Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Sharing the road and the four-foot law

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Sharing the road and the four-foot law

Old 12-21-22, 02:45 PM
  #76  
alcjphil
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,869
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1792 Post(s)
Liked 1,671 Times in 955 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
I'm not terribly surprised--people in that place seem to like a fight.

Never ridden there, but I did break up an argument between a ticket person and a customer in the Montreal Metro in the late 1980s. My then-wife and I were in line to get tickets to ride the train and in those days, you had to buy them from a human being in a glass booth. The woman ahead of us had begrudgingly paid for a ticket when she was asserting she had already paid once. For some reason, the system then was that the seller gave you a paper ticket you had to put into a fare box and then the ticket taker would unlock the turnstile. For reasons I couldn't quite get, the woman in line was refusing to put the ticket in the fare box, leaving it under the window of the booth, and the ticket taker was refusing to unlock the turnstile until she put the ticket in the fare box. I listened to this fascinating Francophone vs. Anglophone debate for about a minute during which we could not buy tickets to enter, all the meantime listening to trains down in the tunnel departing without us. Finally, I just reached around the woman, picked up the ticket, and dumped it in the fare box, then announced two tickets please. They both looked at me in shock, and then I swear they both looked deflated because I took away their argument. Neither of them said a word to me, but we finally got through the turnstile.
It has been over 30 years since the late 1980's in Quebec. Things have changed. Your experience today would not be the same. Riding in Quebec today is pretty darn good except for the condition of some of the roads, but the police are strict, no riding in double pace lines allowed and groups of more than 15 cyclists are not permitted unless it is in a ride organized with police permission. Driver comportment has improved greatly in the last 10 years. Quebec has always been a hotspot for cycling in Canada. This year's Tour de France is instructive: 4 Canadian riders, 3 from Quebec and the 4th who happens to live in Quebec
alcjphil is offline  
Likes For alcjphil:
Old 12-21-22, 03:07 PM
  #77  
alcjphil
Senior Member
 
alcjphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 5,869
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1792 Post(s)
Liked 1,671 Times in 955 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeyBike
Might be from Quebec. That place gets my vote.
How so? I have been riding in Quebec for the last 50 years. I have to assume that you have never ridden in Ontario.
alcjphil is offline  
Old 12-22-22, 11:03 AM
  #78  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times in 5,053 Posts
Originally Posted by alcjphil
It has been over 30 years since the late 1980's in Quebec. Things have changed. Your experience today would not be the same. Riding in Quebec today is pretty darn good except for the condition of some of the roads, but the police are strict, no riding in double pace lines allowed and groups of more than 15 cyclists are not permitted unless it is in a ride organized with police permission. Driver comportment has improved greatly in the last 10 years. Quebec has always been a hotspot for cycling in Canada. This year's Tour de France is instructive: 4 Canadian riders, 3 from Quebec and the 4th who happens to live in Quebec
Yes, it was a long time ago, and I was a mere tourist.
Is there less of the francophone vs. anglophone stuff going on now?
livedarklions is offline  
Old 12-23-22, 12:28 PM
  #79  
JoeyBike
20+mph Commuter
 
JoeyBike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Posts: 7,491

Bikes: Surly LHT, Surly Lowside, a folding bike, and a beater.

Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1422 Post(s)
Liked 315 Times in 210 Posts
Originally Posted by livedarklions
Yes, it was a long time ago, and I was a mere tourist.
Same here. Mid 90s. I was touring into Quebec from New York and exited Vermont. A lot of mean spirited close passes. Read a Quebec newspaper headline about a cyclist hit from behind so hard on a 2-lane roadway that spread him and his bike out over 100 yards. I could easily see why after only a short time there. So I bailed.
JoeyBike is offline  
Old 12-24-22, 08:03 PM
  #80  
rumrunn6
Senior Member
 
rumrunn6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,527

Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0

Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5218 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times in 2,331 Posts
yeah, sharing the road, ain't always so pretty

rumrunn6 is offline  
Old 12-24-22, 08:50 PM
  #81  
RCMoeur 
Cantilever believer
 
RCMoeur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,471
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 491 Post(s)
Liked 1,665 Times in 761 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
yeah, sharing the road, ain't always so pretty

I'm typically in the DC area for over a week in January for TRB & NCUTCD. I've discovered the separated bike lanes in DC can sometimes not be cleared of ice and snow for several days after the general travel lanes are plowed and cleared, and in those situations I use a lane with other traffic, even in heavy traffic conditions. And I receive zero negative feedback from other drivers, as they can see the crud in those lanes and why I'm using the other available lanes.
RCMoeur is offline  
Likes For RCMoeur:
Old 12-28-22, 09:53 AM
  #82  
Milton Keynes
Senior Member
 
Milton Keynes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 3,947

Bikes: Trek 1100 road bike, Roadmaster gravel/commuter/beater mountain bike

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Liked 1,710 Times in 936 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
Having thousands of miles in dense traffic, I don't mind very close passes, but I do want the driver to slow down before he tries to squeeze by.

IMO 4' is still too close at 60mph, while 2' is plenty at 20mph.
That's what I've often thought... I don't mind close passes as long as the vehicle is moving slowly. I'd much rather have a 2' pass at 20 MPH than a 4' pass at 60 MPH.
Milton Keynes is offline  
Old 12-28-22, 11:13 AM
  #83  
njkayaker
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,240
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4221 Post(s)
Liked 1,321 Times in 916 Posts
Originally Posted by NJgreyhead
Recently New Jersey passed a law making it mandatory for motor vehicles to give bicyclists at least four feet of room. Great.

However, I usually see cyclists on a clean 6-foot (or wider) shoulder riding all the way left, close to the shoulder line. Why? To be in compliance, cars then need to go over their left-hand lane line / center line (and maybe rumble strips) unnecessarily, because the four feet of clearance can come from the cyclists if they are considerate riders.

I drive a car and ride a bike. "Share the road" should work both ways.
Vision Zero NJ: Op-Ed: Polzo vs. Essex County decision - Part 2: The bad. The REALLY bad!!
njkayaker is offline  
Likes For njkayaker:
Old 12-29-22, 09:36 AM
  #84  
Iride01 
I'm good to go!
 
Iride01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,809

Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020

Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6099 Post(s)
Liked 4,731 Times in 3,261 Posts
These from the link provided by njkayaker Cyclist need to take note of the legalities and consider liability they assume when doing things that aren't quite the law but seem safer to them. In an accident that goes to the courts, these things will matter. And in a "share the blame" state like I live in, then if I am found in violation of any rules and regulation, I will be assessed a share of the blame whether those violations where material to the accident or not. And that might drastically reduce or even nullify any awards I or my estate may have received.
.” N.J.S.A. 39:4-14.2. Bicyclists do not have special privileges on a roadway’s shoulder. Indeed, a bicycle rider is directed to ride on the furthest right hand side of the roadway, not on the roadway’s shoulder. The Motor Vehicle Code does not designate the roadway’s shoulder as a bicycle lane.9
  • Bicycles are NOT vehicles even though a bicycle rider on a roadway is vested with all the “rights” and “duties applicable to the driver of a vehicle." This is somewhat crazy classification for bicyclists putting us in a legal limbo. It similar to the idea that civil unions are the same as a marriage even though they aren't. New Jersey leaves it bicyclists in a precarious legal position by not defining a bicycle as a vehicle. It's time to ask that the Legislature call bicycles what they are. Vehicles with special privileges.
Thankfully in Mississippi, bicycles are vehicles.
Iride01 is offline  
Old 12-29-22, 01:17 PM
  #85  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,544

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 139 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5703 Post(s)
Liked 2,430 Times in 1,343 Posts
Re: legal status of bikes in NJ, I'm somewhat curious about your concerns, and how you think NJ places bikes in limbo.

The law clearly gives bicyclists (I don't consider things like cars or bikes to have rights) all the same rights and obligations of motor vehicle drivers, despite not considering bicycles vehicles. IMO it's a distinction without a difference. However, if you have specific examples of how this distinction can work against bicyclists, I'd like to hear them.

In some cases the distinction can work for bicyclists, and here's a specific one as applied by courts inn New York State. If a bicyclist who also has a valid driver's license is cited and convicted for a moving violation he can ask that points NOT be assigned against his license. This is because NYS courts apply an equal protection logic, so a bicyclist withn a driver's license isn't penalized more that one without, since no clicense is necessary. I don't know how other states handle this issue, but at least here, Limbo works FOR the bicyclist, not against.

Note to anyone cited in NYS -- You have to make the request because officers often (usually) fail to note that the violation involved a bicycle rather than a car. FWIW the one time I dealt with this personally, I brought it up to the prosecutor pre-trial and ended up with a dismissal because he thougth the judge would laugh at him. So, no points and no fine.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 12-29-22, 01:23 PM
  #86  
livedarklions
Tragically Ignorant
 
livedarklions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613

Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM

Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,094 Times in 5,053 Posts
Originally Posted by Iride01
These from the link provided by njkayaker Cyclist need to take note of the legalities and consider liability they assume when doing things that aren't quite the law but seem safer to them. In an accident that goes to the courts, these things will matter. And in a "share the blame" state like I live in, then if I am found in violation of any rules and regulation, I will be assessed a share of the blame whether those violations where material to the accident or not. And that might drastically reduce or even nullify any awards I or my estate may have received.


Thankfully in Mississippi, bicycles are vehicles.
In NH, bicycles are vehicles, and the definition of "way" includes the paved shoulders. NH law requires cyclists to be in the furthest right "portion of the way" practicable, so the shoulder is definitely an option and may be mandatory.
livedarklions is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.