Huge Discrepancy in Elevation Gain between Wahoo and Strava iOS Apps
#1
Method to My Madness
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,648
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 1,464 Times
in
1,013 Posts
Huge Discrepancy in Elevation Gain between Wahoo and Strava iOS Apps
Does anyone know why there is such a huge discrepancy in elevation gain between the Yahoo and Strava iOS apps? (Please note I am just asking about these apps, not about an altitude difference between GPS and barometer.)
I use the Wahoo app to record my rides, then export the data to the Strava app afterwards. For my most recent ride, Wahoo shows an elevation gain of 2,555 ft. while Strava shows only 1,616 ft., but the two apps agree about the ride distance (to within 0.01 mile). Which elevation gain number is more accurate?
I use the Wahoo app to record my rides, then export the data to the Strava app afterwards. For my most recent ride, Wahoo shows an elevation gain of 2,555 ft. while Strava shows only 1,616 ft., but the two apps agree about the ride distance (to within 0.01 mile). Which elevation gain number is more accurate?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,945
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3948 Post(s)
Liked 7,291 Times
in
2,945 Posts
Did you finish the ride where you started? If so, did the Wahoo give you the same number for ascending as descending?
#3
Method to My Madness
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,648
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 1,464 Times
in
1,013 Posts
Yes, on my driveway right outside my garage.
No. According to the Wahoo app I finished my last ride mid-air 82 ft. above where I started.
No. According to the Wahoo app I finished my last ride mid-air 82 ft. above where I started.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
One of the apps is likely referencing their own elevation model. Strava certainly has this option available, as evidenced by their elevation 'correction' option on the desktop site.
Likes For WhyFi:
#5
Expired Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN
Posts: 11,526
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3661 Post(s)
Liked 5,408 Times
in
2,747 Posts
I let Strava "correct" the elevation. It's always a couple of hundred feet more than Wahoo.
#6
Fat n slow
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Saratoga, NY
Posts: 4,302
Bikes: Cervelo R3, Giant Revolt
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3259 Post(s)
Liked 2,085 Times
in
979 Posts
Buddy of mine has an Wahoo computer (not sure which) and he almost always shows 10-20 feet of elevation gain, even in courses with 5000. Not sure what the cause is.
#7
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,984
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6191 Post(s)
Liked 4,807 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Because they don't figure up the data the same way. And they might not use the same data sources.
Remember that thing about a man with two watches?
Remember that thing about a man with two watches?
#8
Method to My Madness
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,648
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 1,464 Times
in
1,013 Posts
#9
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,984
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6191 Post(s)
Liked 4,807 Times
in
3,316 Posts
Just pick a site and use the data you think is more accurate. Over the course of many rides, it might average out to being close with either site. To take one ride and compare it on multiple sites is just as crazy to me as assuming your device is even correct about the elevation gain and loss you had.
Accuracy really isn't as important as just knowing one route is more climbing than another. And you can figure out that by adding and averaging out the rides of the same route. Throw away what looks like outlier data for any one ride.
Last edited by Iride01; 12-14-21 at 12:17 PM.
Likes For Iride01:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: reno, nv
Posts: 2,299
Bikes: yes, i have one
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 1,182 Times
in
687 Posts
the data source *is* the same. the difference is that Strava post processes it and might make corrections. GPS elevation data is not as good as barometric elevation data. Strava knows the difference and adds correction as needed.
Likes For spelger:
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times
in
471 Posts
I don't use any of the recording devices nor software mentioned to workup my ride-routes/tracks, however I have stayed at Holiday Inn Express & did a fair amount of mapping and map-data manipulation in a former life. When you talk about "ride data" and recording ride data and having various sources workup that ride data you need to really understand what all that means. It may well be that the ride data, in terms of the track that was followed, is simply the gps track itself. "Tracks" and "Routes" are nothing more than a large collection of latitude/longitude pairs. Even if you're transferring ride data that contains elevation, or other associated data, the destination software may only use the lat-lon data(plus time meta data) and then use their own data(sources) to work up other metrics as needed. While the lat/lon points(+time) are unique and transferrable, the remaining output can & will vary depending on data sources, assumptions made, and software(algorithm) processing. Mapping data sources are somewhat a commodity and they do vary.
As mentioned above.."The man with two watches doesn't know what time it is".
As mentioned above.."The man with two watches doesn't know what time it is".
Likes For fishboat:
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
A man with two watches needs to know how to spell.
Maybe somebody at Wahoo or Garmin missed that left turn in ABQ?
Maybe somebody at Wahoo or Garmin missed that left turn in ABQ?
#14
Method to My Madness
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,648
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 1,464 Times
in
1,013 Posts
I don't use any of the recording devices nor software mentioned to workup my ride-routes/tracks, however I have stayed at Holiday Inn Express & did a fair amount of mapping and map-data manipulation in a former life. When you talk about "ride data" and recording ride data and having various sources workup that ride data you need to really understand what all that means. It may well be that the ride data, in terms of the track that was followed, is simply the gps track itself. "Tracks" and "Routes" are nothing more than a large collection of latitude/longitude pairs. Even if you're transferring ride data that contains elevation, or other associated data, the destination software may only use the lat-lon data(plus time meta data) and then use their own data(sources) to work up other metrics as needed. While the lat/lon points(+time) are unique and transferrable, the remaining output can & will vary depending on data sources, assumptions made, and software(algorithm) processing. Mapping data sources are somewhat a commodity and they do vary.
The man with two watches knows it is time to shop for a third watch.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 4,077
Bikes: Velo Orange Piolet
Mentioned: 28 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2228 Post(s)
Liked 2,011 Times
in
972 Posts
"Always choose the device that indicates the greatest elevation gain."
need to add that to The Rules.
https://www.velominati.com/comment-page-8/
need to add that to The Rules.
https://www.velominati.com/comment-page-8/
Likes For tyrion:
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,851
Bikes: Lemond '01 Maillot Jaune, Lemond '02 Victoire, Lemond '03 Poprad, Lemond '03 Wayzata DB conv(Poprad), '79 AcerMex Windsor Carrera Professional(pur new), '88 GT Tequesta(pur new), '01 Bianchi Grizzly, 1993 Trek 970 DB conv, Trek 8900 DB conv
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 759 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 810 Times
in
471 Posts
#17
Method to My Madness
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,648
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 1,464 Times
in
1,013 Posts
"Always choose the device that indicates the greatest elevation gain."
need to add that to The Rules.
https://www.velominati.com/comment-page-8/
need to add that to The Rules.
https://www.velominati.com/comment-page-8/
#18
Method to My Madness
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,648
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 1,464 Times
in
1,013 Posts
A single watch is for telling time.
A second watch may give you a better estimate of time to the extent it is more accurate than the first and you have both watches side-by-side.
A third watch, even if it provides an extra data point, does not instantaneously -- and this is the crux -- give you a better estimate of time, because it takes longer to average three data points than two.
Thus, the third and any additional watches are not for improving one's estimate of time, but to collect for admiration, decoration, projecting wealth, signaling taste and/or restraint, and god forbid (for us cyclists), fall detection (Apple Watch).
It is largely analogous to the N+1 rule I often hear about on BF.
#19
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,230
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10165 Post(s)
Liked 5,852 Times
in
3,152 Posts
I thought Strava elevation correction was based on the map datum and threw out the altimeter readings, which are always crap.
Likes For MoAlpha:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520
Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo
Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times
in
4,672 Posts
With a dedicated bike computer, Strava will take whatever elevation data it is given. It will only correct with their own data if you select that option for a given ride. I don't know how it works for the phone app.
#21
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Land of Pleasant Living
Posts: 12,230
Bikes: Shmikes
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10165 Post(s)
Liked 5,852 Times
in
3,152 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
Likes For Seattle Forrest:
#23
Method to My Madness
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,648
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 1,464 Times
in
1,013 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#25
Method to My Madness
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 3,648
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1943 Post(s)
Liked 1,464 Times
in
1,013 Posts
Thanks, I now realize that. There is a new route I want to explore which starts with a long climb (partly on a major road) so a more accurate estimate of my elevation gain would be helpful.