From your personal experience is this Bike Speed by Age chart correct?
#26
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,305
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3876 Post(s)
Liked 4,782 Times
in
2,206 Posts
Why stop at 65 years old?
...and don't forget your readers!
Just took 30years off my age.
If only our wishes could become truths
...and don't forget your readers!
Just took 30years off my age.
If only our wishes could become truths
__________________
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Vintage, modern, e-road. It is a big cycling universe.
Likes For Wildwood:
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,735
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4268 Post(s)
Liked 2,942 Times
in
1,815 Posts
I don’t know about the average speed, it’s a MTB ‘zine so maybe it’s trail riding speed. Reduction of FTP, at least in % terms might be right. Most of what I’ve seen says on average you get about a 10% reduction in FTP for every 5 years after age 40. So a cyclist that’s 4w/kg at age 40, in theory would be 2w/kg at age 65. Note over a long enough timeframe everyone’s FTP and average speed eventually goes to zero. 💀
I think this is very unlikely. Except in my dreams, I was never such a remarkable specimen.
Likes For MinnMan:
#28
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,927
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2185 Post(s)
Liked 3,337 Times
in
1,742 Posts
Once I got over the feel-less-awful-about-myself initial reaction, I began to think someone just made up a phony plot based on the assumption (recently falsified) that you go into steady decline after about age 25 to 30. There is no mention of the source for data, no mention of how much climbing is involved, what population is represented (serious bikers, once-a-year Walmart bike riders, ...?), so it is basically fiction. “Decline” apparently is a mountain bike mag, not one focused on aging. (Still, who titles a mag on mtn biking "Decline"? This looks like some sort of machine-generated internet content filler. Also, if it is mtb specific, are these numbers for mountain biking, in which case they are far too high.)
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,176
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4274 Post(s)
Liked 4,714 Times
in
2,911 Posts
It's complete garbage for anyone who actually goes near a bike. According to their FTP chart I should now be down to around 100W, which is not even a warm-up.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 701
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
250 Posts
I had no means (or for that matter, motivation) to measure my FTP until I was in my late 50s, but if that 10%/5 year estimate were true, then had I been a trained rider at 40 (I wasn't), I should have had an FTP of 5.4 W/kg. That would be right up there with the World Tour Pros.
I think this is very unlikely. Except in my dreams, I was never such a remarkable specimen.
I think this is very unlikely. Except in my dreams, I was never such a remarkable specimen.
2) Everyone ages differently and it's affected by exercise, diet, amount of booze you drink blah blah blah. We don't know the error bars of the study.
3) I don't think 5.4w/kg is unreasonable for possible FTP for an average healthy man in their late 20s/early 30s with the right nutrition, training, and disciple. We used to have this debate all the time when I was racing: Are the pros made or are they born? By your own admission you didn't train when you were 40 so we'll never know.
Anecdotally it seems close for me, I raced Cat III in my early thirties and while I didn't have a power meter I know my weight, times, and course distances for various TTs and hill climbs from my cycling journals. I've estimated my FTP to be about 300W when I was 30, today it's closer to 240W so the formula fits for me considering I'm also about 5kg heavier a quarter century later.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,176
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4274 Post(s)
Liked 4,714 Times
in
2,911 Posts
1) The study was a small group of triathletes over a few years presumably training to near their max potential FTP. But it's consistent with research that shows VO2 max decreases pretty steadily with age (until it goes to 0). If your VO2 max is higher than your age group you have a 'younger' fitness body.
2) Everyone ages differently and it's affected by exercise, diet, amount of booze you drink blah blah blah. We don't know the error bars of the study.
3) I don't think 5.4w/kg is unreasonable for possible FTP for an average healthy man in their late 20s/early 30s with the right nutrition, training, and disciple. We used to have this debate all the time when I was racing: Are the pros made or are they born? By your own admission you didn't train when you were 40 so we'll never know.
Anecdotally it seems close for me, I raced Cat III in my early thirties and while I didn't have a power meter I know my weight, times, and course distances for various TTs and hill climbs from my cycling journals. I've estimated my FTP to be about 300W when I was 30, today it's closer to 240W so the formula fits for me considering I'm also about 5kg heavier a quarter century later.
2) Everyone ages differently and it's affected by exercise, diet, amount of booze you drink blah blah blah. We don't know the error bars of the study.
3) I don't think 5.4w/kg is unreasonable for possible FTP for an average healthy man in their late 20s/early 30s with the right nutrition, training, and disciple. We used to have this debate all the time when I was racing: Are the pros made or are they born? By your own admission you didn't train when you were 40 so we'll never know.
Anecdotally it seems close for me, I raced Cat III in my early thirties and while I didn't have a power meter I know my weight, times, and course distances for various TTs and hill climbs from my cycling journals. I've estimated my FTP to be about 300W when I was 30, today it's closer to 240W so the formula fits for me considering I'm also about 5kg heavier a quarter century later.
Likes For PeteHski:
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2332 Post(s)
Liked 2,094 Times
in
1,311 Posts
10% every 5 years..................
I musta made the power of one horse back in the day.
I am sure I have not lost more than 15% in 40 years, probably closer to 12% of my total aerobic capacity.
I musta made the power of one horse back in the day.
I am sure I have not lost more than 15% in 40 years, probably closer to 12% of my total aerobic capacity.
Likes For GhostRider62:
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 29,528
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 112 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5219 Post(s)
Liked 3,564 Times
in
2,331 Posts
what good are charts like that? looking at my records, I have the avrg speed of someone 20 years younger & I'm not a fast rider. I get my doors blown off all the time. I guess they're all 40 years younger? don't think so!
Likes For rumrunn6:
#34
ignominious poltroon
Join Date: Jan 2022
Posts: 3,927
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2185 Post(s)
Liked 3,337 Times
in
1,742 Posts
Maybe, on whatever planet this is from, the years are much longer.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 701
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
250 Posts
PeteHski Oh, I totally agree with you.
This study from mid 1980s shows couch potatoes VO2 declines at 12%/decade but well-trained master athletes declined at 5.5%/decade. That's more than a 2X difference based on lifestyle. And as you mention understanding of health and aging is getting better all the time so maybe you can even get a lower decline today. My personal unresearched opinion is that VO2, FTP, MaxHR decline with age, although inevitable, is neither linear nor uniform for most.
Keep riding a lot and hope for the best!
This study from mid 1980s shows couch potatoes VO2 declines at 12%/decade but well-trained master athletes declined at 5.5%/decade. That's more than a 2X difference based on lifestyle. And as you mention understanding of health and aging is getting better all the time so maybe you can even get a lower decline today. My personal unresearched opinion is that VO2, FTP, MaxHR decline with age, although inevitable, is neither linear nor uniform for most.
Keep riding a lot and hope for the best!
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 5,735
Bikes: 2022 Salsa Beargrease Carbon Deore 11, 2020 Salsa Warbird GRX 600, 2020 Canyon Ultimate CF SLX disc 9.0 Di2, 2020 Catrike Eola, 2016 Masi cxgr, 2011, Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4268 Post(s)
Liked 2,942 Times
in
1,815 Posts
I don't think 5.4w/kg is unreasonable for possible FTP for an average healthy man in their late 20s/early 30s with the right nutrition, training, and disciple. We used to have this debate all the time when I was racing: Are the pros made or are they born? By your own admission you didn't train when you were 40 so we'll never know.
(Aged 60, 250 W FTP, 68 kg, 3.7 W/kg, and I've never done any structured training or lifted weights.)
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 701
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 347 Post(s)
Liked 418 Times
in
250 Posts
@MinnMan I'm a never-has-been!
And even if 5.5w/kg could get you to the pros, it's not going to win any races. You'll make more money at your day job than fetching water bottles and jackets from the team car.
And even if 5.5w/kg could get you to the pros, it's not going to win any races. You'll make more money at your day job than fetching water bottles and jackets from the team car.
Last edited by billridesbikes; 02-21-22 at 02:53 PM.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,579
Bikes: 06 Lemond Reno, 98 GT Timberline mtn.bike
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 421 Post(s)
Liked 690 Times
in
430 Posts
I like that chart! It took 20 yrs. off of my age, and I don't even get a chance to ride that often! Nor do I consider myself a "fast" rider.
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,176
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4274 Post(s)
Liked 4,714 Times
in
2,911 Posts
PeteHski Oh, I totally agree with you.
This study from mid 1980s shows couch potatoes VO2 declines at 12%/decade but well-trained master athletes declined at 5.5%/decade. That's more than a 2X difference based on lifestyle. And as you mention understanding of health and aging is getting better all the time so maybe you can even get a lower decline today. My personal unresearched opinion is that VO2, FTP, MaxHR decline with age, although inevitable, is neither linear nor uniform for most.
Keep riding a lot and hope for the best!
This study from mid 1980s shows couch potatoes VO2 declines at 12%/decade but well-trained master athletes declined at 5.5%/decade. That's more than a 2X difference based on lifestyle. And as you mention understanding of health and aging is getting better all the time so maybe you can even get a lower decline today. My personal unresearched opinion is that VO2, FTP, MaxHR decline with age, although inevitable, is neither linear nor uniform for most.
Keep riding a lot and hope for the best!
I've just turned 54 so this is all just beginning to get real for me! More by luck than design I just happen to have been following much of the advice I'm now reading about, which might go some way to explaining why my performance appears to be holding up better than most of my age group peers. I'm not by any means a naturally talented athlete either. I was very average as a 20 something, but have been gradually getting stronger (in a relative sense for my age group) ever since. I can only put it down to my consistently active lifestyle over the last couple of decades, along with improved nutrition. I spent most of my 20s living off takeaways, so there was a lot to gain! It's a shame we can't go back and have another go, LOL.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: northern Deep South
Posts: 8,847
Bikes: Fuji Touring, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2578 Post(s)
Liked 1,901 Times
in
1,193 Posts
I was going to ask "uphill or downhill?" 'til I clicked on the link. (Guilty!)
According to the chart from "Decline" I'm too young to be reading that ****!
According to the chart from "Decline" I'm too young to be reading that ****!
Last edited by Trsnrtr; 02-21-22 at 06:00 PM. Reason: Invoking censor
#41
Grupetto Bob
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,067
Bikes: Bikey McBike Face
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2512 Post(s)
Liked 5,430 Times
in
2,827 Posts
#42
just another gosling
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 19,501
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3873 Post(s)
Liked 1,920 Times
in
1,369 Posts
Speed of whom? It's all over the place, depending on who we are and what we do. In my last 50s, I was averaging 18 on 60 mile rides in 50'/mile terrain. I haven't been out on my single this year, but I'm probably at about 16. Last Sunday we averaged 14.5 on our tandem, similar hilly terrain. Oh - as most of you know, I'm 76, my wife 72. I'm not talented, I just ride as much as I can. My best time on a 400k in my early 60s came out to 16.66 including stops. Only 6600' though.
__________________
Results matter
Results matter
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 4,489 Times
in
3,338 Posts
#44
I'm good to go!
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 14,811
Bikes: Tarmac Disc Comp Di2 - 2020
Mentioned: 50 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6100 Post(s)
Liked 4,732 Times
in
3,262 Posts
Durn, my average speed makes me even younger than the thirty-five or so my max HR suggests I am.
I like that chart!
I like that chart!
#45
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,850
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 601 Post(s)
Liked 1,054 Times
in
530 Posts
This is great, using interpolation, I’m not 67, I’m 47! Still feel 67 though. Chart only goes to 65, so I should not be cycling, or dead?
Tim
Tim
Last edited by tkamd73; 02-23-22 at 09:57 AM.
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,600
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18320 Post(s)
Liked 4,489 Times
in
3,338 Posts
You can bet someone made a Strava segment of that 10 block gauntlet of traffic lights, all timed at about 20 MPH.
https://www.strava.com/segments/3558571
I did manage to get myself in the top 10. One trick is to hit the first light on a yellow, and catch up to the rest of the lights over the cycle.
But, I struggle to figure out how anybody faster than me did the segment without running red lights at high speed.
I have gotten myself into the left lane because there is more turning traffic in the right lane.
https://www.strava.com/segments/3558571
I did manage to get myself in the top 10. One trick is to hit the first light on a yellow, and catch up to the rest of the lights over the cycle.
But, I struggle to figure out how anybody faster than me did the segment without running red lights at high speed.
I have gotten myself into the left lane because there is more turning traffic in the right lane.
#48
USAF Veteran
Without seeing the underlying data, the chart is meaningless. While it may be intuitive that most of us "seniors" may not have the same strength and stamina we had 30 years ago, these number are hard to reconcile. Before my knee surgeries ( I was 65), I was doing about 80-100 miles a week on my old 1984 Univega GT (almost 30lbs) . Not the most "aero" bike and I'm certainly not very "aero". Yet I was able to maintain around 15-16 MPH average on calm, cool days on 20 mile rides along fairly flat roads (live near the beach in SoCal).
Now that I'm getting back into it (at 68), I have a Fuji Newest. Not the latest and greatest but the bike is 6 lbs lighter and much "cleaner". I haven't quite made the 1 hour threshold but over a 30 minutes ride, I'm holding about 18-19 mph average.
Nice to know I've taken about 10 years off just by changing bikes!!
Now that I'm getting back into it (at 68), I have a Fuji Newest. Not the latest and greatest but the bike is 6 lbs lighter and much "cleaner". I haven't quite made the 1 hour threshold but over a 30 minutes ride, I'm holding about 18-19 mph average.
Nice to know I've taken about 10 years off just by changing bikes!!
#49
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,054 Times
in
634 Posts
The problem with the chart is that is stops at 65. Apparently speed levels off at that age, because I will be 84 this year, and my average on the trike is 12mph and 14 on my recumbent bike. And then I could ride faster, but I have no need to. The only time I do is to try to beat a pop up rain home. The speed I ride is comfortable, and I like to see my surroundings.
#50
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,107
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8191 Post(s)
Liked 8,851 Times
in
4,396 Posts
3) I don't think 5.4w/kg is unreasonable for possible FTP for an average healthy man in their late 20s/early 30s with the right nutrition, training, and disciple. We used to have this debate all the time when I was racing: Are the pros made or are they born? By your own admission you didn't train when you were 40 so we'll never know.
.
.