New bike build in the works: Ritchey Ascent 650B
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Likes For tdipail:
#2
Member
Thread Starter
#3
Senior Member
Let us know how you like the bike when done. I've been on the lookout for a rigid mountain bike, this one has the look, but not sure how it would be on trails.
A Kona Unit would probably be a better option for me, but the Ritchey Ascent looks so much better.
A Kona Unit would probably be a better option for me, but the Ritchey Ascent looks so much better.
Likes For katsup:
#4
Member
Thread Starter
Will do!
The wheelset arrived with the wrong hub installed but still got most of the assembly done today. It is a very straight forward build. LOVE the thru axles (my first expereience with them) and also the drop-in WCS headset that comes with the kit because no headeset press needed.
When my butt saw this new wider Brooks Cambium c67 on the internet it said "oh yeah" so here it is. Just sitting on the bike I can tell its gonna be a good saddle for me.
Wheels are carbon and setup for tubless and these Re-Fuse 27.5x2.0 tires should roll nicely. A fairly light combo.
Installed a stubby Hussefelt stem, the Salsa deluxe bend 2 bars and my favorite Tektro Orion brakes.
I am happy with the way it sits
Trying out these fenders and a $12 frame pack bag
I like the bag but the fenders are a 'no-go' with 650's, too much air underneath. The ad said they work for 29's AND 650's but its stretching the truth.
Just waiting for the hub to go on the maiden ride!
,
The wheelset arrived with the wrong hub installed but still got most of the assembly done today. It is a very straight forward build. LOVE the thru axles (my first expereience with them) and also the drop-in WCS headset that comes with the kit because no headeset press needed.
When my butt saw this new wider Brooks Cambium c67 on the internet it said "oh yeah" so here it is. Just sitting on the bike I can tell its gonna be a good saddle for me.
Wheels are carbon and setup for tubless and these Re-Fuse 27.5x2.0 tires should roll nicely. A fairly light combo.
Installed a stubby Hussefelt stem, the Salsa deluxe bend 2 bars and my favorite Tektro Orion brakes.
I am happy with the way it sits
Trying out these fenders and a $12 frame pack bag
I like the bag but the fenders are a 'no-go' with 650's, too much air underneath. The ad said they work for 29's AND 650's but its stretching the truth.
Just waiting for the hub to go on the maiden ride!
,
Last edited by tdipail; 09-26-21 at 08:17 AM.
Likes For tdipail:
#5
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 310 Times
in
218 Posts
Will do!
The wheelset arrived with the wrong hub installed but still got most of the assembly done today. It is a very straight forward build. LOVE the thru axles (my first expereience with them) and also the drop-in WCS headset that comes with the kit because no headeset press needed.
When my butt saw this new wider Brooks Cambium c67 on the internet it said "oh yeah" so here it is. Just sitting on the bike I can tell its gonna be a good saddle for me.
Wheels are carbon and setup for tubless and these Re-Fuse 27.5x2.0 tires should roll nicely. A fairly light combo.
Installed a stubby Hussefelt stem, the Salsa deluxe bend 2 bars and my favorite Tektro Orion brakes.
I am happy with the way it sits
Trying out these fenders and a $12 frame pack bag
I like the bag but the fenders are a 'no-go' with 650's, too much air underneath. The ad said they work for 29's AND 650's but its stretching the truth.
Just waiting for the hub to go on the maiden ride!
,
The wheelset arrived with the wrong hub installed but still got most of the assembly done today. It is a very straight forward build. LOVE the thru axles (my first expereience with them) and also the drop-in WCS headset that comes with the kit because no headeset press needed.
When my butt saw this new wider Brooks Cambium c67 on the internet it said "oh yeah" so here it is. Just sitting on the bike I can tell its gonna be a good saddle for me.
Wheels are carbon and setup for tubless and these Re-Fuse 27.5x2.0 tires should roll nicely. A fairly light combo.
Installed a stubby Hussefelt stem, the Salsa deluxe bend 2 bars and my favorite Tektro Orion brakes.
I am happy with the way it sits
Trying out these fenders and a $12 frame pack bag
I like the bag but the fenders are a 'no-go' with 650's, too much air underneath. The ad said they work for 29's AND 650's but its stretching the truth.
Just waiting for the hub to go on the maiden ride!
,
Please provide feedback on this bike and also on your saddle.
I have been eyeing off that Cambium model.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
Neat bike, I dig the color; I have a Swiss Cross and I really love the ride.
According to Excel Sports, a large Ritchey dealer, this frame has a max combined weight of 264 lbs, which is lower than most commercial bikes. I only bring this up because this is posted in the Clyde sub. Hopefully you already knew this and are within the weight limit. Generally, I would not consider Ritchey to be a very Clyde friendly source for frames.
Edit: screenshot
According to Excel Sports, a large Ritchey dealer, this frame has a max combined weight of 264 lbs, which is lower than most commercial bikes. I only bring this up because this is posted in the Clyde sub. Hopefully you already knew this and are within the weight limit. Generally, I would not consider Ritchey to be a very Clyde friendly source for frames.
Edit: screenshot
Last edited by DorkDisk; 09-30-21 at 05:31 AM.
Likes For DorkDisk:
#7
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 310 Times
in
218 Posts
Neat bike, I dig the color; I have a Swiss Cross and I really love the ride.
According to Excel Sports, a large Ritchey dealer, this frame has a max combined weight of 264 lbs, which is lower than most commercial bikes. I only bring this up because this is posted in the Clyde sub. Hopefully you already knew this and are within the weight limit. Generally, I would not consider Ritchey to be a very Clyde friendly source for frames.
According to Excel Sports, a large Ritchey dealer, this frame has a max combined weight of 264 lbs, which is lower than most commercial bikes. I only bring this up because this is posted in the Clyde sub. Hopefully you already knew this and are within the weight limit. Generally, I would not consider Ritchey to be a very Clyde friendly source for frames.
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Neat bike, I dig the color; I have a Swiss Cross and I really love the ride.
According to Excel Sports, a large Ritchey dealer, this frame has a max combined weight of 264 lbs, which is lower than most commercial bikes. I only bring this up because this is posted in the Clyde sub. Hopefully you already knew this and are within the weight limit. Generally, I would not consider Ritchey to be a very Clyde friendly source for frames.
According to Excel Sports, a large Ritchey dealer, this frame has a max combined weight of 264 lbs, which is lower than most commercial bikes. I only bring this up because this is posted in the Clyde sub. Hopefully you already knew this and are within the weight limit. Generally, I would not consider Ritchey to be a very Clyde friendly source for frames.
The frame was purchased from Excel and I did see that. My body is right at the weight limit and Im not carrying any luggage or doing any aggressive riding. Smooth street and gravel canal paths only. Im not worried.
It does seem low tho' when most manufacturer's touring, commuter and mountain bikes are rated to 300, and some up to 355 (ex: Kona Sutra). Ritchey is an expert builder and I doubt there is something lacking with "his" frames. Could be a liability/protection thing? (JIC).
Something from Salsa regarding rider weight limit:
Is there a rider weight limit on your frames?
No, but we do suggest that you use common sense. After all, your frame is an important part of keeping your body intact and in good working order. Think about what you weigh? Think about your riding style and where you ride? Then look at the frame offerings before you and decide what makes the most sense in the long term. This doesn’t just apply to Salsa brand frames. The smart end user considers this no matter which brand of bicycle he or she is choosing.
To me, common sense in this context =
"Don't use a road bike for downhill runs at the ski resort",
"Expect to encounter additional maintanance requirements if you weigh 350 and are riding across the country on 25c tires"
I believe its the extremes the manufacturers are concerned about
JMHO
Last edited by tdipail; 09-29-21 at 08:21 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
Oh the challenges of being a Clyde!
The frame was purchased from Excel and I did see that. My body is right at the weight limit but Im not carrying any luggage or doing any aggressive riding. Smooth street and gravel canal paths only. No worries.
It does seem low tho' when most manufacturer's touring, commuter and mountain bikes are rated to 300, and some up to 355 (ex: Kona Sutra). Ritchey is an expert builder and I doubt there is something lacking with "his" frames. Could be a liability/protection thing? (JIC).
Something from Salsa regarding rider weight limit:
Is there a rider weight limit on your frames?
No, but we do suggest that you use common sense. After all, your frame is an important part of keeping your body intact and in good working order. Think about what you weigh? Think about your riding style and where you ride? Then look at the frame offerings before you and decide what makes the most sense in the long term. This doesn’t just apply to Salsa brand frames. The smart end user considers this no matter which brand of bicycle he or she is choosing.
To me, common sense in this context =
"Don't use a road bike for downhill runs at the ski resort",
"Expect to encounter additional maintanance requirements if you weigh 350 and are riding across the country on 25c tires"
I believe its the extremes the manufacturers are concerned about
JMHO
The frame was purchased from Excel and I did see that. My body is right at the weight limit but Im not carrying any luggage or doing any aggressive riding. Smooth street and gravel canal paths only. No worries.
It does seem low tho' when most manufacturer's touring, commuter and mountain bikes are rated to 300, and some up to 355 (ex: Kona Sutra). Ritchey is an expert builder and I doubt there is something lacking with "his" frames. Could be a liability/protection thing? (JIC).
Something from Salsa regarding rider weight limit:
Is there a rider weight limit on your frames?
No, but we do suggest that you use common sense. After all, your frame is an important part of keeping your body intact and in good working order. Think about what you weigh? Think about your riding style and where you ride? Then look at the frame offerings before you and decide what makes the most sense in the long term. This doesn’t just apply to Salsa brand frames. The smart end user considers this no matter which brand of bicycle he or she is choosing.
To me, common sense in this context =
"Don't use a road bike for downhill runs at the ski resort",
"Expect to encounter additional maintanance requirements if you weigh 350 and are riding across the country on 25c tires"
I believe its the extremes the manufacturers are concerned about
JMHO
Likes For tdipail:
Likes For tdipail:
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kips Bay, NY
Posts: 2,212
Bikes: Ritchey Swiss Cross | Teesdale Kona Hot | Haro Extreme | Specialized Stumpjumper Comp | Cannondale F1000 | Shogun 1000 | Cannondale M500 | Norco Charger | Marin Muirwoods 29er | Shogun Kaze | Breezer Lightning
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 576 Post(s)
Liked 1,001 Times
in
488 Posts
#13
Member
Thread Starter
10 mile shakedown/maiden voyage tonight. This is a very comfortable and responsive frameset, very happy!
Trying Microshift products for the first time. The bling appeal is very low but super easy to set up, the shifts are crisp and the force at the thumb is very light. Will see how it holds up.
Older Tektro Orion brakes from a previous build feel/work excellent
Cheap beef
Got a pair of these on another bike and they have been holding up well. $27 on Amazon
The only thing Im scratching my head about is this oval chainring thing. I cant tell a differnce, even on climbs.
Trying Microshift products for the first time. The bling appeal is very low but super easy to set up, the shifts are crisp and the force at the thumb is very light. Will see how it holds up.
Older Tektro Orion brakes from a previous build feel/work excellent
Cheap beef
Got a pair of these on another bike and they have been holding up well. $27 on Amazon
The only thing Im scratching my head about is this oval chainring thing. I cant tell a differnce, even on climbs.
Last edited by tdipail; 09-29-21 at 04:29 PM.
Likes For tdipail:
Likes For tdipail:
Likes For ColonelSanders:
Likes For Big Dave Crowe:
#17
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
933 Posts
Oh the challenges of being a Clyde!
The frame was purchased from Excel and I did see that. My body is right at the weight limit and Im not carrying any luggage or doing any aggressive riding. Smooth street and gravel canal paths only. Im not worried.
It does seem low tho' when most manufacturer's touring, commuter and mountain bikes are rated to 300, and some up to 355 (ex: Kona Sutra). Ritchey is an expert builder and I doubt there is something lacking with "his" frames. Could be a liability/protection thing? (JIC).
Something from Salsa regarding rider weight limit:
Is there a rider weight limit on your frames?
No, but we do suggest that you use common sense. After all, your frame is an important part of keeping your body intact and in good working order. Think about what you weigh? Think about your riding style and where you ride? Then look at the frame offerings before you and decide what makes the most sense in the long term. This doesn’t just apply to Salsa brand frames. The smart end user considers this no matter which brand of bicycle he or she is choosing.
To me, common sense in this context =
"Don't use a road bike for downhill runs at the ski resort",
"Expect to encounter additional maintanance requirements if you weigh 350 and are riding across the country on 25c tires"
I believe its the extremes the manufacturers are concerned about
JMHO
The frame was purchased from Excel and I did see that. My body is right at the weight limit and Im not carrying any luggage or doing any aggressive riding. Smooth street and gravel canal paths only. Im not worried.
It does seem low tho' when most manufacturer's touring, commuter and mountain bikes are rated to 300, and some up to 355 (ex: Kona Sutra). Ritchey is an expert builder and I doubt there is something lacking with "his" frames. Could be a liability/protection thing? (JIC).
Something from Salsa regarding rider weight limit:
Is there a rider weight limit on your frames?
No, but we do suggest that you use common sense. After all, your frame is an important part of keeping your body intact and in good working order. Think about what you weigh? Think about your riding style and where you ride? Then look at the frame offerings before you and decide what makes the most sense in the long term. This doesn’t just apply to Salsa brand frames. The smart end user considers this no matter which brand of bicycle he or she is choosing.
To me, common sense in this context =
"Don't use a road bike for downhill runs at the ski resort",
"Expect to encounter additional maintanance requirements if you weigh 350 and are riding across the country on 25c tires"
I believe its the extremes the manufacturers are concerned about
JMHO
I know a guy with a Salsa mountain bike. He rides aggressively. He is 350 pounds. His full suspension bike is broken weekly. I take it that they are pretty serious about the 300 pound limit.
__________________
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
I shouldn't have to "make myself more visible;" Drivers should just stop running people over.
Car dependency is a tax.
#19
Member
Thread Starter
Likes For tdipail:
#20
Senior Member
Looking good, and I still want one. I ended up buying a hardtail mountain bike, so it's difficult to justify the Ascent for my use. Maybe if I come across a used one...
#21
Member
Thread Starter
#22
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
933 Posts
Here is mine.
Ritchey Ascent Breakaway by Richard Mozzarella, on Flickr
700c
It rides like a drop bar conversion. As well it probably should. Ritchey lists the frame in their "mountain" category. But, the follow it up with marketing copy to "build it any way you want."
The above pic is version 1. For version 2, the cable routing moved around a bit. It looks like a 1x, but it's really not. For version 2, I installed a Paul Components 31.8 to SRAM shifter adaptor & SRAM mountain 3x shifter on the handlebar adjacent to the stem so that I could operate the hub.
To route the 3 speed hub shifting, I used the front derailleur cable stop on the underside of the downtube & routed the cable to the under bottom bracket cable guide, then to a Problem Solvers brand pulley located near the seatpost clamp cluster so that the "front" shift cable could run to the Sturmey-Archer CS-RK3 hub along the seat stay. You see a hint of that in the pic above where I used a vintage cable stop clamp & ran the cable along the top tube. (I didn't like the cable slack situation in overdrive, hence the routing change.)
With the 11-42 cassette & XTR rear derailleur operated by short-pull Gevenalle 1x mountain shifters I have 20-140 gear inches on tap.
It's nice to have near mountain bike low gears & still be able to put down meaningful power at 35mph should a good descent present itself.
Ritchey Ascent Breakaway by Richard Mozzarella, on Flickr
700c
It rides like a drop bar conversion. As well it probably should. Ritchey lists the frame in their "mountain" category. But, the follow it up with marketing copy to "build it any way you want."
The above pic is version 1. For version 2, the cable routing moved around a bit. It looks like a 1x, but it's really not. For version 2, I installed a Paul Components 31.8 to SRAM shifter adaptor & SRAM mountain 3x shifter on the handlebar adjacent to the stem so that I could operate the hub.
To route the 3 speed hub shifting, I used the front derailleur cable stop on the underside of the downtube & routed the cable to the under bottom bracket cable guide, then to a Problem Solvers brand pulley located near the seatpost clamp cluster so that the "front" shift cable could run to the Sturmey-Archer CS-RK3 hub along the seat stay. You see a hint of that in the pic above where I used a vintage cable stop clamp & ran the cable along the top tube. (I didn't like the cable slack situation in overdrive, hence the routing change.)
With the 11-42 cassette & XTR rear derailleur operated by short-pull Gevenalle 1x mountain shifters I have 20-140 gear inches on tap.
It's nice to have near mountain bike low gears & still be able to put down meaningful power at 35mph should a good descent present itself.
Last edited by base2; 05-30-22 at 10:31 PM.
Likes For base2: