Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Choice of rims for randonneuring bike...

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway
View Poll Results: Which rim
Campag proton
0
0%
Campag zonda
100.00%
Voters: 1. You may not vote on this poll

Choice of rims for randonneuring bike...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-22-22, 09:10 PM
  #1  
4rensho@gmail.c
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Choice of rims for randonneuring bike...

I am building up a randonneuring bike and currently in the process of building the wheels but have run into a fork in the road concerning rim depth and suppleness. The wheels I am building feature an SP SV-9 dynamo hub in the front and a Dura-Ace 9000 hub in the rear at 20 and 24 holes respectfully. I have the choice of two different rims that are currently built up to different hubs that I dont use. 1 is campagnolo proton wheelset with a box section rim with eyelets and 2 is campagnolo zonda rims with a semi shallow aero profile and no eyelets. My question is which would be better for my build? This will be a bike that I will be using for 300+km brevets and Both seem equally alluring. On the one hand the proton rim would be more playable and forgiving after a long ride and the eyelets are a plus as far as strength go, but they are not at all aerodynamic. The zonda rims are aerodynamic but I worry after 10+hrs in the saddle the ride will be haring and I will regret using a deep section rim. As well durability plays a part. Are eyeleted rims all that stronger or is it a placebo effect? Would the aero gains be with the uncomfort? Two weeks ago I completed a 300km brevet on sun m13 36h rims in 11hrs 9min and have a goal of sub 30hrs for the 600k. Which do I go for? The aerodynamic or the box section "reliable"? Please help.

Last edited by 4rensho@gmail.c; 03-22-22 at 09:12 PM. Reason: Spelling, syntax
4rensho@gmail.c is offline  
Old 03-23-22, 05:43 AM
  #2  
znomit
Zoom zoom zoom zoom bonk
 
znomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,624

Bikes: Giant Defy, Trek 1.7c, BMC GF02, Fuji Tahoe, Scott Sub 35, Kona Rove, Trek Verve+2

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 551 Post(s)
Liked 722 Times in 366 Posts
Is anything really aero at Rando speeds?
znomit is offline  
Old 03-23-22, 06:17 AM
  #3  
GhostRider62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times in 1,314 Posts
Originally Posted by znomit
Is anything really aero at Rando speeds?
At 11 mph, half your power is to overcome the wind.

OP wants to do a sub 30 hour 600K, that means he needs to ride the flats at over 20 mph. Aero is critical at that speed.

So, yes, he needs to consider aerodynamics carefully. I've done 600k in under 23 hours and 400k in under 14 hours and aerodynamics played a role in both.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Likes For GhostRider62:
Old 03-23-22, 06:58 AM
  #4  
rm -rf
don't try this at home.
 
rm -rf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: N. KY
Posts: 5,939
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 973 Post(s)
Liked 511 Times in 351 Posts
Can "compliant" rims really make a difference, compared to supple tires at the correct pressures? What fraction of a mm would the rim move on a bump?

I don't do these long rides. Do you choose stiffer puncture resistant tires or flexible supple ones? Speed vs flat fixing?
rm -rf is online now  
Likes For rm -rf:
Old 03-23-22, 07:11 AM
  #5  
GhostRider62
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times in 1,314 Posts
Rim choice is largely irrelevant for comfort, it is tire construction, size, and pressure

A wider rim plumps up the tire and that helps but wheels are pretty much noncompliant radially.

Personally, I would never use anything but carbon rims anymore. They are much stronger than alum and especially with 16, 18 or 20H fronts.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Likes For GhostRider62:
Old 03-24-22, 02:20 AM
  #6  
Branko D
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 338 Post(s)
Liked 408 Times in 252 Posts
I would pick a 45-50mm deep carbon rim with no nipple holes for ease and reliability with a tubeless setup, with a relatively supple road race tire with some puncture protection (eg GP5000S or similar) and lower the tire pressure until it isn't jarring to ride.

​​​​​​

​​​​​

Last edited by Branko D; 03-24-22 at 04:15 AM.
Branko D is offline  
Likes For Branko D:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.