In defense of powder coat
#1
Bike Butcher of Portland
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,635
Bikes: It's complicated.
Mentioned: 1299 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4679 Post(s)
Liked 5,797 Times
in
2,282 Posts
In defense of powder coat
"It blurrs lug edges"
"Powder coat gets in the threads and makes it difficult to install components"
"Etc., etc., etc."
Yes, there's nothing like a fantastic wet paint job, especially when you have thinned lugs from a master craftsman.
But look at man a vintage Schwinn Paramount, the Nervex lugs rise proud and high. Production frames rarely have thinned out lugs.
At 4-5x the cost of a decent powder coat, how many frames can one afford to wet paint?
Show me your:
a) crappy powder coated frames, or
b) your wonderfully powder coated frames.
I'll start with some wonderful ones:
Not so bad, eh?
"Powder coat gets in the threads and makes it difficult to install components"
"Etc., etc., etc."
Yes, there's nothing like a fantastic wet paint job, especially when you have thinned lugs from a master craftsman.
But look at man a vintage Schwinn Paramount, the Nervex lugs rise proud and high. Production frames rarely have thinned out lugs.
At 4-5x the cost of a decent powder coat, how many frames can one afford to wet paint?
Show me your:
a) crappy powder coated frames, or
b) your wonderfully powder coated frames.
I'll start with some wonderful ones:
Not so bad, eh?
__________________
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
If someone tells you that you have enough bicycles and you don't need any more, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Port Angeles, WA
Posts: 7,922
Bikes: A green one, "Ragleigh," or something.
Mentioned: 194 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1627 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
356 Posts
Well, @gugie, it's hard to make a judgement from those 8-10 foot shots, its all in the details. I've seen most of the bikes you pictured above a lot closer, and they all looked good to me .
I've only got one frame PCed; it turned out OK. 8 out 10, two thumbs up, would do business again.
I've only got one frame PCed; it turned out OK. 8 out 10, two thumbs up, would do business again.
__________________
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
● 1971 Grandis SL ● 1972 Lambert Grand Prix frankenbike ● 1972 Raleigh Super Course fixie ● 1973 Nishiki Semi-Pro ● 1979 Motobecane Grand Jubile ●1980 Apollo "Legnano" ● 1984 Peugeot Vagabond ● 1985 Shogun Prairie Breaker ● 1986 Merckx Super Corsa ● 1987 Schwinn Tempo ● 1988 Schwinn Voyageur ● 1989 Bottechia Team ADR replica ● 1990 Cannondale ST600 ● 1993 Technium RT600 ● 1996 Kona Lava Dome ●
Last edited by Lascauxcaveman; 03-20-19 at 12:08 AM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 568
Bikes: Forty of them
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 99 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 33 Times
in
21 Posts
My problem with powdercoat is that it's extremely difficult to get off, so when it eventually gets beat up and someone realizes how difficult and/or expensive it'll be refinish the frame again it'll end up being thrown away instead. One less piece of history for the world, and all because a previous owner took the lazy, cheap way out. With just a little bit of learning and a little bit of effort anyone can put on a better-looking paint job which will last nearly as long as powdercoat, and will also be practically removable in the future. It's really easy, guys, it just takes some time.
As for the examples so far, that red thing with the fenders looks like it's been Plasti-Dipped. The others... well, anything looks good if you're far enough away. The orange Trek, on the other hand, looks about right because Trek put way too much paint on them when they were new.
As for the examples so far, that red thing with the fenders looks like it's been Plasti-Dipped. The others... well, anything looks good if you're far enough away. The orange Trek, on the other hand, looks about right because Trek put way too much paint on them when they were new.
#5
Senior Member
It's your bike. Do what you want. Some people take hobbies way too seriously.
#6
Senior Member
I think all the bikes posted look fine. Very good actually. Sure some bikes deserve wet paint, but not everyone can wear a fine Italian suit either. My understanding is PC is way better environmentally, so that gives it a large bias in my book.
#8
Sophomore Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,531
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1628 Post(s)
Liked 1,057 Times
in
631 Posts
I think the problem with powdercoating is it can rust underneath. Which can also happen with paint, but the process is much slower and much more obvious to the naked eye.
Likes For Lemond1985:
#9
aka: Dr. Cannondale
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,733
Mentioned: 234 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2155 Post(s)
Liked 3,404 Times
in
1,205 Posts
Like wet paint, the final quality has much to do with the skill of the operator. I had many bikes powder coated by a local guy who was also a bicyclist, and every one was a work of art. He stopped taking outside/non contracted jobs and the only other local person who does PC does terrible, terrible work on bike frames (although he does fine on patio furniture).
I have a frame he did that's so bad I'll have to have it stripped and redone at some point by someone else...and it's in storage because I can't bear to look at it.
I have a frame he did that's so bad I'll have to have it stripped and redone at some point by someone else...and it's in storage because I can't bear to look at it.
__________________
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
Hard at work in the Secret Underground Laboratory...
#10
Senior Member
Comment wasn't rude. Pretty much direct and to the point. If you're offended by it, maybe it's you..............
__________________
My bikes: '81 Trek 957, '83 Trek 720, '85 Trek 500, '85 Trek 770,'81 Merckx, '85 Centurion Cinelli, '85 Raleigh Portage, '92 RB-2, '09 Bianchi
My bikes: '81 Trek 957, '83 Trek 720, '85 Trek 500, '85 Trek 770,
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,701
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1136 Post(s)
Liked 650 Times
in
336 Posts
Anyway back to the topic...
I think aesthetically it's a toss-up. I've seen powder that looks thin and wet like paint. I'm unconvinced there's a meaningful difference in rust prevention between the two (just about how much prep you put into it), but the point about removing the powder being very difficult is a good one.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: GWN
Posts: 2,538
Mentioned: 27 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1858 Post(s)
Liked 606 Times
in
403 Posts
My problem with powdercoat is that it's extremely difficult to get off, so when it eventually gets beat up and someone realizes how difficult and/or expensive it'll be refinish the frame again it'll end up being thrown away instead. One less piece of history for the world, and all because a previous owner took the lazy, cheap way out. With just a little bit of learning and a little bit of effort anyone can put on a better-looking paint job which will last nearly as long as powdercoat, and will also be practically removable in the future. It's really easy, guys, it just takes some time.
As for the examples so far, that red thing with the fenders looks like it's been Plasti-Dipped. The others... well, anything looks good if you're far enough away. The orange Trek, on the other hand, looks about right because Trek put way too much paint on them when they were new.
As for the examples so far, that red thing with the fenders looks like it's been Plasti-Dipped. The others... well, anything looks good if you're far enough away. The orange Trek, on the other hand, looks about right because Trek put way too much paint on them when they were new.
#13
Extraordinary Magnitude
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waukesha WI
Posts: 13,646
Bikes: 1978 Trek TX700; 1978/79 Trek 736; 1984 Specialized Stumpjumper Sport; 1984 Schwinn Voyageur SP; 1985 Trek 620; 1985 Trek 720; 1986 Trek 400 Elance; 1987 Schwinn High Sierra; 1990 Miyata 1000LT
Mentioned: 84 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2608 Post(s)
Liked 1,699 Times
in
935 Posts
I saw it as a reply to the post above it.
__________________
*Recipient of the 2006 Time Magazine "Person Of The Year" Award*
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
Commence to jigglin’ huh?!?!
"But hey, always love to hear from opinionated amateurs." -says some guy to Mr. Marshall.
#15
Senior Member
I believe that telling Gugie that his posting a perfectly reasonable thread on a bicycle enthusiast site is "taking his hobby way too seriously" is a bit rude. It just struck me as needlessly negative. Maybe I'm off
Anyway back to the topic...
I think aesthetically it's a toss-up. I've seen powder that looks thin and wet like paint. I'm unconvinced there's a meaningful difference in rust prevention between the two (just about how much prep you put into it), but the point about removing the powder being very difficult is a good one.
Anyway back to the topic...
I think aesthetically it's a toss-up. I've seen powder that looks thin and wet like paint. I'm unconvinced there's a meaningful difference in rust prevention between the two (just about how much prep you put into it), but the point about removing the powder being very difficult is a good one.
Last edited by sdn40; 03-19-19 at 08:43 AM.
#16
I am potato.
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,116
Bikes: Only precision built, custom high performance elitist machines of the highest caliber. 🍆
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,629 Times
in
933 Posts
I've heard powder is hard to remove. Maybe manually, that may be true. If so, that's only because of the durability of the coat to begin with. I've had many bikes pc'd. The local "good" powder shop screwed up one. They just soaked the frame in a chemical tank & didn't seem to make a deal of it.
I've also heard that the frame can rust under the coating. That is also true of paint. That issue is 100% prep work & why some guys are cheap & some are good. In properly prepared powder jobs, the powder actually gets into the pores of the metal. Chips and scratches are better localized and can not travel as they do under paint. Local market's vary, but $200 for a job done right is cheaper than a $100 job done wrong.
I've seen the salt water spray test results. There is a reason we pc'd all the deck railings on the ship I served on.
Below is a before & after pictures of my most amazing transformation. This 40 year old frame was cured & will easily go on to live another 40 or 50 more with out issue.
20181022_150454 by Richard Mozzarella, on Flickr
20181108_191930 by Richard Mozzarella, on Flickr
20181108_191908 by Richard Mozzarella, on Flickr
I've also heard that the frame can rust under the coating. That is also true of paint. That issue is 100% prep work & why some guys are cheap & some are good. In properly prepared powder jobs, the powder actually gets into the pores of the metal. Chips and scratches are better localized and can not travel as they do under paint. Local market's vary, but $200 for a job done right is cheaper than a $100 job done wrong.
I've seen the salt water spray test results. There is a reason we pc'd all the deck railings on the ship I served on.
Below is a before & after pictures of my most amazing transformation. This 40 year old frame was cured & will easily go on to live another 40 or 50 more with out issue.
20181022_150454 by Richard Mozzarella, on Flickr
20181108_191930 by Richard Mozzarella, on Flickr
20181108_191908 by Richard Mozzarella, on Flickr
#19
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
This reminds me: my custom Gugificazione(tm) fork is still suffering the indignity of rattle-can primer and paint, with touch-ups here and there. It deserves a proper powdercoat job.
#20
Senior Member
#21
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,613
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10958 Post(s)
Liked 7,487 Times
in
4,188 Posts
MI have a 1990 touring frame made by Fuji which was powdercoated before I bought the frame off this site. Its pretty good overall- its a touring bike so as long as its square and overall good condition, Im happy. Low standards, given the purpose.
The powedercoat chipped off one of the top cable guides, i would guess due to sweat/rain. I covered it with testors paint and its held fine. It convinced me to powdercoat an MTB frame for one of my kids, so its clearly good enough for my standards to try it out on another bike.
And I have a Schwinn Premis that will be powdercoated at some point this year, once I strip the paint and emory off the surface rust.
Powdercoat on thinned lugs could be an issue- but production bikes?...meh, the detail is still there to me.
Here is my touring bike, shortly after being built. It was once so shiny!
The powedercoat chipped off one of the top cable guides, i would guess due to sweat/rain. I covered it with testors paint and its held fine. It convinced me to powdercoat an MTB frame for one of my kids, so its clearly good enough for my standards to try it out on another bike.
And I have a Schwinn Premis that will be powdercoated at some point this year, once I strip the paint and emory off the surface rust.
Powdercoat on thinned lugs could be an issue- but production bikes?...meh, the detail is still there to me.
Here is my touring bike, shortly after being built. It was once so shiny!
Last edited by mstateglfr; 03-19-19 at 09:34 AM.
#22
Bad example
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Seattle and Reims
Posts: 3,066
Bikes: Peugeot: AO-8 1973, PA-10 1971, PR-10 1973, Sante 1988; Masi Gran Criterium 1975, Stevenson Tourer 1980, Stevenson Criterium 1981, Schwinn Paramount 1972, Rodriguez 2006, Gitane Federal ~1975, Holdsworth Pro, Follis 172 ~1973, Bianchi '62
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 825 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
95 Posts
__________________
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
Keeping Seattle’s bike shops in business since 1978
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 1,833
Bikes: 1984 Schwinn Supersport, 1988 Trek 400T, 1977 Trek TX900, 1982 Bianchi Champione del Mondo, 1978 Raleigh Supercourse, 1986 Trek 400 Elance, 1991 Waterford PDG OS Paramount, 1971 Schwinn Sports Tourer, 1985 Trek 670
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 604 Post(s)
Liked 1,063 Times
in
535 Posts
I’ve been powder coating a lot of things lately, we have a very good powder-coating business nearby, Hy-Tec in Waukesha. Only a matter of time before I take a bike frame over there.
Tim
Tim
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,679
Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 581 Times
in
409 Posts
Do you spray the decals with a clear or leave them proud? If you can get thin water slides I can see them being left to the elements but the thicker decals would not look good on a fine machine w/o a clear to blend into the finish.
#25
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 27,199
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 378 Post(s)
Liked 1,409 Times
in
909 Posts
My painted bikes do. Very little difference in appearance, and a huge difference in price.
A lot of bikes in the 80's did not clear over the decals, and some had stickers, not decals.