Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Tubs vs. Cinchers- ride/suppleness

Search
Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Tubs vs. Cinchers- ride/suppleness

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-14-23, 07:07 AM
  #26  
tiger1964 
Senior Member
 
tiger1964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 2,431

Bikes: Drysdale/Gitane/Zeus/Masi/Falcon/Palo Alto/Raleigh/Legnano

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 981 Post(s)
Liked 631 Times in 402 Posts
Originally Posted by L134
I read Totally Tubular thread from beginning to end
Wow -- how long did that take?

Looks like I'll be riding tubulars on one bike; just bought wheels which fortunately came with tires. Digesting Totally Tubular looks daunting.
__________________
Larry:1958 Drysdale, 1961 Gitane Gran Sport, 1974 Zeus track, 1988 Masi Gran Corsa, 1974 Falcon, 1980 Palo Alto, 1973 Raleigh Gran Sport, 1974 Legnano. Susan: 1976 Windsor Profesional.


tiger1964 is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 07:54 AM
  #27  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,268

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times in 490 Posts
Originally Posted by ehcoplex
Subjective, of course, but this is what I was looking for!

I'm starting to see a set of tubular wheels in my future... The original reason for inquiring is I've got an old Holdsworth Professional I'm building up now. I can just squeeze 700x35c tires into it, but it's pretty close. In my recent experience, with all the wonderful 'gifts' of aging (& crappy roads) I feel like 35c is about the narrowest I can be comfortable on, at least with clinchers. The Holdsworth will be my 'go-fast(ish)-on-the-slightly-less-crappy-local-roads-on-nice-days' bike, so if I could get a really nice ride on tubulars (& even lose a little weight, too), why not give 'em a try?
I'm glad you posted, because I am basically in the same position: I am having some Nisi Corsa Strettos (36H-32H) built up for my (Holdsworth-built) Grubb. They should be done by the end of the month. I chose the 25mm Bontrager R4's because the roads up here are like butter. I was using Super Champion Modele 58 (40H, 32H) on the Grubb before, so it should be interesting to see the difference. Anyway, I just wanted to try out tubulars. As soon as the roads dry out a bit (probably March), I'll give them a spin on the M.U.P.
1989Pre is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 08:04 AM
  #28  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,703

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1947 Post(s)
Liked 2,010 Times in 1,109 Posts
My 22mm Continental Sprinters on Nemesis rims built with 32 DT Comps 3x on 7900 hubs ride nicer than my 23mm GP4000s on Open Pros and 32 DT Comps 3x on 7700 hubs at the same pressures. Nicer still are Continental Competition$ on GL330 rims. My only experience with wide tires are with nice CX tubulars which rode nicer than whatever CX clinchers I trained on.

BUT—Good Tubulars on nice wheels are so light, and so cool, and so perfect on a vintage race bike in vintage race bike configuration, that if one has such a bike, one needs such a wheel set.

(Tape goes with tubeless, electronic shifting, disc brakes, carbon, and bead head nymphs.)
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Classtime is offline  
Likes For Classtime:
Old 01-14-23, 09:21 AM
  #29  
Atlas Shrugged
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,323 Times in 674 Posts
Originally Posted by MooneyBloke
The thing not adding up is your recollection. I have in my current possession a pair of Shamals, and they most definitely have deep sew-up rims.
The poster mentioned that he just purchased a new pair for $1k and they are no longer being made.
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 09:23 AM
  #30  
iab
Senior Member
 
iab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,053
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,793 Times in 1,407 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlas Shrugged
Just ignore all the tests that show they are slower because I say so.
You have no idea about tubeless.
Glueing tubulars is not a time wasting PITA?
How do you repair your tubular on the side of the road, with a sewing kit?
Who is behind this big bike conspiracy against the superior tubular tire?
This is exactly the myth non-tubular owners perpetuate.

First, tubular tape. Literally takes seconds.
Second, for small punctures, sealant. Literally takes seconds.
Third, for complete blowouts, you carry a spare. Swapping literally takes seconds.
Fourth, for repairing that blowout, Tire Alert. Shipping literally takes seconds.

Ever try to put on tight clinchers? Ever try to repair tight clinchers on the road? Ever changed a clincher flat and have it go flat in literally seconds after repair because you didn't find the tiny shard from the original flat still stuck in the clincher? Ever get a snakebite flat?

The only, and I mean only, downside to tubulars, is cost. Not cheap by any means. So if you do want the full experience for great tubulars, which you really need to be better than modern clinchers, you have to commit to emptying your wallet. Is that worth it? ymmv.
iab is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 09:36 AM
  #31  
Andy Antipas 
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 493

Bikes: too many old steel bikes

Mentioned: 73 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 136 Post(s)
Liked 938 Times in 176 Posts
Originally Posted by iab
This is exactly the myth non-tubular owners perpetuate.

First, tubular tape. Literally takes seconds.
Second, for small punctures, sealant. Literally takes seconds.
Third, for complete blowouts, you carry a spare. Swapping literally takes seconds.
Fourth, for repairing that blowout, Tire Alert. Shipping literally takes seconds.

Ever try to put on tight clinchers? Ever try to repair tight clinchers on the road? Ever changed a clincher flat and have it go flat in literally seconds after repair because you didn't find the tiny shard from the original flat still stuck in the clincher? Ever get a snakebite flat?

The only, and I mean only, downside to tubulars, is cost. Not cheap by any means. So if you do want the full experience for great tubulars, which you really need to be better than modern clinchers, you have to commit to emptying your wallet. Is that worth it? ymmv.
And to add to iab 's excellent points, if you shop around you can get the excellent Veloflex Roubaix's or Vlaanderens for less that top end clinchers. I just bought 2 Veloflex Roubaix's (25mm) for $50 each shipped. Top end clinchers are generally quite a bit more expensive than that. Most of us C&Vers are pretty good bargain hunters. If you haven't tried tubulars you owe it to yourself to try them.
Andy Antipas is offline  
Likes For Andy Antipas:
Old 01-14-23, 10:30 AM
  #32  
Ex Pres 
Cat 6
 
Ex Pres's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mountain Brook, AL
Posts: 7,482
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times in 118 Posts
To give you an idea, when I started riding tubulars again I pumped up a set of Vitt Corsa CX's to 145# and went on one of our ~30mi group rides. I was truly amazed how well they rode even on normal just OK pavement.

Now that doesn't mean I keep 'em there. But I think that pressure would be teeth-rattling and not fun with clinchers.


.
__________________
72 Frejus (for sale), Holdsworth Record (for sale), special CNC & Gitane Interclub / 74 Italvega NR (for sale) / c80 French / 82 Raleigh Intl MkII f&f (for sale)/ 83 Trek 620 (for sale)/ 84 Bruce Gordon Chinook (for sale)/ 85 Ron Cooper / 87 Centurion IM MV (for sale) / 03 Casati Dardo / 08 BF IRO / 09 Dogma FPX / 09 Giant TCX0 / 10 Vassago Fisticuff








Ex Pres is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 10:32 AM
  #33  
daka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 503

Bikes: Raleigh Super Course, Raleigh International, Raleigh Gran Sport

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Liked 317 Times in 198 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy Antipas
And to add to iab 's excellent points, if you shop around you can get the excellent Veloflex Roubaix's or Vlaanderens for less that top end clinchers. I just bought 2 Veloflex Roubaix's (25mm) for $50 each shipped. Top end clinchers are generally quite a bit more expensive than that. Most of us C&Vers are pretty good bargain hunters. If you haven't tried tubulars you owe it to yourself to try them.
I would like to echo that last sentence. When I rebuilt that Raleigh Professional Mk I a year or so ago I bought the inexpensive tubulars that Yellow Jersey sells. Those were 3 for $50 so even less expensive than most clinchers. Even without having experienced good tubulars I found the ride to be delightful and really enjoyed it (and this is in spite of the bike being too big for me). If I may say so, I didn't think mounting was that big of a deal but I was under no time pressure to get it done. The most work was removing the old cement from the rims that had been applied 50 years before.

daka is offline  
Likes For daka:
Old 01-14-23, 11:04 AM
  #34  
iab
Senior Member
 
iab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,053
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,793 Times in 1,407 Posts
Originally Posted by daka
I would like to echo that last sentence. When I rebuilt that Raleigh Professional Mk I a year or so ago I bought the inexpensive tubulars that Yellow Jersey sells.
This is where mmmv . I find those to be absolute crap. If someone has some nice clinchers and tried the Yellow Jersey junk, I would know why they would never use a tubular ever again. It's like riding on a brick. That said, I do carry those tires as a spare so I can get home. Even staying folded under my saddle for years, they will work as a spare. I don't want to fold an expensive tire for years.

But yes, you can find some bargains like Andy pointed out. There has been a guy at the Madison swap selling 25mm FMB PRs for $20 each. But if you want something else (I prefer the 30mm), getting lucky is rare and again, they ain't cheap.
iab is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 11:16 AM
  #35  
daka
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 503

Bikes: Raleigh Super Course, Raleigh International, Raleigh Gran Sport

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 251 Post(s)
Liked 317 Times in 198 Posts
I had enough fun on those crap Yellow Jersey tires that I have gathered parts to build a tubular wheelset for my Raleigh International. When I build those wheels, I will make sure to ante-up for better tires as recommended in this thread.
daka is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 11:49 AM
  #36  
EVlove
Full Member
 
EVlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 312

Bikes: 1980 Dawes Super Galaxy + 1981 Lotus Classique + 1986 Bianchi Sport SX + 2005 Van Dessel Project WR + 2021 Zizzo Liberté

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 480 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by 1989Pre
I chose the 25mm Bontrager R4's because the roads up here are like butter.
Must be a different Brunswick ME than the one I used to pass through
EVlove is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 12:12 PM
  #37  
DiabloScott
It's MY mountain
 
DiabloScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002

Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4337 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times in 1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by L134
But, but, but - I thought everyone wanted to be part of the 1%. Now you can and it is so easy.
It's an elitist club... not for posers.
I don't think the improved ride quality or reduced pinch flat frequency is reason enough for anyone to decide to try tubulars - you have to have another reason... like you got a bike you like that came with tubular wheels, or someone gave you a free pair or tubular wheels, or you really like learning old-timey skills.

DiabloScott is offline  
Likes For DiabloScott:
Old 01-14-23, 12:37 PM
  #38  
tremolo1965
Human-Powered
 
tremolo1965's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: PNW - Skagit Valley
Posts: 162

Bikes: 1970 Schwinn Suburban, 1973 Raleigh Sports, 1978 De Rosa

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Liked 132 Times in 36 Posts
I ride both. Tubulars are worth the expense - skip the Starbucks and give them a try.

How many times have you heard a statement to the effect of “…these tubulars ride as well as clinchers.”?

*edited to add that I weigh 200 lbs, and have prefer running tubulars at about 6 bar*

Last edited by tremolo1965; 01-14-23 at 12:44 PM.
tremolo1965 is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 12:47 PM
  #39  
Chombi1 
Senior Member
 
Chombi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,485
Mentioned: 102 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1639 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 829 Times in 538 Posts
People who are still skeptical on tubs should just try them before they knock em......And do it with at least decent quality tubs and not Rallies and Giros.......Once you get to feel the fast, magic carpet ride good tubs gives its rider, you might never look back.......
​​​​​​​
Chombi1 is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 12:58 PM
  #40  
Atlas Shrugged
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1248 Post(s)
Liked 1,323 Times in 674 Posts
Originally Posted by Chombi1
People who are still skeptical on tubs should just try them before they knock em......And do it with at least decent quality tubs and not Rallies and Giros.......Once you get to feel the fast, magic carpet ride good tubs gives its rider, you might never look back.......
Sorry you can’t use the term “fast, magic carpet ride” that was taken by the titanium advocates years ago. Given the demographics that participate in these forums most of us started the sport riding tubulars and remember very well the PIA they are, and the drastic improvement in modern clincher tire technology. Whether it is a top end supple clincher with latex tubes or tubeless there is no perceptible difference in ride quality and a huge improvement in ease of use. There is a reason outside of a very small group of C&V riders no one uses them and there is no resurgence in users. Take wool clothing or steel frames both are dated technologies yet have a strong and active following of both young and old riders the same can’t be said regarding tubulars.
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Likes For Atlas Shrugged:
Old 01-14-23, 01:11 PM
  #41  
ehcoplex 
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,683

Bikes: '38 Schwinn New World, ’69 Peugeot PX-10, '72 Peugeot PX-10, ‘7? Valgan, '78 Raleigh Comp GS, ’79 Holdsworth Pro, ’80 Peugeot TH-8 tandem, '87 Trek 400T, ‘7? Raleigh Sports, ‘7? Raleigh Superbe, ‘6? Hercules

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 761 Post(s)
Liked 1,563 Times in 757 Posts
There've been a couple comments along the line of try good clinchers first- I've got 38c RH, 35c RH, 42c Soma EX Randos and 42c GB Hetres on my various bikes, so I've got a fair idea of what good clinchers feel like. I don't have a ton of miles on the Somas yet, but comfort/feel-wise I'd rate them at the top, followed by the RH Barlows, then the Hetres and finally the RH Bon Jons. If I could achieve the comfort level of the Somas or the Barlows with, say, 30c tubs (& save some weight & learn another old-timey skill too!) I'd love it. But as suggested, I think I'll just keep my eye out for a bargain on a set of tubular wheels to try. I still need to paint/get the frame painted/powedercoated and source mechs for this build, so I'm definitely already approaching the budget limit!
ehcoplex is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 01:47 PM
  #42  
masi61
Senior Member
 
masi61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682

Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times in 315 Posts
Originally Posted by ehcoplex
There've been a couple comments along the line of try good clinchers first- I've got 38c RH, 35c RH, 42c Soma EX Randos and 42c GB Hetres on my various bikes, so I've got a fair idea of what good clinchers feel like. I don't have a ton of miles on the Somas yet, but comfort/feel-wise I'd rate them at the top, followed by the RH Barlows, then the Hetres and finally the RH Bon Jons. If I could achieve the comfort level of the Somas or the Barlows with, say, 30c tubs (& save some weight & learn another old-timey skill too!) I'd love it. But as suggested, I think I'll just keep my eye out for a bargain on a set of tubular wheels to try. I still need to paint/get the frame painted/powedercoated and source mechs for this build, so I'm definitely already approaching the budget limit!
It is worth a try for sure. Used tubular wheelsets are one of those things that if you keep them on your radar they may not pop up immediately but eventually they will.

Call me nuts but my stable of road bikes is about to be expanded to cover latex tubed clinchers, tubeless clinchers and now for this year I should have at least one tubular tired bike on the road.

A few remarks about running 30mm tubulars. That is getting into cyclocross size territory. For wider tubulars like that you might want to consider building up some hubs of your choice with a wider tubular rim. the only one I know of is the Velocity Major Tom. Some eBay sellers still have these, I saw some today advertised for ~$68 each, a pretty good deal. These were the 28 hole. I have a nice set of custom Major Toms in a 28 front, 32 rear.with some lightweight hubs coulld build a very light wheelset! I have a brand new set of these rims built up with Chris King R45 28f/28r eleven speed hubs that I was going to try out on a used (California) Masi Gran Criterium that I am about finished with . The rear will be clad with a 30 mm Schwalbe tubular in the rear. My front does not have the clearance for a 30 so it will get a Tufo 25 mm in the front.

No one has mentioned a lack of machined sidewalls with their vintage tubular wheels but I will put this out there that if I am sticking with rim brakes, I would prefer machined sidewalls for their improved braking performance. Also, I bought my Schwalbe 30mm tubular tires from Bike24.com in Germany for a ridiculous blow out price of like $18 each. I'm at work now and I don't recall the model number of that Schwalbe tire but it might be one of those that has the popular "basketball" tread profile. These are more of what you might consider "commuter" grade tubulars since they weigh in at a more hefty weight of about 375 grams per tire. I intend to glue these on with regular tubular tire glue painted onto both the base tape and the rim base using the "Belgian method" that I have seen documented on some YouTube videos.

Last edited by masi61; 01-14-23 at 05:36 PM.
masi61 is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 01:51 PM
  #43  
Bad Lag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: So Cal, for now
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: 1974 Bob Jackson - Nuovo Record, Brooks Pro, Clips & Straps

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times in 452 Posts
Originally Posted by iab
This is exactly the myth non-tubular owners perpetuate.

First, tubular tape. Literally takes seconds.
Second, for small punctures, sealant. Literally takes seconds.
Third, for complete blowouts, you carry a spare. Swapping literally takes seconds.
Fourth, for repairing that blowout, Tire Alert. Shipping literally takes seconds.

Ever try to put on tight clinchers? Ever try to repair tight clinchers on the road? Ever changed a clincher flat and have it go flat in literally seconds after repair because you didn't find the tiny shard from the original flat still stuck in the clincher? Ever get a snakebite flat?

The only, and I mean only, downside to tubulars, is cost. Not cheap by any means. So if you do want the full experience for great tubulars, which you really need to be better than modern clinchers, you have to commit to emptying your wallet. Is that worth it? ymmv.
Let's have a rational discussion where we look at differences and try to find discriminators between the two.

Tubular tape is not needed on a clincher but maybe rim tape is a close equivalent, so not much difference there.

Sealant works as well on clinchers as it does in tubulars. It either seals, or you need to patch.

Blow outs - I've had both blow out due to the terrible roads I was on which broke the cords. If you want to protect against a blow out, you have to carry a spare - same for both; doable for both, as modern clinchers are foldable.

Shipping to "Tire Alert" does not take "seconds". Packaging has to be done and you have to go to the UPS Store. It is nowhere close to free (~$40/tire), and makes that tire inaccessible for quite a while. I think the approach of repairing them yourself is more closely analogous to the clincher repair. Tubulars are easily and well repaired at home (while watching TV or whatever).

Yes, I just mounted a set of very tight clinchers. There is a technique to it but they are very doable. Is this a hand strength issue, similar to how some cannot get enough braking power? <-- honest question, here.

Tubulars are demonstrably lighter, overall. They do have a different feel when riding (I suspect some of this is the latex tubes). Latex tubes are available for clinchers, too. If you don't mind pumping before every single ride, try latex clincher tubes, first. You'll be doing that with your tubulars, as well.

I did not find anything above that was a major discriminator.

For me, that minor weight difference and the feel of latex tubes are not worth the hassle of tubular tires, especially if you are on poor road surfaces.

Last edited by Bad Lag; 01-14-23 at 01:57 PM.
Bad Lag is offline  
Likes For Bad Lag:
Old 01-14-23, 02:08 PM
  #44  
masi61
Senior Member
 
masi61's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 3,682

Bikes: Puch Marco Polo, Saint Tropez, Masi Gran Criterium

Mentioned: 25 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1163 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times in 315 Posts
Originally Posted by Atlas Shrugged
Sorry you can’t use the term “fast, magic carpet ride” that was taken by the titanium advocates years ago. Given the demographics that participate in these forums most of us started the sport riding tubulars and remember very well the PIA they are, and the drastic improvement in modern clincher tire technology. Whether it is a top end supple clincher with latex tubes or tubeless there is no perceptible difference in ride quality and a huge improvement in ease of use. There is a reason outside of a very small group of C&V riders no one uses them and there is no resurgence in users. Take wool clothing or steel frames both are dated technologies yet have a strong and active following of both young and old riders the same can’t be said regarding tubulars.
For me there really is a perceptible difference in ride quality between the different types of road tires. Cornering and descending are generally considered different with tubulars presumably due to the lack of sidewall material in the rims making them feel quicker off axis. With that said, I would add that while tubulars feel different in cornering, it is possible that they are no better if your measure of performance is the ride time. Personally I think that while I loved tubulars (back in the day), when I think of how great my tubeless tire road bike corners - they are two slightly different animals that achieve the same objective but with a different methodology. The stiff sidewall design of tubeless reminds me of low profile performance car tires. They seem to be able to pull off the magic trick of being stiff and supple at the same time.
masi61 is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 03:25 PM
  #45  
iab
Senior Member
 
iab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NW Burbs, Chicago
Posts: 12,053
Mentioned: 201 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3015 Post(s)
Liked 3,793 Times in 1,407 Posts
Originally Posted by Bad Lag
Let's have a rational discussion where we look at differences and try to find discriminators between the two.

Tubular tape is not needed on a clincher but maybe rim tape is a close equivalent, so not much difference there.

Sealant works as well on clinchers as it does in tubulars. It either seals, or you need to patch.

Blow outs - I've had both blow out due to the terrible roads I was on which broke the cords. If you want to protect against a blow out, you have to carry a spare - same for both; doable for both, as modern clinchers are foldable.

Shipping to "Tire Alert" does not take "seconds". Packaging has to be done and you have to go to the UPS Store. It is nowhere close to free (~$40/tire), and makes that tire inaccessible for quite a while. I think the approach of repairing them yourself is more closely analogous to the clincher repair. Tubulars are easily and well repaired at home (while watching TV or whatever).

Yes, I just mounted a set of very tight clinchers. There is a technique to it but they are very doable. Is this a hand strength issue, similar to how some cannot get enough braking power? <-- honest question, here.

Tubulars are demonstrably lighter, overall. They do have a different feel when riding (I suspect some of this is the latex tubes). Latex tubes are available for clinchers, too. If you don't mind pumping before every single ride, try latex clincher tubes, first. You'll be doing that with your tubulars, as well.

I did not find anything above that was a major discriminator.

For me, that minor weight difference and the feel of latex tubes are not worth the hassle of tubular tires, especially if you are on poor road surfaces.
I am having a rational discussion.

I throw a tubular in a box, trust me, it is not fragile, print a label and put it in my mailbox where it is collected. What country do you live in where that doesn't take seconds? Are you still using something other than a computer?

Also, there is no way possible you can change a tight clincher on the road faster than I can change a tubular. How many people actually carry a spare clincher, or need to? Spare tube, sure, I do that. And how you conflate stopping power with broken tire irons is beyond me.

One more thing, raise your hand if your tire iron punctured your tube. Never gonna happen with tubulars.

There is no doubt tubulars of equivalent size can be run a lower pressure which makes for a more comfortable ride.
iab is offline  
Likes For iab:
Old 01-14-23, 04:05 PM
  #46  
Bad Lag
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: So Cal, for now
Posts: 2,475

Bikes: 1974 Bob Jackson - Nuovo Record, Brooks Pro, Clips & Straps

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1104 Post(s)
Liked 794 Times in 452 Posts
(post deleted by author)

Last edited by Bad Lag; 01-14-23 at 04:53 PM.
Bad Lag is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 04:05 PM
  #47  
DiabloScott
It's MY mountain
 
DiabloScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002

Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4337 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times in 1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by iab
How many people actually carry a spare clincher, or need to?
When foldable clinchers first came out - there were a lot of posers who wanted that "folded tubular under the saddle" look. Never fooled no one; ridicule was dispensed.

These days not so much, but people who ride with a spare clincher are usually on really long tours (backups of everything) or they know their mounted tire is about shot but can't bring themselves to throw it away until it's ruined.
DiabloScott is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 04:37 PM
  #48  
EVlove
Full Member
 
EVlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 312

Bikes: 1980 Dawes Super Galaxy + 1981 Lotus Classique + 1986 Bianchi Sport SX + 2005 Van Dessel Project WR + 2021 Zizzo Liberté

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 480 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by 1989Pre
Where did you have a problem?
TBH I only ever passed through on Route 1, and then only outside of the summer craziness; we used to have a second home down in Stonington. Quite possibly I'm misremembering. Our preferred route was via Augusta and Belfast. All I know is some of the worst roads I ever drove were in Maine but that would have been the peninsula roads, come to think of it. Route 15 was once listed as literally the worst road in Maine. Some of the drivers weren't much better...

Back to regularly scheduled bike content.
EVlove is offline  
Likes For EVlove:
Old 01-14-23, 04:46 PM
  #49  
EVlove
Full Member
 
EVlove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 312

Bikes: 1980 Dawes Super Galaxy + 1981 Lotus Classique + 1986 Bianchi Sport SX + 2005 Van Dessel Project WR + 2021 Zizzo Liberté

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 480 Times in 219 Posts
Originally Posted by iab
Fourth, for repairing that blowout, Tire Alert. Shipping literally takes seconds.
I wasn't aware of this service, thanks for mentioning it. I'm just getting back into tubulars and while my first pair of Sprinter Gatorskins was a $35 bargain (pricing error on Amazon, snatched it first and went looking for wheels later), I probably won't be that lucky again.
EVlove is offline  
Old 01-14-23, 04:52 PM
  #50  
1989Pre 
Standard Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brunswick, Maine
Posts: 4,268

Bikes: 1948 P. Barnard & Son, 1962 Rudge Sports, 1963 Freddie Grubb Routier, 1980 Manufrance Hirondelle, 1983 F. Moser Sprint, 1989 Raleigh Technium Pre, 2001 Raleigh M80

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1297 Post(s)
Liked 940 Times in 490 Posts
Got my first tubulars in the mail today. 320tpi, skinwall and $55.00 apiece.
Recommended pressure 90-180? That was a surprise.
__________________
Unless you climb the rungs strategically, you’re not going to build the muscle you need to stay at the top.
1989Pre is offline  
Likes For 1989Pre:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.