Understanding Derailleur Travel Paths
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Understanding Derailleur Travel Paths
The sketch below illustrates my questions. What do we know about derailleur travel paths?
As a follow up question, what do we think the odds are that electronic shifting technology will eventually lead someone to make a universal, "super derailleur" for which the user could programmatically adjust the pull ratio and travel path to suit any setup? I could see that having three useful applications:
1) Vintage bikes.
2) All bikes in a stable when one might want to spend big $$$ on an awesome RD and be able to move it from bike to bike.
3) A custom travel path might improve shifting if it allowed the derailleur to follow the curve of the cogs with greater precision.
The drawback would probably be that such a thing would likely have to be ugly as sin, particularly in the context of vintage bikes.
As a follow up question, what do we think the odds are that electronic shifting technology will eventually lead someone to make a universal, "super derailleur" for which the user could programmatically adjust the pull ratio and travel path to suit any setup? I could see that having three useful applications:
1) Vintage bikes.
2) All bikes in a stable when one might want to spend big $$$ on an awesome RD and be able to move it from bike to bike.
3) A custom travel path might improve shifting if it allowed the derailleur to follow the curve of the cogs with greater precision.
The drawback would probably be that such a thing would likely have to be ugly as sin, particularly in the context of vintage bikes.
Last edited by Harold74; 07-28-21 at 10:34 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Chapel Hill NC
Posts: 1,683
Bikes: 2000 Litespeed Vortex Chorus 10, 1995 DeBernardi Cromor S/S
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 645 Post(s)
Liked 797 Times
in
446 Posts
The sketch below illustrates my questions. What do we know about derailleur travel paths?
As a follow up question, what do we think the odds are that electronic shifting technology will eventually lead someone to make a universal, "super derailleur" for which the user could programmatically adjust the pull ratio and travel path to suit any setup? I could see that having three useful applications:
1) Vintage bikes.
2) All bikes in a stable when one might want to spend big $$$ on an awesome RD and be able to move it from bike to bike.
3) A custom travel path might improve shifting if it allowed the derailleur to follow the curve of the cogs with greater precision.
The drawback would probably be that such a thing would likely have to be ugly as sin, particularly in the context of vintage bikes.
As a follow up question, what do we think the odds are that electronic shifting technology will eventually lead someone to make a universal, "super derailleur" for which the user could programmatically adjust the pull ratio and travel path to suit any setup? I could see that having three useful applications:
1) Vintage bikes.
2) All bikes in a stable when one might want to spend big $$$ on an awesome RD and be able to move it from bike to bike.
3) A custom travel path might improve shifting if it allowed the derailleur to follow the curve of the cogs with greater precision.
The drawback would probably be that such a thing would likely have to be ugly as sin, particularly in the context of vintage bikes.
iirc Campag claim that their 12sp RDs are designed so that the movement arc closely mirrors the shape of their cassettes
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times
in
570 Posts
However, the distance between the upper jockey and the sprocket immediately above it is governed by chain length - as the RD moves inward and the chain wraps around successively larger sprockets, the resulting rotation of the cage pulls the lower wheel forward and the upper wheel downward. I think the geometry of the cage and the relative positions of the jockey wheels and the pivot will determine the path described by the upper wheel and the cassette.
Shimano used to call this a Double Servo panta movement. Ironically, you'll notice they illustrate it with a straight line, but the optimum path is indeed curved.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
However, the distance between the upper jockey and the sprocket immediately above it is governed by chain length - as the RD moves inward and the chain wraps around successively larger sprockets, the resulting rotation of the cage pulls the lower wheel forward and the upper wheel downward.
1) The motion of "body" of the derailleur appears to be linear, and would almost have to be based on its construction.
2) The Claris upper jockey does drop down as you suggested.
3) The Suntour upper jockey actually seems to pop UP.
I guess that all is well so long as the various components of motion add up to something approriate.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times
in
570 Posts
To complicate things, the size and configuration of the cassette really drives the demands of the derailleur. These super wide range cassettes (like 10-51) require a ton of vertical displacement of that guide pulley. And derailleurs designed to work well with these types of cassettes also have larger distances between the guide pulley and the cage axis. The more distance there, the more vertical displacement you can get with cage movement. I think this is a pretty interesting aspect of chain-driven drivetrain design, personally.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
So it seems to me that, although the effect may be negligible, all of the following would impact the derailleur guide pulley travel path:
1) The B-screw adjustment would impact the linear component of the travel path.
2) For the same chain length, the B-screw adjustment would impact the non-linear component of the travel path.
3) Chain stretch would impact the non-linear component of the travel path.
1) The B-screw adjustment would impact the linear component of the travel path.
2) For the same chain length, the B-screw adjustment would impact the non-linear component of the travel path.
3) Chain stretch would impact the non-linear component of the travel path.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I could have sworn that somebody mentioned that shift "crispness" differences would be negligible on a 7-speed. I can't find that comment now though.
The reason for that is that 7-speed setups have wide, durable chains and larger gaps between cogs, right? Those things lead to more forgiving shifting? Once I run out of 7-speed cassettes, I may attempt to switch the bike to a 9-speed throughout the entire drivetrain, complete with new wheels and all. Hopefully that's a 2030 project.
The reason for that is that 7-speed setups have wide, durable chains and larger gaps between cogs, right? Those things lead to more forgiving shifting? Once I run out of 7-speed cassettes, I may attempt to switch the bike to a 9-speed throughout the entire drivetrain, complete with new wheels and all. Hopefully that's a 2030 project.
#8
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
We already have that technology. It's called "friction shifting."
Likes For JohnDThompson:
#9
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,536
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3670 Post(s)
Liked 5,422 Times
in
2,756 Posts
That may have been a post I deleted in the thread where you were going on about long cage vs short cage derailleurs. You are correct as to the gist. You will not be able to tell one from another if the cog range is appropriate. If you are determined to go out of spec your experience may vary. Obviously faulty set up or worn out parts won't help.
#10
Senior Member
Programmable travel path is doable, but it would be difficult to justify the considerable increase in mechanical complexity. During Campagnolo's post-Dura-Ace-7400 scramble to stay relevant, one of the weird designs they pushed out allowed the parallelogram angle to be selected between two presets. It made the derailleur heavier and a bit funny-looking, and was generally a failure, solving a problem that not very many people had.
Modern 1x derailleurs do a pretty good job of adapting to different cassettes through the offset between their jockey wheel and the a-pivot. Modern multi-ring derailleurs less so, but they work well enough anyway, and it's not like very many cyclists want to routinely make large drivetrain changes on a multi-chainring bike (having less need to do so theoretically being one of the perks of multi-ring drivetrains).
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,845
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2338 Post(s)
Liked 2,822 Times
in
1,541 Posts
The sketch below illustrates my questions. What do we know about derailleur travel paths?
As a follow up question, what do we think the odds are that electronic shifting technology will eventually lead someone to make a universal, "super derailleur" for which the user could programmatically adjust the pull ratio and travel path to suit any setup? I could see that having three useful applications:
1) Vintage bikes.
2) All bikes in a stable when one might want to spend big $$$ on an awesome RD and be able to move it from bike to bike.
3) A custom travel path might improve shifting if it allowed the derailleur to follow the curve of the cogs with greater precision.
The drawback would probably be that such a thing would likely have to be ugly as sin, particularly in the context of vintage bikes.
As a follow up question, what do we think the odds are that electronic shifting technology will eventually lead someone to make a universal, "super derailleur" for which the user could programmatically adjust the pull ratio and travel path to suit any setup? I could see that having three useful applications:
1) Vintage bikes.
2) All bikes in a stable when one might want to spend big $$$ on an awesome RD and be able to move it from bike to bike.
3) A custom travel path might improve shifting if it allowed the derailleur to follow the curve of the cogs with greater precision.
The drawback would probably be that such a thing would likely have to be ugly as sin, particularly in the context of vintage bikes.
there is clearly no demand for super derailleur or there would be one. Bike companies market what sells...
I can't imagine any one wanting to go to the effort to switch derailleurs between bikes, too much work and hassle. Many people with multiple bikes keep each bike ready to go. I certainly do, meaning each bike has a pump, seat bag with tubes, patch kit, tools, their own lights.
as with all things mechanical one super derailler conflicts with keys to easy success
- Matching components will work better than mix and match, and certainly will be easier to set up
- Keeping things in spec or very close minimizes complications
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#12
Senior Member
If you're suggesting something other than a parallelogram, I guess that's an option, but parallelograms have a combination of elegance, durability, and lack of stiction that makes them hard to beat for the purpose.
but pretty much all current rear deraillers use the slant parallelogram approach
No, many 1x derailleurs - including pretty much all of SRAM's models and the Campagnolo Ekar - use an unslanted dropped parallelogram. This is usually fine for 1x derailleurs because they can use a high jockey wheel offset to manage chain gap, without fear of front shifting interfering with the jockey wheel position. The benefit is that the parallelogram doesn't get actuated when the chain is bounced by the bicycle going over bumps: the most obvious benefit is that bumps are less likely to cause ghost-shifting, but it also (and arguably more importantly) protects stuff like the shift cable and limit screws from sharp jolts.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I'm far less of a C&V purist than most but, if someone could make a sexy, shiny, programmable derailleur that would allow indexed shifting on my wife's old 15 speed, I'd be all over that. Plus, I enjoy programming things.