is a reason it needs to be this way. I'm still happy I bought it.
The newer designs they have don't interest me.
I didn't pay attention when I ordered the tandem frame, I was disappointed it is not lugged. I don't know if was for structural or cost reasons. I am also disappointed it has a modern type threadless steerer, again I don't know if there is a reason it needs to be this way. I'm still happy I bought it.
The newer designs they have don't interest me.
#187
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
I think "peak Rivendell" was about 10 years ago, but they have jumped the shark since then, IMO. The new models all have such long chain stays that they are almost cargo bikes. And after reading how much better Grant thinks lugs are compared to tig welded frames, it is sad to see them move away from lugs.
Finally, it seems off that a typical "Rivendell build" will have super high end seat posts and stems, but the absolute cheapest rear derailleur and hubs. Seatposts and stems don't do anything, but the hubs and derailleurs are arguably the most complex moving parts on your bike.
Finally, it seems off that a typical "Rivendell build" will have super high end seat posts and stems, but the absolute cheapest rear derailleur and hubs. Seatposts and stems don't do anything, but the hubs and derailleurs are arguably the most complex moving parts on your bike.
One of the things that's always struck me about bicycles is the *minute* differences that will make something desirable or hated. (or maybe it's the minute differences that give an excuse to love or hate something). The tubing, the weight, the color, the decals, the braze ons, the wheelbase length, the range of tire size, the type of brakes, the build, the name on it or attached to it... I think at that time, the Homer was a thinner tubed sport/touring geometry and made by Waterford. The Sam was pretty close to the same geometry, but with more stout tubes and made in Taiwan. I wanted a Homer. I had my "stout" and "long" bikes covered; so I wanted a beautiful, relatively light and nimble bike I could throw a rack and bags on. I wanted that aesthetic with the Craftsman-esque lettering and color scheme. And I wanted it built with the Rivendell lugs and paint, and put together almost literally just down the street from my house at Waterford. I think this is about the time the Grant was trying to move everything to Taiwan- I'm pretty sure I was talking to Grant about getting a bike when the "custom" page disappeared off the website- and everything fell through- I was waving a stack of cash in my hand begging for him to take my money- and he suggested I buy a custom from Waterford.
Most of my bikes are touring bikes- I believe in long wheelbases and long chainstays- but as beneficial as those features are, they come with tradeoffs. When the Clem first came out- the comically long chainstays looked out of balance with the bike. And then those comically long chainstays went on every other bike; the Homer used to be the most beautiful bike- and it's no longer graceful.
From what I see on FB and stuff, Rivendell seems to be doing OK with this design/manufacturing shift- and I'm glad. He's got great ideas, a lot of his ideas about cycling are fantastic, he knows more about bikes than I can even pretend to and he seems like a genuinely good, cool guy. It's just this current crop of bikes doesn't follow in my own particular... ... idiom.
It's always interesting to see what people interpret as the "Rivendell aesthetic" by making their "poor man's Rivendell." Whether it's a utilitarian build with racks and baskets or with several different colors of ratty cloth bar tapes and twine hanging off it and contrasting nail polish touch ups, or a beautiful bike with a modern yet retro-ish flair to it.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Likes For The Golden Boy:
#188
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Napa Valley, CA
Posts: 908
Bikes: Wife says I have too many :-)
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 327 Post(s)
Liked 250 Times
in
158 Posts
From: Atlantis - Our best selling touring bike - by Rivendell Bicycle Works
"The Atlantis used to be built by Toyo, in Japan. All new Atlantis frames are built in Wisconsin. Quality is the same, highest quality."
Can you point to these incidents?
From what I've read, he's said the frames need to be as heavy as they need to be.
"The Atlantis frame and fork weigh about a pound more (combined) than our A. Homer Hilsen, a road frame. The extra weight comes by means of stouter tubes and a wider fork crown, and pays for itself in the extra durability needed for rough riding and load-toting. A pound is hardly anything, when you consider the weight of your body and between 16 and 21 pounds of parts, wheels, racks, and fenders. So don't let that pound scare you. There isn't an ounce of fat on the Atlantis. It's just a rugged, strong bike, and one you'll likely have and ride for the rest of your life."
So have you met him? That's the question.
"The Atlantis used to be built by Toyo, in Japan. All new Atlantis frames are built in Wisconsin. Quality is the same, highest quality."
Can you point to these incidents?
From what I've read, he's said the frames need to be as heavy as they need to be.
"The Atlantis frame and fork weigh about a pound more (combined) than our A. Homer Hilsen, a road frame. The extra weight comes by means of stouter tubes and a wider fork crown, and pays for itself in the extra durability needed for rough riding and load-toting. A pound is hardly anything, when you consider the weight of your body and between 16 and 21 pounds of parts, wheels, racks, and fenders. So don't let that pound scare you. There isn't an ounce of fat on the Atlantis. It's just a rugged, strong bike, and one you'll likely have and ride for the rest of your life."
So have you met him? That's the question.
#189
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
The information was accurate when it was posted 8 years ago. I think everything Riv offers is made in Taiwan now.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#190
Senior Member
It looks like I haven't posted in this thread in like 7 years (oddly enough- about the same time I was TRYING to buy a canti-Homer).
One of the things that's always struck me about bicycles is the *minute* differences that will make something desirable or hated. (or maybe it's the minute differences that give an excuse to love or hate something). The tubing, the weight, the color, the decals, the braze ons, the wheelbase length, the range of tire size, the type of brakes, the build, the name on it or attached to it... I think at that time, the Homer was a thinner tubed sport/touring geometry and made by Waterford. The Sam was pretty close to the same geometry, but with more stout tubes and made in Taiwan. I wanted a Homer. I had my "stout" and "long" bikes covered; so I wanted a beautiful, relatively light and nimble bike I could throw a rack and bags on. I wanted that aesthetic with the Craftsman-esque lettering and color scheme. And I wanted it built with the Rivendell lugs and paint, and put together almost literally just down the street from my house at Waterford. I think this is about the time the Grant was trying to move everything to Taiwan- I'm pretty sure I was talking to Grant about getting a bike when the "custom" page disappeared off the website- and everything fell through- I was waving a stack of cash in my hand begging for him to take my money- and he suggested I buy a custom from Waterford.
Most of my bikes are touring bikes- I believe in long wheelbases and long chainstays- but as beneficial as those features are, they come with tradeoffs. When the Clem first came out- the comically long chainstays looked out of balance with the bike. And then those comically long chainstays went on every other bike; the Homer used to be the most beautiful bike- and it's no longer graceful.
From what I see on FB and stuff, Rivendell seems to be doing OK with this design/manufacturing shift- and I'm glad. He's got great ideas, a lot of his ideas about cycling are fantastic, he knows more about bikes than I can even pretend to and he seems like a genuinely good, cool guy. It's just this current crop of bikes doesn't follow in my own particular... ... idiom.
It's always interesting to see what people interpret as the "Rivendell aesthetic" by making their "poor man's Rivendell." Whether it's a utilitarian build with racks and baskets or with several different colors of ratty cloth bar tapes and twine hanging off it and contrasting nail polish touch ups, or a beautiful bike with a modern yet retro-ish flair to it.
One of the things that's always struck me about bicycles is the *minute* differences that will make something desirable or hated. (or maybe it's the minute differences that give an excuse to love or hate something). The tubing, the weight, the color, the decals, the braze ons, the wheelbase length, the range of tire size, the type of brakes, the build, the name on it or attached to it... I think at that time, the Homer was a thinner tubed sport/touring geometry and made by Waterford. The Sam was pretty close to the same geometry, but with more stout tubes and made in Taiwan. I wanted a Homer. I had my "stout" and "long" bikes covered; so I wanted a beautiful, relatively light and nimble bike I could throw a rack and bags on. I wanted that aesthetic with the Craftsman-esque lettering and color scheme. And I wanted it built with the Rivendell lugs and paint, and put together almost literally just down the street from my house at Waterford. I think this is about the time the Grant was trying to move everything to Taiwan- I'm pretty sure I was talking to Grant about getting a bike when the "custom" page disappeared off the website- and everything fell through- I was waving a stack of cash in my hand begging for him to take my money- and he suggested I buy a custom from Waterford.
Most of my bikes are touring bikes- I believe in long wheelbases and long chainstays- but as beneficial as those features are, they come with tradeoffs. When the Clem first came out- the comically long chainstays looked out of balance with the bike. And then those comically long chainstays went on every other bike; the Homer used to be the most beautiful bike- and it's no longer graceful.
From what I see on FB and stuff, Rivendell seems to be doing OK with this design/manufacturing shift- and I'm glad. He's got great ideas, a lot of his ideas about cycling are fantastic, he knows more about bikes than I can even pretend to and he seems like a genuinely good, cool guy. It's just this current crop of bikes doesn't follow in my own particular... ... idiom.
It's always interesting to see what people interpret as the "Rivendell aesthetic" by making their "poor man's Rivendell." Whether it's a utilitarian build with racks and baskets or with several different colors of ratty cloth bar tapes and twine hanging off it and contrasting nail polish touch ups, or a beautiful bike with a modern yet retro-ish flair to it.
#191
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,411
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 32 Times
in
18 Posts
This thread popped up in my e-mail feed, so I thought I would comment.
For me, a Rivendell is all about the ride and that means geometry, more than anything. The one 80's MTB I know of that I think nails the "poor man's Rivendell" is the 1983-85 Trek 8xx series MTB's. Instead of copying the Ritchey geometry, Trek modified their touring bike design into a 26" wheel MTB. If you look at the geometry of the 22" Treks and the original 56 cm Atlantis (26" wheels), they are so close they may as well be identical.
I was fortunate to finally get a 1984 Trek 830. My main bike is a Hunqapillar and I can say the 830 is spot on for the Rivendell ride. In fact, I probably prefer it to the Hunqapillar, solely because I run max width tires and fat tires and 26" wheels is just a better combination for my riding, than fat tires and 700c wheels.
Other 80's MTB's were completely different animals.
For me, a Rivendell is all about the ride and that means geometry, more than anything. The one 80's MTB I know of that I think nails the "poor man's Rivendell" is the 1983-85 Trek 8xx series MTB's. Instead of copying the Ritchey geometry, Trek modified their touring bike design into a 26" wheel MTB. If you look at the geometry of the 22" Treks and the original 56 cm Atlantis (26" wheels), they are so close they may as well be identical.
I was fortunate to finally get a 1984 Trek 830. My main bike is a Hunqapillar and I can say the 830 is spot on for the Rivendell ride. In fact, I probably prefer it to the Hunqapillar, solely because I run max width tires and fat tires and 26" wheels is just a better combination for my riding, than fat tires and 700c wheels.
Other 80's MTB's were completely different animals.
#192
Full Member
It looks like I haven't posted in this thread in like 7 years (oddly enough- about the same time I was TRYING to buy a canti-Homer).
One of the things that's always struck me about bicycles is the *minute* differences that will make something desirable or hated. (or maybe it's the minute differences that give an excuse to love or hate something). The tubing, the weight, the color, the decals, the braze ons, the wheelbase length, the range of tire size, the type of brakes, the build, the name on it or attached to it... I think at that time, the Homer was a thinner tubed sport/touring geometry and made by Waterford. The Sam was pretty close to the same geometry, but with more stout tubes and made in Taiwan. I wanted a Homer. I had my "stout" and "long" bikes covered; so I wanted a beautiful, relatively light and nimble bike I could throw a rack and bags on. I wanted that aesthetic with the Craftsman-esque lettering and color scheme. And I wanted it built with the Rivendell lugs and paint, and put together almost literally just down the street from my house at Waterford. I think this is about the time the Grant was trying to move everything to Taiwan- I'm pretty sure I was talking to Grant about getting a bike when the "custom" page disappeared off the website- and everything fell through- I was waving a stack of cash in my hand begging for him to take my money- and he suggested I buy a custom from Waterford.
Most of my bikes are touring bikes- I believe in long wheelbases and long chainstays- but as beneficial as those features are, they come with tradeoffs. When the Clem first came out- the comically long chainstays looked out of balance with the bike. And then those comically long chainstays went on every other bike; the Homer used to be the most beautiful bike- and it's no longer graceful.
From what I see on FB and stuff, Rivendell seems to be doing OK with this design/manufacturing shift- and I'm glad. He's got great ideas, a lot of his ideas about cycling are fantastic, he knows more about bikes than I can even pretend to and he seems like a genuinely good, cool guy. It's just this current crop of bikes doesn't follow in my own particular... ... idiom.
It's always interesting to see what people interpret as the "Rivendell aesthetic" by making their "poor man's Rivendell." Whether it's a utilitarian build with racks and baskets or with several different colors of ratty cloth bar tapes and twine hanging off it and contrasting nail polish touch ups, or a beautiful bike with a modern yet retro-ish flair to it.
One of the things that's always struck me about bicycles is the *minute* differences that will make something desirable or hated. (or maybe it's the minute differences that give an excuse to love or hate something). The tubing, the weight, the color, the decals, the braze ons, the wheelbase length, the range of tire size, the type of brakes, the build, the name on it or attached to it... I think at that time, the Homer was a thinner tubed sport/touring geometry and made by Waterford. The Sam was pretty close to the same geometry, but with more stout tubes and made in Taiwan. I wanted a Homer. I had my "stout" and "long" bikes covered; so I wanted a beautiful, relatively light and nimble bike I could throw a rack and bags on. I wanted that aesthetic with the Craftsman-esque lettering and color scheme. And I wanted it built with the Rivendell lugs and paint, and put together almost literally just down the street from my house at Waterford. I think this is about the time the Grant was trying to move everything to Taiwan- I'm pretty sure I was talking to Grant about getting a bike when the "custom" page disappeared off the website- and everything fell through- I was waving a stack of cash in my hand begging for him to take my money- and he suggested I buy a custom from Waterford.
Most of my bikes are touring bikes- I believe in long wheelbases and long chainstays- but as beneficial as those features are, they come with tradeoffs. When the Clem first came out- the comically long chainstays looked out of balance with the bike. And then those comically long chainstays went on every other bike; the Homer used to be the most beautiful bike- and it's no longer graceful.
From what I see on FB and stuff, Rivendell seems to be doing OK with this design/manufacturing shift- and I'm glad. He's got great ideas, a lot of his ideas about cycling are fantastic, he knows more about bikes than I can even pretend to and he seems like a genuinely good, cool guy. It's just this current crop of bikes doesn't follow in my own particular... ... idiom.
It's always interesting to see what people interpret as the "Rivendell aesthetic" by making their "poor man's Rivendell." Whether it's a utilitarian build with racks and baskets or with several different colors of ratty cloth bar tapes and twine hanging off it and contrasting nail polish touch ups, or a beautiful bike with a modern yet retro-ish flair to it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wirelessness
Classic & Vintage
419
02-09-24 08:30 PM
AZORCH
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling
29
12-27-10 10:25 PM