UPS lost my Bikeflights shipment
#151
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,094
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,290 Times
in
743 Posts
So, in summation, had you purchased insurance, your loss would have been covered. You chose to not buy insurance so your loss was not covered. So the purchase of insurance was a voluntary decision. Had the insurance been bought, and the bikes been lost, the insurance would have been paid out. So, it is a product that can be bought voluntarily, the benefits of which have been clearly explained, benefits paid upon loss or damage of item insured. So not a scam, instead it is a product, the value of which you receive according to certain conditions spelled out before you buy.
But did they find the bike?
But did they find the bike?
#152
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,237
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18413 Post(s)
Liked 15,536 Times
in
7,328 Posts
I suspect that some of the differing opinions on insurance come from life circumstances...If you don't own anything of significant value, then insurance is less important. On the other hand, if you own a home, or perhaps have significant assets which could be subject to a legal judgment, insurance might seem more sensible. (As regards the latter: on top of substantial liability coverage on our home and auto insurance, we carry a $1 million umbrella liability policy. Since we have much more than that amount in retirement accounts, it's a very cheap way to protect our future.)
I looked up PA law. One interesting aspect is that not only are bibles protected from judgment, so are sewing machines belonging to seamstresses or those belonging to and used by private families as long as they are not for hire or sale.
Likes For indyfabz:
#153
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,237
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18413 Post(s)
Liked 15,536 Times
in
7,328 Posts
The bike was replaceable. What were not were the custom Robert Beckman racks that were attached to it. The matching panniers were designed to work only with his racks. Maybe this will finally be the winter I pay a visit to either Bilenky or Firth & Wilson to see if they can modify my current racks to accept the Beckman panniers. In addition to being terrific pieces of equipment, they have a lot of sentimental value. Did about 10,000 of loaded touring with them in '99-'00.
#154
Full Member
Thread Starter
So, in summation, had you purchased insurance, your loss would have been covered. You chose to not buy insurance so your loss was not covered. So the purchase of insurance was a voluntary decision. Had the insurance been bought, and the bikes been lost, the insurance would have been paid out. So, it is a product that can be bought voluntarily, the benefits of which have been clearly explained, benefits paid upon loss or damage of item insured. So not a scam, instead it is a product, the value of which you receive according to certain conditions spelled out before you buy.
But did they find the bike?
But did they find the bike?
I reiterate, who says they would have honored the insurance even if I had indeed purchased it?
#155
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,878
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,963 Times
in
4,688 Posts
FWIW, I've filed all kinds of insurance claims over the past 40 years: theft and three roofs damaged by hailstorms (homeowners ins), auto claims, broken camera equipment (special policy), life insurance for deceased relative, etc. None have been denied.
#156
Full Member
Thread Starter
This seems like a good way to excuse your lack of foresight.
FWIW, I've filed all kinds of insurance claims over the past 40 years: theft and three roofs damaged by hailstorms (homeowners ins), auto claims, broken camera equipment (special policy), life insurance for deceased relative, etc. None have been denied.
FWIW, I've filed all kinds of insurance claims over the past 40 years: theft and three roofs damaged by hailstorms (homeowners ins), auto claims, broken camera equipment (special policy), life insurance for deceased relative, etc. None have been denied.
Last edited by amazinmets73; 11-03-22 at 12:19 PM.
#157
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,878
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,963 Times
in
4,688 Posts
I hope you never wreck your car, or fall asleep in bed while smoking a cigarette, or...
#158
Full Member
Thread Starter
I will say I'm very meticulous about checking receipts and tracking numbers post the lost of the bikes. If I had been prior to the incident I would have spotted the error.
#159
Full Member
Thread Starter
#160
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,094
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,290 Times
in
743 Posts
I guess you'll never know. What I know is, when I bought insurance on a shipment, and it was lost, they paid. I was returning my wedding band after we first bought it, in exchange for a smaller size, and it was lost. The insurance paid in full. I was happy I bought it.
Likes For phughes:
#161
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,903
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,212 Posts
Lack of foresight? I've shipped numerous other products post this incident, including several bikes. I did not purchase additional insurance. Why? Because I know I lose money on average purchasing it. Sure, you can always get unlucky as was the case here, but it's a winning approach on average.
#162
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 4,036
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2239 Post(s)
Liked 3,434 Times
in
1,797 Posts
#163
Full Member
Thread Starter
#164
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,903
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,212 Posts
Don't forget to file for a new roof after hail damage. (Although I've paid for that roof over the last dozen or so years through increased premiums.)
#165
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,903
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,931 Times
in
1,212 Posts
I've always thought the case studies my friends in business classes had were more about Monday morning quarterbacking than learning critical thinking or whatever reason was given for them. But here you're bemoaning a net loss, while arguing against buying the insurance that would have protected you against that loss. Ben Franklin noted, "Experience is a hard school, but a fool will learn in no other." Wonder what he would have said about someone who did not learn from their own experience?
#166
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,878
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,963 Times
in
4,688 Posts
I've always thought the case studies my friends in business classes had were more about Monday morning quarterbacking than learning critical thinking or whatever reason was given for them. But here you're bemoaning a net loss, while arguing against buying the insurance that would have protected you against that loss. Ben Franklin noted, "Experience is a hard school, but a fool will learn in no other." Wonder what he would have said about someone who did not learn from their own experience?
Likes For phughes:
#168
Full Member
Thread Starter
I've always thought the case studies my friends in business classes had were more about Monday morning quarterbacking than learning critical thinking or whatever reason was given for them. But here you're bemoaning a net loss, while arguing against buying the insurance that would have protected you against that loss. Ben Franklin noted, "Experience is a hard school, but a fool will learn in no other." Wonder what he would have said about someone who did not learn from their own experience?
We are all aware (I would hope) that purchasing lottery tickets is on average a losing proposition by a significant margin. However, we can find numerous instances of individuals who've made a net profit playing the lottery. Does that invalidate the fact that lottery players lose money on average?
Same reasoning applies here. Yes, I may indeed have experienced negative variance, but purchasing insurance is still on average a losing proposition.
Likes For amazinmets73:
#170
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3949 Post(s)
Liked 7,296 Times
in
2,946 Posts
We are all aware (I would hope) that purchasing lottery tickets is on average a losing proposition by a significant margin. However, we can find numerous instances of individuals who've made a net profit playing the lottery. Does that invalidate the fact that lottery players lose money on average?
Same reasoning applies here. Yes, I may indeed have experienced negative variance, but purchasing insurance is still on average a losing proposition.
Same reasoning applies here. Yes, I may indeed have experienced negative variance, but purchasing insurance is still on average a losing proposition.
#171
Full Member
Thread Starter
Yea, I can agree with that. If I were shipping a package valued at $17,000 as opposed to $1,700, yes, I would insure it.
#172
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 39,237
Mentioned: 211 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18413 Post(s)
Liked 15,536 Times
in
7,328 Posts
When I was touring in the Black Hills I got hit with a pretty bad storm while in camp. I think the only thing that saved my tent fly was the fact that I was pitched under a small tree. The next morning I noticed a couple of car repair places advertising that they handle insurance claims for hail damage.
#173
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,272
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4257 Post(s)
Liked 1,354 Times
in
940 Posts
Not sure I follow your reasoning. Yes, obviously I'd like to recover the bikes. Doesn't change the fact the purchasing insurance is a losing proposition.
We are all aware (I would hope) that purchasing lottery tickets is on average a losing proposition by a significant margin. However, we can find numerous instances of individuals who've made a net profit playing the lottery. Does that invalidate the fact that lottery players lose money on average?
Same reasoning applies here. Yes, I may indeed have experienced negative variance, but purchasing insurance is still on average a losing proposition.
We are all aware (I would hope) that purchasing lottery tickets is on average a losing proposition by a significant margin. However, we can find numerous instances of individuals who've made a net profit playing the lottery. Does that invalidate the fact that lottery players lose money on average?
Same reasoning applies here. Yes, I may indeed have experienced negative variance, but purchasing insurance is still on average a losing proposition.
Insurance exists to reduce risk. Lotteries aren't doing that.
Essentially, the point of insurance is to spread the risk (cost of a loss) across a population. That is, everybody is bearing the cost of small insurance payments to avoid a small risk of a large loss.
That service isn't going to be free.
The other thing you are missing is the issue of liability (reimbursing damage to other people's property).
One major point of requiring automobile liability insurance is to avoid having the person whose property is damaged from having to sue the responsible party to recover damages.
That is, it avoids the requirement of a civil suit and the risk of the person responsible not being able to pay damages.
That's a service too (which isn't going to be free).
Last edited by njkayaker; 11-03-22 at 02:24 PM.
#174
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,878
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,963 Times
in
4,688 Posts
Honest question: do you own a home, or a car that's worth more than a few thousand dollars?
#175
Full Member
Thread Starter
No.
Insurance exists to reduce risk. Lotteries aren't doing that.
Essentially, the point of insurance is to spread the risk (cost of a loss) across a population. That is, everybody is bearing the cost of small insurance payments to avoid a small risk of a large loss.
That service isn't going to be free.
The other thing you are missing is the issue of liability (reimbursing damage to other people's property).
One major point of requiring automobile liability insurance is to avoid having the person whose property is damaged from having to sue the responsible party to recover damages.
That is, it avoids the requirement of a civil suit and the risk of the person responsible not being able to pay damages.
That's a service too (which isn't going to be free).
Insurance exists to reduce risk. Lotteries aren't doing that.
Essentially, the point of insurance is to spread the risk (cost of a loss) across a population. That is, everybody is bearing the cost of small insurance payments to avoid a small risk of a large loss.
That service isn't going to be free.
The other thing you are missing is the issue of liability (reimbursing damage to other people's property).
One major point of requiring automobile liability insurance is to avoid having the person whose property is damaged from having to sue the responsible party to recover damages.
That is, it avoids the requirement of a civil suit and the risk of the person responsible not being able to pay damages.
That's a service too (which isn't going to be free).
"Essentially, the point of insurance is to spread the risk (cost of a loss) across a population. That is, everybody is bearing the cost of small insurance payments to avoid a small risk of a large loss."
Seriously, do you guys read any of my responses? I fully understand this and have already addressed it, as evidenced by my prior statement, which I will reiterate verbatim:
"Respondents, I am not saying we as a society shouldn't utilize insurance. It's probably better if everyone has slightly less money as opposed to most people having slightly more and a not insignificant percentage having their lives devastated."
"That service isn't going to be free."
Well, obviously.