Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Information on this Raleigh frame

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Information on this Raleigh frame

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-21, 03:37 AM
  #1  
dub 24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Information on this Raleigh frame

Hey folks I just registered on the forum and posted an introduction. I am starting a refurb on a frame and would be very grateful if anybody could answer a few questions .
I have figured out from searching that the frame number of the bike WG3000188 tells me it was built in 1983 ,in June and was built at the Nottingham's lightweight unit . This information I gathered from www.raleigh-sb4059.com/ which is a wealth of information. My dilemma is

1. I can't find out which model it is

2.. The rear stays and forks were originally chromed. The original owner back in the 90's decided to have the frame resprayed and the chrome is only visible from half way along the stays and half way up the forks. I can see where the painted has chipped that the chrome extends further up under the paint but not sure how far .I was hoping somebody here could confirm if they were fully chromed or not .
I look forward to hearing from you guys with any information you may provide, and unfortunately I can't post any pictures as I haven't enough posts yet.

Cheers
dub 24








,
dub 24 is offline  
Old 05-21-21, 03:44 AM
  #2  
cb400bill
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,631

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3085 Post(s)
Liked 6,568 Times in 3,766 Posts
Pic Assist - https://www.bikeforums.net/g/album/21454701

__________________












cb400bill is offline  
Old 05-21-21, 05:53 AM
  #3  
thumpism 
Bikes are okay, I guess.
 
thumpism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 6,938

Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT

Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,446 Times in 1,557 Posts
Welcome! Seat binder and cable guide position are unusual and don't remind me of any production Raleighs I've seen.
thumpism is offline  
Old 05-21-21, 07:13 AM
  #4  
Charles Wahl
Disraeli Gears
 
Charles Wahl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,093
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 504 Post(s)
Liked 369 Times in 214 Posts
Do you have the fork? If so, is it one with sloping shoulders (fork crown) and apparently without external lugs? Having a mid-1983 serial number might make it a 1984 sales year bike. Take a look at these catalog JPGs, archived by bulgie:
https://bulgier.net/pics/bike/Catalogs/Raleigh83/
https://bulgier.net/pics/bike/Catalogs/Raleigh84/

If you look at the 3rd page and the last couple pages of each, you will see the various complete bikes (p.3) and framesets (latter pages) that Raleigh offered those years, with that particular seat stay termination. If you look at pages following and preceding those, you'll find some specs. Only a few of them have any chrome on chain stays or fork blades, and none of them appear to be chromed on the seat stays. One indicator of the "level" of frame would be what type of dropouts they have -- the "professional" level seems to have Campagnolo short horizontal dropouts (though vertical for the Time Trials frame set, unlike yours), and the others seem to use Gipiemme short horizontal. I once owned a 1984 (WG4) Gran Course frameset that I bought new in mid-1985, with the Gipiemme dropouts. It was all painted except for the dropouts (front and rear) and was a very nice ride; maybe the nicest ride I've ever had on a bike. That one had windowed Prugnat lugs -- well, at least they were windowed -- and the sloping fork crown was Davis, I believe.

[EDIT: OK, I looked at the pictures in your gallery, and you've got Campagnolo dropouts, plus the fork with the Davis crown. So it is most probably one of the higher-end bikes mentioned. It might even be a Reynolds 753 tubeset rather than 531 or 531C (the latter is what my erstwhile year-later frame has). Another thought on the chrome: Raleigh did make some custom-order frames according to those catalogs last pages.]

Last edited by Charles Wahl; 05-21-21 at 07:36 AM.
Charles Wahl is offline  
Old 05-21-21, 07:27 AM
  #5  
cb400bill
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,631

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3085 Post(s)
Liked 6,568 Times in 3,766 Posts
Fork Pic

__________________












cb400bill is offline  
Old 05-21-21, 07:32 AM
  #6  
cb400bill
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,631

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3085 Post(s)
Liked 6,568 Times in 3,766 Posts
Pic Assist - drop out

__________________












cb400bill is offline  
Old 05-21-21, 08:48 AM
  #7  
T-Mar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times in 1,874 Posts
Looks like one of the Team replica or Team Pro frames. All that chrome wasn't necessarily meant to be exposed.
T-Mar is offline  
Old 05-21-21, 08:51 AM
  #8  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,146
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3804 Post(s)
Liked 6,643 Times in 2,602 Posts
I would think very few models had that particular seat stay treatment, which would help nail things down. And you're sure it's a Raleigh?
nlerner is offline  
Old 05-21-21, 01:27 PM
  #9  
non-fixie 
Shifting is fun!
 
non-fixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,000

Bikes: Yes, please.

Mentioned: 279 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 4,587 Times in 1,764 Posts
Here ya go:


__________________
Are we having fun, or what ...



non-fixie is offline  
Likes For non-fixie:
Old 05-21-21, 04:18 PM
  #10  
dub 24
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Information on Raleigh frame

Hey everybody
Thank you so much for all your replies and for taking the time to assist me. Thanks cb400 bill for posting my pictures .

After I posted I decided to contact the chap again who gave me the frame to see if I could garnish any more information. He was able to tell me that the frame is possibly a 531c which was definitely painted in the Raleigh TI livery.
So based on this information and what I have learned from here. I think the frame is from 1983 and is a Team Replica.

I don't think it's a Team Professional as I was looking on another website.. radpropaganda.org and they list a 1980's team professional frame with a W frame number like mine but the rear supports where they meet the seat post are tapered, on my frame they are not. Yet they also have the same frame with the same supports as mine ie not tapered yet the frame is an SB frame (all very confusing ).

From looking in the 1984 catalogue the only thing that's similar to my frame is the Grand Tour frame and that's only because the the back stays and forks are 10" chromed could it be this frame.

Many thanks folks for all your help so far, I really appreciate it.

dub 24
dub 24 is offline  
Old 05-23-21, 08:44 PM
  #11  
montclairbobbyb 
Recovering Bikeaholic
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lambertville
Posts: 171

Bikes: 84 Specialized Expedtion, 85 StumpJumper, 85 Schwinn Cimarron, 2019 VO Polyvalent, 2007 Niner MCR, 2008 Niner SIR

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 41 Post(s)
Liked 128 Times in 47 Posts
Any reason it's NOT a Competition? That would be my first guess...
montclairbobbyb is offline  
Old 05-27-21, 09:38 AM
  #12  
non-fixie 
Shifting is fun!
 
non-fixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Holland, NL
Posts: 11,000

Bikes: Yes, please.

Mentioned: 279 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 4,587 Times in 1,764 Posts
Originally Posted by montclairbobbyb
Any reason it's NOT a Competition? That would be my first guess...
Check out the TT cable guides, which are on top on the '84 and '85 Competitions. These are my '84 Competitions:




The May or June '83 production date seems a bit early for regular '84 models, so perhaps it was a pre-production frame? That could explain small deviations from the final production specifications.

Having said that, I have another of those frames (the one mentioned in the spreadsheet above) from November '83 that doesn't officially exist either ...
__________________
Are we having fun, or what ...



non-fixie is offline  
Likes For non-fixie:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.