Cassette question? More top end speed?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Cassette question? More top end speed?
2017 Specialized Diverge Comp Carbon. Awesome bike. Built a little more for the climbing/diverse gravel route. Been a great road bike. I have been trying to make it a faster and faster road bike.
Stock Cassette: Shimano 105, 11-speed, 11-32t
Stock Chainrings: Praxis 48/32t
I am looking for more top end speed capability out of my bike.
I upgraded my front rings to Praxis 50/34t. Helped and Better.
Still want more.
I am considering upgrading my cassette.
Would this fit/Help?: Shimano Ultegra R8000 Bicycle Cassette 11-30T
IF not, I would love recommendations on Cassette upgrades that would A. Fit, and B. Help me with some more top end speed.
Wheels: DT R460 Disc SCS
I REALLY appreciate any advice here.
Thank you!!!
Stock Cassette: Shimano 105, 11-speed, 11-32t
Stock Chainrings: Praxis 48/32t
I am looking for more top end speed capability out of my bike.
I upgraded my front rings to Praxis 50/34t. Helped and Better.
Still want more.
I am considering upgrading my cassette.
Would this fit/Help?: Shimano Ultegra R8000 Bicycle Cassette 11-30T
IF not, I would love recommendations on Cassette upgrades that would A. Fit, and B. Help me with some more top end speed.
Wheels: DT R460 Disc SCS
I REALLY appreciate any advice here.
Thank you!!!
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,853
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1067 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 259 Times
in
153 Posts
11-30 has the same top gear (11t) as what you already have.
The gearing on the bike isn't really the limiter anyway.
You just need to train at pedalling faster and harder.
The gearing on the bike isn't really the limiter anyway.
You just need to train at pedalling faster and harder.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: location location
Posts: 3,035
Bikes: MBK Super Mirage 1991, CAAD10, Yuba Mundo Lux, and a Cannondale Criterium Single Speed
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 297 Times
in
207 Posts
What Dean said. The 11-30 will fit, but won’t help your top end speed. Save the cash for the cassette and invest in a cadence sensor (if you don’t already have one) and consider a power meter.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
50x11 on a 700c/25mm tire is 119 gear inches. That works out to 42.8mph at 120rpm.
Work on the engine, not the transmission.
Work on the engine, not the transmission.
Likes For caloso:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,281
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8275 Post(s)
Liked 9,033 Times
in
4,471 Posts
How fast are you going in 50x11?
Likes For big john:
#6
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,045
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22590 Post(s)
Liked 8,924 Times
in
4,157 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,281
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8275 Post(s)
Liked 9,033 Times
in
4,471 Posts
Likes For big john:
#8
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,045
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22590 Post(s)
Liked 8,924 Times
in
4,157 Posts
I do believe the new SRAM 12 speed has a 10t option but that's going to be WAY more trouble that it's worth. OP should work on spinning/cadence as suggested. If for some reason he still wants more top end he could get a 53T front chainring, of course.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,281
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8275 Post(s)
Liked 9,033 Times
in
4,471 Posts
I still want to know how fast he is going in the 50x11. That's the high gear I use and it's plenty most of the time. If the descent is really steep I just coast anyway. The OP is in Florida so I don't know where he could use a giant gear.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3375 Post(s)
Liked 5,512 Times
in
2,855 Posts
Likes For Shimagnolo:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 923 Times
in
569 Posts
I use a 48/34 set up. The top end speed capability is fine- start to spin out over 35 mph.
I'd like more middle end speed capability- sustained 22-24 mph on the flat.
Unfortunately, there's no magic gear ratio to get me there.
I'd like more middle end speed capability- sustained 22-24 mph on the flat.
Unfortunately, there's no magic gear ratio to get me there.
#12
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,561 Times
in
1,790 Posts
Gears higher than that (50x14, 50x13, 50x12, 50x11) on flat terrain are just hypothetical.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,281
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8275 Post(s)
Liked 9,033 Times
in
4,471 Posts
You actually use your 50x11? I sure don't--at least not on a level grade. 50x15 is about my highest useful gear on the flat, which gets me going about 26 mph (but not for long).
Gears higher than that (50x14, 50x13, 50x12, 50x11) on flat terrain are just hypothetical.
Gears higher than that (50x14, 50x13, 50x12, 50x11) on flat terrain are just hypothetical.
#14
climber has-been
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 7,102
Bikes: Scott Addict R1, Felt Z1
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3427 Post(s)
Liked 3,561 Times
in
1,790 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,281
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8275 Post(s)
Liked 9,033 Times
in
4,471 Posts
#17
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times
in
371 Posts
You actually use your 50x11? I sure don't--at least not on a level grade. 50x15 is about my highest useful gear on the flat, which gets me going about 26 mph (but not for long).
Gears higher than that (50x14, 50x13, 50x12, 50x11) on flat terrain are just hypothetical.
Gears higher than that (50x14, 50x13, 50x12, 50x11) on flat terrain are just hypothetical.
One, sprint finish particularly with a big group and a lead out, you definitely want more than 50x15.
Another non hypothetical, time trialing with a tail wind. To maintain a speed in the high 20’s at a cadence that does not have too high aerobic cost you want more than 50x15.
And just being able to stand for a butt break at a relatively low candence and 20 mph you need a bigger gear.
All that said I agree with the point that the OP doesn’t need bigger gears.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,753
Bikes: 1986 KHS Fiero, 1989 Trek 950, 1990 Trek 7000, 1991 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo, 1992 Trek 1400, 1997 Cannondale CAD2 R300, 1998 Cannondale CAD2 R200, 2002 Marin San Rafael, 2006 Cannondale CAAD8 R1000, 2010 Performance Access XCL9R
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 284 Post(s)
Liked 385 Times
in
207 Posts
The rider I used to be, says the OP needs to needs to learn to spin. The rider I am now, has finally learned to spin.
I have two bikes, setup completely different. My old steel bike has a compact 50/34 and 12-30. I have spun it out on the trainer, at 42 mph and 120 rpm. For 30 seconds... On the street, I've hit 28 but for less than 30 seconds. But I can maintain 20 easily without killing myself mashing or over spinning.
The other is nice aluminum bike, 53/39 also 12-30. Never had it on the trainer. Only recently started riding it. Last week I got to sprint it chasing a guy, I never caught him, but Strava showed me at 38.7 MPH. Somehow, I stayed over 25 for a good minute. Yes, it was a slight downhill. I've had no issue holding 23 for a couple minutes on flat ground.
Nowhere near the rider I used to be. But trying to be smarter this time around... Looking forward to spinning on the trainer this winter..
I have two bikes, setup completely different. My old steel bike has a compact 50/34 and 12-30. I have spun it out on the trainer, at 42 mph and 120 rpm. For 30 seconds... On the street, I've hit 28 but for less than 30 seconds. But I can maintain 20 easily without killing myself mashing or over spinning.
The other is nice aluminum bike, 53/39 also 12-30. Never had it on the trainer. Only recently started riding it. Last week I got to sprint it chasing a guy, I never caught him, but Strava showed me at 38.7 MPH. Somehow, I stayed over 25 for a good minute. Yes, it was a slight downhill. I've had no issue holding 23 for a couple minutes on flat ground.
Nowhere near the rider I used to be. But trying to be smarter this time around... Looking forward to spinning on the trainer this winter..
#19
Senior Member
Well, when it comes to gearing, look back to the greats in cycling history. In 1956 Ray Booty, "the boot", was the first man to break 4 hours in a 100 mile TT. His record of 3 hrs 53min 28 sec, stood for 34 years.
As was the custom for many english riders back in the day, he rode his bike to the race on the previous day....a 100 miles.
25+ mph for 4 hours. What was his gearing?, 84inch fixed, or equivalent to a 50x16.
As was the custom for many english riders back in the day, he rode his bike to the race on the previous day....a 100 miles.
25+ mph for 4 hours. What was his gearing?, 84inch fixed, or equivalent to a 50x16.
#20
I eat carbide.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 21,627
Bikes: Lots. Van Dessel and Squid Dealer
Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1325 Post(s)
Liked 1,306 Times
in
560 Posts
I caught an "SCS" in the original post. Don't care that the model says it's not but with SCS you're running what is essentially a cross bike. You put a 50 on it. You want to go faster.
1. Spin. You're mashing.
2. Put a 53 on it (have we really come to the point where people have forgotten that a 53 is considered a "full sized" crank?) - you already have an 11. That's as big as you can go on your setup.
3. Get an actual road bike instead of a cross bike masquerading as a road bike.
1. Spin. You're mashing.
2. Put a 53 on it (have we really come to the point where people have forgotten that a 53 is considered a "full sized" crank?) - you already have an 11. That's as big as you can go on your setup.
3. Get an actual road bike instead of a cross bike masquerading as a road bike.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels
#21
Version 7.0
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 13,127
Bikes: Too Many
Mentioned: 297 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1340 Post(s)
Liked 2,482 Times
in
1,457 Posts
During this time of year, I do low cadence / big gear work on flat terrain to build strength and adaptation on the road and time trial bike. So I use the 50/11 on my road bike and 54/11 on my TT bike a lot.
#22
Should Be More Popular
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Malvern, PA (20 miles West of Philly)
Posts: 43,045
Bikes: 1986 Alpine (steel road bike), 2009 Ti Habenero, 2013 Specialized Roubaix
Mentioned: 560 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22590 Post(s)
Liked 8,924 Times
in
4,157 Posts
I don't know if we will ever get an answer. I hate it when that happens!
#23
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,902
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4802 Post(s)
Liked 3,923 Times
in
2,552 Posts
My experience is that top speed (barring very fast downhills) is a matter more of the right gear than how big it is. Most racers will agree. While they all have that big top gear, much more important is the small steps between gears so they can get exactly the right one for that day, that stretch of road, that wind, etc. I raced it the days of 5 and 6-speed FWs. 13 teeth was as small as they came. But far more important to me was having the 14, the 15 and the 15. (I rode a 53 or 54 in front depending on the race.)
So the OP is running an 11-32 11-speed. 32, 28, 25, 23, 21, 19, 17, 15, 13, 12, 11? For fast riding and flatter roads, why not run a 11-25 (or even better, a 12-25) and have 14, 16 (and 18) tooth cogs? If it were me, I'd make up a second wheelset with the smaller, closer cassette, nice road rims and some fast tires.
Not having the large cogs is a reminder as soon as you get on the bike that you are riding a fast one and have to step up to it. On the days you are not feeling it, just take the gravel wheels. If you have to have it all, there is another solution. Keep the small cassette but make the crankset a triple. I ran a 53-42-28 triple and a racing FW/cassette for decades. I'm getting old, so the same cassettes now get paired with a 50-38-24.
Ben
So the OP is running an 11-32 11-speed. 32, 28, 25, 23, 21, 19, 17, 15, 13, 12, 11? For fast riding and flatter roads, why not run a 11-25 (or even better, a 12-25) and have 14, 16 (and 18) tooth cogs? If it were me, I'd make up a second wheelset with the smaller, closer cassette, nice road rims and some fast tires.
Not having the large cogs is a reminder as soon as you get on the bike that you are riding a fast one and have to step up to it. On the days you are not feeling it, just take the gravel wheels. If you have to have it all, there is another solution. Keep the small cassette but make the crankset a triple. I ran a 53-42-28 triple and a racing FW/cassette for decades. I'm getting old, so the same cassettes now get paired with a 50-38-24.
Ben
Likes For 79pmooney:
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,902
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4802 Post(s)
Liked 3,923 Times
in
2,552 Posts
Well, when it comes to gearing, look back to the greats in cycling history. In 1956 Ray Booty, "the boot", was the first man to break 4 hours in a 100 mile TT. His record of 3 hrs 53min 28 sec, stood for 34 years.
As was the custom for many english riders back in the day, he rode his bike to the race on the previous day....a 100 miles.
25+ mph for 4 hours. What was his gearing?, 84inch fixed, or equivalent to a 50x16.
As was the custom for many english riders back in the day, he rode his bike to the race on the previous day....a 100 miles.
25+ mph for 4 hours. What was his gearing?, 84inch fixed, or equivalent to a 50x16.
I rode a race of 105.6 hilly miles in 3 hours and 58 minutes years ago. Only used my 13 downhill and perhaps the final mile. (A bigger gear would have made no difference.) The time I spent in the break, I used the 14 and 15. Yes I was riding a 54 but 54-14 is the same as a 50 x 13.
Ben