Let's start a Clubman / Path Racer Pic Thread
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
Let's start a Clubman / Path Racer Pic Thread
I have a bug up my ***** about building a replica. There have been so many great examples on this forum. I would appreciate it if we could collect them in a thread for inspiration.
Thanks and Happy Easter.
RFC
Thanks and Happy Easter.
RFC
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: West of St. Louis
Posts: 864
Bikes: (3) 1970's Raleigh Sports, (1) 1968 Robin Hood 3 speed, 1974 Raleigh Grand Prix, 1976 Raleigh Grand Prix, 1969 Peugeot UO-18, 1971 Peugeot UO-08, 1980 Giant road bike, 1954 Humber, 1940ish Hercules Popular, 1963 Dunelt, 2007 Trek 3700 mountain bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I posted the following bit last year on my Raleigh rebuild:
I just completed my first project, rebuilding a Raleigh Sports 3 speed from a frame set I found on e-Bay.
After stripping the frame of all mechanicals, I had it sand blasted and powder coated a semi-gloss black.
Once I had that done, it just a matter of rebuilding from the ground up. I added a few "esentials" such as a Brooks B17 saddle in Honey, matching leather grips, a saddle bag of unknown origin, a chrome frame pump and a set of rat trap pedals with clips and straps.
Considering this is my first attempt to rebuild a bike, I think it turned out fairly well.
I just completed my first project, rebuilding a Raleigh Sports 3 speed from a frame set I found on e-Bay.
After stripping the frame of all mechanicals, I had it sand blasted and powder coated a semi-gloss black.
Once I had that done, it just a matter of rebuilding from the ground up. I added a few "esentials" such as a Brooks B17 saddle in Honey, matching leather grips, a saddle bag of unknown origin, a chrome frame pump and a set of rat trap pedals with clips and straps.
Considering this is my first attempt to rebuild a bike, I think it turned out fairly well.
Likes For gbalke:
Likes For steppinthefunk:
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
One thing I don't get is seat height. For me to only have 3-4" of seat tube and still have good leg extension, when standing, the top tube would be well beyond my soft tissue and bumping up against bone.
#5
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,258
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
Top tube is more significant than seat tube in determining proper fit.
One usually doesn't stand flat footed when riding a bike, or have the bike straight up and down when stopped.
From looking at the way you have your bikes set up, you could probably greatly benefit from a custom build. Not everyone can comfortably ride 'off the shelf'.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
You are probably right, but this issue is not specific to me. Everyones' legs run from the ground to their crotch. Bottom bracket is x cm from the ground. Seat height should also be about x cm if the TT is up to bone. Now, I do prefer my leg extension to just short of the knee break. That's probably a result of years of distance running.
#7
Falcon Chaser
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UKbyWI
Posts: 86
Bikes: Raleigh, Trek, Schwinn, Falcon, Specialized
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Here is my Triumph.
__________________
Falcon - Ric
"Respect your Fellow Collector"
Falcon - Ric
"Respect your Fellow Collector"
#8
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,258
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
6 Posts
You are probably right, but this issue is not specific to me. Everyones' legs run from the ground to their crotch. Bottom bracket is x cm from the ground. Seat height should also be about x cm if the TT is up to bone. Now, I do prefer my leg extension to just short of the knee break. That's probably a result of years of distance running.
Bottom bracket heights can vary widely, for example a 54 cm seat tube could differ in 'standover height' by as much as a couple of centimeters.
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
I understand, but a couple of cm's accounts for less than an inch. The point is, are people getting proper leg extension with seats at this height?
#10
Designer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,368
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
My theoretical fit is probably a 50cm but I wouldn't hesitate to go up to a 54cm frame if I knew I was going to be using swept back bars like the Lauterwassers. Stand over height might become an issue but I'm not worried about it.
__________________
Last edited by steppinthefunk; 04-12-09 at 04:06 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,153
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3807 Post(s)
Liked 6,676 Times
in
2,607 Posts
I rode this yesterday with a friend who was on a 1940 Stoddard Clubman, 3-speed with a quadrant shifter and Lauterwasser bars. I'm afraid I didn't get a pic. It was a cool-looking bike, but he was working real hard to climb any sort of hill.
Neal
Neal
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 16,874
Bikes: 1980 Masi, 1984 Mondonico, 1984 Trek 610, 1980 Woodrup Giro, 2005 Mondonico Futura Leggera ELOS, 1967 PX10E, 1971 Peugeot UO-8
Mentioned: 49 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1856 Post(s)
Liked 664 Times
in
506 Posts
If this is combined with a laid back seat tube and a deep BB drop, such as the 8 cm you often see on DeRosa frames, the seat tube length could work out to 56 or 57 cm.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 5,045
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
I'm not sure what is meant by"clubman/path racer." They're not remotely the same thing. As was recently discussed in another thread.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 5,045
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
Thanks, we should. There is a common, yet technically inaccurate usage of "Pathracer." I'm personally comfortable with the technically inaccurate common usage. However, if you are not, please provide us with a short, succinct technical definition for those who wish to be technically correct.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lancaster County, PA
Posts: 5,045
Bikes: '39 Hobbs, '58 Marastoni, '73 Italian custom, '75 Wizard, '76 Wilier, '78 Tom Kellogg, '79 Colnago Super, '79 Sachs, '81 Masi Prestige, '82 Cuevas, '83 Picchio Special, '84 Murray-Serotta, '85 Trek 170, '89 Bianchi, '90 Bill Holland, '94 Grandis
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Thanks, we should. There is a common, yet technically inaccurate usage of "Pathracer." I'm personally comfortable with the technically inaccurate common usage. However, if you are not, please provide us with a short, succinct technical definition for those who wish to be technically correct.
A "path racer" is a (pure) track bike.
A "road/path" bike is one that could have been used for club runs and training, but also for track meets. It would always have had rear-facing dropouts. As such, it is a relatively small subset of "clubman" bikes. It would have had a higher bottom bracket and more relaxed angles than a "pure" track bike, as well as some common braze-ons. Seems the term you're looking for is "road/path," but with the understanding that this would always have involved the track dropouts - otherwise, the bike could not have passed inspection for competitive use on the track (whether paved or grass).
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,466
Bikes: many
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 16 Times
in
13 Posts
Sorry to be pedantic (I know I am), but I think that perpetuating the inaccurate terminology sows the seeds of confusion, as well as obfuscating the historical record.
A "path racer" is a (pure) track bike.
A "road/path" bike is one that could have been used for club runs and training, but also for track meets. It would always have had rear-facing dropouts. As such, it is a relatively small subset of "clubman" bikes. It would have had a higher bottom bracket and more relaxed angles than a "pure" track bike, as well as some common braze-ons. Seems the term you're looking for is "road/path," but with the understanding that this would always have involved the track dropouts - otherwise, the bike could not have passed inspection for competitive use on the track (whether paved or grass).
A "path racer" is a (pure) track bike.
A "road/path" bike is one that could have been used for club runs and training, but also for track meets. It would always have had rear-facing dropouts. As such, it is a relatively small subset of "clubman" bikes. It would have had a higher bottom bracket and more relaxed angles than a "pure" track bike, as well as some common braze-ons. Seems the term you're looking for is "road/path," but with the understanding that this would always have involved the track dropouts - otherwise, the bike could not have passed inspection for competitive use on the track (whether paved or grass).
BTW, if you haven't noticed, I, too, am a know-it-all PITA. Welcome, or, as we say in our family, "If you don't have anything nice to say, come sit next to me."
#19
Uber Goober
Some observations- First off, I've seen old pictures where people are riding frames that are huge by modern standards, where they almost certainly couldn't stand over the bike- just have to dismount when stopping. And on some of those bikes, they used the seatpost/seat arrangement that shifts the seat forward, with seatpost at rear of the seat. So apparently, in the old days, at least some people had a lot different idea about proper bike fit than we do now. Secondly, I've got an Arpan bike which is presumably modeled on the Raleighs. It seems to have a higher bottom bracket but longer crank arms than my Ashtabula-crank bikes. Not sure if this is typical, or how this compares to modern road bikes, but that would affect the proper seat height vs standover and all.
__________________
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
"be careful this rando stuff is addictive and dan's the 'pusher'."
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 17,153
Mentioned: 481 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3807 Post(s)
Liked 6,676 Times
in
2,607 Posts
1949 Raleigh Clubman:
1950 Raleigh Clubman:
1951 Raleigh Clubman:
And required reading on the topic, Peter Kohler's article on the Raleigh Clubman.
Neal
1950 Raleigh Clubman:
1951 Raleigh Clubman:
And required reading on the topic, Peter Kohler's article on the Raleigh Clubman.
Neal
Last edited by nlerner; 04-13-09 at 05:25 AM.
Likes For nlerner:
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 228
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I really like the old Raleigh bikes especially the Clubman types. Attached is a pic of my 1958 Raleigh Trent Sports which is similar to the older "Clubman" types but made with Raleigh's garden-variety tubes. I've swapped-out the AW3 gearset in the rear wheel with a FW4 gearset and added the 3/4 speed shifter. With the Brooks B72 and new Kenda tires, it really rides like a dream. The only drawback is that it uses the now rare 597bsd wheels. So sometime in the near future I'll have to consider changing to 590, 584 or 700c rims when these wearout. Until then I'll just enjoy it as is. PG.
Likes For PolishGuy:
#25
Makeshift
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 618
Bikes: 2002 Bianchi Vigorelli, 2002 S-works CX, 1973 Raleigh Super Course conversion, 1979 Raleigh Competition, 1973 Raleigh Professional Track, 1980 Austro Daimler Inter-10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My mock clubman/road/path etc:
Some serious saddle to bar drop there.
Some serious saddle to bar drop there.