Road Bike Upgrade Advice Requested
#26
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,952
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6177 Post(s)
Liked 4,794 Times
in
3,306 Posts
Even so, low speeds benefit from aerodynamics too. The benefit will show more at the end of longer rides. A one hour ride, probably not.
Also, when in the drops, the angle of my arms holds my butt down better so it's not lifting as much with every push on the pedals. So more energy gets put in the pedal. And this is while seated or standing to pedal.
#27
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 678
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 348 Times
in
195 Posts
Over the last year I have blown off so many riders with new bikes and equipment with that old ten-speed I can not even count them. It is a rider that makes a bike fast, the bike does not make a rider fast. It is true that an expensive bike with "aerodynamic" frame, wheels and "aero" bars can get a few mph extra, but spending all that money to go 17 or 18 mph is not worth it because that is still slow. When I was younger in the 1990s I placed 40th in a time-trial with a six-speed touring bike like yours out of 401 entrants, probably averaging about 22mph, maybe 23 at the most.
I think instead of a new bike you need to train harder and in a different way. Pick a speed you want to go and then ride at that speed as long as you can. Find some steep hills and ride up and down them until you barely have the energy to ride back home. And cross-train by riding only every other day, and in-between doing some jogging on soft grass or sand for a half-hour or 45 minutes at a fast enough pace that you are beat the rest of the day. Get to bed early and get up early and eat healthy, no soda-pop, no alcohol, no fast-food, and go for the veggies and fruits as much as possible.
It is scientifically proven that the biggest gain in speed a rider can get out of a bicycle is by using an aerodynamic riding position where their body is as level as possible and their head is low so they are out of the wind. When you go really fast down a hill you can get down in that position and hear the wind noise go away, and if you have a digital speedo on your bike you can get down in that position and watch the mph climb three or more mph easily. If you do not train your body well and do not use that riding position then you will never go fast.
You can get different freewheels with different gearing spreads to suit the type of circuit you are riding, wide ratios for more hills, close ratios for flatter circuits. The only real difference between older and newer bikes is the number of gears they have, maybe 24 instead of ten or twelve, but by matching your gearing to the circuit you want to go fast on a bike with more speeds has little or no advantage.
I am going to do at least one time-trial this year of a dozen miles, and I know I will be able to do it on my 50 year-old ten-speed road bike at least at 20mph with no toe straps or clips or fancy aero-clothing etc.. Barring any catastrophic health problems of course. And before that time-trial while training, and at the time-trial, I am going to pass a lot of bikes people have paid one or more thousand dollars for, for no good reason.
Lastly, my old ten-speed is fast because I took it completely apart, cleaned every bearing and put it back together using grease sparingly. I would not put any lube on the derailleur wheels except dry graphite. If your bike has old dry grease in the bearings for the wheels and bottom-bracket, and the derailleur has never been apart and cleaned spotlessly, you may have a lot of drag slowing you down. Also your wheels need to be true so they never drag on the brake shoes at all. This is essential if you are going to go fast with any bike new or old. I think the older bikes might have an advantage because sealed bearings have more drag than the old non-sealed ball-bearing hubs and bottom-brackets. If I had to race a new bike I would take the seals out of the bearings and throw them away.
Last edited by beng1; 05-18-22 at 07:35 PM.
#28
Senior Member
I don't see any reason to buy a racing bike unless you want to race. An endurance would work well. Modern bikes are really a pleasure to ride so you should treat yourself to one. I have a Domane SL5, a great bike all around.
#29
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I've been riding a Specialized Roubaix for a few years, it has 'endurance' geometry. It is comfortable for me, and I enjoy riding it. I'm 65.
My advice is to do some test rides! Go to a few bike shops, ask to ride the bike you want. Talk to them about different bikes. Then decide on the shop you want to deal with.
Then TEST RIDE. It won't take long for you to decide if you like the way a bike rides once you ride it.
My advice is to do some test rides! Go to a few bike shops, ask to ride the bike you want. Talk to them about different bikes. Then decide on the shop you want to deal with.
Then TEST RIDE. It won't take long for you to decide if you like the way a bike rides once you ride it.
#30
Newbie racer
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406
Bikes: Propel, red is faster
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times
in
974 Posts
Personal opinion based off of what I'm seeing as "trends" these days in bike offerings.
If after a road endurance geometry, go ahead and instead just get either a gravel bike or a cyclocross bike. That can take lots of tire, more than even the 28's of modern road bikes.
With either with the majority of the stem spacers the stack is higher than road bike racer style bike. Largely, the difference is going to be in fork/headtube and BB drop affecting handling a bit. Then you lose the tire clearance on the road bike you keep with the other.
I feel this may be why sooo many people are going gravel bike these days, especially if using it on trails and such.
Just a thought. Obed Baseline 105 build, a hair over budget for you but a ton of bike for the money and with more capability than an endurance road bike. Or, something similar would be a SUPER nice bike that checks a lot of boxes.
If after a road endurance geometry, go ahead and instead just get either a gravel bike or a cyclocross bike. That can take lots of tire, more than even the 28's of modern road bikes.
With either with the majority of the stem spacers the stack is higher than road bike racer style bike. Largely, the difference is going to be in fork/headtube and BB drop affecting handling a bit. Then you lose the tire clearance on the road bike you keep with the other.
I feel this may be why sooo many people are going gravel bike these days, especially if using it on trails and such.
Just a thought. Obed Baseline 105 build, a hair over budget for you but a ton of bike for the money and with more capability than an endurance road bike. Or, something similar would be a SUPER nice bike that checks a lot of boxes.
Likes For burnthesheep:
#31
Senior Member
#32
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
A new bike will not make you any faster, especially if the trail you ride is not hilly. If your bike is in good shape, cleaned, oiled and adjusted, then the only thing holding it back from going faster is the rider. I am your age and in the last year I have ridden a ten speed bike older than your bike over a longer course at over 19mph average, and I had a heart attack and surgery last year.
Over the last year I have blown off so many riders with new bikes and equipment with that old ten-speed I can not even count them. It is a rider that makes a bike fast, the bike does not make a rider fast. It is true that an expensive bike with "aerodynamic" frame, wheels and "aero" bars can get a few mph extra, but spending all that money to go 17 or 18 mph is not worth it because that is still slow. When I was younger in the 1990s I placed 40th in a time-trial with a six-speed touring bike like yours out of 401 entrants, probably averaging about 22mph, maybe 23 at the most.
I think instead of a new bike you need to train harder and in a different way. Pick a speed you want to go and then ride at that speed as long as you can. Find some steep hills and ride up and down them until you barely have the energy to ride back home. And cross-train by riding only every other day, and in-between doing some jogging on soft grass or sand for a half-hour or 45 minutes at a fast enough pace that you are beat the rest of the day. Get to bed early and get up early and eat healthy, no soda-pop, no alcohol, no fast-food, and go for the veggies and fruits as much as possible.
It is scientifically proven that the biggest gain in speed a rider can get out of a bicycle is by using an aerodynamic riding position where their body is as level as possible and their head is low so they are out of the wind. When you go really fast down a hill you can get down in that position and hear the wind noise go away, and if you have a digital speedo on your bike you can get down in that position and watch the mph climb three or more mph easily. If you do not train your body well and do not use that riding position then you will never go fast.
You can get different freewheels with different gearing spreads to suit the type of circuit you are riding, wide ratios for more hills, close ratios for flatter circuits. The only real difference between older and newer bikes is the number of gears they have, maybe 24 instead of ten or twelve, but by matching your gearing to the circuit you want to go fast on a bike with more speeds has little or no advantage.
I am going to do at least one time-trial this year of a dozen miles, and I know I will be able to do it on my 50 year-old ten-speed road bike at least at 20mph with no toe straps or clips or fancy aero-clothing etc.. Barring any catastrophic health problems of course. And before that time-trial while training, and at the time-trial, I am going to pass a lot of bikes people have paid one or more thousand dollars for, for no good reason.
Lastly, my old ten-speed is fast because I took it completely apart, cleaned every bearing and put it back together using grease sparingly. I would not put any lube on the derailleur wheels except dry graphite. If your bike has old dry grease in the bearings for the wheels and bottom-bracket, and the derailleur has never been apart and cleaned spotlessly, you may have a lot of drag slowing you down. Also your wheels need to be true so they never drag on the brake shoes at all. This is essential if you are going to go fast with any bike new or old. I think the older bikes might have an advantage because sealed bearings have more drag than the old non-sealed ball-bearing hubs and bottom-brackets. If I had to race a new bike I would take the seals out of the bearings and throw them away.
Over the last year I have blown off so many riders with new bikes and equipment with that old ten-speed I can not even count them. It is a rider that makes a bike fast, the bike does not make a rider fast. It is true that an expensive bike with "aerodynamic" frame, wheels and "aero" bars can get a few mph extra, but spending all that money to go 17 or 18 mph is not worth it because that is still slow. When I was younger in the 1990s I placed 40th in a time-trial with a six-speed touring bike like yours out of 401 entrants, probably averaging about 22mph, maybe 23 at the most.
I think instead of a new bike you need to train harder and in a different way. Pick a speed you want to go and then ride at that speed as long as you can. Find some steep hills and ride up and down them until you barely have the energy to ride back home. And cross-train by riding only every other day, and in-between doing some jogging on soft grass or sand for a half-hour or 45 minutes at a fast enough pace that you are beat the rest of the day. Get to bed early and get up early and eat healthy, no soda-pop, no alcohol, no fast-food, and go for the veggies and fruits as much as possible.
It is scientifically proven that the biggest gain in speed a rider can get out of a bicycle is by using an aerodynamic riding position where their body is as level as possible and their head is low so they are out of the wind. When you go really fast down a hill you can get down in that position and hear the wind noise go away, and if you have a digital speedo on your bike you can get down in that position and watch the mph climb three or more mph easily. If you do not train your body well and do not use that riding position then you will never go fast.
You can get different freewheels with different gearing spreads to suit the type of circuit you are riding, wide ratios for more hills, close ratios for flatter circuits. The only real difference between older and newer bikes is the number of gears they have, maybe 24 instead of ten or twelve, but by matching your gearing to the circuit you want to go fast on a bike with more speeds has little or no advantage.
I am going to do at least one time-trial this year of a dozen miles, and I know I will be able to do it on my 50 year-old ten-speed road bike at least at 20mph with no toe straps or clips or fancy aero-clothing etc.. Barring any catastrophic health problems of course. And before that time-trial while training, and at the time-trial, I am going to pass a lot of bikes people have paid one or more thousand dollars for, for no good reason.
Lastly, my old ten-speed is fast because I took it completely apart, cleaned every bearing and put it back together using grease sparingly. I would not put any lube on the derailleur wheels except dry graphite. If your bike has old dry grease in the bearings for the wheels and bottom-bracket, and the derailleur has never been apart and cleaned spotlessly, you may have a lot of drag slowing you down. Also your wheels need to be true so they never drag on the brake shoes at all. This is essential if you are going to go fast with any bike new or old. I think the older bikes might have an advantage because sealed bearings have more drag than the old non-sealed ball-bearing hubs and bottom-brackets. If I had to race a new bike I would take the seals out of the bearings and throw them away.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
Those are great bikes! I got a "pro deal" on an S-Works Tarmac a few years back and after spending some time on it, i wished a Roubaix had been available to me at the same price
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
Thanks for the excellent (and honest) post. Definitely not a slam dunk to give up the pizza and ice cream LOL. As for the aerodynamics, when I bend lower I can feel the wind graze my back so I know that I'm being more efficient, but it's something I'll have to get used to as that position isn't very comfortable right now. 60% seems to be comfortable but I'll admit it isn't very aerodynamic.
Just get a new bike. New bikes are fun. Like a few others have pointed out, they are not necessarilly faster, --- but the lighter weight feels better , and i seconded one of the guys' recommendation of a Roubaix (although to be fair, i once had a Cannondale Synapse and it had the same "Endurance geometry" but i never liked that bike )
Bikes like the Roubaix or Synapse, - really every big manufacturer makes a competing model - have a more comfortable position, -- but its not hard to lean over a bit more to get more "aero" --- most of us ride on the brake hoods 85% of the time anyway
#35
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 678
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 790 Post(s)
Liked 348 Times
in
195 Posts
Thanks for the excellent (and honest) post. Definitely not a slam dunk to give up the pizza and ice cream LOL. As for the aerodynamics, when I bend lower I can feel the wind graze my back so I know that I'm being more efficient, but it's something I'll have to get used to as that position isn't very comfortable right now. 60% seems to be comfortable but I'll admit it isn't very aerodynamic.
#36
Full Member
I'd like to offer a different perspective even though what everyone is saying is also true.
I have been riding a heavy steel Masi for about a decade. I recently as an over 50 rider bought a carbon fiber endurance bike. Is it faster? Yes! Every segment I ride it on is a personal record even without trying. The reason everyone is correct is it isn't a lot faster. What's faster is accelerating (it feels instantaneous) and hills which feel like you are just dancing up them. Once up to speed on a straight the bike is only slightly faster mainly do to aerodynamics which is why I could keep up with my carbon fiber friends on my old steel bike. The thing is while only a little bit faster I'm a lot less wiped out not spending all that energy accelerating and climbing.
I would ride the new bike. My guess is it will put a big smile on your face. If it does buy it and enjoy having fun riding a 1-2mph faster. If it doesn't then you can happily keep riding the Schwinn.
I have been riding a heavy steel Masi for about a decade. I recently as an over 50 rider bought a carbon fiber endurance bike. Is it faster? Yes! Every segment I ride it on is a personal record even without trying. The reason everyone is correct is it isn't a lot faster. What's faster is accelerating (it feels instantaneous) and hills which feel like you are just dancing up them. Once up to speed on a straight the bike is only slightly faster mainly do to aerodynamics which is why I could keep up with my carbon fiber friends on my old steel bike. The thing is while only a little bit faster I'm a lot less wiped out not spending all that energy accelerating and climbing.
I would ride the new bike. My guess is it will put a big smile on your face. If it does buy it and enjoy having fun riding a 1-2mph faster. If it doesn't then you can happily keep riding the Schwinn.
#37
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
I'd like to offer a different perspective even though what everyone is saying is also true.
I have been riding a heavy steel Masi for about a decade. I recently as an over 50 rider bought a carbon fiber endurance bike. Is it faster? Yes! Every segment I ride it on is a personal record even without trying. The reason everyone is correct is it isn't a lot faster. What's faster is accelerating (it feels instantaneous) and hills which feel like you are just dancing up them. Once up to speed on a straight the bike is only slightly faster mainly do to aerodynamics which is why I could keep up with my carbon fiber friends on my old steel bike. The thing is while only a little bit faster I'm a lot less wiped out not spending all that energy accelerating and climbing.
I would ride the new bike. My guess is it will put a big smile on your face. If it does buy it and enjoy having fun riding a 1-2mph faster. If it doesn't then you can happily keep riding the Schwinn.
I have been riding a heavy steel Masi for about a decade. I recently as an over 50 rider bought a carbon fiber endurance bike. Is it faster? Yes! Every segment I ride it on is a personal record even without trying. The reason everyone is correct is it isn't a lot faster. What's faster is accelerating (it feels instantaneous) and hills which feel like you are just dancing up them. Once up to speed on a straight the bike is only slightly faster mainly do to aerodynamics which is why I could keep up with my carbon fiber friends on my old steel bike. The thing is while only a little bit faster I'm a lot less wiped out not spending all that energy accelerating and climbing.
I would ride the new bike. My guess is it will put a big smile on your face. If it does buy it and enjoy having fun riding a 1-2mph faster. If it doesn't then you can happily keep riding the Schwinn.
#38
Full Member
This is hard. Basically, they are all worth it and none of them are worth it. It really depends on your situation. I will say my wife has an aluminum bike that is almost as light as my carbon fiber and running wider tires seems just as comfortable. I started looking at aluminum and it seemed like you were getting a lot more bike for just a few hundred more going to the carbon. It's similar with groupsets. Functionally I think Tiagra is good enough, but 105 gets you an extra gear and compatibility with ultegra which seems worth the upgrade. There's no clear answer other than I don't think Dura-Ace is never really worth it if you aren't sponsored or wealthy. I would ride both. If you can't feel a difference then get the aluminum. If carbon feels better than decide if it's enough to spend the extra money.
#39
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2021
Posts: 39
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
This is hard. Basically, they are all worth it and none of them are worth it. It really depends on your situation. I will say my wife has an aluminum bike that is almost as light as my carbon fiber and running wider tires seems just as comfortable. I started looking at aluminum and it seemed like you were getting a lot more bike for just a few hundred more going to the carbon. It's similar with groupsets. Functionally I think Tiagra is good enough, but 105 gets you an extra gear and compatibility with ultegra which seems worth the upgrade. There's no clear answer other than I don't think Dura-Ace is never really worth it if you aren't sponsored or wealthy. I would ride both. If you can't feel a difference then get the aluminum. If carbon feels better than decide if it's enough to spend the extra money.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Posts: 5,395
Bikes: Too many to list
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Liked 1,124 Times
in
746 Posts
Notice i said WAS. I got to where i wasnt riding it enough to justify having it hanging around when i really needed (need is relative) a new mountain bike. But if i had been dedicated about riding it at least 100-125 miles per week, i would have kept it for sure . Its a wonderful bike and i cant say enough good about it except that i think for me the Roubaix model would have been even better
Sooooo --- that said. With the proceeds from selling the above bike plus a few other things, i built the aforementioned mountain bike , and had my local shop refurbish an old Litespeed i have had since 2002. I stripped the paint from the frame (it was one of the painted Litespeeds ) and utilized an old Campagnolo Record 10 speed group and other parts i had laying around . It looks good, gets lots of compliments anytime i go out, and is all the road bike i really need for the rare occasions (maybe once every 2 weeks at most) that i get goaded into a road ride
It doesnt look too far off the back, but the bike , despite being Titanium, transmits a lot of road vibration, the analog shifting is clunkier than Di2, and the head tube is shorter so im always in a "race ready" position whether i want to be or not. Weight difference is really not that much
So for me and with the amount of road riding i do -- the re-furbished old bike (but this would have been close to state of the art when it was new) is a better fit for my needs than the new 12k Superbike --- But that is the operative phrase - "For my needs" -- as the new bike is still better
Likes For DMC707:
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,280 Times
in
740 Posts
To your point.....I have been riding for about 40 yrs. And, until about 3 months ago, my main rides were a CAAD 12 and a GURU Sidero (steel). Each weighs about 17 1/2 lbs and both are wonderful bikes. But, recently I paid off two car loans and now have all this money with nowhere to go. If that isn't a recipe for a new bike I don't know what is. So, I came across a GURU Photon at the Pro's Closet and thought it was time for my first CF bike. For $2200 I got a 14 lb 8 oz bike (15 lb 3 oz w/pedals, etc) with Dura Ace 11 sp mechanical and 1295 g Mavic clinchers. I can't even tell you what a joy it is. And, yes, it feels like rediscovering cycling.
Last edited by bruce19; 05-27-22 at 05:22 AM.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Lebanon (Liberty Hill), CT
Posts: 8,473
Bikes: CAAD 12, MASI Gran Criterium S, Colnago World Cup CX & Guru steel
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1743 Post(s)
Liked 1,280 Times
in
740 Posts
Just some personal opinions based on my experience and what I've heard others (think GCN) say. If you get the basic CF frame you will not get anything better than say a CAAD type frame. And, since AL is less expensive to build you will get better components and wheels for the same price. Now if you buy Hi-Mod CF you will get lighter and better but you will pay twice the price of either of the aforementioned. As for 105, everyone says it's the best bang for the buck you can buy. I have no reason to doubt that. Mine have been excellent.
#44
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
TBH, those aren't likely to change your speed that much instantly either, unless your current tires are really, really bad.
Last edited by livedarklions; 05-27-22 at 09:10 AM.
Likes For livedarklions:
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,486
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1081 Post(s)
Liked 681 Times
in
438 Posts
You don't say how important comfort is, but if you're used to the ride characteristics of steel, you may not like the way an aluminum bike feels.
You may be able to get most of the improvement you're looking for by just upgrading the wheelset and tires to something lighter. That makes the most difference anyway (rotating mass) and might breath new life into that bike. There are probably a few other things you could do to reduce the weight a little, but start with the wheels and tires.
You may be able to get most of the improvement you're looking for by just upgrading the wheelset and tires to something lighter. That makes the most difference anyway (rotating mass) and might breath new life into that bike. There are probably a few other things you could do to reduce the weight a little, but start with the wheels and tires.
#46
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,952
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6177 Post(s)
Liked 4,794 Times
in
3,306 Posts
Although if the OP is in the 16'ish mph range for average speed
then staying in the drops more will save energy that can be used to ride faster speeds for more of the ride. Therefore having a better average speed than sitting up. But maybe not as much of an increase as the OP wishes.
When doing 20 mph or more, One should be able tell a big difference in more aero in the drops as opposed to less aero. Pedaling is much less effort to hold a particular speed.
3) Using the drops more often
When doing 20 mph or more, One should be able tell a big difference in more aero in the drops as opposed to less aero. Pedaling is much less effort to hold a particular speed.
#47
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
You don't say how important comfort is, but if you're used to the ride characteristics of steel, you may not like the way an aluminum bike feels.
You may be able to get most of the improvement you're looking for by just upgrading the wheelset and tires to something lighter. That makes the most difference anyway (rotating mass) and might breath new life into that bike. There are probably a few other things you could do to reduce the weight a little, but start with the wheels and tires.
You may be able to get most of the improvement you're looking for by just upgrading the wheelset and tires to something lighter. That makes the most difference anyway (rotating mass) and might breath new life into that bike. There are probably a few other things you could do to reduce the weight a little, but start with the wheels and tires.
I just bought a new aluminum Allez Elite after a few years of basically riding steel only. The Elite is a damn smooth ride, if anything it's more comfortable than the steel.