Issue Swapping Chain Rings
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 53
Bikes: '15 Giant Propel Advanced SL1, '17 Trek Madone RSL
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 80 Times
in
15 Posts
Issue Swapping Chain Rings
I am replacing the chainrings on a 10 speed bike. The old ones are steel, the new ones are aluminum. They are 110BCD and connect to the cranks via a five bolt pattern.
Sounds easy enough but...when I finished and tested it I found that when on the small ring and the fastest 2 cogs out back the chain is catching the pins and trying to shift onto the big ring.
Some might call that cross-chaining and that I shouldn't be using those gears but with the old steel rings I had no problems. I was not really trying to turn this old bike into an automatic.
I noticed the tabs on the old ring are bent in a little to push the ring out a little. The new rings have no such bend.
Has anyone seen this sort of issue? Did I buy the wrong type of chain ring?...I guess I’ll try putting a washer or two under the big ring.
Sounds easy enough but...when I finished and tested it I found that when on the small ring and the fastest 2 cogs out back the chain is catching the pins and trying to shift onto the big ring.
Some might call that cross-chaining and that I shouldn't be using those gears but with the old steel rings I had no problems. I was not really trying to turn this old bike into an automatic.
I noticed the tabs on the old ring are bent in a little to push the ring out a little. The new rings have no such bend.
Has anyone seen this sort of issue? Did I buy the wrong type of chain ring?...I guess I’ll try putting a washer or two under the big ring.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 3,767
Bikes: lots
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1958 Post(s)
Liked 2,932 Times
in
1,489 Posts
You shouldn't cross chain small/small for just this reason. Easy fix: Don't do it. Those gear ratios make no sense anyway.
#3
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,784
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3587 Post(s)
Liked 3,400 Times
in
1,934 Posts
Rather than putting washers between the ring and the crank, which would increase the risk of the chain jamming between the rings, you could put a spacer on the bottom bracket to shift the whole crank outward.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
Most likely the new rings have lift pins that stick out a tad more than the cheap steel ring had.
Rings can have a dish to them so when mounted the right way the two rings end up having the correct center to center of teeth spacing. Because steel is both stronger and stiffer than Al is the steel tings are most often thinner, thus a dishing, or offset, is needed to maintain the C-C dimension (that was developed for Al rings first).
First thing I would look at is how the front shifting/chain rub (ft der adjustment) is. If this is good than I would not add any spacers between the rings. That would only make the shifting worse and increase the chain rub on cage potential. Next i would look at the chain line of the rings and how it compares to the cassette's chain line. I would only change that (by spacing the BB, as John said) if the chain line was not pretty close to the same ft and rr.
The no cost solution (but one that is far harder to do) is to not use those combos. Andy
Chain catching the insides of the larger rings (made worse by those lift pins) is a result of how much tooth count difference there is between the rings, how well the rings chain line matches the cassette's and how short the chainstays are.
Rings can have a dish to them so when mounted the right way the two rings end up having the correct center to center of teeth spacing. Because steel is both stronger and stiffer than Al is the steel tings are most often thinner, thus a dishing, or offset, is needed to maintain the C-C dimension (that was developed for Al rings first).
First thing I would look at is how the front shifting/chain rub (ft der adjustment) is. If this is good than I would not add any spacers between the rings. That would only make the shifting worse and increase the chain rub on cage potential. Next i would look at the chain line of the rings and how it compares to the cassette's chain line. I would only change that (by spacing the BB, as John said) if the chain line was not pretty close to the same ft and rr.
The no cost solution (but one that is far harder to do) is to not use those combos. Andy
Chain catching the insides of the larger rings (made worse by those lift pins) is a result of how much tooth count difference there is between the rings, how well the rings chain line matches the cassette's and how short the chainstays are.
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,903
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4803 Post(s)
Liked 3,927 Times
in
2,553 Posts
A trick you can do while riding (if your shifter allows it) is to move the derailleur cage in a touch while in those crossed positions. Now the chain is held away from the pins. You hear the chain rub but everything works fine. (You will have BFers, both alive and passed on to the other world, rolling over in their respective beds or graves for intentionally riding with chain rub and dooming another precious derailleur to an early death. I both do this and set my limit screws to rub in the extreme gears to minimize chain drops. I used to kill Cyclones regularly in 5-10,000 miles. I make no apologies. For me, it's about the ride, not the bike.
Edit: To cxwrench's comment re: crossover - I do it on purpose on long climbs with short breaks of flat or downhill so I don't have to double shift twice. Again, for me, the bike is there for the ride and for me, not the other way around.
Edit: To cxwrench's comment re: crossover - I do it on purpose on long climbs with short breaks of flat or downhill so I don't have to double shift twice. Again, for me, the bike is there for the ride and for me, not the other way around.
Last edited by 79pmooney; 06-22-22 at 12:37 PM.
#6
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 53
Bikes: '15 Giant Propel Advanced SL1, '17 Trek Madone RSL
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 80 Times
in
15 Posts
I took another look...the problem I'm having has nothing to do with the DR...there's no rubbing at all. The problem is that the rings are just too close together.
The large ring has zero dish. Just not using the smaller cogs seems potentially dangerous...if I accidentally find myself on those small cogs, the chain tries to climb onto the bigger ring but it's not what one would call smooth transition.
I think maybe I need to go back to the heavy steel rings...all worked well with them...but they are really heavy.
The large ring has zero dish. Just not using the smaller cogs seems potentially dangerous...if I accidentally find myself on those small cogs, the chain tries to climb onto the bigger ring but it's not what one would call smooth transition.
I think maybe I need to go back to the heavy steel rings...all worked well with them...but they are really heavy.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
I took another look...the problem I'm having has nothing to do with the DR...there's no rubbing at all. The problem is that the rings are just too close together.
The large ring has zero dish. Just not using the smaller cogs seems potentially dangerous...if I accidentally find myself on those small cogs, the chain tries to climb onto the bigger ring but it's not what one would call smooth transition.
I think maybe I need to go back to the heavy steel rings...all worked well with them...but they are really heavy.
The large ring has zero dish. Just not using the smaller cogs seems potentially dangerous...if I accidentally find myself on those small cogs, the chain tries to climb onto the bigger ring but it's not what one would call smooth transition.
I think maybe I need to go back to the heavy steel rings...all worked well with them...but they are really heavy.
There's nothing dangerous about avoiding some cog/ring combos. In fact some here (and in real life have found out) that using the combos with issues can be dangerous. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart