Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Rules of thumb for older bikes

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Rules of thumb for older bikes

Old 11-09-20, 07:52 PM
  #1  
bbpo8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
Rules of thumb for older bikes

I've gotten into old bicycles the last few months. From reading in Bike Forums and elsewhere, I developed some Rules of Thumb for identifying and assessing vintage bikes. Please correct these and add any others you can think of.

Signs of an earlier (pre-1987) bike:
- Quill stem
- Shifters on the down tube
- Non-aero brake levers (the brake cables go over the handlebars)
(Based on the Eroica guidelines)

Signs of an inexpensive model:
- Kickstand
- Shift levers on the stem
- Plastic handles on the shift levers (not always the case*)
-Safety brake levers*
-Stamped dropouts*
-Steel rims*
-Cottered crank* (some good quality bikes into the 60s had cottered cranks** )
( * = from Markeologist , ** = from 3alarmer)

Steel bikes with Chromoly, Reynolds 531 tubing or better are recommended for long rides and serious cyclists.
Bikes with lesser quality tubing (high tensile steel) are fine for less intense riding, like around town. Some quality touring bikes are made with tubing like that drawn from Hi Ten**)

Bikes advertised with minimal description: stolen or have owners who aren't knowledgeable. "Red bike. Rides like a dream."

Bikes advertised with a long list of specifications belong to fanatics. Extra points for a history of the bike. More points when you can tell it pains the owner to part with the bike.

Bikes offered at a very low price: stolen bike, bike with a broken or dented frame, a spouse selling the bike of an ex-.

Bikes advertised without mentioning their size: Aggh!

Fat tubes = carbon or aluminum frame

Bike with the seat way higher than the handlebars: racing bike. For the young and athletic only.

Relaxed geometrry, endurance bikes: for the vast majority of cyclists.

Upright posture, hybrids: for the vast majority of the population

Bike with a rack. Uncool but useful.

Vintage bike: 1) Old and interesting 2) Old and overpriced

Someone who talks about his "stable of bikes", his "Bike mancave", or "N+1" = hoarder

SurferRosa: "A nicely painted and fully lugged chromoly (or better) road bike in my size might be worth a second look. My eyes immediately go to the presence of forged dropouts, an on-frame rear derailleur hanger, and then toward the details."

ADDED: These are general rules of thumb compiled from posters at Bikeforum and elsewhere.There are always exceptions. The most important rule is go with what makes sense for you.

Have I missed anything? Thanks.

Last edited by bbpo8; 11-10-20 at 02:16 AM. Reason: suggestions from readers
bbpo8 is offline  
Likes For bbpo8:
Old 11-09-20, 07:59 PM
  #2  
old's'cool
curmudgineer
 
old's'cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Chicago SW burbs
Posts: 4,371

Bikes: 2 many 2 fit here

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 240 Post(s)
Liked 48 Times in 35 Posts
welcome to the party
old's'cool is offline  
Likes For old's'cool:
Old 11-09-20, 08:06 PM
  #3  
CargoDane
Not a newbie to cycling
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 911

Bikes: Omnium Cargo Ti with Rohloff, Bullitt Milk Plus, Dahon Smooth Hound

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 356 Post(s)
Liked 319 Times in 197 Posts
Originally Posted by bbpo8 View Post

Someone who talks about his "stable of bikes", his "Bike mancave", or "N+1" = fanatic
Or "hoarder".
CargoDane is offline  
Likes For CargoDane:
Old 11-09-20, 08:19 PM
  #4  
daka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 262

Bikes: Raleigh Super Course x2, Raleigh International

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 121 Post(s)
Liked 138 Times in 84 Posts
Sentimental value? My father was sent to France in WWII and fell in love with Europe. After the war was over he went back and rode a late '40s Raleigh all over. When he married my mother, they did the trip again together - cycling, hosteling and camping. I like bikes that look like his - they remind me of him and all the stories he could tell about where he went on that bike.



I think some folks can now afford the bike(s) they used to dream about as teenagers or college students. You see a lot of white-haired guys driving Corvettes for the same reason. A racing bike may not be ergonomically optimized for an individual of a certain age and while it really doesn't look right to change the C&V bikes much, you may see some triple chainwheels and long arm derailleurs sneak aboard. Although my Dad crossed the Alps on a three-speed, I'm not anxious to try that.

Last edited by daka; 11-09-20 at 08:24 PM.
daka is offline  
Old 11-09-20, 08:24 PM
  #5  
Markeologist
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Marin County, Alta California
Posts: 224

Bikes: Since new: 85/86 Rodriguez Tandem, wife's 87 Gitane Team Pro, 92 Burley Rock-n-Roll, 85 Fisher Comp, 88 Puch Pro, two 92 Bridgestone X0-1s; later: 66/67 Gitane Champion du Monde, late 60s/early 70s B.Carre, my 87 Gitane Team Pro, 77/78 Ritchey Tandem

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 81 Post(s)
Liked 141 Times in 76 Posts
Signs of an inexpensive model:
- Kickstand
- Shift levers on the stem
- Plastic handles on the shift levers (NOT ALWAYS THE CASE)
IF TALKING OF C&V ROADBIKES YOU SHOULD ADD:
-Safety brake levers
-Stamped dropouts
-Steel rims
-Cottered crank (for most post-1950s applications)

Last edited by Markeologist; 11-09-20 at 08:30 PM. Reason: typo
Markeologist is offline  
Likes For Markeologist:
Old 11-09-20, 08:48 PM
  #6  
chainwhip
Senior Member
 
chainwhip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 208 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 82 Posts
Originally Posted by daka View Post
Sentimental value? My father was sent to France in WWII and fell in love with Europe. After the war was over he went back and rode a late '40s Raleigh all over. When he married my mother, they did the trip again together - cycling, hosteling and camping. I like bikes that look like his - they remind me of him and all the stories he could tell about where he went on that bike.



I think some folks can now afford the bike(s) they used to dream about as teenagers or college students. You see a lot of white-haired guys driving Corvettes for the same reason. A racing bike may not be ergonomically optimized for an individual of a certain age and while it really doesn't look right to change the C&V bikes much, you may see some triple chainwheels and long arm derailleurs sneak aboard. Although my Dad crossed the Alps on a three-speed, I'm not anxious to try that.
"You see a lot of white-haired guys driving Corvettes for the same reason."

A premium bicyle is like a Sports Car for your Body.
You must ask youself:
"Is my body worth it?"

Regardless of your current level of fitness,
I say yes! ...because:






chainwhip is offline  
Old 11-09-20, 08:51 PM
  #7  
chainwhip
Senior Member
 
chainwhip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 561
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 208 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 82 Posts
The Ultimate Fashion Acessory is a fit body.

Gucci got none on the rack.


Nor Colnago, for that matter.

:0)
chainwhip is offline  
Likes For chainwhip:
Old 11-09-20, 09:13 PM
  #8  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,024
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2156 Post(s)
Liked 1,236 Times in 670 Posts
Originally Posted by bbpo8 View Post
I've gotten into old bicycles the last few months. From reading in Bike Forums and elsewhere, I developed some Rules of Thumb for identifying and assessing vintage bikes. Please correct these and add any others you can think of.

Signs of an earlier (pre-1987) bike:
- Quill stem
- Shifters on the down tube
- Non-aero brake levers (the brake cables go over the handlebars)
(Based on the Eroica guidelines)

Signs of an inexpensive model:
- Kickstand
- Shift levers on the stem
- Plastic handles on the shift levers (not always the case*)
-Safety brake levers*
-Stamped dropouts*
-Steel rims*
-Cottered crank (for most post-1950s applications) * ( * = from Markeologist )

Steel bikes with Chromoly, Reynolds 531 tubing or better are still worth riding.
Bikes with lesser quality tubing (high tensile steel) might be okay as beaters or for short trips.

Bikes advertised with minimal description: stolen or have owners who aren't knowledgeable. "Red bike. Rides like a dream."

Bikes advertised with a long list of specifications belong to fanatics. Extra points for a history of the bike. More points when you can tell it pains the owner to part with the bike.

Bikes offered at a very low price: stolen bike, bike with a broken or dented frame, a spouse selling the bike of an ex-.

Bikes advertised without mentioning their size: Aggh!

Fat tubes = carbon or aluminum frame

Bike with the seat way higher than the handlebars: racing bike. For the young and athletic only.

Relaxed geometrry, endurance bikes: for the vast majority of cyclists.

Upright posture, hybrids: for the vast majority of the population

Bike with a rack. Uncool but useful.

Vintage bike: 1) Old and interesting 2) Old and overpriced

Someone who talks about his "stable of bikes", his "Bike mancave", or "N+1" = fanatic

Have I missed anything? Thanks.
Sigh... new to the hobby and already flexing the judgmental muscle.

How bout not trying to make a list of ways to look down on things and just enjoy your bike(s).
Happy Feet is offline  
Old 11-09-20, 09:56 PM
  #9  
3alarmer
Friendship is Magic
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Big Tomato
Posts: 19,889

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 283 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21823 Post(s)
Liked 4,703 Times in 3,443 Posts
-Cottered crank (for most post-1950s applications) * ( * = from Markeologist )
...you should move your break point somewhere up into the '60's . There were still plenty of decent bikes with cottered cranks made and sold into the 1960's.



1965 Carlton Catalina



Steel bikes with Chromoly, Reynolds 531 tubing or better are still worth riding.
Bikes with lesser quality tubing (high tensile steel) might be okay as beaters or for short trips.
...again, this a broad generalization that does not always hold true. Here is a perfectly fine touring bike made from tubing drawn from Hi Ten. A touring bike has different requirements for frame weight.





It is true that eventually these butted Hi Ten frames disappeared from the marketplace. Probably because everyone got the idea they were junk.
3alarmer is offline  
Likes For 3alarmer:
Old 11-09-20, 10:46 PM
  #10  
browngw 
Senior Member
 
browngw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Port Dover Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,422

Bikes: 1965 Dilecta Le Blanc, 1956 Royal Nord, 1971 Robin Hood Sports, 1972 CCM Turismo,1976 SuperCycle Excalibur, 1979 Raleigh DL1, 1984 Rossi, 2014 Salsa Vaya, 2017 Felt DD70, 2012 Giant Halfway Folder, 2019 Giant Lafree and others

Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 304 Post(s)
Liked 232 Times in 122 Posts
This post makes me unhappy. Starting out in the bike hobby as a snob before you even know what is going on by using the stereotypes of other bike snobs will never make you happy and serves no purpose to you or anyone else

. Choose what YOU like and be passionate about it. Ruling out "hi-ten" or cottered cranks after a certain year means that some of the most popular areas of the hobby are ignored, for example the tremendous following of British 3 speeds. And shame on those who encourage said behaviour. Restoration and saving bikes should be done out of passion, nostalgia or artistic appreciation, not a dumb set of rules. I am currently restoring a 70s Canadian built CCM 10 speed for a number of reasons even though it is Hi-Ten, chrome wheels etc. It belonged to a friend (gifted to me by his son), it was built in my country, it represents the bike boom era and it is a really pretty shade of blue! These are real reasons to love bikes. Rant over.
__________________
We are what we reflect. We are the changes that we bring to this world. Ride often. -Geo.-
browngw is offline  
Old 11-09-20, 11:05 PM
  #11  
ltokuno
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Arizona
Posts: 107

Bikes: Masi, Olmo, Miele, Masi, Masi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 38 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
For corrections I can think of great bikes that violate each rule listed. Then there's what people have done with the bikes between the time it was new and now. There's examples of things that we might think of as a silly mod to great bikes but were good for the owner at the time. Think Colnago Mexico with a flat bar and a kick stand. Then there's the bikes without name recognition that are as good if not better than the big names.
You might be better off just taking each bike as an individual case instead of trying to list rules that would let good bikes slip through the cracks.
ltokuno is offline  
Likes For ltokuno:
Old 11-09-20, 11:19 PM
  #12  
tkamd73 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,193

Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400t, 1977 Trek TX900, 1983 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1991 PDG Paramount OS, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 392 Post(s)
Liked 433 Times in 244 Posts
He’ll probably want to rewrite a bunch of those in another six months, and if he really sticks with it, forget about them altogether, in a few years.
Tim
tkamd73 is offline  
Likes For tkamd73:
Old 11-09-20, 11:47 PM
  #13  
cudak888 
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 26,620

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 74 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1569 Post(s)
Liked 1,823 Times in 1,051 Posts
  • Kickstand (at least when I put one back on. #projectbike, so there).
  • Shift levers on the handlebar.
  • Stamped dropouts.
  • Stainless steel rims. (Whoops. The '51 in the background has stainless rims. This one doesn't).
  • Cottered cranks.
  • "Lesser" quality tubing.
  • Advertised with a minimal description by the PO.
  • Bought for $75. Seller knew it was a '52 Raleigh and had it sitting around for years. Nothing special or stolen here. Looked like crap when I got it too, so it wouldn't have flown for $75 at any yard sale.
  • Advertised without mentioning the size. I knew it was a 23" for the alternative sizes of a Raleigh Sports can be quickly ID'ed on sight.
  • Upright posture: Because I spent 10 years farting around on drop bars and my back and Dutch commuting sensibilities say screw that. I also own a fair number of classic lightweights with drops too, which helps to annoy fad-following dimwits who do not understand that a single person can have two interests usually generalized as competing extremes. I have yet to implode like the Death Star.
  • No rack: Severely uncool, because utility bikes should have racks.
  • It's a vintage bike which is old, interesting, and was not necessarily overpriced.
  • You forgot weight. It'll weigh about 42 pounds. Don't really care. This is coming from a 531 fan, too. Might as well smash all the generalizations while we're at it.
  • Apparently, I'm a "fanatic" because I do this. Fine.



Have I missed anything? Yep. Playing social anthropologist to your own hobby doesn't do much except to divide.

-Kurt

P.S.: Rule of thumb: You might tick someone off by inadvertently slapping a label on them. #lowendbikecollectorFTW
__________________








Last edited by cudak888; 12-03-20 at 08:31 AM.
cudak888 is offline  
Likes For cudak888:
Old 11-10-20, 01:00 AM
  #14  
machinist42
mycocyclist
 
machinist42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Monkey Junction, Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,707

Bikes: 1964 Schwinn Paramount P-13 DeLuxe, 1964 Schwinn Sport Super Sport, 1972 Falcon San Remo, 1974 Maserati MT-1, 1974 Raleigh International, 1984 Lotus Odyssey, 198? Rossin Ghibli, 1990 LeMond Le Vanquer (sic), 1991 Specialized Allez Transition Pro, +

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 692 Post(s)
Liked 293 Times in 194 Posts
I am Fred.
machinist42 is offline  
Likes For machinist42:
Old 11-10-20, 01:06 AM
  #15  
bbpo8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
Thanks for feedback

Thanks for the suggestions. I incorporated feedback, as well as specific information from Markeologist and 3alarmer.

In response to cudak888, tkamd73, ltokuno, browngw and Happy Feet, there is this Post Script:

"These are general rules of thumb compiled from posters at Bikeforum and elsewhere.There are always exceptions. The most important rule is go with what makes sense for you."

Some personal background. Even though I'm new to Bike Forums, I've ridden bikes since 1957. In the early years, I rode hand-me-downs which I'm sure were heavy and low-end. It didn't matter to me - I had a blast. I commuted, rode around Europe, did everything but competition. In 1993 when I finally had money, I bought a mid-range bike, a Bianchi Eros, which I've ridden for the past 27 years. Only in the last few months have I gotten into other bikes.

Getting more deeply into the details of bicycling has been a revelation. What I've learned from BIke Forums has helped me make sense of my experiences. For example, if you're going to ride long distances, it really is good to have a light, well made bike. Or if you're going to invest energy in a bike, it's good to get a quality one that repays your investment. Or, for casual use, almost any bike will work. These ideas may seem obvious to you, but they aren't to most people.

There's a pragmatic reason for guidelines like these. Because of coronavirus, more people are buying older bikes. Selecting an appropriate one is a dauntiing task.
bbpo8 is offline  
Likes For bbpo8:
Old 11-10-20, 01:32 AM
  #16  
Happy Feet
Senior Member
 
Happy Feet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 5,024
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2156 Post(s)
Liked 1,236 Times in 670 Posts
Zero to hero expurt...

snore.
Happy Feet is offline  
Likes For Happy Feet:
Old 11-10-20, 01:51 AM
  #17  
bbpo8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
Can someone explain to me the personal insults? Why does this list provoke such a reaction?
It's just some guidelines that I've collected. It's not about me. I'm asking if knowledgeable people can correct or add to them.
Weird. Is this typical behavior?
bbpo8 is offline  
Old 11-10-20, 02:13 AM
  #18  
SurferRosa
Señor Member
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 4,662

Bikes: Old school lightweights

Mentioned: 61 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1912 Post(s)
Liked 2,166 Times in 1,207 Posts
Originally Posted by bbpo8 View Post
Have I missed anything? Thanks.
I wouldn't have put it so ... bluntly (apparently?), but I think you have some decent tips for new buyers of good quality vintage road bikes of the 10-14 speed variety. For me, it can be said more easily: a nicely painted and fully lugged chromoly (or better) road bike in my size might be worth a second look. My eyes immediately go to the presence of forged dropouts, an on-frame rear derailleur hanger, and then toward the details.
SurferRosa is offline  
Likes For SurferRosa:
Old 11-10-20, 02:37 AM
  #19  
bbpo8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
Not claiming to be an expert

Thanks for the specific suggestion, SurferRosa. I added it to the original post.

I dunno, maybe people think that I'm claiming to be an expert. Of course I'm not.These are all ideas that I've taken from posts at Bike Forums (and elsewhere), maybe from some of you.

To make it clear: I'M NOT AN EXPERT! I'M ASKING FOR FEEDBACK ON RULES OF THUMB COLLECTED FROM EXPERTS.

If people want to make specific corrections or additions, that is wonderful. Can we stick to that topic?
bbpo8 is offline  
Old 11-10-20, 04:12 AM
  #20  
merziac
Senior Member
 
merziac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 8,381

Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2

Mentioned: 163 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2550 Post(s)
Liked 1,822 Times in 1,226 Posts
Originally Posted by bbpo8 View Post
Can someone explain to me the personal insults? Why does this list provoke such a reaction?
It's just some guidelines that I've collected. It's not about me. I'm asking if knowledgeable people can correct or add to them.
Weird. Is this typical behavior?


First of all, welcome aboard, glad you found us.

That being said, maybe not typical but not unexpected.

When it still says "Junior" by member and a total post count of 6, any manifesto, sweeping generalizations are likely to be met with this sort of reaction.

We are a huge mosaic here, many agree on many things, many don't, opinions here run the gamut and many of us have little wiggle room on some things, just the way it is.

Normally, new folks here ask more questions to get the lay of the land before making such a comprehensive statement which is hard as some will take offense when you deride something they hold dear despite the perceived popular opinion.

Last edited by merziac; 11-10-20 at 04:43 AM.
merziac is offline  
Likes For merziac:
Old 11-10-20, 04:12 AM
  #21  
randyjawa 
Senior Member
 
randyjawa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada - burrrrr!
Posts: 10,920

Bikes: 1958 Rabeneick 120D, 1968 Legnano Gran Premio, 196? Torpado Professional, 2000 Marinoni Piuma

Mentioned: 187 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 969 Times in 587 Posts
I am pretty sure that I could argue against darn near every point that the OP offers. And, for what it is worth, I used to feel much the same way when I was new to the hobby of finding, restoring and riding vintage bicycles.

In my experience, not what I have read from others, but what I have actually experienced, there are no rules of thumb for finding, restoring and riding vintage bicycles (I speak only of vintage road bicycles and some roadsters). Components do little to define a quality bike. A good component can easily be installed on a non-quality bike and visa versa. A top of the line frame and fork set might not be all that great for casual riding. The list of arguments can expand from here.

I'M NOT AN EXPERT! I'M ASKING FOR FEEDBACK ON RULES OF THUMB COLLECTED FROM EXPERTS.
What experts? You don't honestly think that we are all experts? I know for one thing for sure, when it comes to vintage road bicycles - I AM NOT AN EXPERT. Are there any experts here at the Bike Forums? Might be a couple but most are just back yard mechanics, just like me and, perhaps, the OP.
__________________
"98% of the bikes I buy are projects".
randyjawa is offline  
Likes For randyjawa:
Old 11-10-20, 04:42 AM
  #22  
bbpo8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Palo Alto, California
Posts: 12
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 21 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 8 Posts
What a weird place!

Half of the comments had good specific information. Half are going off on tangents. The personal stuff is just silly. What's the point?

Yes, I do consider you experts. I've learned a lot from reading here. I don't think you should downrplay your expertise. The technical discussions are usually clear and understandable. In spite of minor disagreements, there seems to be a shared understanding which I've tried to capture. If something specific is wrong, let me know.

Yes, these are rules of thumb and don't cover all the cases. There are always exceptions. But I was surprised at the unanimity, for example, when people asked about the value of a bike they just picked up. Estimates were close to each other, as well as the suggestions for what to do with the bike.

The knowledge you have is important because people will be buying and using bikes more in the future because of the pandemic, urban congestion and climate change. Covid will probably be with us for some time, and bikes are one way to cope with it. Cities around the world are encouraging people to use bicycles.

The gap between your expertise and that of the general public is immense.
bbpo8 is offline  
Likes For bbpo8:
Old 11-10-20, 06:00 AM
  #23  
RobbieTunes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,297
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,374 Times in 888 Posts
Once you went with "rules," you became part of the cancel culture.
RobbieTunes is offline  
Likes For RobbieTunes:
Old 11-10-20, 07:06 AM
  #24  
Peruano
Biker
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 165

Bikes: One or more from each decade since 1960s

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Liked 18 Times in 10 Posts
Stereotypes only work if you cling to your original biases and thus don't recognize it when you are wrong.
Peruano is offline  
Likes For Peruano:
Old 11-10-20, 07:18 AM
  #25  
Phil_gretz
Journeyman Bike Commuter
 
Phil_gretz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 6,826

Bikes: '79 Peugeot PXN10LE, '88 Fuji Saratoga, '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '16 Motobecane Gran Premio Elite, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100

Mentioned: 23 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1363 Post(s)
Liked 1,321 Times in 711 Posts
This is a difficult thread to read. I can't contribute to the "list", and I'll admit that I still carry many of the same biases deep down inside. These are what help me not to waste time refurbishing bikes that will not absolutely delight me when ridden.

Alas, many or most bikes simply do not thrill when ridden. A very few do. Those are the gems. How does one identify a gem in the rough? That's the $64,000 question. Instincts informed by experience, the results of trial and error, and a lifetime of learning the lessons with which we're presented.

Very, very few bikes truly stir the soul.
Phil_gretz is offline  
Likes For Phil_gretz:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.