Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

Proposition 65 Warnings

Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

Proposition 65 Warnings

Old 11-05-20, 01:02 PM
  #1  
taylorgeo
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Posts: 167
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked 25 Times in 20 Posts
Proposition 65 Warnings

I've noticed some manufactures of cycling apparel and gloves have Proposition 65 Warnings on the label.

Does anyone avoid purchasing such apparel and gloves?
taylorgeo is offline  
Old 11-05-20, 01:17 PM
  #2  
thinktubes 
weapons-grade bolognium
 
thinktubes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Across the street from Chicago
Posts: 6,262

Bikes: Battaglin Cromor, Ciocc Designer 84, Schwinn Superior 1981

Mentioned: 43 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 960 Post(s)
Liked 2,159 Times in 829 Posts
ECC = everything causes cancer. Deal with it.
thinktubes is offline  
Old 11-05-20, 01:33 PM
  #3  
FiftySix
I'm the anecdote.
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,823

Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times in 795 Posts
Originally Posted by taylorgeo
I've noticed some manufactures of cycling apparel and gloves have Proposition 65 Warnings on the label.

Does anyone avoid purchasing such apparel and gloves?
A California law that seems to affect everyone that might sell something that ends up in California. So Prop 65 warnings are added which really don't mean squat since the products are still able to be sold and purchased in California.

The best I can tell, 95% of all products I've come across in the last year have a Prop 65 label. No matter where that product came from or where it is sold to.

Bottom line, the Prop 65 label does not affect my purchases.
FiftySix is offline  
Likes For FiftySix:
Old 11-05-20, 01:42 PM
  #4  
Germany_chris
Iím a little Surly
 
Germany_chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Near the district
Posts: 2,415

Bikes: Two Cross Checks, a Karate Monkey, and a Disc Trucker

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 697 Post(s)
Liked 1,260 Times in 637 Posts
As a real answer to your question I donít wear anything that has a prop 65 warning
Germany_chris is offline  
Likes For Germany_chris:
Old 11-05-20, 01:45 PM
  #5  
Mojo31
-------
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Tejas
Posts: 11,477
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8606 Post(s)
Liked 5,707 Times in 3,129 Posts
I'll buy it, but try not to ingest it.
Mojo31 is offline  
Likes For Mojo31:
Old 11-05-20, 01:46 PM
  #6  
mstateglfr 
Sunshine
 
mstateglfr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,154

Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo

Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10507 Post(s)
Liked 6,950 Times in 3,920 Posts
Originally Posted by taylorgeo
I've noticed some manufactures of cycling apparel and gloves have Proposition 65 Warnings on the label.

Does anyone avoid purchasing such apparel and gloves?
I dont know of any clothing I own that has a prop65 warning.
I also dont look for it before ripping off the tags.

I do not avoid purchasing clothing with that warning as it never enters my mind as a consideration before purchase. Now I am slightly curious to see how much cycling clothing has a prop65 warning.
mstateglfr is offline  
Old 11-05-20, 01:57 PM
  #7  
FiftySix
I'm the anecdote.
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 1,823

Bikes: '12 Schwinn, '13 Norco

Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1110 Post(s)
Liked 1,176 Times in 795 Posts
Prop 65 on clothing, but "complies with all state and federal product safety standards".


FiftySix is offline  
Old 11-05-20, 03:16 PM
  #8  
bbbean 
Senior Member
 
bbbean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,654

Bikes: Giant Propel, Cannondale SuperX, Univega Alpina Ultima

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 650 Post(s)
Liked 396 Times in 235 Posts
Originally Posted by taylorgeo
I've noticed some manufactures of cycling apparel and gloves have Proposition 65 Warnings on the label.

Does anyone avoid purchasing such apparel and gloves?

I'm sure someone does, but the warnings are ridiculous. The State of California uses unrealistic standards and ignores the simple fact that dosage makes the poison. Caffeine and alcohol may cause cancer. Everything MAY cause cancer.

Buy the gear you need. If you're buying from a reputable store and a reputable brand, it's safe.
__________________

Formerly fastest rider in the grupetto, currently slowest guy in the peloton

bbbean is offline  
Old 11-05-20, 03:18 PM
  #9  
CargoDane
Not a newbie to cycling
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 911

Bikes: Omnium Cargo Ti with Rohloff, Bullitt Milk Plus, Dahon Smooth Hound

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 356 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times in 199 Posts
I bought an MSR stove at one point (the Reactor). It too had that warning. When they warn about everything, it becomes meaningless.
CargoDane is offline  
Likes For CargoDane:
Old 11-05-20, 04:08 PM
  #10  
GlennR
On Your Left
 
GlennR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Long Island, New York, USA
Posts: 8,373

Bikes: Trek Emonda SLR, Sram eTap, Zipp 303

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3004 Post(s)
Liked 2,433 Times in 1,187 Posts
I just bought some N95 masks made in the USA and they have a Prop 65 warning.
GlennR is offline  
Likes For GlennR:
Old 11-05-20, 06:51 PM
  #11  
Pratt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,010
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 424 Times in 252 Posts
Bu t they continue to make a glaring omission. Sunlight is not just suspected, but actually, known to cause cancer, and yet it has no warnings.
Pratt is offline  
Old 11-05-20, 06:55 PM
  #12  
cb400bill
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 21,145

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Hybrid

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2992 Post(s)
Liked 5,913 Times in 3,458 Posts
As I don't live in California, I'm safe.
__________________
Cold-hearted orb that rules the night / Removes the colors from our sight / Red is grey and yellow, white / But we decide which is right / And which is an illusion.






cb400bill is offline  
Old 11-05-20, 06:55 PM
  #13  
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,082
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,410 Times in 2,337 Posts
The fact that it's called "Prop 65" means that it was a ballot initiative and it didn't become law through the normal legislative process. I'm a little surprised that nobody in California has introduced a proposition to cancel it.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 11-05-20, 06:57 PM
  #14  
Lemond1985
Sophomore Member
 
Lemond1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,690
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 1,055 Times in 629 Posts
Originally Posted by Pratt
Bu t they continue to make a glaring omission. Sunlight is not just suspected, but actually, known to cause cancer, and yet it has no warnings.
Sadly, there's no way to squeeze money out of the manufacturer.
Lemond1985 is offline  
Likes For Lemond1985:
Old 11-05-20, 07:37 PM
  #15  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,730

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3484 Post(s)
Liked 3,143 Times in 1,803 Posts
Originally Posted by CargoDane
I bought an MSR stove at one point (the Reactor). It too had that warning. When they warn about everything, it becomes meaningless.
Nah, it protects the manufacturer from liability. If you bought it and use it despite the warning, the risk is on you.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 11-05-20, 07:41 PM
  #16  
CargoDane
Not a newbie to cycling
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 911

Bikes: Omnium Cargo Ti with Rohloff, Bullitt Milk Plus, Dahon Smooth Hound

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 356 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times in 199 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
Nah, it protects the manufacturer from liability. If you bought it and use it despite the warning, the risk is on you.
If so, it's not a warning, and it could have been relegated to the documents/user manual. Instead, it was wired (a thin wire) with other huge warnings about safety. Had to use a wire cutter to cut off the wire without destroying the cooker itself.

Some it is to protect themselves from liability, other things are by law (Prop 65).
CargoDane is offline  
Likes For CargoDane:
Old 11-06-20, 08:05 AM
  #17  
Maelochs
Senior Member
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,158

Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE

Mentioned: 143 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7452 Post(s)
Liked 3,138 Times in 1,677 Posts
Life remains the leading cause of death---and Nobody Talks About It.

The fact that there is no proof of the conspiracy is proof of the conspiracy.

Oxygen Oxide is so corrosive it actually destroys iron and steel. Yet no one warns us? And Dihydrogen Oxide is almost a universal solvent, and is implicated in countless swimming, boating, and fishing deaths---yet no one says a word.

We should be thankful that those brave Californians are not afraid to be afraid of everything, and are willing to spend money they don't have to warn the rest of us.
Maelochs is offline  
Likes For Maelochs:
Old 11-06-20, 08:14 AM
  #18  
Reflector Guy
Senior Member
 
Reflector Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,318

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito XE, Via Nirone 7, GT Aggressor Pro

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 588 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times in 576 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
And Dihydrogen Oxide is almost a universal solvent, and is implicated in countless swimming, boating, and fishing deaths---yet no one says a word.
That is one crazy substance. It is used to make concrete, it is used to smother fires..... And some people actually drink the stuff!
Reflector Guy is offline  
Likes For Reflector Guy:
Old 11-06-20, 12:01 PM
  #19  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2280 Post(s)
Liked 1,709 Times in 936 Posts
Originally Posted by thinktubes
ECC = everything causes cancer. Deal with it.
But only in California.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Old 11-06-20, 12:05 PM
  #20  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2280 Post(s)
Liked 1,709 Times in 936 Posts
Originally Posted by bbbean
I'm sure someone does, but the warnings are ridiculous. The State of California uses unrealistic standards and ignores the simple fact that dosage makes the poison. Caffeine and alcohol may cause cancer. Everything MAY cause cancer.
And when they test substances on laboratory rats, they tend to give them a proportionate dosage that's WAY above what the average person is likely to encounter.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Old 11-06-20, 12:07 PM
  #21  
Gresp15C
Senior Member
 
Gresp15C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,892
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1061 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times in 421 Posts
The cancer warnings are just the unintended side effect of Prop 65 that is visible to the rest of the world. The law created an incentive to over-report toxic substances in products, hence the vague labels.

But people forget the actual reason for Prop 65, which was that the EPA was not enforcing its own regulations in California, and the people wanted a stricter law. And the law has been credited with greatly reducing toxic emissions according to what I've been able to dig up on the topic.
Gresp15C is offline  
Likes For Gresp15C:
Old 11-06-20, 12:08 PM
  #22  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2280 Post(s)
Liked 1,709 Times in 936 Posts
Originally Posted by unterhausen
The fact that it's called "Prop 65" means that it was a ballot initiative and it didn't become law through the normal legislative process. I'm a little surprised that nobody in California has introduced a proposition to cancel it.
So, in other words, it is a measure voted on by a bunch of idiots in the voting population, rather than a measure dreamed up by an idiot representative of a bunch of idiots in the voting population.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Likes For Milton Keynes:
Old 11-06-20, 12:10 PM
  #23  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2280 Post(s)
Liked 1,709 Times in 936 Posts
Originally Posted by Maelochs
Life remains the leading cause of death---and Nobody Talks About It.
Just like how marriage is the chief cause of divorce. The thing about life, though, is that nobody gets out of it alive.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Old 11-06-20, 12:17 PM
  #24  
CargoDane
Not a newbie to cycling
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 911

Bikes: Omnium Cargo Ti with Rohloff, Bullitt Milk Plus, Dahon Smooth Hound

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 356 Post(s)
Liked 323 Times in 199 Posts
Originally Posted by Gresp15C
The cancer warnings are just the unintended side effect of Prop 65 that is visible to the rest of the world. The law created an incentive to over-report toxic substances in products, hence the vague labels.

But people forget the actual reason for Prop 65, which was that the EPA was not enforcing its own regulations in California, and the people wanted a stricter law. And the law has been credited with greatly reducing toxic emissions according to what I've been able to dig up on the topic.
That's sounds right. It's just annoying it is everywhere. It loses its meaning.
CargoDane is offline  
Likes For CargoDane:
Old 11-06-20, 01:00 PM
  #25  
phughes
Senior Member
 
phughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,974
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 994 Post(s)
Liked 1,197 Times in 687 Posts
Originally Posted by taylorgeo
I've noticed some manufactures of cycling apparel and gloves have Proposition 65 Warnings on the label.

Does anyone avoid purchasing such apparel and gloves?
No, I just don't eat the gloves, and I avoid California since the state must be full of people who would eat gloves.
phughes is offline  
Likes For phughes:

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.