Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Classic & Vintage
Reload this Page >

Steel touring decision: '88 Panasonic DX-3000 or '85 Fuji Del Rey

Notices
Classic & Vintage This forum is to discuss the many aspects of classic and vintage bicycles, including musclebikes, lightweights, middleweights, hi-wheelers, bone-shakers, safety bikes and much more.

Steel touring decision: '88 Panasonic DX-3000 or '85 Fuji Del Rey

Old 03-31-23, 11:14 AM
  #1  
oship
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Steel touring decision: '88 Panasonic DX-3000 or '85 Fuji Del Rey

Hi all, first time poster here.

I've been in the market for a used vintage steel bike that I could use for as a heavy-duty commuter and touring bike. After diving into quite the rabbit hole these last few weeks, I've given myself the deadline of this weekend to pick a bike. My criteria are: steel frame (hopefully indestructible) for more comfortable, longer rides; eyelets and mounting points for front and rear racks; and sufficient fork clearance for thicker, more comfortable tires (though the vast majority of my riding will be road riding). I've narrowed it down to two: a 1988 Panasonic DX-3000 and a 1985(?) Fuji Del Rey.

My question is: which would be better for longer road touring rides? I recognize that these aren't traditional touring bikes and weren't back in the day, either, but I really love the looks of them. I haven't done bike touring before, but I'd like to load one of these up with racks and gear and get on some long rides now that the weather is getting nicer. Is there something I'm not considering that might make one bike deficient compared to the other or otherwise unsuitable for touring? From what I can tell, they both have eyelets that I can use for racks. Any red flags that I should know about before I pull the trigger on one? The site isn't allowing me to post photos, but imagine that both are in equivalently good-to-fair condition.
oship is offline  
Old 03-31-23, 12:40 PM
  #2  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 837 Post(s)
Liked 1,080 Times in 521 Posts
Originally Posted by oship
I haven't done bike touring before, but I'd like to load one of these up with racks and gear and get on some long rides now that the weather is getting nicer. Is there something I'm not considering that might make one bike deficient compared to the other or otherwise unsuitable for touring?
Yes, a lot. Basic criteria and expectations of a touring bike:

- Relaxed geometry/long wheelbase, this provides a more stable ride while loaded. Without this you will have poor handling, especially on descents and ascents. Speed wobble/shimmy is a concern.
- Eyelets for both front and rear racks as well as fenders. This typically means two eyelets in both front and back. Fenders are of course not a requirement, but they really can come in hand in conditions that call for them and you'll be glad for them.
- A triple chainring for lower gearing options, especially helpful for climbs when loaded. There are other setups that can achieve close to similar, but I'm talking about the baseline for vintage touring bikes.
- More than one water bottle mount, often three.
- At least 36 spokes on both wheels, often 40 in the rear.
- Cantilver breaks for increased stopping power when loaded.

I'd have to look at the Del Rey again to be sure, but off the top of my head I'm pretty sure neither of these bikes meet any of the above criteria. Some will say you can tour on any bike, and that is of course true, but you seem to be looking for an honest answer on how those bikes compare to an actual touring bike. I think frame geo/wheelbase and gearing are most key here.

That being said, vintage touring bikes are quite easy to find, either on this very forum in the Classic & Vintage sales section or on CL and Offerup. If you let us know your location somebody may know of something available. It's also worth looking through this thread to get an idea of models and features: Show us your vintage touring bikes.

Some popular options are trek 520/620/720, Schwinn Voyageur, Miyata 210/610/1000, Centurion Pro Tour, Panasonic PT-3500, Fuji Touring Series, Nishiki Cresta. The list goes on. ~1984-1988 are the years I'd look at for any/all vintage touring bike models (unless I wanted something very specific from earlier years for my own niche reasons).

Last edited by polymorphself; 03-31-23 at 01:37 PM.
polymorphself is offline  
Likes For polymorphself:
Old 03-31-23, 01:36 PM
  #3  
Classtime 
Senior Member
 
Classtime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,694

Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road

Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1946 Post(s)
Liked 2,004 Times in 1,105 Posts
If they are both complete and unmolested and available now, I’d go with the 88 Panasonic for the 105 SIS group. It’s got some brazeons for two bottles and racks and if you like the touring/camping thing, get a Tourer later.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Classtime is online now  
Old 03-31-23, 01:42 PM
  #4  
Dfrost 
Senior Member
 
Dfrost's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,989

Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione

Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times in 256 Posts
Originally Posted by oship
Hi all, first time poster here.

I've been in the market for a used vintage steel bike that I could use for as a heavy-duty commuter and touring bike. After diving into quite the rabbit hole these last few weeks, I've given myself the deadline of this weekend to pick a bike. My criteria are: steel frame (hopefully indestructible) for more comfortable, longer rides; eyelets and mounting points for front and rear racks; and sufficient fork clearance for thicker, more comfortable tires (though the vast majority of my riding will be road riding). I've narrowed it down to two: a 1988 Panasonic DX-3000 and a 1985(?) Fuji Del Rey.

My question is: which would be better for longer road touring rides? I recognize that these aren't traditional touring bikes and weren't back in the day, either, but I really love the looks of them. I haven't done bike touring before, but I'd like to load one of these up with racks and gear and get on some long rides now that the weather is getting nicer. Is there something I'm not considering that might make one bike deficient compared to the other or otherwise unsuitable for touring? From what I can tell, they both have eyelets that I can use for racks. Any red flags that I should know about before I pull the trigger on one? The site isn't allowing me to post photos, but imagine that both are in equivalently good-to-fair condition.
Do you already have a lead on the two bikes mentioned, in your size? If not, then you’re significantly limiting your options, especially within your time frame.

@polymorphself has identified a number of seriously good candidates to also consider.

If you are quite sure that you’ll do fully loaded touring, I.e., with camping equipment, etc., as opposed to lighter “credit card” touring that doesn’t require carrying all the camping stuff? Your candidates fall into the latter category. Worth saying is that many around here on C&V find that those additional suggested models are also wonderful everyday bikes, especially with good wheels and fat (not “thick”) supple tires that are now available. For myself, I wouldn’t worry about 36/40 spoke wheels unless I was heavy myself with a huge touring load front and back. Well-built 32-spoke wheels should be plenty sufficient.
Dfrost is offline  
Likes For Dfrost:
Old 03-31-23, 02:12 PM
  #5  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 837 Post(s)
Liked 1,080 Times in 521 Posts
Originally Posted by Dfrost
For myself, I wouldn’t worry about 36/40 spoke wheels unless I was heavy myself with a huge touring load front and back. Well-built 32-spoke wheels should be plenty sufficient.
I agree with this, I guess I was just thinking that OEM the bikes in question would have mostly come with 36/40 setups.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 03-31-23, 03:02 PM
  #6  
jdawginsc 
Edumacator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,767

Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 3,105 Times in 1,955 Posts
Echoing the above...and a twist. A good few rules of thumb are
(1) two eyelets in the rear and/or front
(2) clearance that you imagine a fender or bigger tire fitting between the rear tire and seat tube
(3) Cantilever brakes


Last edited by jdawginsc; 03-31-23 at 03:07 PM.
jdawginsc is offline  
Likes For jdawginsc:
Old 03-31-23, 03:41 PM
  #7  
georges1
Steel is real
 
georges1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Not far from Paris
Posts: 1,937

Bikes: 1992Giant Tourer,1992MeridaAlbon,1996Scapin,1998KonaKilaueua,1993Peugeot Prestige,1991RaleighTeamZ(to be upgraded),1998 Jamis Dragon,1992CTWallis(to be built),1998VettaTeam(to be built),1995Coppi(to be built),1993Grandis(to be built)

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 666 Post(s)
Liked 963 Times in 637 Posts
88Panasonic DX3000 would be my choice
georges1 is offline  
Old 03-31-23, 04:32 PM
  #8  
oship
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Thanks, all for the replies! I’ve done some considerable searching in CL and FB marketplace for most of those bikes that were mentioned by name in this thread but haven’t found any in my size. The DX3000 and the Del Rey are in my size — they correspond to specific bike postings that are available near me.

I’m leaning towards the DX3000 - as noted above it’s got two eyelets on the rear that, with a nice rack and bags, I think will be sufficient for my caliber of touring, at least for the time being. Plus the 88 model has a super slick 80s look with purple and blue highlights.

I think I’ll do a final sweep of the online marketplaces for those more established touring bike models before I pull the trigger
oship is offline  
Likes For oship:
Old 03-31-23, 04:37 PM
  #9  
thumpism 
Bikes are okay, I guess.
 
thumpism's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 6,938

Bikes: Waterford Paramount Touring, Giant CFM-2, Raleigh Sports 3-speeds in M23 & L23, Schwinn Cimarron oddball build, Marin Palisades Trail dropbar conversion, Nishiki Cresta GT

Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2647 Post(s)
Liked 2,446 Times in 1,557 Posts
Welcome! Either of those bikes is better than what I toured on the first time, a steel-framed (NoCroMo dontcha know) with cottered crank, steel wheels and a 40-52/14-28 freewheel. I crossed the Alps with that gearing but would never attempt it now. People have toured on less-nice bikes than either one of yours for generations. Make sure the bike's in good mechanical shape, be careful out there and have a blast.
thumpism is offline  
Likes For thumpism:
Old 03-31-23, 04:43 PM
  #10  
jdawginsc 
Edumacator
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 6,767

Bikes: '87 Crestdale, '87 Basso Gap, '92 Rossin Performance EL-OS, 1990 VanTuyl, 1980s Losa, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 1987 PX10, etc...

Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2432 Post(s)
Liked 3,105 Times in 1,955 Posts
Originally Posted by oship
Thanks, all for the replies! I’ve done some considerable searching in CL and FB marketplace for most of those bikes that were mentioned by name in this thread but haven’t found any in my size. The DX3000 and the Del Rey are in my size — they correspond to specific bike postings that are available near me.

I’m leaning towards the DX3000 - as noted above it’s got two eyelets on the rear that, with a nice rack and bags, I think will be sufficient for my caliber of touring, at least for the time being. Plus the 88 model has a super slick 80s look with purple and blue highlights.

I think I’ll do a final sweep of the online marketplaces for those more established touring bike models before I pull the trigger
The Del Ray would be a definite no go for touring for me. Just rehabbed one and they were more of a sport bike with decently tight geometry.

Honestly unfamiliar with the DX 3000 but Panasonics are well regarded...my friend had a sprightly DX2000 back in the day.
__________________
1987 Crest Cannondale, 1987 Basso Gap, 1992 Rossin Performance EL, 1990ish Van Tuyl, 1985 Trek 670, 1982 AD SLE, 2003 Pinarello Surprise, 1990ish MBK Atlantique, 1987 Peugeot Competition, 1987 Nishiki Tri-A, 1981 Faggin, 1996 Cannondale M500, 1984 Mercian, 1982 AD SuperLeicht, 1985 Massi (model unknown), 1988 Daccordi Griffe , 1989 Fauxsin MTB, 1981 Ciocc Mockba, 1992 Bianchi Giro, 1977 Colnago Super












jdawginsc is offline  
Old 03-31-23, 04:46 PM
  #11  
polymorphself 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 2,040
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 837 Post(s)
Liked 1,080 Times in 521 Posts
Agree if either is going to be the one go with the Panasonic. Well regarded frames, especially by the late 80s, and I do love their late 80s paint jobs. It screams 1988 without being tacky.
polymorphself is offline  
Old 03-31-23, 10:30 PM
  #12  
t2p
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA - Southwest PA
Posts: 3,048

Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1391 Post(s)
Liked 1,849 Times in 1,064 Posts
I have a DX3000 - I believe it is an 87 model

I believe the OEM gearing would be a little tall for touring use

not too familiar with the drivetrain - not sure which would be the best way to provide lower gearing

also not sure of the tire max width
t2p is online now  
Old 04-01-23, 10:18 PM
  #13  
due ruote 
Senior Member
 
due ruote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,454
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 904 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times in 320 Posts
I can’t speak to the Fuji, but I had a DX3000 for a while and it was a very nice rider.
due ruote is offline  
Old 04-02-23, 01:32 AM
  #14  
Insidious C. 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: PNW
Posts: 1,523

Bikes: One of everything and three of everything French

Mentioned: 51 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 462 Post(s)
Liked 334 Times in 211 Posts
Looking at your pics, my first observation is that the Fuji has a smaller frame size. The Fuji appears to have slightly longer chain stays and larger cogs, which are desirable attributes for touring, but not as important as correct fit.
__________________
I.C.
Insidious C. is offline  
Old 04-02-23, 04:04 PM
  #15  
The Golden Boy 
Extraordinary Magnitude
 
The Golden Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,641

Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT

Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2607 Post(s)
Liked 1,694 Times in 933 Posts
Originally Posted by oship
Thanks, all for the replies! I’ve done some considerable searching in CL and FB marketplace
Where abouts are you located? People here LOVE to shop and spend other people's money.

Seriously, people LOVE to search CL and marketplace and present good options for you- heck- even a state or quarter of a state (eg: SE WI) if you don't feel like putting in a city or anything.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*

Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!

"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
The Golden Boy is offline  
Likes For The Golden Boy:
Old 04-02-23, 09:22 PM
  #16  
Hobbiano 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 1,214
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 394 Post(s)
Liked 346 Times in 230 Posts
There's this: https://www.bikeforums.net/classic-v...610-58-cm.html
Hobbiano is offline  
Old 04-02-23, 11:32 PM
  #17  
RiddleOfSteel
Master Parts Rearranger
 
RiddleOfSteel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Portlandia's Kuiper Belt, OR
Posts: 4,402

Bikes: 1982 Trek 720 - 1985 Trek 620 - 1984 Trek 620 - 1980 Trek 510 - Other luminaries past and present

Mentioned: 221 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1556 Post(s)
Liked 2,024 Times in 989 Posts
I had a 1985 Fuji del Rey for a little bit. 32s and fenders were tight but could be done. Nice braze-on features, solid frame, longer chain stays. Great commuter for sure. I built it up for a 6'9" guy and he loved it!

RiddleOfSteel is offline  
Likes For RiddleOfSteel:
Old 04-04-23, 12:20 PM
  #18  
oship
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 6
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Update: I tried out the Panasonic, which was a 21”, and found that it was too small for my liking. It was tough to pass on it, but I wanted something more substantial. I passed on the Fuji, which I think would make a great city bike, but didn’t sound like it quite hit the mark for my intentions.

Instead, I ended up buying a 1991 Trek 520 with a 23” frame. The thing is a beast no doubt — a little on the big size for me (I wish they made 22” frames) — but it’s comfortable when riding, in great shape, and has many of the original components. Plus it came outfitted with a lot of the touring accessories I need. Needless to say I’m very excited about it!

Does anyone know of resources (books, e-books, manuals, video series) that I could reference when looking to do maintenance work for this bike? Any must-haves in the world of vintage bike maintenance?
oship is offline  
Likes For oship:
Old 04-04-23, 12:29 PM
  #19  
cb400bill
Forum Moderator
 
cb400bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,628

Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista

Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3085 Post(s)
Liked 6,561 Times in 3,763 Posts
Originally Posted by oship
Instead, I ended up buying a 1991 Trek 520 with a 23” frame.
Pic Assist - https://www.bikeforums.net/g/picture/28602244

__________________












cb400bill is offline  
Old 04-04-23, 12:41 PM
  #20  
squirtdad
Senior Member
 
squirtdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,832

Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque

Mentioned: 106 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2336 Post(s)
Liked 2,808 Times in 1,534 Posts
Originally Posted by oship
Update: I tried out the Panasonic, which was a 21”, and found that it was too small for my liking. It was tough to pass on it, but I wanted something more substantial. I passed on the Fuji, which I think would make a great city bike, but didn’t sound like it quite hit the mark for my intentions.

Instead, I ended up buying a 1991 Trek 520 with a 23” frame. The thing is a beast no doubt — a little on the big size for me (I wish they made 22” frames) — but it’s comfortable when riding, in great shape, and has many of the original components. Plus it came outfitted with a lot of the touring accessories I need. Needless to say I’m very excited about it!

Does anyone know of resources (books, e-books, manuals, video series) that I could reference when looking to do maintenance work for this bike? Any must-haves in the world of vintage bike maintenance?
on line https://www.parktool.com/en-us/blog/repair-help

paper book... I like this one covers vintage and modern

https://www.amazon.com/Zinn-Art-Road...0633660&sr=8-1
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)



squirtdad is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.