Opinion on which frame size to get....
#1
CyclingBrian
Thread Starter
Opinion on which frame size to get....
Need some advice here on a frame size purchase. I was fit on a Scott Solace a while back but the frame is getting tired. Overall the bike and fit has worked for me. I'm looking at a Felt Fr1 54 or 56. The 56 has a longer reach than my Scott by about 9mm. see chart.
Typically I would just go with the 56 but I have a back condition and I'm not sure the extra reach is a good thing? I could compensate for the extra reach with a shorter stem OR adjusting the saddle some. I know the 54 could me made to work but would require adjustments as well.
Thoughts on a size? My biker fitter is out of commission for a while and isn't responding to emails. I would like to make the right decision the first time.
Thanks
brian
________________________(own) (own)_______(considering)
____________________Framed Scott Solace Felt 54__ Felt 56
Top Tube Eff cm________56________56 _______54.8____56.3
Seat Tube cm__________52________56_______50.5____52.5
Seat tube Angle cm_____73________73.5______73.5____73.5
Chainstay length mm___417________405______405_____405
Headtube Length mm__ 180________185______135_____155
Reach mm___________388________384.6_____385____394
Stack _______________NA________592.3_____550_____572
Can't upload a graphic!
Typically I would just go with the 56 but I have a back condition and I'm not sure the extra reach is a good thing? I could compensate for the extra reach with a shorter stem OR adjusting the saddle some. I know the 54 could me made to work but would require adjustments as well.
Thoughts on a size? My biker fitter is out of commission for a while and isn't responding to emails. I would like to make the right decision the first time.
Thanks
brian
________________________(own) (own)_______(considering)
____________________Framed Scott Solace Felt 54__ Felt 56
Top Tube Eff cm________56________56 _______54.8____56.3
Seat Tube cm__________52________56_______50.5____52.5
Seat tube Angle cm_____73________73.5______73.5____73.5
Chainstay length mm___417________405______405_____405
Headtube Length mm__ 180________185______135_____155
Reach mm___________388________384.6_____385____394
Stack _______________NA________592.3_____550_____572
Can't upload a graphic!
Last edited by BeetleJuice; 01-05-22 at 12:24 AM.
#2
Senior Member
Don't overlook the stack difference. If your bike has a 592mm stack, plus some spacers, the much shorter stack heights will be a problem.
#3
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Yeah, moving out from 384.6mm to 394mm of reach PLUS dropping down from 592.3 to 572mm of stack height could be a bit rough.
10mm of reach can be offset with a shorter stem and/or more compact bars.
20mm of stack height could be more difficult to overcome, assuming your current bike also uses spacers. You could get a kinda goofy looking +35 degree rise stem. And/or you could use riser drop bars from ControlTech, Ritchey, Specialized, and others as they are 10-20mm of rise, depending on model.
10mm of reach can be offset with a shorter stem and/or more compact bars.
20mm of stack height could be more difficult to overcome, assuming your current bike also uses spacers. You could get a kinda goofy looking +35 degree rise stem. And/or you could use riser drop bars from ControlTech, Ritchey, Specialized, and others as they are 10-20mm of rise, depending on model.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,606
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 581 Post(s)
Liked 921 Times
in
518 Posts
If your current ride has a stem with not too much rise and not too little reach, assume you can duplicate that setup on the Felt with a different length stem. 10 or 20mm is not much.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elevation 666m Edmonton Canada
Posts: 2,482
Bikes: 2013 Custom SA5w / Rohloff Tourster
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1237 Post(s)
Liked 321 Times
in
248 Posts
It's laughable that you are looking at the 54. Everything but the TT on the 56 screams midget size also.
A shorter stem is never the problem it's made out to be.
I would look at the 58 cm or just forget this model.
A shorter stem is never the problem it's made out to be.
I would look at the 58 cm or just forget this model.
#6
CyclingBrian
Thread Starter
Thanks for the responses. I build bikes but I don't know bike geometry well, so that's why I'm asking. Last thing I want is buying a frame online and then having to return it. Given the responses here, I'm going to pass on the Felt model. I just may ride my current bike(s) for another year and then look at a Canyon. Save for something better.
Thanks!
Thanks!
#7
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,986
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,809 Times
in
3,317 Posts
If you aren't sure, and don't know why stack and reach are important as well as other geometry, then you really need to try that bike on for size in person.
Likes For Iride01:
#8
CyclingBrian
Thread Starter
I've decided I'm going to look at Canyon endurance bikes. Problem is no stock these days.
Thanks.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,878
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,963 Times
in
4,688 Posts
#10
CyclingBrian
Thread Starter
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,878
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,963 Times
in
4,688 Posts
'Overused'? What does that mean? Does it complain bitterly on steep climbs? Does it go home to lie down before you are done riding? Does your frame wake up all achy the day after a hard ride?
I've seen bf posters make all kinds of excuses for wanting new bikes, but this is a new one.
I've seen bf posters make all kinds of excuses for wanting new bikes, but this is a new one.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,024 Times
in
723 Posts
Stack is an easily understandable thing. I've never seen a good explanation of the importance of reach vs top tube length. Care to elucidate?
#13
CyclingBrian
Thread Starter
'Overused'? What does that mean? Does it complain bitterly on steep climbs? Does it go home to lie down before you are done riding? Does your frame wake up all achy the day after a hard ride?
I've seen bf posters make all kinds of excuses for wanting new bikes, but this is a new one.
I've seen bf posters make all kinds of excuses for wanting new bikes, but this is a new one.
SERIOUSLY it has a lot of miles. There's nothing wrong with wanting some new. Perhaps a stiffer frame or BB.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 7,878
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6963 Post(s)
Liked 10,963 Times
in
4,688 Posts
Nothing at all wrong with wanting a new bike. But don't delude yourself (or us). Frames don't really 'wear out' or get 'tired.'
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,426
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4404 Post(s)
Liked 4,856 Times
in
3,004 Posts
For the OP, the 54 Felt is a non-starter with a stack 42 mm lower than a known comfortably fitting frame! The reach is the same and the reason the effective top tube is shorter is because the head tube is shorter, so it's being measured at a lower reference point. When the stack heights are so different you can't really compare reach directly. If you added 42 mm of stem spacers in the smaller frame to make the stack height identical, then the effective reach would be about 13 mm shorter because of the head tube angle.
Last edited by PeteHski; 01-06-22 at 05:39 AM.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,426
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4404 Post(s)
Liked 4,856 Times
in
3,004 Posts
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,799
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,024 Times
in
723 Posts
Reach is a better reference as you know how far forward you are going to have to reach relative to the BB i.e. where your feet are fixed. Effective top tube length is a bit more vague as it doesn't relate directly to the BB, which should be the centre of your whole bike fit. That's why reach & stack are now generally considered the primary frame dimensions as they both relate directly to the centre of the BB.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,904
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2604 Post(s)
Liked 1,933 Times
in
1,213 Posts
I'm always amused by these "fit me over a text medium" discussions. If the person asking doesn't know his (or her) size, they need to find someone who can measure them, put them on a bike or something like it, and figure out what size they need.
On a forum like this, I think everyone should buy a 62 cm frame. If they can ride it, well and good. If not, they can sell it at a discount to someone who can ride it (like me!) and buy something smaller.
On a forum like this, I think everyone should buy a 62 cm frame. If they can ride it, well and good. If not, they can sell it at a discount to someone who can ride it (like me!) and buy something smaller.
#19
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,614
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10963 Post(s)
Liked 7,490 Times
in
4,189 Posts
Reach helps measure how the bike will fit while standing as a result. It really helps for MTB where you stand a bunch, but as one who stands on most every hill for road/gravel, it is beneficial there too.
The top tube length of some tri bikes, mtbs, etc are totally misleading if you go just off that number. The reach measurement normalizes things. This really all started 30ish years ago with sloping top tubes and its why using just the seat tube length is also quite worthless for measuring a bike's fit as compared to another bike.
Stack and reach measurements are great because they normalize comparing bikes that are different designs.
I own a 58cm gravel bike, a 65cm road bike, a 65cm gravel/touring bike, a 63.6cm road bike and a 66cm road bike that also measures 63 depending on how its measured.
^ seat tube measurement is worthless when comparing different style bikes. So is top tube length.
Reach(and stack) also really help when comparing a bike that has a number size with a bike that has a t-shirt size. How does a size 54cm road frame with a sloping top tube from company A compare to a size medium road frame with a level top tube from company Z?
#20
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,986
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6193 Post(s)
Liked 4,809 Times
in
3,317 Posts
And some don't give the effective top tube length. Which is not the same as top tube length, though many label top tube length when they are actually giving effective top tube length.... so see, top tube is confusing to those that don't know, and frame reach has always been frame reach.
As long as the bikes being compared are all the same basic type, road bike to another road bike, TT bike to another TT bike or cruiser bike to a cruiser bike, then the comparison will be close enough. However to simply rely on reach and stack or effective TTL and stack, will still lead one to picking the wrong bike if they have finicky preferences. Some people seem to have troubles with things that don't feel initially like what they are use to.
Last edited by Iride01; 01-06-22 at 03:57 PM. Reason: clarity, I hope.
#21
Senior Member
Reach is measured from the center of the BB, so it eliminates the effect of different seat tube angles. Once you've figured out the reach that's perfect for you, the STA only affects your choice of seatpost setback. My ideal is a 525mm stack, 370mm reach and 74 degree STA to use a 25mm setback seatpost. If a frame has 380mm of reach, I'll need a 100mm stem instead of a 110mm. Also, reach can only be compared at one stack height. If two frames are under consideration and one has 20mm less stack, assume that 20mm of spacer will be used and subtract 6mm from the reach of that frame.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,949
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3950 Post(s)
Liked 7,296 Times
in
2,946 Posts
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,426
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4404 Post(s)
Liked 4,856 Times
in
3,004 Posts
So why does it matter more? This is the thing that's always under explained. The effective top tube is also vague but tells me if a frame is within a range of what fits. Since I ride seated knowing how far the relative distance from the seat to the stem is seems better than a number that tells me how far from the bb to the stem. I don't sit at the bb. I will agree that ett is a vague number, I've never seen it as more than a starting point, same as when toptubes were straight across. Just don't see how reach is any more effective or imparts any more info. Stack is just something good to know especially with flexibility.
#25
CyclingBrian
Thread Starter
I'm always amused by these "fit me over a text medium" discussions. If the person asking doesn't know his (or her) size, they need to find someone who can measure them, put them on a bike or something like it, and figure out what size they need.
On a forum like this, I think everyone should buy a 62 cm frame. If they can ride it, well and good. If not, they can sell it at a discount to someone who can ride it (like me!) and buy something smaller.
On a forum like this, I think everyone should buy a 62 cm frame. If they can ride it, well and good. If not, they can sell it at a discount to someone who can ride it (like me!) and buy something smaller.