Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Poll: tightening crank bolts after mounting arms

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.
View Poll Results: Do you retighten the bolts?
Yes, I retighten once
34.92%
No, I leave 'em alone
53.97%
I do something a little different (explain)
11.11%
Voters: 63. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: tightening crank bolts after mounting arms

Old 01-14-23, 12:36 PM
  #1  
SurferRosa
señor miembro
Thread Starter
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 8,239

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3846 Post(s)
Liked 6,437 Times in 3,183 Posts
Poll: tightening crank bolts after mounting arms

After mounting arms on a square taper bottom bracket and tightening the bolts, do you retighten once after a short ride, or do you leave them alone?

If you retighten, what's that "short ride" look like? Is a hill involved?
SurferRosa is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 12:50 PM
  #2  
seagrade 
Making up the numbers
 
seagrade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 277
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 102 Post(s)
Liked 476 Times in 149 Posts
As much as I have been susceptible to overthinking bicycle mechanics methodology and application of The Knowledge over the years, all I've ever done with crank bolts is recheck tension, and retighten if necessary, after the first ride and thereafter from time-to-time.

From time-to-time I've found things needed minor retightening after first ride.

I've never given any thought to the topography or intensity of a test ride, other than to throw in a few sub-max sprints.
seagrade is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 01:11 PM
  #3  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Just like the lug nuts on our cars, I like to at least go around the block and re-check the torque before taking the vehicle any further. The nice thing about a beam torque wrench is that it's easier to see how far short of the desired torque you are when checking. If the bolt has become really loose again, I'll pull it back up to the target torque, but if there's a decent amount left, I'll stop a little shy, since some torque loss is to be expected when the crank seats onto the taper.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 01:31 PM
  #4  
SurferRosa
señor miembro
Thread Starter
 
SurferRosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Pac NW
Posts: 8,239

Bikes: '70s - '80s Campagnolo

Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3846 Post(s)
Liked 6,437 Times in 3,183 Posts
I retighten once. My "short ride" is up a steep hill a half block long, and that's pretty much it.

The reason this is pertinent for me right now is that I overhauled a couple new-to-me bikes recently, and three of the crank arms had deformed tapers, probably from over-tightening.
SurferRosa is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 02:23 PM
  #5  
rccardr 
aka: Dr. Cannondale
 
rccardr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,852
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2151 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times in 1,198 Posts
Never re-tighten, have never had a bolt/arm get loose, either. Nor a wheel.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
rccardr is offline  
Likes For rccardr:
Old 01-14-23, 02:23 PM
  #6  
Mr. 66
Senior Member
 
Mr. 66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 3,440
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1124 Post(s)
Liked 1,704 Times in 941 Posts
I'll re tighten, if I can remember I'll bring tools and check on the ride. I've made the mistake of not and roasted a taper or two.
Mr. 66 is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 03:23 PM
  #7  
oneclick 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 2,890
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,311 Times in 775 Posts
"Failure from "over-tightening" is caused by repeated re-tightening of properly installed cranks. In use, an aluminum crank squirms on its taper and, because the retaining bolt prevents it from moving off the taper, it elbows itself away from the bolt and up the taper ever so slightly. The resulting loss of preload, after hard riding, can be detected by how easily the bolt can be turned.Loss of crank bolt preload is greater on left than the right cranks, because left cranks transmit torque and bending simultaneously while right cranks transmit these forces separately. The left crank transmits driving torque through the spindle to the right crank and chainwheel while the right crank drives the chainwheel directly. Besides that, the right crank transmits torque to the spindle only when standing on both pedals. Doing this with the right foot forward (goofy footed) is the only time the spindle transmits reverse torque.

Mechanics, unaware of why crank bolts lose preload (and commensurate crank tightening), have re-tightened bolts until cranks split. No warnings against re-tightening properly installed cranks are evident although it is here where the warning should be directed rather than at lubrication.
[...]
Crank "dust caps" have the additional duty to retain loose crank bolts. Because crank bolts lose preload in use, they can become loose enough to subsequently unscrew and fall out if there is no cap. If this occurs, loss of the screw will not be noticed until the crank comes off, after the screw is gone."

(Attibution should be unnecessary.)
oneclick is offline  
Likes For oneclick:
Old 01-14-23, 04:44 PM
  #8  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,936

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,367 Times in 1,916 Posts
I check the torque. If it's down from the installed torque, I snug it up. Otherwise, I leave it alone.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 06:08 PM
  #9  
bulgie 
blahblahblah chrome moly
 
bulgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,980
Mentioned: 92 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1162 Post(s)
Liked 2,542 Times in 1,065 Posts
I don't retighten, don't even check, because I've never seen a need to. Never had one come loose. I'm not saying this is advice for others, but it has worked for me.

I think I tighten them tighter initially than most people do though. I don't know, since I've never used a torque wrench, but I'll bet I'm overtightening according to the manufacturer's spec. I don't use a tommy bar or cheater, just the normal 6 or 7" long wrench, but with close to all my might. I figger if a peanut butter wrench was good enough for Tullio, it's good enough for me.

This has never split or wallowed a crank for me, despite my use of <gasp> grease on the tapers. My chainline comes out OK, though I'll admit I never measured it with a micrometer. If I had to guess I'd say my cranks might go on a half-mm further than at recommended torque, but I'm OK with that. I like low-Q.

Maybe this would cause problems on a cheap/weak crank, like I dunno, Maxy? I have stuck with better brands like Campy Record, Dura-Ace, Stronglight 93/99, TA Pro, Mavic, Specialized. I have broken 3 cranks, two TA and one Campy, but not at the square taper. Twice as many TA cranks as Campy probably because I used TA on MTBs versus road only on Campy. Maybe TA cranks are weaker as well, I dunno, but the MTB abuse could be enough to explain it. I raced Norba Expert class (hard pedaling) and competed in Observed Trials (hard knocks).

I frequently took the cranks off for cleaning just because it's easier than cleaning in-place when they're grimy, so some of my cranks have been off and back on many times.

Mark B
bulgie is offline  
Likes For bulgie:
Old 01-14-23, 06:09 PM
  #10  
clubman 
Phyllo-buster
 
clubman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,831

Bikes: roadsters, club bikes, fixed and classic

Mentioned: 133 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2287 Post(s)
Liked 2,030 Times in 1,245 Posts
I've had so few 'loosenings' that I've chosen to err on tightening once. And as a confessional, rarely with a torque wrench

Mark beat me to it.
clubman is offline  
Likes For clubman:
Old 01-14-23, 06:13 PM
  #11  
79pmooney
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,830

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4745 Post(s)
Liked 3,861 Times in 2,510 Posts
I said "No, ...". Sometimes I will re-tighten once if I'm not sure I actually got it right the first time but just that once. I've read what oneclick quoted (post #7) from several sources and I have always found a hard ridden crank will not be up to to torque when I check it. I did split a crank years ago and consider that the lesson from that was yes, what oneclick posted is what happens.

And yes, I've heard supposedly good mechanics tell folk that checking those bolts for torque is good practice. I keep my mouth shut because that's an argument I'm not going to win and just walk away a little sad and hope the advised forgets.
79pmooney is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 06:46 PM
  #12  
Soody
Senior Member
 
Soody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,047

Bikes: Gunnar, Shogun, Concorde, F Moser, Pete Tansley, Rocky Mtn, Diamant, Krapf, Marin, Avanti, Winora, Emmelle, Ken Evans

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 272 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 214 Posts
Originally Posted by oneclick
"Failure from "over-tightening" is caused by repeated re-tightening of properly installed cranks. In use, an aluminum crank squirms on its taper and, because the retaining bolt prevents it from moving off the taper, it elbows itself away from the bolt and up the taper ever so slightly. The resulting loss of preload, after hard riding, can be detected by how easily the bolt can be turned.Loss of crank bolt preload is greater on left than the right cranks, because left cranks transmit torque and bending simultaneously while right cranks transmit these forces separately. The left crank transmits driving torque through the spindle to the right crank and chainwheel while the right crank drives the chainwheel directly. Besides that, the right crank transmits torque to the spindle only when standing on both pedals. Doing this with the right foot forward (goofy footed) is the only time the spindle transmits reverse torque.

Mechanics, unaware of why crank bolts lose preload (and commensurate crank tightening), have re-tightened bolts until cranks split. No warnings against re-tightening properly installed cranks are evident although it is here where the warning should be directed rather than at lubrication.
[...]
Crank "dust caps" have the additional duty to retain loose crank bolts. Because crank bolts lose preload in use, they can become loose enough to subsequently unscrew and fall out if there is no cap. If this occurs, loss of the screw will not be noticed until the crank comes off, after the screw is gone."

(Attibution should be unnecessary.)

Brandt's take on this issue has always infuriated me. He doesn't actually explain what to do about the problem. So, crank arms can squirm up the taper, you lose preload of the bolt, retightening can damage everything, what do you do about it?
He's writing I guess as an iconoclastic person discussing the issue with others who know what they're doing but now his piece has taken the place of a near definitive guide. I suspect he had a conflict of interest as avocet sold left crank arms or something.
Soody is offline  
Likes For Soody:
Old 01-14-23, 06:56 PM
  #13  
ThermionicScott 
working on my sandal tan
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,625

Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)

Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3868 Post(s)
Liked 2,560 Times in 1,574 Posts
Originally Posted by Soody
Brandt's take on this issue has always infuriated me. He doesn't actually explain what to do about the problem. So, crank arms can squirm up the taper, you lose preload of the bolt, retightening can damage everything, what do you do about it?
He's writing I guess as an iconoclastic person discussing the issue with others who know what they're doing but now his piece has taken the place of a near definitive guide. I suspect he had a conflict of interest as avocet sold left crank arms or something.
That's precisely why I adopted the "middle way" of checking the torque that I described a few posts up. Use the torque wrench to check if the bolt is seriously loose, but if it's not, don't keep retorquing the full amount, since that can damage the crank.
__________________
Originally Posted by chandltp
There's no such thing as too far.. just lack of time
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
RUSA #7498
ThermionicScott is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 07:18 PM
  #14  
Soody
Senior Member
 
Soody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,047

Bikes: Gunnar, Shogun, Concorde, F Moser, Pete Tansley, Rocky Mtn, Diamant, Krapf, Marin, Avanti, Winora, Emmelle, Ken Evans

Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 272 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times in 214 Posts
Originally Posted by ThermionicScott
That's precisely why I adopted the "middle way" of checking the torque that I described a few posts up. Use the torque wrench to check if the bolt is seriously loose, but if it's not, don't keep retorquing the full amount, since that can damage the crank.
Yep that's basically what I do too. Check it's snug. Not trying to drive it on further but just hand right down by the socket on the wrench give it a little push. For 5 rides maybe.
1/20 maybe require this. I also frequently see this failure happen on other people's bikes. Correct installation with attention to cleaning the surfaces, light grease, and adequate torque is the main thing.

I think the reason this advice isn't mainstream is that it isn't viable for a bike shop to do or to instruct. I've lent a wrench out to people that i've rebuilt bikes for with these instructions but it's very tiresome giving customers any instructions or chores unless they're both your friend and a nerd. I'll try to test ride bikes i rebuild a few times to do this but riding the very small ones sucks.
Soody is offline  
Likes For Soody:
Old 01-14-23, 08:31 PM
  #15  
Trakhak
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,338
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2429 Post(s)
Liked 2,888 Times in 1,646 Posts
If you're talking about a bike with a conventional tapered spindle that you (or a previous owner) bought new from a bike store, chances are that the crank bolts were tightened during the 90-day tuneup (or whatever wording was used) that the bike manufacturer required the dealers to offer. Aside from safety checks (brake checks, etc.), I always thought of the torquing of the crank bolts as the most important part of the tuneup.

I suppose it's possible that some of the left crank arms that we sold to customers were needed because the original crank was over-tightened at some point, but I'd bet that most were sold to people who had never bothered bringing the bike in to get that first tuneup.

Handy tip to anyone installing a crankset with a tapered spindle: grease the threads of the crank bolts and then use a calibrated torque wrench on one crank and a standard socket wrench on the other to tighten the two crank bolts simultaneously. When you hear the torque wrench click, both bolts have reached the correct tightness.

Last edited by Trakhak; 01-14-23 at 08:35 PM.
Trakhak is offline  
Likes For Trakhak:
Old 01-14-23, 08:52 PM
  #16  
steelbikeguy
Senior Member
 
steelbikeguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Peoria, IL
Posts: 4,450
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1820 Post(s)
Liked 3,330 Times in 1,564 Posts
I've always just tightened once... until..

There was the time when I bought a Phil titanium BB to use on a Campy Record crankset. i.e. the classic late 70's/early 80's Nuovo or Super Record crankset. I thought I'd replace the Campy BB with a lighter Phil BB. I contacted Phil to be sure that the axle taper was suited for the Campy, and they assured me it was. I installed it as typical, and did a few rides. Unfortunately, I was in the middle of a ride when I discovered that one (or both?) arms were a bit loose! I was close to one of the LBSs, and they snugged the bolts up. No issues after that.

My guess is that there was enough difference in the taper of the Campy axle and the Phil that the aluminum arms had to yield a bit before they fully contacted the axle taper. That, of course, meant that the bolts were no longer tight, and the crank arms were free to move around and deform the aluminum.

I had a chance to test this hypothesis when I bought some SunXCD cranks (clones of the TA Cyclotouriste) for a bike. I wasn't sure what BB to use, but had a Specialized cup & cone BB that looked like it was suitable. Since both the crank and BB were made in Japan, I figured that it should work. The test fit seemed fine. Still, for the first few weeks, I'd check the bolt torque after each ride. The first few rides did need a bit of additional torque, but after that, there was little or no change in bolt tension. A couple of years later, and no problems.

In my experience with good quality cranks that fit the axles, there shouldn't be any need to recheck bolt torque. On a brand new crank, it wouldn't be a bad idea to go check a few times, though.

Steve in Peoria
steelbikeguy is offline  
Likes For steelbikeguy:
Old 01-14-23, 09:41 PM
  #17  
BFisher
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,336
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 767 Post(s)
Liked 1,897 Times in 889 Posts
Never went back to re-tighten a crank arm and have never had one come loose. Never cracked or otherwise damaged a crank arm, and yes, I grease my tapers.
BFisher is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 10:00 PM
  #18  
BoltBreaker
This wrench fits...
 
BoltBreaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Location: Eastbania
Posts: 70

Bikes: Two Rivs, and a bespoke Gugie

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 35 Post(s)
Liked 90 Times in 26 Posts
If I'm gonna break a bolt, it'll be a seat post binder bolt most likely. But BB crankarm bolts are set 'n forget. Unless they creak... then they get a re-torque.
BoltBreaker is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 10:05 PM
  #19  
nlerner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,127
Mentioned: 480 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3788 Post(s)
Liked 6,574 Times in 2,580 Posts
Too modern for me; I’m sticking with cottered cranks.
nlerner is offline  
Likes For nlerner:
Old 01-14-23, 11:01 PM
  #20  
Sorcerer
Full Member
 
Sorcerer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: '16 StumpJ, Salsa Mukluk, Soulcycles SS, Dean Colonel HT, BMC FourstrokeTrail, Dean Torres CX, Santana Visa Tandem, Trek T2000 Tandem, Cupertino MTB Tandem, FreeAgent26"Xtracycle, Dirt Drop Dingle, Jamis Dragon Dingle, Airborne Skyhag SS, SSDean Cols
Posts: 219
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 70 Post(s)
Liked 116 Times in 61 Posts
It wasn't until eBay where I have purchased some crank arms that loosened, and one that cracked open around the taper.

I sort of attribute this to the adage: You get what you pay for.

However, I have bikes with used cranks from eBay on them, mostly White Industries, that I ride hard on a regular basis.

Anyway, used stuff, and pre-owned, is a bit of crap shoot.

That said, until I bought cranks on eBay, I was in the install them tight, and after a ride or two only snug up the crank bolts until they stay on (below threshold) thereafter, using only a 7" long spanner (Park tool).

This is how I was taught from an old Schwinn bikes shop when I was a kid. I never questioned it.

The paradigm seemed to be that the crank bolt wrench handle length would prevent over-torque.

[ I was at the same time told not to grease the tapers.]

Then one day I had the experience of a creak that wouldn't go away, and as a last resort I retorqued the cranks, and voila, the creak went away. It was a single speed.

At the moment I am lost in the fog on the matter. After some recent related experience with PF30 bottom brackets I have become a firm believer in torque wrench usage.

Love square taper stuff as much as I love 27.2 seat tubes.

I'm no expert on this matter. This is my experience.
Sorcerer is offline  
Old 01-15-23, 01:38 AM
  #21  
Andrew_G
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 57 Post(s)
Liked 133 Times in 66 Posts
I find that after crankset installation, I have to retighten the BB bolts several times, until the crank seats. After it the crankset settles in, the bolts stay put.

After initial crankset installation, I do an easy break-in ride on gentle terrain. I don't want to distort the tapers (if that's possible) by pounding on a crankset before it's fully seated.

I completed a crankset installation break in ride yesterday, Friday Jan 13. The crankset was an IRD Defiant (made by Andel in Taiwan) mated to an appropriate JIS taper Phil Wood BB. The BB bolts seemed to settle in after an hour of riding.

I get similar results when using a Campy 9/10 crankset mated to a Phil Wood BB (with Campy spec tapers).
Andrew_G is offline  
Old 01-15-23, 01:53 AM
  #22  
bwilli88 
Not lost wanderer.
 
bwilli88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Lititz, Pa
Posts: 3,361

Bikes: In USA; 73 Raleigh Super Course dingle speed, 72 Raleigh Gran Sport SS, 72 Geoffry Butler, 81 Centurion Pro-Tour, 74 Gugie Grandier Sportier

Mentioned: 72 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 885 Post(s)
Liked 979 Times in 514 Posts
I tighten at least one grunt, no torque wrench here, then go for a short ride, come back and use a rawhide mallet and give the crank arm a few good whacks, then snug up again.
__________________
Cambodia bikes, Bridgestone SRAM 2 speed, 2012 Fuji Stratos...
bwilli88 is offline  
Old 01-15-23, 03:21 AM
  #23  
Murray Missile 
Senior Member
 
Murray Missile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 700 Ft. above sea level.
Posts: 3,205

Bikes: More than there were awhile ago.

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 620 Post(s)
Liked 1,205 Times in 575 Posts
Torque wrench musings.....

Question for all the torque wrench users, How often do you have your wrenches checked for calibration? Continue at your own risk.......

Testing torque wrenches used in a manufacturing facility was part of my old job for about 15 years, Around 300 of them and all different brands and types. A personal observation from doing thousands of tests on a half dozen or so different brands used in an industrial environment: If you have an older Proto, MAC or US made Craftsman and don't substitute your torque wrench for a breaker bar or hammer you're probably fine for a few decades. If you have a Snap On get it checked occasionally. If you have a cheap Chinese wrench you really don't want to know........ Of all the brand name consumer grade wrenches the company used Snap On were the only ones we had to remove from service for being out of calibration and it was usually within a year to 18 months. Snap On doesn't warranty tools used in a manufacturing facility either. To save money they tried buying the Chinese cheapies through McMaster-Carr and Grainger. Those had an 80% failure rate right out of the package and the few that passed the first time rarely made it past 6 months at which point the ratchet heads were usually slipping anyway. The best were the industrial grade wrenches from Beloit, Belknap and anything with Sturtevant and/or Richmont as part of the name but they are $$$ so it's doubtful too many home shops will have those. Kudos to anyone that does have any though, GOOD STUFF!
__________________
".....distasteful and easily triggered."
Murray Missile is offline  
Likes For Murray Missile:
Old 01-15-23, 10:54 AM
  #24  
JohnDThompson 
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,936

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,367 Times in 1,916 Posts
Originally Posted by Murray Missile
Question for all the torque wrench users, How often do you have your wrenches checked for calibration?
I use a beam-type torque wrench.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 01-15-23, 11:07 AM
  #25  
sd5782 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Toledo Ohio
Posts: 1,501

Bikes: 1964 Huffy Sportsman, 1972 Fuji Newest, 1973 Schwinn Super Sport (3), 1982 Trek 412, 1983 Trek 700, 1989 Miyata 1000LT, 1991 Bianchi Boardwalk, plus others

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 577 Post(s)
Liked 686 Times in 385 Posts
I have a couple beam type torque wrenches as I don’t trust the other types. I was actually quite surprised how much one has to crank on the wrench to get up to 20 ft/lbs on a crank. That is a whole other discussion about torque needed. I use the torque wrench only on BBs and nothing else on bikes. I also use seldom on cars and motorcycles anymore since it has been a long time since I needed to do head bolts.

My observation is that just cranking down with a 3/8” ratchet won’t get it very tight, and even with 1/2” drive ratchet, ones needs to lay into it pretty good. I use the 1/2” and crank pretty hard and then out comes the 3/8” torque wrench. I am always amazed how much more I have to tighten. I am kinda afraid of splitting the arm so I stop at 20 ft/lbs. I ride it a few miles and recheck and don’t crank it down much if loose; just a good snug up with the 1/2” drive and then discipline myself to leave it alone.
sd5782 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.