Raleigh Pro Geometry Question
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
Raleigh Pro Geometry Question
I am seeking any real numbers WRT Raleigh Professional frame geometry to help me design a frame I will make. Specifically the early/mid 1970s versions with fastback seat stays and the full sloping crown.
I recently finished a French influenced frame/fork and am planning my next project. I have had a few tube sets in my stash for decades along with a collection of fittings and it's time to do something with them. Here's a link to the Framebuilders thread I started on that frame. P - Bike Forums
I have owned a few Pros over the years but never got around to measuring them but always was drawn to the aesthetics of the stay treatment and the minimal lines of the crown. It is this that I wish to follow with my project. This frame won't be for any specific rider, not a custom build in that sense. I'm also not trying to make a replica, details will reflect 50 years of gained knowledge and my mechanical preferences. Still I want to be as true to the vibe that I can be.
If you have some data about frame geometry of these iconic bikes please let me know. Andy
I recently finished a French influenced frame/fork and am planning my next project. I have had a few tube sets in my stash for decades along with a collection of fittings and it's time to do something with them. Here's a link to the Framebuilders thread I started on that frame. P - Bike Forums
I have owned a few Pros over the years but never got around to measuring them but always was drawn to the aesthetics of the stay treatment and the minimal lines of the crown. It is this that I wish to follow with my project. This frame won't be for any specific rider, not a custom build in that sense. I'm also not trying to make a replica, details will reflect 50 years of gained knowledge and my mechanical preferences. Still I want to be as true to the vibe that I can be.
If you have some data about frame geometry of these iconic bikes please let me know. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 20,305
Mentioned: 130 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3464 Post(s)
Liked 2,829 Times
in
1,995 Posts
Don't copy them too much.
iconic in styling, yes.
longer rear triangle than you might recall but shorter than the International. 415mm?
I recall 70mm of drop.
normal reach brake calipers
126mm spacing
avoid that seat lug bolt style and threading.
use a nicer bottom bracket shell.
just build a good frame with "the look" and paint it in Blue Mink and silver
iconic in styling, yes.
longer rear triangle than you might recall but shorter than the International. 415mm?
I recall 70mm of drop.
normal reach brake calipers
126mm spacing
avoid that seat lug bolt style and threading.
use a nicer bottom bracket shell.
just build a good frame with "the look" and paint it in Blue Mink and silver
Likes For repechage:
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Near Pottstown, PA: 30 miles NW of Philadelphia
Posts: 2,186
Bikes: 2 Trek Mtn, Cannondale R600 road, 6 vintage road bikes
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
Liked 1,028 Times
in
404 Posts
It would be inadequate gratitude for the wisdom and knowledge you’ve posted here for a long time. Thanks.
Likes For Prowler:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 23,223
Mentioned: 654 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4722 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3,036 Times
in
1,874 Posts
Here's the specification sheet from a Bike World Magazine road test of a 1972 Raleigh Pro. It includes partial geometry measurements.
Likes For T-Mar:
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
Sounds like you’re interested in the MK IV. I believe that run ended in the Sept of 1976 when Worksop shut down for the annual “vacation” and retooled for the following year’s model, in this case the MK V which changed several things. My Pro was made in August 76 so is one of the last of the MK IVs. Let me know what details/measurements you would like. My frame is a 58cm c-c and I only do metric. Inches are for lumber and cinder blocks.
It would be inadequate gratitude for the wisdom and knowledge you’ve posted here for a long time. Thanks.
It would be inadequate gratitude for the wisdom and knowledge you’ve posted here for a long time. Thanks.
I have had 3 Pros (and a couple of Internationals). Two were Mk IVs IIRC and one was a Mk5 (which admittedly rode nicer IMO). Only the MkV was bought new from Geo. Rennies Bicycle Shop, where I was working. My boss told a story of when he and the partner visited the Raleigh factory (back when that sort of thing was encouraged by Raleigh) and he asked the guide about the geometry. The response was it was determined by what lug set they picked out of the pile that day. A non answer and made no sense but as an example of how close to the chest Raleigh was with some info.
Thanks for the help. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#6
Full Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 344
Bikes: 1975 Motobecane LeChampion (silver lilac), 1974 Motobecane Grand Jubile (red/black); 1975 Motobecane Team Champion (orange); 1982 Pinarello Professional (Exorcist Green); 1974 Raleigh Professional MkIV mink blue, 1974 Motobecane Grand Record blk/red
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 103 Post(s)
Liked 749 Times
in
172 Posts
Andy, you might recall that I have one of your old MkIVs, which is a '74 21 1/2" CTT frame, one of my favorite bikes. I will try to get some dimensions for you shortly, but in the meantime here is a pic....
Andy
Arvada CO USA
Andy
Arvada CO USA
Likes For 75lechamp:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Given the date, my guess is this isn't a Mark IV. Plus, it looks like Raleigh reports front-end geo the same way they did in the adverts for my 1952 Rudge (were the Professionals built at Nottingham?). The way I read the front end specs: Wheel radius is 333mm, assuming skinny tubulars. Fork offset is 2 ⅜ inches, or 60.3 mm, and angle is 73 degrees. So trail by the standard formula or online calculators is 38.75 mm. This is close to the value on my 1952 Rudge, surprisingly! Its wheelbase is more in the range of 43 inches, maybe more.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 955
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
I am seeking any real numbers WRT Raleigh Professional frame geometry to help me design a frame I will make. Specifically the early/mid 1970s versions with fastback seat stays and the full sloping crown.
I recently finished a French influenced frame/fork and am planning my next project. I have had a few tube sets in my stash for decades along with a collection of fittings and it's time to do something with them. Here's a link to the Framebuilders thread I started on that frame. P - Bike Forums
I have owned a few Pros over the years but never got around to measuring them but always was drawn to the aesthetics of the stay treatment and the minimal lines of the crown. It is this that I wish to follow with my project. This frame won't be for any specific rider, not a custom build in that sense. I'm also not trying to make a replica, details will reflect 50 years of gained knowledge and my mechanical preferences. Still I want to be as true to the vibe that I can be.
If you have some data about frame geometry of these iconic bikes please let me know. Andy
I recently finished a French influenced frame/fork and am planning my next project. I have had a few tube sets in my stash for decades along with a collection of fittings and it's time to do something with them. Here's a link to the Framebuilders thread I started on that frame. P - Bike Forums
I have owned a few Pros over the years but never got around to measuring them but always was drawn to the aesthetics of the stay treatment and the minimal lines of the crown. It is this that I wish to follow with my project. This frame won't be for any specific rider, not a custom build in that sense. I'm also not trying to make a replica, details will reflect 50 years of gained knowledge and my mechanical preferences. Still I want to be as true to the vibe that I can be.
If you have some data about frame geometry of these iconic bikes please let me know. Andy
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
Prowler- Yes, the Mk IV is my ideal target. The dimensions I am looking for are the usual center to center of the seat tube, top tube, chain stays and if possible angles and rake/trail. I've done some searching for numbers for a while in my planning but Raleigh did a poor job at putting out any back in that day. I have a vague memory of an on line discussion about this quite a few years ago and was hoping whoever was apart of that might have saved the discussions and step forward.
I have had 3 Pros (and a couple of Internationals). Two were Mk IVs IIRC and one was a Mk5 (which admittedly rode nicer IMO). Only the MkV was bought new from Geo. Rennies Bicycle Shop, where I was working. My boss told a story of when he and the partner visited the Raleigh factory (back when that sort of thing was encouraged by Raleigh) and he asked the guide about the geometry. The response was it was determined by what lug set they picked out of the pile that day. A non answer and made no sense but as an example of how close to the chest Raleigh was with some info.
Thanks for the help. Andy
I have had 3 Pros (and a couple of Internationals). Two were Mk IVs IIRC and one was a Mk5 (which admittedly rode nicer IMO). Only the MkV was bought new from Geo. Rennies Bicycle Shop, where I was working. My boss told a story of when he and the partner visited the Raleigh factory (back when that sort of thing was encouraged by Raleigh) and he asked the guide about the geometry. The response was it was determined by what lug set they picked out of the pile that day. A non answer and made no sense but as an example of how close to the chest Raleigh was with some info.
Thanks for the help. Andy
Also, having worked for Ford Motor Company when I first transitioned from the space industry to the auto industry, I found the company to play many speciications VERY close to the chest. But in the '40s and '50s, and seemingly even into the 1970s, Raleigh was surprisingly open at least about publishing a reference set of specifications. Can't say how close they are to "true" for every frame and every size variant, but they were willing to build at least a little footstool to stand on, in public press! The data I've seen for my Rudge all comes from the Raleigh advertising and the magazine reviews reproduced by Peter Kohler in his "On the Drops" blogs.
Last edited by Road Fan; 04-07-22 at 09:47 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 955
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
I think mine might be more of a touring bike, and it might be even older than the 1970s. It's 531 so though pretty nice.
Here are the numbers:
Head angle: 73.5 degrees
Seat angle: 71 degrees
Fork offset: 82mm
BB drop: 61.5mm
Chainstay length: 453mm
TT length: 580mm
ST length: 565mm
HT length: 160mm
Rear dropout spacing: 123mm
Interesting design of fork that looks actually quite sketchy: the legs are just mitred and somehow brazed onto a tube that forms the crown. But it's not a big fillet braze. Just a sort of capillary-action type deal. The writing on the side of the DT looks like it says "LENTON". Going to google for that...
UPDATE: I think is a 1958 Raleigh Grand Prix Super 7 in Polychromatic Silver Grey!
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/retroraleighs/lenton-kohler.html
Here are the numbers:
Head angle: 73.5 degrees
Seat angle: 71 degrees
Fork offset: 82mm
BB drop: 61.5mm
Chainstay length: 453mm
TT length: 580mm
ST length: 565mm
HT length: 160mm
Rear dropout spacing: 123mm
Interesting design of fork that looks actually quite sketchy: the legs are just mitred and somehow brazed onto a tube that forms the crown. But it's not a big fillet braze. Just a sort of capillary-action type deal. The writing on the side of the DT looks like it says "LENTON". Going to google for that...
UPDATE: I think is a 1958 Raleigh Grand Prix Super 7 in Polychromatic Silver Grey!
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/retroraleighs/lenton-kohler.html
Last edited by guy153; 04-07-22 at 11:02 AM.
#12
Not lost wanderer.
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,328
Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier
Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 990 Times
in
522 Posts
While not a Raleigh, here are a couple of nice fast back seat lugs.
Geoffrey Butler
British Witcomb
Geoffrey Butler
British Witcomb
__________________
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
The issue I have with the two "fastback" types shown is that the stays are along either side of the binder slot. When tightening the binder bolt the stays will be bent/flexed toward each other. Not what I would call being a slick design, having more stress on the bolt and the stays. The Raleigh's design places the stays against the seat tube below the binder slot. So no stays are harmed when the post is secured in place. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#14
Seńor Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hardy, VA
Posts: 17,923
Bikes: Mostly English - predominantly Raleighs
Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1491 Post(s)
Liked 1,090 Times
in
638 Posts
Yes, I am making assumptions, but finding the same model in the same size is going to give the most accurate information.
edit: It would still be a good exercise in documenting the information for possible compilation, even if it doesn't answer Andrew's exact question.
__________________
In search of what to search for.
In search of what to search for.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Near Pottstown, PA: 30 miles NW of Philadelphia
Posts: 2,186
Bikes: 2 Trek Mtn, Cannondale R600 road, 6 vintage road bikes
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
Liked 1,028 Times
in
404 Posts
Prowler- Yes, the Mk IV is my ideal target. The dimensions I am looking for are the usual center to center of the seat tube, top tube, chain stays and if possible angles and rake/trail. I've done some searching for numbers for a while in my planning but Raleigh did a poor job at putting out any back in that day. I have a vague memory of an on line discussion about this quite a few years ago and was hoping whoever was apart of that might have saved the discussions and step forward.
ST = 58cm c-c. 59cm c-t
TT = 57cm c-c
HT = 16.5cm
Steerer tube = 20.3cm (I think that includes to bottom of tube in the fork crown, not sure)
chain stays = 43cm from center of BB to center of dropout slot
Chain stay diameter 23mm at BB, 12mm at DO
Wheel base = 101.5cm (rear axle at rear of DO slot)
ST and HT angles both 73deg
Fork rake 4.7cm
Trail 6cm
BB height 26.5
BB width = 68mm
Rear spacing 125mm
I'm lead to believe that this bike is 11 tubes Reynolds 531 ( if you count each fork leg seperately)
I recall spending a lot of time on this stuff BUT, if something seems out of place let me know and I'll remeasure, as long as I can without taking the bike apart.
BTW: Your postings on front fork alignment have been very helpful. I've solved some annoying problems. Cheers
Springsteen: "Your aint a beauty but, hey, you're alright". Oh yes, those are Bocama long point professional HT lugs. Whatever was handy at the end of the production run. I like them a lot.
#16
blahblahblah chrome moly
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,987
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1173 Post(s)
Liked 2,569 Times
in
1,073 Posts
Genius really, super strong and lightweight. In a sense, no crown could be stronger, since if you stress the fork to failure it will always be the blades that bend. The crown and the braze joint are both way stronger than the blades, so there's no sense in making a crown (or braze) stronger than that. For pure engineering excellence, I'd take this over the massive sand-cast crown on the Pro for sure. The thimble crown is superior in every way except maybe style (de gustibus). Though the old bikie in me still loves the Pro crown because that's what I grew up lusting after.
Pic scraped from the web somewhere, I forget where, sorry):
I think we're seeing the nail they drove through a drilled hole to pin the blade to the crown during brazing. Brazing might have been partly or completely automated — yes even way back then — with brass pieces inserted as it was being assembled. The whole crown was then heated with big flames until the brass melts and flows around, no human touch required. I don't know how automated it was at Nottingham but I've seen a video of it being done that way in an Asian factory, and I believe Raleigh was the leader in that kind of stuff. For a long time Nottingham was the biggest bicycle factory on earth.
Mark B
Likes For bulgie:
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
Those Raleigh "thimble" crowns aren't a tube really, or should I say not just a tube. They're a piece of flat sheetmetal stamped to shape, bent around and welded, but they incorporate plugs that go down into the blades. A pair of secondary round bits that could be called tubes are also inserted inside this primary piece of bent sheetmetal, so the part of the crown that looks tubular is a double layer.
Genius really, super strong and lightweight. In a sense, no crown could be stronger, since if you stress the fork to failure it will always be the blades that bend. The crown and the braze joint are both way stronger than the blades, so there's no sense in making a crown (or braze) stronger than that. For pure engineering excellence, I'd take this over the massive sand-cast crown on the Pro for sure. The thimble crown is superior in every way except maybe style (de gustibus). Though the old bikie in me still loves the Pro crown because that's what I grew up lusting after.
Pic scraped from the web somewhere, I forget where, sorry):
I think we're seeing the nail they drove through a drilled hole to pin the blade to the crown during brazing. Brazing might have been partly or completely automated — yes even way back then — with brass pieces inserted as it was being assembled. The whole crown was then heated with big flames until the brass melts and flows around, no human touch required. I don't know how automated it was at Nottingham but I've seen a video of it being done that way in an Asian factory, and I believe Raleigh was the leader in that kind of stuff. For a long time Nottingham was the biggest bicycle factory on earth.
Mark B
Genius really, super strong and lightweight. In a sense, no crown could be stronger, since if you stress the fork to failure it will always be the blades that bend. The crown and the braze joint are both way stronger than the blades, so there's no sense in making a crown (or braze) stronger than that. For pure engineering excellence, I'd take this over the massive sand-cast crown on the Pro for sure. The thimble crown is superior in every way except maybe style (de gustibus). Though the old bikie in me still loves the Pro crown because that's what I grew up lusting after.
Pic scraped from the web somewhere, I forget where, sorry):
I think we're seeing the nail they drove through a drilled hole to pin the blade to the crown during brazing. Brazing might have been partly or completely automated — yes even way back then — with brass pieces inserted as it was being assembled. The whole crown was then heated with big flames until the brass melts and flows around, no human touch required. I don't know how automated it was at Nottingham but I've seen a video of it being done that way in an Asian factory, and I believe Raleigh was the leader in that kind of stuff. For a long time Nottingham was the biggest bicycle factory on earth.
Mark B
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
My recollections were correct: when I first got my Mk IV, almost 10 years ago, I took it all apart for a frame up overhaul. Had all winter to do it so I nerded out and measured everything as well, and wrote it down (yikes wadda nerd). So, again, serial number says August of 1976:
ST = 58cm c-c. 59cm c-t
TT = 57cm c-c
HT = 16.5cm
Steerer tube = 20.3cm (I think that includes to bottom of tube in the fork crown, not sure)
chain stays = 43cm from center of BB to center of dropout slot
Chain stay diameter 23mm at BB, 12mm at DO
Wheel base = 101.5cm (rear axle at rear of DO slot)
ST and HT angles both 73deg
Fork rake 4.7cm
Trail 6cm
BB height 26.5
BB width = 68mm
Rear spacing 125mm
I'm lead to believe that this bike is 11 tubes Reynolds 531 ( if you count each fork leg seperately)
I recall spending a lot of time on this stuff BUT, if something seems out of place let me know and I'll remeasure, as long as I can without taking the bike apart.
BTW: Your postings on front fork alignment have been very helpful. I've solved some annoying problems. Cheers
Springsteen: "Your aint a beauty but, hey, you're alright". Oh yes, those are Bocama long point professional HT lugs. Whatever was handy at the end of the production run. I like them a lot.
ST = 58cm c-c. 59cm c-t
TT = 57cm c-c
HT = 16.5cm
Steerer tube = 20.3cm (I think that includes to bottom of tube in the fork crown, not sure)
chain stays = 43cm from center of BB to center of dropout slot
Chain stay diameter 23mm at BB, 12mm at DO
Wheel base = 101.5cm (rear axle at rear of DO slot)
ST and HT angles both 73deg
Fork rake 4.7cm
Trail 6cm
BB height 26.5
BB width = 68mm
Rear spacing 125mm
I'm lead to believe that this bike is 11 tubes Reynolds 531 ( if you count each fork leg seperately)
I recall spending a lot of time on this stuff BUT, if something seems out of place let me know and I'll remeasure, as long as I can without taking the bike apart.
BTW: Your postings on front fork alignment have been very helpful. I've solved some annoying problems. Cheers
Springsteen: "Your aint a beauty but, hey, you're alright". Oh yes, those are Bocama long point professional HT lugs. Whatever was handy at the end of the production run. I like them a lot.
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 955
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 321 Post(s)
Liked 263 Times
in
212 Posts
Those Raleigh "thimble" crowns aren't a tube really, or should I say not just a tube. They're a piece of flat sheetmetal stamped to shape, bent around and welded, but they incorporate plugs that go down into the blades. A pair of secondary round bits that could be called tubes are also inserted inside this primary piece of bent sheetmetal, so the part of the crown that looks tubular is a double layer.
Mark B
Mark B
Yes a brilliant design and I like the look. Modern Pashleys still use crowns that look like a bit like this.
I have been tempted to make a TIG fork in which it just would be a tube (probably a bit of steerer) but have never seen one like this. Superficially it looks like it might be a good design because everything seems to be in compression. But what if the fork becomes kind of sheared to the side while still being loaded? In that case the segmented design of TIG fork would be much stiffer. Resisting this kind of shear is probably one of the most important jobs a fork crown has to do.
It's a good thing I didn't make this fork based on a misunderstanding of an old and much superior Raleigh fork and then die as a result
#20
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
Measure Twice - Cut Once
Andrew, from experience, I measured a lot of frames doing research on ride and handling characteristics back in the mid 70's.
If you take 10 Raleigh Pros, same size, same year, you're going to get at least 3 different dimension sets with regard (staring from the front and working back) fork rake distance, fork bend, head tube angle, top tube length, seat tube angle, drop, and chain stay length. Beyond the front end, the differences may not be glaring but these were "hand crafted frames".
Raleigh was notorious for using whatever was on the shelf! Was it built Monday AM or Friday PM? Before or after a 3 pint lunch!
Now, if you take 10 different Internationals you're going to get 6 or 7 different spec sets! I'd always admired the look of the champagne International. At end of 2019 I came across a 1974 frame in nice condition.
When I measured it and checked the alignment... Oh the horror! Oh the horror! The head and seat tube were 75°, the forks had a 65mm rake. I took to a friend's shop and we corrected the frame alignment, It took him almost an hour to properly align the fork blades then remove 10mm of rake!
My suggestion is to find a bike that you REALY enjoy riding. Copy the geometry and dimensions. You'll be a happy man!
I'm having a frame built that way - in July, it will be 2 years!
I could built it myself but I've been promising him for years that I'd have him build me a frame (he needed the money too).
verktyg
If you take 10 Raleigh Pros, same size, same year, you're going to get at least 3 different dimension sets with regard (staring from the front and working back) fork rake distance, fork bend, head tube angle, top tube length, seat tube angle, drop, and chain stay length. Beyond the front end, the differences may not be glaring but these were "hand crafted frames".
Raleigh was notorious for using whatever was on the shelf! Was it built Monday AM or Friday PM? Before or after a 3 pint lunch!
Now, if you take 10 different Internationals you're going to get 6 or 7 different spec sets! I'd always admired the look of the champagne International. At end of 2019 I came across a 1974 frame in nice condition.
When I measured it and checked the alignment... Oh the horror! Oh the horror! The head and seat tube were 75°, the forks had a 65mm rake. I took to a friend's shop and we corrected the frame alignment, It took him almost an hour to properly align the fork blades then remove 10mm of rake!
My suggestion is to find a bike that you REALY enjoy riding. Copy the geometry and dimensions. You'll be a happy man!
I'm having a frame built that way - in July, it will be 2 years!
I could built it myself but I've been promising him for years that I'd have him build me a frame (he needed the money too).
verktyg
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Last edited by verktyg; 04-09-22 at 03:07 AM.
Likes For verktyg:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Near Pottstown, PA: 30 miles NW of Philadelphia
Posts: 2,186
Bikes: 2 Trek Mtn, Cannondale R600 road, 6 vintage road bikes
Mentioned: 83 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
Liked 1,028 Times
in
404 Posts
When I measured it and checked the alignment... Oh the horror! Oh the horror! The head and seat tube were 75°, the forks had a 65mm rake. I took to a friend's shop and we corrected the frame alignment, It took him almost an hour to properly align the fork blades then remove 10mm of rake!
The only issue with my MK IV is the danger of running into something cuz I was staring at that fine British chrome on the fork legs instead of watching ahead.
Andrew R Stewart , when you build your Pro-ish frame, be sure to include a stylised AS cut out on the BB shell so we can see the Campagnolo logo on the accordion sleeve over the BB spindle.
Last edited by Prowler; 04-09-22 at 06:11 AM.
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
"when you build your Pro-ish frame, be sure to include a stylised AS cut out on the BB shell so we can see the Campagnolo logo on the accordion sleeve over the BB spindle." Prowler
I got past my cut out BB shell phase way long ago. And I disliked the Campy two piece plastic shield/sleeve, Every Campy BBed bike I rode ended up with the far easier Sugino accordion sleeves.
Vertyg- Your experience mimics mine in that those era high end Raleighs seemed to shift geometry with each production series. I mostly want to make a Pro inspired frame/fork because of having some past with Pros and I learned to like the look. As I mentioned I remember my 1978 Pro (a far different Pro than those before) was the nicest riding Pro I have had. So I'm not married to any specific geometry. I'm noy looking to make a copy or replica, just a bike that looks like it might be a Raleigh Pro but won't be. Andy
I got past my cut out BB shell phase way long ago. And I disliked the Campy two piece plastic shield/sleeve, Every Campy BBed bike I rode ended up with the far easier Sugino accordion sleeves.
Vertyg- Your experience mimics mine in that those era high end Raleighs seemed to shift geometry with each production series. I mostly want to make a Pro inspired frame/fork because of having some past with Pros and I learned to like the look. As I mentioned I remember my 1978 Pro (a far different Pro than those before) was the nicest riding Pro I have had. So I'm not married to any specific geometry. I'm noy looking to make a copy or replica, just a bike that looks like it might be a Raleigh Pro but won't be. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#23
verktyg
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,030
Bikes: Current favorites: 1988 Peugeot Birraritz, 1984 Gitane Super Corsa, 1980s DeRosa, 1981 Bianchi Campione Del Mondo, 1992 Paramount OS, 1988 Colnago Technos, 1985 RalieghUSA SBDU Team Pro
Mentioned: 207 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1036 Post(s)
Liked 1,238 Times
in
654 Posts
Raleigh Pro Replica Of Sorts
Verktyg- Your experience mimics mine in that those era high end Raleighs seemed to shift geometry with each production series.[each week!] I mostly want to make a Pro inspired frame/fork because of having some past with Pros and I learned to like the look. As I mentioned I remember my 1978 Pro (a far different Pro than those before) was the nicest riding Pro I have had. So I'm not married to any specific geometry. I'm not looking to make a copy or replica, just a bike that looks like it might be a Raleigh Pro but won't be. Andy
At the beginning of 1979 the Raleigh America sales team showed up at our shop unannounced and demanded that we drop all of our other brands and floorplan the complete Raleigh line! Most of the models were way overpriced plus we didn't have a market for them. Centurion and Nishiki were taking over a lot of the business in our area. They had much nicer cosmetics and features for a lot less $$$. We politely showed them which way the door opened! About the same time Trek stopped by with the same visions of sugar plums and they too went home empty handed. We didn't NEED either brand!
As far as looks go, back about 2006-2007 I started acquiring bikes that i liked but could never have afforded BITD. I found a 1975 Mk. IV Pro frame in nice condition. What I always liked about those bikes were the beautiful Davis sloping fork crowns. I was lucky, I got a frame that handled perfectly for my tastes.
What I really would have wanted was a 1972-3 with the "bird's mouth" lugs... Not sure what Mk. they were.
Factory specs for the 1975 Professional Mk. IV DL-180
I can appreciate your desire to build a frame with the Raleigh Pro inspired features. Last year, I picked up a bucket list Raleigh Pro frame, a silver and black 1974 Mk. IV from a BF member.
verktyg
__________________
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Don't believe everything you think! History is written by those who weren't there....
Chas. ;-)
Last edited by verktyg; 04-09-22 at 02:40 PM.
Likes For verktyg: