Should a “betweener" go with a Large or Medium frame?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Should a “betweener" go with a Large or Medium frame?
Hello, I am relatively new to bicycling . I ride a Bianchi Pista SS and a Giant Tough Road . Both are Large frame size . I feel like they fit well .
I measure 5 foot 9 1/2 inches at the doctors with my Nikes on so they say I am 5 10”. I may be actually 5 9.
I am about to buy another Bike. What am I missing by not choosing Frame Size M. Would Medium optimize my energy?
Thank you in Advance
I measure 5 foot 9 1/2 inches at the doctors with my Nikes on so they say I am 5 10”. I may be actually 5 9.
I am about to buy another Bike. What am I missing by not choosing Frame Size M. Would Medium optimize my energy?
Thank you in Advance
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,839
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6934 Post(s)
Liked 10,938 Times
in
4,673 Posts
There are too many variables involved to give a reliable answer over the internet. You should buy your next bike from a good shop that will do a proper fitting.
Likes For Koyote:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,090
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 1,289 Times
in
743 Posts
Hello, I am relatively new to bicycling . I ride a Bianchi Pista SS and a Giant Tough Road . Both are Large frame size . I feel like they fit well .
I measure 5 foot 9 1/2 inches at the doctors with my Nikes on so they say I am 5 10”. I may be actually 5 9.
I am about to buy another Bike. What am I missing by not choosing Frame Size M. Would Medium optimize my energy?
Thank you in Advance
I measure 5 foot 9 1/2 inches at the doctors with my Nikes on so they say I am 5 10”. I may be actually 5 9.
I am about to buy another Bike. What am I missing by not choosing Frame Size M. Would Medium optimize my energy?
Thank you in Advance
So what kind of bike are you considering, or even better, what specific bike? Bike sizes vary from manufacturer to manufacturer. What will you use it for?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 712
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 283 Post(s)
Liked 262 Times
in
164 Posts
Lookup using a book and a tape measure against a wall to get your true bicycling inseam length. And look at the specs for the length of the crank arms that come with each size. Just your height in shoes isn't a great measure for picking a bike. You should try both sizes hands on if you can.
#5
Full Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Oakland CA
Posts: 273
Bikes: 1984 Gitane TdF, 1986 Look Équipe, 1983 Colnago Super
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 112 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times
in
79 Posts
I'm also 5'10" and frequently find myself in the same quandary. There's a trade off I believe.
The smaller frames feel a bit quicker, more nimble, better for shorter rides. The larger ones feel big, stable, and comfortable for longer distances.
You really need to have several bikes ready for each scenario.
The smaller frames feel a bit quicker, more nimble, better for shorter rides. The larger ones feel big, stable, and comfortable for longer distances.
You really need to have several bikes ready for each scenario.
#7
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,499
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3648 Post(s)
Liked 5,381 Times
in
2,732 Posts
What does the mfg suggest for the bike you are looking at? I think most would recommend a Medium or 54cm for 5'9". That's assuming normal proportions.
Likes For shelbyfv:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Mission Viejo
Posts: 5,800
Bikes: 1986 Cannondale SR400 (Flat bar commuter), 1988 Cannondale Criterium XTR, 1992 Serotta T-Max, 1995 Trek 970
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 2,163 Times
in
1,322 Posts
Ha ha. I actually did that in 1986. I’m just under 5’9”, probably closer to 5’8” these days, and they didn’t have 54cm so I bought the 56cm. Four years later, a shop was blowing out frames and they didn’t have a 54cm, so once again I got a 56cm.
So far so good!
John
So far so good!
John
#9
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,427
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
1,026 Posts
If you’re between sizes, always go smaller. No question…but I guess that’s not the question.
To the question, generally speaking, 5’9” sure sounds like a Medium size frame.
To the question, generally speaking, 5’9” sure sounds like a Medium size frame.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,480
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7648 Post(s)
Liked 3,465 Times
in
1,831 Posts
Likes For Maelochs:
#11
Thread Killer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 12,427
Bikes: 15 Kinesis Racelight 4S, 76 Motebecane Gran Jubilée, 17 Dedacciai Gladiatore2, 12 Breezer Venturi, 09 Dahon Mariner, 12 Mercier Nano, 95 DeKerf Team SL, 19 Tern Rally, 21 Breezer Doppler Cafe+, 19 T-Lab X3, 91 Serotta CII, 23 3T Strada
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3129 Post(s)
Liked 1,696 Times
in
1,026 Posts
Likes For chaadster:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,839
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6934 Post(s)
Liked 10,938 Times
in
4,673 Posts
Likes For Koyote:
#13
For The Fun of It
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Louisissippi Coast
Posts: 5,845
Bikes: Lynskey GR300, Lynskey Backroad, Litespeed T6, Lynskey MT29, Burley Duet
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2134 Post(s)
Liked 1,643 Times
in
825 Posts
There can be a substantial amount of variability between one manufacturer's medium and another's. Same with large. Assuming you cannot try before you buy, you'll have to know the dimensions of a bike that works for you, and examine that against the dimension of the bike you are interested in. If you can try first, you should. Some manufacturers make a ML, so keep that in mind as well.
#14
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 13,458
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4330 Post(s)
Liked 3,951 Times
in
2,641 Posts
Test ride the bike that you want in both sizes and see which one feels best for you. Talk with a knowledgeable salesperson and maybe ask for recommendations as well but really it is all about your fit on whatever bike you want. Nobody on the internet can really determine much for you other than what you have told us which is very little but even if you had said I want to buy the Bike Co. BikeMaster and provided a link it would still be tough because we don't know much about your fitment to that bike only you and your fitter would really know, maybe the sales person or some shop employee with fitting knowledge. It all really comes down to you and your feelings on the bike.
If you know what you want and have some fitting issues or just want something that really fits you might consider talking with a custom builder and a fitter and really get something dialed in to you not just to the general mass public. Nothing wrong with a stock bike necessarily but a custom fit bike could be just the ticket if you know you enjoy riding and want a real upgrade.
If you know what you want and have some fitting issues or just want something that really fits you might consider talking with a custom builder and a fitter and really get something dialed in to you not just to the general mass public. Nothing wrong with a stock bike necessarily but a custom fit bike could be just the ticket if you know you enjoy riding and want a real upgrade.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,760
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1109 Post(s)
Liked 1,200 Times
in
760 Posts
Here's the trade off and, IMHO the major decision criterion: head tube length and how high or low you want your handlebars.
There's a lot of range for saddle height and even a decent amount for setback. There's a lot of range for stem length too. So seat tube and top tube length and seat tube angle can be adjusted for quite a bit. But there's not a lot of range - either up or down - for stem height, given any stem angle. Maybe 40 mm either way (35 - 40 mm is generally the maximum spacer height under any stem).
In general, given a specific model of frame, aside from seat tube and top tube length differnces, the larger frame will have a longer head tube vs. the smaller frame. So if you're challenged to get the bars high enough for your fit and comfort, you should opt for the larger frame. If you dont have that issue and/or really need your bars as low as possible, go with the smaller one.
If you're in the middle, ride both and just feel which feels better. The smaller one might be a a little lighter and quicker feeling, the larger one, maybe more stable.
My experience is that I need my handlebars higher and opt for larger frame with a shorter stem and less saddle extension, if presented with two that might work OK. Others, especially younger and stronger, more flexible riders, would have the opposite opinion.
There's a lot of range for saddle height and even a decent amount for setback. There's a lot of range for stem length too. So seat tube and top tube length and seat tube angle can be adjusted for quite a bit. But there's not a lot of range - either up or down - for stem height, given any stem angle. Maybe 40 mm either way (35 - 40 mm is generally the maximum spacer height under any stem).
In general, given a specific model of frame, aside from seat tube and top tube length differnces, the larger frame will have a longer head tube vs. the smaller frame. So if you're challenged to get the bars high enough for your fit and comfort, you should opt for the larger frame. If you dont have that issue and/or really need your bars as low as possible, go with the smaller one.
If you're in the middle, ride both and just feel which feels better. The smaller one might be a a little lighter and quicker feeling, the larger one, maybe more stable.
My experience is that I need my handlebars higher and opt for larger frame with a shorter stem and less saddle extension, if presented with two that might work OK. Others, especially younger and stronger, more flexible riders, would have the opposite opinion.
Last edited by Camilo; 12-16-21 at 01:51 AM.
Likes For Camilo:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Hacienda Hgts
Posts: 2,100
Bikes: 1999 Schwinn Peloton Ultegra 10, Kestrel RT-1000 Ultegra, Trek Marlin 6 Deore 29'er
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 821 Post(s)
Liked 1,955 Times
in
941 Posts
Veganbikes is spot on.
Pay more now and reap the benefits for a lifetime.
Pay more now and reap the benefits for a lifetime.
Likes For CAT7RDR:
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,373
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4384 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
2,981 Posts
But I totally agree at 5'9" I can't think of many Large frames that would work well. I would have thought the OP was a medium without much question.
#18
Banned
Go with the size frame that fits you best regardles of the label on the bike. Some have medium and medium-large and large and others have different amounts of reach depending on the intended use of the bike and so there are categories of bikes being sold by Trek and Specialized and other companies. It is more complicated than in the past when everything was based on the length of the seat tube.
You posture and riding position is what is important and if you cannot extend your arms properly or feel scrunched up or need to stretch to reach the controls on the handlebar then this should govern your selection and not some chart.
You posture and riding position is what is important and if you cannot extend your arms properly or feel scrunched up or need to stretch to reach the controls on the handlebar then this should govern your selection and not some chart.
Likes For Calsun:
#19
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
M and L are entirely too vague to answer the question as is 5'9". If it felt right being on the bike, it's probably right sized. I'm shorter than you are and rode several thousand very comfortable miles on a L frame FX 3.
#20
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,095 Times
in
5,053 Posts
I disagree. It depends on your riding goals and the specific bike in question. At 6' tall I'm often in between a large and medium frame and usually go with large. Why? Because I'm primarily an endurance rider and prefer the inevitably longer wheelbase and higher stack of a larger frame size. If I was racing crits I may well choose to size down for a more aggressive position with slammed, super-long stem. But that's not how I want to ride all day.
But I totally agree at 5'9" I can't think of many Large frames that would work well. I would have thought the OP was a medium without much question.
But I totally agree at 5'9" I can't think of many Large frames that would work well. I would have thought the OP was a medium without much question.
I think if you look at the geometry of the Tough Road he's talking about, it's more than possible a large frame could work for him.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,279 Times
in
739 Posts
People can ride frames in a range of sizes. I have a 32.5" inseam and am 5'9" tall. I ride 54-56. Optimal for me is a 55 with a 55 TT measured virtually. This is often referred to as a "square 55."
#22
Full Member
Even if you'll seriously get yourself involved into cycling, you'll eventually find out that there's no other way of really "optimizing your energy" than riding a lot of different bikes and finding the ones that work for you. And in many cases this synergy will not follow formal logic.
As for now, don't attempt to "optimize your energy". Get a bike that fits in a sense that it doesn't do more harm than good.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,545
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5222 Post(s)
Liked 3,575 Times
in
2,339 Posts
good luck
fastest 17 mile commute was on an old mtb w/ big fat slicks, that was too small for me
have a hybrid that is too large for me but feels quite comfortable
current mtb is correct size, feels good
current road bike is correct size, feels good
fastest 17 mile commute was on an old mtb w/ big fat slicks, that was too small for me
have a hybrid that is too large for me but feels quite comfortable
current mtb is correct size, feels good
current road bike is correct size, feels good
#24
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2761 Post(s)
Liked 2,534 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Hello, I am relatively new to bicycling . I ride a Bianchi Pista SS and a Giant Tough Road . Both are Large frame size . I feel like they fit well .
I measure 5 foot 9 1/2 inches at the doctors with my Nikes on so they say I am 5 10”. I may be actually 5 9.
I am about to buy another Bike. What am I missing by not choosing Frame Size M. Would Medium optimize my energy?
Thank you in Advance
I measure 5 foot 9 1/2 inches at the doctors with my Nikes on so they say I am 5 10”. I may be actually 5 9.
I am about to buy another Bike. What am I missing by not choosing Frame Size M. Would Medium optimize my energy?
Thank you in Advance
Going to a M may mean a better fit, or it may be too small.
#25
Senior Member
To the OP. I'd go by your leg length, not just your height. A lot of riders of your height have shorter legs than I do, being 3-4 inches shorter. The medium size is meaningless. In some brands, I ride a 50 or 52 and others it's S or XS. Seat tube lengths are also meaningless these days, except for a minimum to make use of a common 350mm post. You should go by stack and reach. Nearly all brands list these values. Also of importance is saddle to bar drop. I use a large 10cm saddle to bar drop, so there's a limit of about 530mm on the stack, with a 72-73cm saddle height. I look for a 365 to 380mm reach. There's a lot of adjustment available with stem length and handlebar reach. If your saddle to bar drop is less, add more stack. Taller saddle height - add some more stack.
Last edited by DaveSSS; 12-25-21 at 08:40 AM.